BUSINESS & POLITICS IN THE WORLD

 

GLOBAL OPINION REPORT NO. 802-804

 

 

Week: July 24 – August 30, 2023

Presentation: August 04, 2023

 

 

Contents

 

805-43-24/Commentary: Pakistanis Oppose Two Educational Systems In Their Country: Only 21% Of Pakistanis Support British Managed Education In Pakistani Schools, 57% Oppose; Opposition Mounting Over A Decade, Reason Cited: It Is Disruptive Of Social Cohesion. 3

SUMMARY OF POLLS. 4

ASIA   9

Survey: 57% Of Companies Foresee Price Hikes This Year 9

76% Of Corporate Leaders Say Japan’s Economy Is ‘Expanding’ 11

Survey: Japan Inc. Bullish On AI, Already In Use At 41% Of Companies. 12

Pakistanis Oppose Two Educational Systems In Their Country: Only 21% Of Pakistanis Support British Managed Education In Pakistani Schools, 57% Oppose; Opposition Mounting Over A Decade, Reason Cited: It Is Disruptive Of Social Cohesion. 13

Gallup Pakistan Analysis Of World Bank Enterprise Survey. 14

MENA   20

Views On Sustainability - KSA Edition. 20

Kenyans Want Government To Prioritise Environmental Protection, Even At The Expense Of Job Creation. 20

WEST EUROPE.. 28

Twitter Users Increasingly Negative About Elon Musk And The Company. 28

Majority Of Britons Support Government Regulation Of AI To Prevent Job Losses, With Few Expecting It To Create More Job Opportunities Than Those That Are Lost 33

Food Standard Agency's Flagship Survey Shows 1 In 4 People Are Now Food Insecure. 36

One In Four Britons Think Climate Change Is Out Of Control 37

On The Highway, 27% Of French People Admit To Throwing Waste Out Of The Window Of Their Car 40

Ahead Of U.S. Visit, About 6 In 10 Italians View Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni Favorably. 44

NORTH AMERICA.. 46

Engagement For Boomers: What They Want, How To Give It 47

Which U.S. Workers Are More Exposed To AI On Their Jobs. 49

Americans Name China As The Country Posing The Greatest Threat To The U.S. 55

AUSTRALIA.. 60

1.43 Million Australians ‘At Risk’ Of ‘Mortgage Stress’ In June 2023 Representing 28.7% Of Mortgage Holders. 61

ANZ-Roy Morgan New Zealand Consumer Confidence Down 1.8pts To 83.7 In July. 63

MULTICOUNTRY STUDIES. 66

What Worries The World – July 2023, Survey Across 29 Nations. 66

Youth Outlooks: Life Quality And Economic Conditions, Survey Across 12 MENA Countries. 69

A Recent Yougov Survey Across 18 Nations Shows That Globally The Majority Of Consumers Prefer To Buy Products From Their Own Country. 79

A New International Yougov Survey, Conducted In 12 Countries, Looks At Favourability Towards Having To Travel By Ten Forms Of Transportation. 80

China’s Approach To Foreign Policy Gets Largely Negative Reviews In 24-Country Survey. 83

 

INTRODUCTORY NOTE

 

This weekly report consists of twenty-three surveys. The report includes five multi-country studies from different states across the globe.

 

805-43-24/Commentary: Pakistanis Oppose Two Educational Systems In Their Country: Only 21% Of Pakistanis Support British Managed Education In Pakistani Schools, 57% Oppose; Opposition Mounting Over A Decade, Reason Cited: It Is Disruptive Of Social Cohesion

In a Gallup & Gilani Pakistan National Survey conducted in the year 2013, a representative sample of adult men and women from across Pakistan was asked the following question, “Some people think parallel-running of the O/A levels and matriculation/FSC education systems is generating a rift amongst the Pakistani youth whereas others don’t think this is the case. What do you think about this?” In response to this question, 44% said it was creating a rift, 38% replied that that was not the case and 18% either did not know or did not respond. Comparative Picture: This question was asked again in 2023 to allow a comparison to be made across the years. In 2023, 57% said that it was creating a rift, 21% replied that that was not the case and 22% either did not know or did not respond. Trend Analysis: The proportion of people who believe that parallel running these education systems is creating a rift has increased by 13%, while those that believe that that it is not the case have decreased by 17% between 2013 and 2023. 

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/5C5VGRRogwtzyl70-KdqIomk8znflJR8ynIMVvfKGCtXhT0JcL0CVKJtGla39SCBYxFo0gL7LFbFdsu8QeK_tKfJxKiqDJOEWWnRKkq_FyAAbldDhHlx9ZQlg62i9twV6tX74139lU9r

(Gallup Pakistan)

July 25, 2023

Source:https://gallup.com.pk/wp/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/25.07.23-History-poll-2.pdf

 

SUMMARY OF POLLS

ASIA

(Japan)

Survey: 57% Of Companies Foresee Price Hikes This Year

More than half of major companies plan to raise prices for clients and consumers by the end of the year or believe price increases may occur, a survey by The Asahi Shimbun found.Of 100 companies surveyed between July 3-14, 33 said they plan to increase the prices of their products or services between July and December. A further 24 said increases are a possibility.Of the 57 companies, 53 have already raised prices between January 2022 and June this year.Only 13 respondents said they will not raise prices. This group included financial companies. 

(Asahi Shimbun)

July 24, 2023

 

76% Of Corporate Leaders Say Japan’s Economy Is ‘Expanding’

Business confidence has dramatically improved after COVID-19 was downgraded to the equivalent of seasonal flu.An Asahi Shimbun survey of business sentiment among 100 major companies nationwide found that 76 viewed the domestic economy as “expanding” or “gradually expanding.”The finding represents an increase of 30 companies from the previous survey last November.Many corporate leaders are optimistic that economic activity and personal consumption are on the rise now that the novel coronavirus has lost its “scare” factor.

(Asahi Shimbun)

July 25, 2023

 

Survey: Japan Inc. Bullish On AI, Already In Use At 41% Of Companies

More than 90 percent of major Japanese companies are considering using or have already adopted generative artificial intelligence in their operations, but many cite data breaches and authenticity as concerns, a survey by The Asahi Shimbun found.Of 100 companies surveyed, 41 said they are already using generative AI, while 50 said they are considering using it.The 91 companies using or considering generative AI were asked to state why and could pick from a list of activities. Multiple answers were allowed.

(Asahi Shimbun)

July 26, 2023

 

(Pakistan)

Pakistanis Oppose Two Educational Systems In Their Country: Only 21% Of Pakistanis Support British Managed Education In Pakistani Schools, 57% Oppose; Opposition Mounting Over A Decade, Reason Cited: It Is Disruptive Of Social Cohesion

In a Gallup & Gilani Pakistan National Survey conducted in the year 2013, a representative sample of adult men and women from across Pakistan was asked the following question, “Some people think parallel-running of the O/A levels and matriculation/FSC education systems is generating a rift amongst the Pakistani youth whereas others don’t think this is the case. What do you think about this?” In response to this question, 44% said it was creating a rift, 38% replied that that was not the case and 18% either did not know or did not respond.In 2023, 57% said that it was creating a rift, 21% replied that that was not the case and 22% either did not know or did not respond. 

(Gallup Pakistan)

July 25, 2023

 

Gallup Pakistan Analysis Of World Bank Enterprise Survey

Only 3% of firms in Pakistan introduced a new product or service, 8 times less than the regional average (25%) and 12 times less than the global average (36%). The use of innovation in business practices helps make processes more efficient and operations smoother.Breaking down the percentage of firms that have introduced a new product or service according to firm size reveals interesting insights. The trend in South Asia and the world shows that large firms are the most innovative (39% in South Asia and 48% in Pakistan) followed by medium firms (32% in South Asia and 42% globally), with small firms being the least innovative (22% in South Asia and 33% firms across the world).  

(Gallup Pakistan)

July 25, 2023

 

MENA

(Saudi Arabia)

Views On Sustainability - KSA Edition

The vast majority (95%) of individuals in Saudi Arabia are familiar with the term sustainability, where they primarily associate it with the conservation of natural resources and renewable energy sources.When it comes to actions taken to live more sustainably, the majority of the population (9 in 10) have also taken steps towards a more sustainable lifestyle although these tend to be actions that require easy to medium effort such as using low-energy lightbulbs. While 4 out of 5 express a willingness to make lifestyle compromises to benefit the environment, 3 in 5 are unclear about specific actions that could make a difference in addressing climate change.

(Ipsos Saudi Arabia)

27 July 2023

 

AFRICA

(Kenya)

Kenyans Want Government To Prioritise Environmental Protection, Even At The Expense Of Job Creation 

Half (49%) of Kenyans say pollution is a “somewhat serious” or “very serious” problem in their community. o Citizens say deforestation (31%), trash disposal (25%), pollution of water sources (14%), and sanitation (14%) are the most important environmental issues in their community. o Eight out of 10 citizens (79%) say plastic bags are a major source of pollution in Kenya.  More than half (55%) of respondents say the primary responsibility for reducing pollution and keeping the community clean rests with ordinary citizens. About one third would assign this responsibility to their local (25%) or national governments (10%). 

(Afrobarometer)

27 July 2023

 

WEST EUROPE

(UK)

Twitter Users Increasingly Negative About Elon Musk And The Company

A new YouGov poll shows that two thirds of Twitter users (67%) have reacted negatively to the new ‘X’ branding, including 41% who feel “very negatively” about the change. These figures are about the same among the platform’s most frequent users.Just 4% of all users feel positively about the rebranding to ‘X’, while 21% are indifferent.Since our first poll in April last year – shortly after Musk initiated his acquisition of Twitter – recognition of the tech tycoon has increased significantly. Back then, 63% of Britons had an opinion on Elon Musk; now 79% do.

(YouGov UK)

July 27, 2023

 

Majority Of Britons Support Government Regulation Of AI To Prevent Job Losses, With Few Expecting It To Create More Job Opportunities Than Those That Are Lost

New polling from Ipsos shows that only 1 in 8 (12%) think AI will create far more new job opportunities than the jobs that are lost; over half (55%) disagree. To mitigate this, 2 in 3 (64%) agree the government should create new regulations or laws to prevent the potential loss of jobs due to AI, with just 14% disagreeing. Despite concerns about loss of jobs without government intervention, nearly half (46%) agree that businesses should embrace AI in the workplace if it saves time and resources – a view more common amongst university graduates (60%) compared to non-graduates (46%).

(Ipsos MORI)

26 July 2023

 

Food Standard Agency's Flagship Survey Shows 1 In 4 People Are Now Food Insecure

Confidence in food safety and authenticity, 93% of respondents reported that they were confident that the food they buy is safe to eat. 87% of respondents were confident that the information on food labels is accurate. Confidence in the food supply chain, 76% of respondents reported that they had confidence in the food supply chain. Respondents were more likely to report confidence in farmers (88%) and shops and supermarkets (85%) than in takeaways (62%), and food delivery services (45%).

(Ipsos MORI)

26 July 2023

 

One In Four Britons Think Climate Change Is Out Of Control

The latest Ipsos Political Monitor, taken 19th to 23rd July, 2023 explored public attitudes towards climate change, how the government is dealing with the issue and whether Labour would do a better job. Three in four Britons think climate change is a serious global threat (77%), with one in four (25%) saying it is out of control but just over half (52%) saying there is still time to deal with it.More generally, 77% of Britons are concerned about climate change / global warming. This is down from 84% last July (during last summer’s heatwave). However, concern is greater than ten years ago (60% in 2013).

(Ipsos MORI)

27 July 2023

 

(France)

On The Highway, 27% Of French People Admit To Throwing Waste Out Of The Window Of Their Car

Even though 88% of French people say they are concerned about environmental issues, the 2023 edition of the survey illustrates the difficulty of changing their behavior to limit their environmental impact. For the second year in a row, 27% of them, or more than 1 in 4, say they throw their waste out of their vehicle window when driving on the highway. Even more alarmingly, this practice is paradoxically increasing among young people under 35, who are 42% to admit to doing so – up 6 points compared to 2022. 

(Ipsos France)

July 28, 2023

 

(Italy)

Ahead Of U.S. Visit, About 6 In 10 Italians View Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni Favorably

s Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni travels to the United States to meet with President Joe Biden this week, Italians hold largely positive opinions of Meloni’s leadership. Nearly six-in-ten Italians (57%) have a favorable opinion of Meloni, while 41% have a negative one.Nearly nine-in-ten or more Italians who have a positive opinion of these parties also hold a favorable opinion of Meloni. In comparison, around 40% or fewer of those who have unfavorable views of these parties support Meloni.

(PEW)

JULY 25, 2023

 

NORTH AMERICA

(USA)

Engagement For Boomers: What They Want, How To Give It

Millennials and Gen Zers get a lot of attention in the workplace. And for good reason -- your younger workers are your future leaders. As of the end of 2022, 35% of employees in the baby boomer generation are engaged at work. That means boomers are slightly more engaged than older millennials (33%) and Gen Xers (31%) but have the same level of engagement as Gen Zers and younger millennials.

(PEW)

JULY 25, 2023

 

Which U.S. Workers Are More Exposed To AI On Their Jobs

Artificial intelligence (AI) recently gained new  attention with the release of ChatGPT and Dall-E. These tools and the broader array of AI-driven business applications represent a new reality for workers.In 2022, 19% of American workers were in jobs that are the most exposed to AI, in which the most important activities may be either replaced or assisted by AI.23% of workers have jobs that are the least exposed to AI, in which the most important activities are farther from the reach of AI. Other workers, nearly six-in-ten in all, are likely to have varying levels of exposure to AI.

(PEW)

JULY 26, 2023

 

Americans Name China As The Country Posing The Greatest Threat To The U.S.

Negative views of China have become more common in the United States in recent years, and a new Pew Research Center survey shows that Americans also widely see China as the greatest threat facing their nation.In an open-ended question allowing Americans to name which country they see as the greatest threat to the U.S., 50% name China – almost three times the share who name Russia (17%).Another 4% say no country poses the greatest threat to the U.S.Only 2% of Americans name North Korea – and the same share describe the U.S. itself as the greatest threat.

(PEW)

JULY 27, 2023

 

AUSTRALIA

(Australia)

1.43 Million Australians ‘At Risk’ Of ‘Mortgage Stress’ In June 2023 Representing 28.7% Of Mortgage Holders

New research from Roy Morgan shows an estimated 1.43 million (28.7%) mortgage holders were ‘At Risk’ of ‘mortgage stress’ in the three months to June 2023. This period encompassed two interest rate increases of 0.25% taking official interest rates to 4.1% in June.This is the equal highest number of mortgage holders considered ‘At Risk’ of mortgage stress (the same as for the three months to May 2023) for over 15 years since there were 1.46 million ‘At Risk’ in May 2008.

(Roy Morgan)

July 25, 2023

 

(New Zealand)

ANZ-Roy Morgan New Zealand Consumer Confidence Down 1.8pts To 83.7 In July

ANZ-Roy Morgan Consumer Confidence fell 1.8 points in July to 83.7, with the fall driven by the question of whether it’s a good time to buy a major household item, which fell from a net figure of -27% to -39%. That doesn’t bode well for retailers.Inflation expectations bounced back almost completely from their sharp fall last month, rising from 4.3% back up to 4.7% – still trending lower, however, and well off their high of over 6% in late-2021.The ANZ-Roy Morgan Consumer Confidence Index eased slightly in July, and remains at low levels.

(Roy Morgan)

July 28, 2023

 

MULTICOUNTRY STUDIES

What Worries The World – July 2023, Survey Across 29 Nations

Our monthly What Worries the World survey explores what the public thinks are the most important social and political issues, drawing on more than ten years of data to place the latest scores in context. This wave was conducted between June 3rd – July 7th, 2023.Inflation is still the highest concern this month. But this month sees a further easing of 2pp to 38%.Across all countries, worry about inflation is followed by crime & violence (31%, +2pp), poverty & social inequality (30%, -1pp), unemployment (26%, -1pp), and financial & political corruption (26%, +1pp) which together make up the top five global worries.

(Ipsos Global)

24 July, 2023

Source:https://www.ipsos.com/en/what-worries-world-july-2023

 

Youth Outlooks: Life Quality And Economic Conditions, Survey Across 12 MENA Countries

 MENA citizens can believe that their quality of life in the future will be better, even if they simultaneously have less faith in the economic situation improving in the coming two to three years. Overall, women are more positive than men, with young women being more positive in country-specific cases – Mauritania and Sudan – than both men of their age cohort and older women. In nine countries, young women are more likely than women ages 30+ to say that the quality of their lives is better than their parents’. 

(Arabbarometer)

July 25, 2023

Source:https://www.arabbarometer.org/2023/07/youth-outlooks-life-quality-and-economic-conditions-part-ii/

 

A Recent Yougov Survey Across 18 Nations Shows That Globally The Majority Of Consumers Prefer To Buy Products From Their Own Country

A recent YouGov Surveys survey shows that globally the majority of consumers prefer to buy products from their own country: as many as 60% of these agree with this statement. 46% believe that, overall, local products are of higher quality and 53% agree that it is a patriotic duty to buy products of national origin whenever possible.While a significant percentage of consumers say they are indifferent, very few are opposed to any of these claims. For example, only 9% of these would be less likely to buy goods produced by a local company.

(YouGov Italy)

July 25, 2023

Source:https://it.yougov.com/news/2023/07/25/global-i-consumatori-preferiscono-acquistare-prodo/

 

A New International Yougov Survey, Conducted In 12 Countries, Looks At Favourability Towards Having To Travel By Ten Forms Of Transportation

A new international YouGov survey, conducted in 12 countries, looks at favourability towards having to travel by ten forms of transportation (including walking).Walking is the most favourable way of getting about in most countries, although notably not in the US where the 74% with a positive opinion of getting around on foot is lower than the 77% for driving in a car or the 81% for being a passenger in a car. This is also the lowest favourability score for walking of all the countries in the study.

(YouGov UK)

July 26, 2023

Source:https://yougov.co.uk/topics/travel/articles-reports/2023/07/26/britons-have-least-favourable-view-cycling-12-coun

 

China’s Approach To Foreign Policy Gets Largely Negative Reviews In 24-Country Survey

Views of China are broadly negative across 24 countries in a new Pew Research Center survey: A median of 67% of adults express unfavorable views of the country, while 28% have a favorable opinion.Negative views extend to evaluations of China’s international actions. Despite several high-profile diplomatic initiatives by Beijing over the past year – such as brokering a peace deal between Saudi Arabia and Iran and issuing a 12-point proposal for the end of violence in Ukraine – a median of 71% think China does not contribute to global peace and stability.

(PEW)

JULY 27, 2023

Source:https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2023/07/27/chinas-approach-to-foreign-policy-gets-largely-negative-reviews-in-24-country-survey/

 

ASIA

805-43-01/Polls

Survey: 57% Of Companies Foresee Price Hikes This Year

More than half of major companies plan to raise prices for clients and consumers by the end of the year or believe price increases may occur, a survey by The Asahi Shimbun found.

Of 100 companies surveyed between July 3-14, 33 said they plan to increase the prices of their products or services between July and December. A further 24 said increases are a possibility.

"Increased raw material prices and transportation costs have weighed heavily on our operations," Naomi Ishii, executive vice president of Suzuki Motor Corp., told the survey. "We cannot offset them by reducing expenses and cutting down on costs."

Tamotsu Hiiro, president of McDonald's Holdings Co. (Japan), said, “The yen’s depreciation and the spike in raw material prices, which started last year, are expected to stay.” 

Of the 57 companies, 53 have already raised prices between January 2022 and June this year.

Only 13 respondents said they will not raise prices. This group included financial companies. 

The remaining 30 companies gave other answers.

The prices of resources and raw materials rose sharply after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine last year. They have been buoyed by a recovery in demand since the COVID-19 pandemic eased.

The yen’s depreciation on the back of interest rate hikes by U.S. and European central banks has also pushed up prices of goods and services because imports are more expensive.

The survey asked the 57 companies that plan price increases or believe hikes may occur to say why. They could choose up to two reasons for their answer.

In all, 53 companies cited increased energy and raw material costs. Twenty mentioned the weakening yen and more expensive imports.

Some cited human resources. Eleven companies attributed the hikes to improvements in the treatment of their workers.

A further 10 companies cited advances in quality and performance.

Some companies said consumers are embracing higher prices.

“We feel that customers have taken a break from their saving-oriented lifestyles and have come to accept price increases,” said Naoya Araki, president of H2O Retailing Corp., whose subsidiary operates the Hankyu and Hanshin department stores.

Makoto Tani, chairman of Skylark Holdings Co., said the company has differentiated prices at its restaurant chains based on where the outlets are located. It has hiked prices in urban areas but kept them low in rural areas where diners are returning only slowly.

Tani said the average spending per customer has risen overall.

Kensuke Hosomi, president of FamilyMart Co., said sales of fried chicken, coffee and other items have remained more or less unchanged since the convenience store chain raised prices last year.

“We are gaining customers’ understanding for price increases,” Hosomi said.

He added that products on the market will be divided into two groups: high added-value items with higher price tags, and items that are strategically kept at low prices.

(Asahi Shimbun)

July 24, 2023

Source:https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/14964498

 

805-43-02/Polls

76% Of Corporate Leaders Say Japan’s Economy Is ‘Expanding’

Photo/Illutration

Business confidence has dramatically improved after COVID-19 was downgraded to the equivalent of seasonal flu.

An Asahi Shimbun survey of business sentiment among 100 major companies nationwide found that 76 viewed the domestic economy as “expanding” or “gradually expanding.”

The finding represents an increase of 30 companies from the previous survey last November.

Many corporate leaders are optimistic that economic activity and personal consumption are on the rise now that the novel coronavirus has lost its “scare” factor.

However, concerns remain about labor shortages and a slowdown in overseas economies that could impact Japan.

The Asahi Shimbun conducted the survey from July 3 to 14.

Seventy-five companies responded that the domestic economy is “gradually expanding.” One company said it is “expanding.”

Twenty-two companies viewed the economy as “at a standstill.” The figure was half that of the previous survey late last year.

When asked to choose up to two reasons for their assessment, most companies, 71, cited “personal consumption.”

Asked about the prospects for personal consumption over the next three months, 74 companies expected a “gradual recovery,” up from 44 in the previous survey.

“The mindset of consumers toward spending has improved,” said Taro Fujie, president of Ajinomoto Co. “We are at the beginning of a cycle where wage increases are linked to appropriate price hikes.”

Chiharu Fujioka, managing officer of Mitsui Fudosan Co., noted that hotel occupancy rates exceeded 80 percent, and that “the average daily rate is higher than in 2019 before the pandemic.”

In addition to the easing of pandemic-related restrictions on social activities, the influx of foreign visitors following the lifting of entry curbs is a positive factor.

Tatsuya Yoshimoto, president of J. Front Retailing Co., said that along with an increase in domestic travelers and foreign tourists, “customer numbers and sales at department stores and shopping centers have grown.”

“Business activity at large-scale stores near stations, which had been slow to recover, has also significantly improved,” he said.

Forty-three companies cited “capital investment” as a reason for their assessment.

Fifty-one companies answered that they will increase their domestic capital investment in the current fiscal year compared to the previous fiscal year.

Ichiro Ozeki, president of Secom Co., said his company has received many inquiries about access control systems.

“Investments in facilities aimed at improving work efficiency and saving labor are increasing amid growing labor shortages caused by the recovery from the pandemic,” he said.

On the other hand, senior officials of companies who view the domestic economy as “at a standstill” voiced concern about labor shortages and the slowdown of overseas economies.

“While demand for construction is strong, there are delays in projects due to a lack of manpower,” said Nobuaki Nara, president of Tokyo Steel Manufacturing Co.

Turning to the global economy, 51 companies took a cautious view, saying it is “at a standstill.”

Takahiro Mori, vice president of Nippon Steel Corp., said, “There are also downside risks, such as the tightening of monetary policy by central banks in the United States and Europe and the downturn in the Chinese economy.”

(Asahi Shimbun)

July 25, 2023

Source:https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/14965289

 

805-43-03/Polls

Survey: Japan Inc. Bullish On AI, Already In Use At 41% Of Companies

More than 90 percent of major Japanese companies are considering using or have already adopted generative artificial intelligence in their operations, but many cite data breaches and authenticity as concerns, a survey by The Asahi Shimbun found.

Of 100 companies surveyed, 41 said they are already using generative AI, while 50 said they are considering using it.

Two companies expressed a negative stance on AI. They had either banned it or were considering banning its use.

One company said it has no plans to use the technology. The remaining six gave other responses.

The poll was conducted between July 3-14.

The 91 companies using or considering generative AI were asked to state why and could pick from a list of activities. Multiple answers were allowed.

“Improving operational efficiency” was the choice of 80 companies.

In second place was “summarizing, analyzing and correcting texts,” which was picked by 64.

In all, 61 companies selected “chatbots,” or automated services that answer questions.

Generative AI entered mainstream business use after the success of ChatGPT, which was released in November by U.S. company OpenAI.

“(Generative AI) will likely change our business operations in a big way,” said Koji Nagai, president of Nomura Holdings Co., the parent of brokerage Nomura Securities Co.

The company is using generative AI to draft emails and documents, and to summarize texts.

Jun Ohta, president of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group Inc., said the company released a generative AI tool to domestic branches of subsidiary Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp. in July. It helps employees to gather information and write documents.

Yoshinari Kitajima, president of Dai Nippon Printing Co., said 30,000 employees began using generative AI at the end of May. They use it to produce automated minutes of meetings from audio recordings and to prepare schedules.

At Asahi Group Holdings Ltd., which has Asahi Breweries Ltd. and other companies under its umbrella, about 100 employees are participating in a trial project that started in May. The project aims to improve the efficiency of company operations using generative AI.

FamilyMart Co. plans to introduce a generative AI assistant at 5,000 convenience stores by the end of March to help store managers order merchandise based on weather conditions and sales records at other outlets.

Meanwhile, the survey asked the companies about what worries them about AI. Again, they chose from a list and multiple answers were allowed.

Ninety-five companies selected “security, such as information leakages.”

In all, 85 expressed concerns over “verification of (information) authenticity and spread of false information.”

“Copyright” was cited by 74 companies, and “protection of personal information” was chosen by 71 companies.

“The primary challenge is how much we can ensure security and authenticity of contents,” said Ryuichiro Nishiyama, president of Seibu Holdings Inc., whose subsidiaries operate Seibu Railway and Prince Hotels.

Takeshi Matsui, executive vice president of Osaka Gas Co., said, “It is important that users are willing to ascertain the authenticity (of information) and are capable of doing that.”

Tokio Marine Holdings Inc. began using generative AI in June to draft replies to inquiries from insurance agencies on a trial basis. Kenji Okada, senior managing director, said employees double-check the replies to ensure their accuracy.

Some companies said it will take time before generative AI brings about a real impact on business operations.

“While (generative AI) holds potential in many aspects, time is needed before governance and rules are established,” said Masahiko Uotani, chairman and CEO of cosmetics maker Shiseido Co. Shiseido plans to use ChatGPT in-house.

“We should be ready to promptly respond to future changes,” Uotani said.

Fumiaki Koizumi, chairman of Mercari Inc., said, “Technologies will improve rapidly next year or the year after. Companies that can keep up with the changes will survive and those that cannot will be eliminated.”

(Asahi Shimbun)

July 26, 2023

Source:https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/14966290

 

805-43-04/Polls

Pakistanis Oppose Two Educational Systems In Their Country: Only 21% Of Pakistanis Support British Managed Education In Pakistani Schools, 57% Oppose; Opposition Mounting Over A Decade, Reason Cited: It Is Disruptive Of Social Cohesion

In a Gallup & Gilani Pakistan National Survey conducted in the year 2013, a representative sample of adult men and women from across Pakistan was asked the following question, “Some people think parallel-running of the O/A levels and matriculation/FSC education systems is generating a rift amongst the Pakistani youth whereas others don’t think this is the case. What do you think about this?” In response to this question, 44% said it was creating a rift, 38% replied that that was not the case and 18% either did not know or did not respond. Comparative Picture: This question was asked again in 2023 to allow a comparison to be made across the years. In 2023, 57% said that it was creating a rift, 21% replied that that was not the case and 22% either did not know or did not respond. Trend Analysis: The proportion of people who believe that parallel running these education systems is creating a rift has increased by 13%, while those that believe that that it is not the case have decreased by 17% between 2013 and 2023. 

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/5C5VGRRogwtzyl70-KdqIomk8znflJR8ynIMVvfKGCtXhT0JcL0CVKJtGla39SCBYxFo0gL7LFbFdsu8QeK_tKfJxKiqDJOEWWnRKkq_FyAAbldDhHlx9ZQlg62i9twV6tX74139lU9r

(Gallup Pakistan)

July 25, 2023

Source:https://gallup.com.pk/wp/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/25.07.23-History-poll-2.pdf

 

805-43-05/Polls

Gallup Pakistan Analysis Of World Bank Enterprise Survey

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/QuOSgG45QwIGPxFNToH79HyOXiyrpcP9leIpPwS8U2oTEGj8u9XXdc_08kutkdUuIabEqEoRpmHpojSb4mYBrCSznjI2m6LAMutOIL6Ij6PLT4hZXFwlNA7-xKOaFwZ5TrZX3ytoCRv5

1. Percent of firms that introduced a new product/service 

Only 3% of firms in Pakistan introduced a new product or service, 8 times less than the regional average (25%) and 12 times less than the global average (36%). The use of innovation in business practices helps make processes more efficient and operations smoother. It allows technological advancement to speed up and enables a business to stay relevant. With an exponentially lower percentage of firms within Pakistan introducing new products and services, the rate of growth could get impacted. Innovation drives competition and is beneficial for both the suppliers and the consumers, since novel solutions also see a surge in demand and customers’ propensity to pay for a product or service.

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/UFvqyHEOrQA8cYMEgEPRe7UO06jKpROv5wwT-R-4zvOvI1fw-TmfFresGbxMtq8ieV5gBKWF80CZW5qev656nY2XLCe5Zo1T71UZgSDdpm7a_p923JBJp4xlrJ7fNwK7YyBV_SYg5Fza

A sector-wise breakdown reveals that the services sectors of Pakistan and South Asia are both doing better compared to the manufacturing sectors when it comes to introducing new products and services. This could either be because the services sector is absolutely more innovative than its counterpart, or since it is less developed relative to the manufacturing sector, there is more room for innovation. The same analysis could be applied to the services sector of South Asia.

On the other hand, in all countries as a whole, the manufacturing sector is 5% more innovative compared to the services sector, given that the metric for innovation is introducing a new product or service. This could be because manufacturing and retail businesses typically have higher room for growth through diversification and tweaking steps in different processes. 

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/zJNKUJa4mmtxzcAR4xSTlt48EW9hxPIo1NEmeIQQhAgSBfyKKmYP5mBNevjOfsEEn-Xou-8wg-eD61yV2dXo5rZRs0JLZJ32JtfAcwLFrxZl0k9TWnqyrnN4vyglFy2Nj_SomKy9NyNT

Breaking down the percentage of firms that have introduced a new product or service according to firm size reveals interesting insights. The trend in South Asia and the world shows that large firms are the most innovative (39% in South Asia and 48% in Pakistan) followed by medium firms (32% in South Asia and 42% globally), with small firms being the least innovative (22% in South Asia and 33% firms across the world).  

dhttps://lh6.googleusercontent.com/PtFtyu6wmXjMEnFbWzCofkIhJFsEOSIj_rsOLg_rcPv3v10MmxFZqpOQBdVzsJ3IXDsyF974ijp3EXp6FqIi8FV6BSZnwqJXqz_Otfs7OoZhOhBcQJGCvkvBE0XRt2NLq1h3hUk4ajwW

However, in the case of Pakistan, it is the medium sized firms that are more innovative than both small and large firms. Only 2% of small firms and 4% of large firms have introduced new products or services, but the number is 5% for medium sized firms. This could be an indication of a growing number of medium sized firms that are valuing innovation and new ideas. Such a sign is positive for the economy because as these medium sized firms grow into larger businesses, the impact they will have on innovation will become even greater. Regardless, the percentage of firms in Pakistan engaging in introducing new products and services is still much lower compared to the region and the world, and will require significant time and effort to catch up. Catching up is important to ensure that the products and services the country exports are up to the standards of a growing global technological space and constantly improving standards.  

2. Percent of firms whose new product/service is also new to the main market  

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/CbkjLAiSu--b20YJaXPg0hlS6txxrMqRrsuU94hWmN3UtJ21-jf4oXH7n4-sxvxaV0VBCa514RB2AK3r2SlxiMtBBMU4MU801TCbuLwZuw_xo1MfkPIshXuRIs93DrU-W3bDlvgQSxbP

There are no Pakistani firms, out of the 1300 surveyed, whose new product or service is also new to the main market. This means that out of the 3% who have introduced new products or services, none have been novel to the market itself, even if they were new for the company. Compared to Pakistan, there have been 52% such firms in South Asia and 68% in the world. These figures are particularly bleak because even if a firm is innovative in its own capacity, those advances may eventually grow redundant if the business is not contributing novel ideas to the market. Let alone the world, Pakistan is also very behind in the South Asian region as well. 

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/wMF6Cbk0zfzTi3wnq98VXbqknq9_T4-RNnSWe8PRB2pa_3uDGBH_k0-sZSMPexN8IszSaCpMpn8lf376Dukg3r76rANcnMQbm7Z2tXUPAmsL-rOGJvl0033isQJl4eVu1YsFWlXogZ89

Even in terms of firms that introduced process innovations, Pakistan is very behind South Asia and the world in general. In fact, South Asia is ahead of the global average as well, indicating the rapid growth of technology and innovation in the region. Only 2% of the firms in Pakistan introduced process innovation, compared to 32% in South Asia and 27% in the world. This means that for every Pakistani firm that innovates its process, there are 16 firms in South Asia and more than 13 firms in the world doing so. This also adds extra pressure on the firms that are being innovative in the first place. 

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/T1jZDObTzDMyXHyMgJIpkGhbI7weK3WMwAcTee6yHP_NM3Dd7ZcwsutH1P6nyQdBF3dlBWh6Da_2lQAH270GxYIh0aZWcDw9irwE4eWygDbcdyp_DFmLYkKoeBsd3N75-zkrpmELqaw5

A sector-wise breakdown of process innovation for firms in Pakistan reveals that even within the small percentage of firms doing so, the proportion of those in the services industry is higher than those in the manufacturing industry. 2% of service-oriented businesses have introduced new process innovations compared to 1% manufacturing businesses. Processes are vital in manufacturing related industries in order to make production more cost-effective while also improving quality. Innovation in this regard gains and retains not only local but also foreign customers. These numbers also imply that the services sector is also strong in terms of innovation, and perhaps with more attention paid to it, could make up for the deficit in innovative practices and processes by the manufacturing sector in the short run. 

3. Research and Development 

Only 2% of the firms in Pakistan spend on research and development. 10 times more firms across the world do so (20%). South Asia is somewhere in the middle with 12% of firms spending on research and development.

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/GP_VoanexMKZyGXYiCdZs7SJaXirmAAkfIMhGUwbVDUhNwLXbWbgxHT2xnEOdeFUN-ThqYGW2K1PXejxlw6kDIkpKnIEgSVRSO2K_Oi9mzjXXZ6PBbSaL_t40efG11HqqORqF8BOXDZp

Research and development is an aspect of business that may not yield immediate profits and thus might get overlooked, but its long term benefits can be attested by the percentage of firms worldwide allocating parts of their budgets towards it. Even though Pakistan’s economy is a growing one, shifting some focus on research and development early on would ensure a sustained growth in businesses and may contribute to lower costs as new methods are discovered and devised. 

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/UU0lAlWSOWujCtcvMNG19cKrio3HZ_S-tixcscIG_stOiaVIB8WzRmEt9WbgQlzEhodl7yjfNBt8gk4VMU3yTR4pBCvUdE0Rqi9ZzkbsyCsq6LZLBzyWA96eA1veAagEwutBC-DPeh3Y

Of the 2% manufacturing firms that invest in research and development, 6% of firms in the motor vehicles and transport equipment industry claim to do so, followed by 5% in the food industry. These are positive signs as investment in the transport industry could lower transport costs as well as wear and tear on products. Similarly, new innovations and research in the food industry has the potential to mitigate health risks that may arise and can bring Pakistan’s food industry to a position where it may start exporting as well. 

(Gallup Pakistan)

July 25, 2023

Source:https://gallup.com.pk/wp/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WES-PR6-Innovation-Technology.pdf

 

MENA

805-43-06/Polls

Views On Sustainability - KSA Edition

The vast majority (95%) of individuals in Saudi Arabia are familiar with the term sustainability, where they primarily associate it with the conservation of natural resources and renewable energy sources.

When it comes to actions taken to live more sustainably, the majority of the population (9 in 10) have also taken steps towards a more sustainable lifestyle although these tend to be actions that require easy to medium effort such as using low-energy lightbulbs. While 4 out of 5 express a willingness to make lifestyle compromises to benefit the environment, 3 in 5 are unclear about specific actions that could make a difference in addressing climate change.

In terms of corporate responsibility, 56% believe that companies in Saudi Arabia lack in terms of supporting sustainability and ethical best practices but consider technology companies and oil and gas companies to be the most active on sustainability.

Moreover, when considering the overall cost implications of sustainable practices, around half of individuals believe that the responsibility for expenses should lie with governments. On the other hand, 1 in 4 are open to personally bearing the costs themselves showing their support and contribution to sustainability.

(Ipsos Saudi Arabia)

27 July 2023

Source:https://www.ipsos.com/en-sa/views-sustainability-ksa-edition

 

805-43-07/Polls

Kenyans Want Government To Prioritise Environmental Protection, Even At The Expense Of Job Creation 

Key findings 

On pollution and environmental governance:  

Half (49%) of Kenyans say pollution is a “somewhat serious” or “very serious” problem in their community. o Citizens say deforestation (31%), trash disposal (25%), pollution of water sources (14%), and sanitation (14%) are the most important environmental issues in their community. o Eight out of 10 citizens (79%) say plastic bags are a major source of pollution in Kenya.  More than half (55%) of respondents say the primary responsibility for reducing pollution and keeping the community clean rests with ordinary citizens. About one third would assign this responsibility to their local (25%) or national governments (10%).  An overwhelmingly majority (91%) of Kenyans say the government should do more to limit pollution and protect the environment, including 74% who want the government to do “much more.”  Three-fourths (75%) of citizens say the government should prioritise environmental protection over job creation and income generation. 

On natural resource extraction:  

Public opinion is evenly divided as to whether the benefits of natural resource extraction, such as jobs and revenue, outweigh associated environmental costs. o Respondents are also divided on whether ordinary people have a voice in decisions about natural resource extraction that occurs near their communities. o Only 35% think that local communities receive a fair share of revenue from natural resource extraction.  A large majority (85%) of Kenyans want the government to regulate natural resource extraction more tightly in order to reduce its negative impacts on the environment. 

Pollution and environmental governance 

Pollution: The scope of the problem 

Half (49%) of Kenyans consider pollution in their communities to be a “very serious” (28%) or “somewhat serious” (21%) problem, while the other half (50%) think it is “not very serious” (31%) or “not at all serious” (20%)1 (Figure 1). 

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/JUwglL55KlCskV3_AaL4_O02KBg1Zjod1GqFHxhuerS7VfBH2MDCgERbJGA1cFto7Sy0b5XTSW4CGJk-MHFr9xxScrPlqNQpsaW3WCeX8pdBJ63VYDMtPkPsonTtX7uD408h5Vi9dSgM

Urban residents are significantly more concerned about pollution than rural residents (63% vs. 43%) (Figure 2). 

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/q6v0DkLsBsuuNEoZnbwdpo9eVbCNbzWRDF9cNqvENOAh0Vqvk2c-t-le5gvC3HCs3YFPpbmgMoc2hvFU7NuYnZ-iMiMeE_2S8ZftgwivgAEJHjxRMGnM2smlgbRjbJkVaTrPnKJOVyXI

Concerns about pollution also increase sharply with one’s experience of  poverty, ranging from 35% among well-off respondents to 59% among those with high lived poverty.

Three out of every 10 Kenyans (31%) rank deforestation as the most important environmental issue in their community, followed by trash disposal (25%), human waste management (14%), pollution of water sources (14%), and air pollution (6%) (Figure 3). 

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/LgP15QwFbALVhoTQHnkfn7mQDfLVmDdm17D5pwvdEa5FB4HpFs0hAMqfFKEKEo01nrolQKmjZn1oi-D4NTpSTi82u9eF_AtgCthwKpAdM-5G0WphwRxMdOBU3ZQZofxIX4DH4eRtATCK

And despite a ban on single-use plastic bags in place since 2017 (Kimeu, 2023), eight out of 10 citizens (79%) say that plastic bags are a major source of pollution in Kenya (Figure 4).  

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/bN4ua8hNyYkWI99qq4KTmL19k4oBuV_33B0KoqAyZ3BbFMSEuJnH8EqAPv2SliVJy2dTeCdEceLXf8pBeOvHJ4NTiM6hyP53YMdPl3FXPxkJ4BA1UccboCHdt8yN5tStkD-Y140YuA54

Protecting the environment 

Efforts to combat pollution encompass a wide spectrum of actions, ranging from increasing the use of renewable energy and reusable shopping bags to the dismantling of the coal burning industry. For Kenyans, protecting the environment starts with an individual responsibility: More than half (55%) of respondents say ordinary citizens have the primary responsibility for reducing pollution and keeping their communities clean (Figure 5). 

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/B3z-LZglV5IFxlQ735EdpeZGdLK-yDXPuNLw-nt3sCKOVvwtHVGuRBTyu2KxVWauvnTFl5NTy0K6LLZiAsl4nn811_WWBcgRY17r1zr_E5a5nXaFK3dLfh2Ui3BkQyic2ACi61v6mlzP

Aside from individual initiative, a quarter (25%) of Kenyans would instead place that responsibility on the local government, while 10% would look to the national government, 3% to business and industry, and 3% to traditional leaders.

Overall, Kenyans are almost evenly divided in their assessments of the government’s performance on reducing pollution and protecting the environment: Half (50%) think it is doing “fairly well” or “very well,” while an almost equal proportion (47%) rate its efforts poorly (Figure 6). 

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/IUs_mQXuyMZSwnT9iBbt_f2qogvV4Ix_e3USzkAk4mMmZ1T3LxVXUY15dJg2Of3eOfSEntILh1g2RXaVBT_O_kVWVrNBFC3QMxMBGnpKfNoZ5g_CPYwXlwlv-mYePNtYArlMoJcFcN7e

Urban residents offer less favourable ratings of government efforts to reduce pollution and protect the environment than rural residents (46% vs. 52%). And approval is notably lower among poor respondents (38%) and those with no formal education (41%) than among their better-off and more educated counterparts. While ratings of the government’s performance are mixed, Kenyans overwhelmingly (91%) say the government should do more to limit pollution and protect the environment, including 74% who want the government to do “much more” (Figure 7). 

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/LaVl3bbQyPSh9MT_KUk04gDpUoRhLHj88IZuJ9DUXreItIVm3bHhWeKoksLtBTK5SJ1Aw_OlzyVhkiBT8HnJp9Z6aNb4RKq_pwnLGD7Ot9ssC5VYT2t3LKl2piytpqQ3iKXJ-OS_OJE4

Only about one in 10 think the government should keep doing what it is currently doing (5%) or should do less (4%) to protect the environment.

Even if policies to protect the environment come into conflict with job creation or income generation, three-fourths (75%) of Kenyans say the government should prioritise environmental protection, including 52% who “strongly agree” with this approach (Figure 8).

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/tHrh71Rsbk35PFpH84e403uwTETNMZMoCY3xp6I8MAUm6_kYVUQYJq0O9CdViI-cWXV109Yj2dfYYiIyVCY2W1zUdK6Wp9feaWc6Bi7gJcR5_PSYn9HwBz-2OwCfZQAvJ4eDweAIj5wi

Only 20% of respondents say the government should focus more on creating jobs and increasing incomes even if doing so leads to greater environmental damage. Support for prioritising environmental protection over jobs and incomes is somewhat weaker among citizens experiencing high lived poverty (70%) and those with no formal education (65%). 

Natural resource extraction 

Mining of soda ash, limestone, gold, and other minerals currently contributes only about 1% of Kenya’s GDP, but its potential is estimated at 10% of GDP (Republic of Kenya, 2016; Onditi, 2022), which would make it a major source of revenue but possibly also a significant contributor to environmental pollution. Almost half (46%) of Kenyans say the benefits that natural resource extraction brings to the economy in terms of revenue and job creation outweigh the industry’s environmental costs, but about the same proportion (44%) disagree (Figure 9). 

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/39gY1yqct1UZ8JyxZ_C_r9QIRxNYtagbyZZ5zCoONP2voDEMiq5Kzuz04PbrrPhtK2ZoCQy3TOqBvIWcP_imO4wrm7-ajQSVhRyzjcmyptEcx_HKOpZl6V6CGS0V1MMO4BytA64dibcV

Opinions are less divided when it comes to regulating natural resource extraction: 85% of Kenyans want the government to tighten regulation to reduce the industry’s negative impacts on the environment.

But respondents are divided again in their assessments when it comes to the stake of ordinary citizens in natural resource extraction (Figure 10). 

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/7SAOcGvDuOvr30K1cE4L5Qk1NyZ2wo8J4uXoUXTGLNsfg-BZv4R5EquDq8Pt9m-be5MTp2As0s-i7BUU4SPTC7UWivoy6DuLD-W3yy_eHsqUJ2Fh6Dmr7rMUSRvmdeGCQa7Q0p-yEAAF

While 44% of respondents say that people have a voice in decisions about natural resource extraction that takes place near their communities, 47% think they don’t. And only three out of 10 citizens think local communities receive a fair share of the revenues from natural resource extraction, while a majority 54% disagree.

Conclusion 

Survey results show that many Kenyans are concerned about pollution and feel a personal responsibility to protect the environment. But they also expect “much more” from the government on this issue – even to the point of prioritising environmental protection over job creation should the two goals be in conflict. As one step to safeguard the environment, tighter regulation of natural resource extraction has overwhelming public support. Poor citizens are particularly likely to see pollution as a serious problem and to give the government poor marks on protecting the environment, suggesting that mitigation of environmental degradation may be especially urgent in less affluent communities. 

(Afrobarometer)

27 July 2023

Source:https://www.afrobarometer.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/AD678-Kenyans-want-government-to-prioritise-environmental-protection-Afrobarometer-25july23.pdf

 

WEST EUROPE

805-43-08/Polls

Twitter Users Increasingly Negative About Elon Musk And The Company

Almost half now say there is too much freedom to post whatever you want on the platform

Yesterday, Elon Musk announced that the platform formerly known as Twitter was rebranding to ‘X’, replacing the iconic blue bird logo. Musk has reportedly long had a fascination with the letter X, with his X.com being one of first business ventures – while the company was later merged with PayPal, he retained the domain name, which now redirects to Twitter.

A new YouGov poll shows that two thirds of Twitter users (67%) have reacted negatively to the new ‘X’ branding, including 41% who feel “very negatively” about the change. These figures are about the same among the platform’s most frequent users.

Just 4% of all users feel positively about the rebranding to ‘X’, while 21% are indifferent.

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/WTje5DczB7jNpMD5XnDC9FsibQYylRI04u5uiYC1_lVH7AgdqY2rLT3aqGeek3DimwVdgUqjw5yVLwhYC_Z8zS-SxBl8f0TLP1j9gEtqDKwBk-lcyTdheiNMWXP8Un1piOi3pwSCT6iF

The British public, as well as Twitter users, take an increasingly negative view of Elon Musk

Since our first poll in April last year – shortly after Musk initiated his acquisition of Twitter – recognition of the tech tycoon has increased significantly. Back then, 63% of Britons had an opinion on Elon Musk; now 79% do.

This has been a case of familiarity breeding contempt, however. While 40% of Britons had an unfavourable view of Musk in April 2022, this figure had increased to 54% in December, and to 61% now.

About one in five Britons (19%) have a favourable opinion of the Twitter owner, about the same as it was in December (18%), but lower than his starting figure of 23% in April.

Musk’s favourability among Twitter users has likewise been declined. Among all users, 27% had a favourable view and 49% an unfavourable one in April 2022. Those figures now stand at 20% and 67% respectively.

Among daily users, Musk’s favourability has dropped from 29% in April last year to 21% now, while the number with a negative view has risen from 50% to 67%.

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/FYtkOYWpKaX-nS3-GPfsF3dB_0cFQqEPYe3KfTRqRXf8RVVZNiMtrDKsDi1cx2xH_S9urWwsh-Y2Vo37HEBs_mqSmUvmIyz55Yq553wyVfxywKB4KhvTKDfikGTw6WZ2SEcDVl-3FK7B

Twitter’s own reputation has declined since Elon Musk started to acquire the platform

Most Britons (54%) have a negative view of Twitter itself, up from 50% in December and 45% in April 2022. The proportion with a positive view remains the same as last time (21%), although this is down from 26% in our first poll.

Among daily Twitter users, two thirds continue to have a favourable view of the platform (67%, from 72% in spring 2022), but the number with an unfavourable view has increased from 27% to 33%.

Among all users, favourability has fallen from 51% to 40%, while negativity has increased from 35% to 48%.

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/qUjFMskHaVRBfkXdQ-zI7CEW4mr80JhEZyurhFk0Jd55_Z9WYS6n8ZfmwAcNW8JW90F86StJtvbeBq2di8sVGxh3cQ9s7B7EXhdiMAXvtU_6tymanQZwjqJtjR2HqYGcFqiK4MXzeokc

Twitter users increasingly say there is too much free speech on the platform

When Musk acquired Twitter, he made clear his desire to promote greater freedom of speech on the platform.

Even at the time, however, there was a tendency among Twitter users to believe the platform gave people too much freedom to post offensive and harmful content. One in three users in April 2022 (37%) said so, compared to only 14% taking the opposing view that Twitter did not give people enough freedom to post what they want. A quarter (27%) thought the platform got the balance right.

Following 15 months with Musk at the helm, Twitter users are even more inclined to think the platform gives people too much leeway to post what they want, at 47%. Only 21% now think Twitter gets the balance right, while 13% say freedom of speech is not strong enough on the platform.

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/DfbaDvW3Hqpwk14l5zog3AYCv574qwEDYxh9pPGl6_7vSxoKILPfrPrHIUZ0WMDL4YzPxZA6lssUHwoqPVs3s5GDfP8eE0eEGpQQvrz34ZZtdd5cvt4qeCb6hxl3XghId58aUDNtB4ru

Most Twitter users say that Musk’s takeover has been bad for the platform

The public continue to think that Elon Musk buying Twitter has been bad for the social network. More than four in ten say so (44%), up from 38% in December. About the same number say it has been neither good nor bad as last time (18%), while just 4% think Musk’s ownership has been good for Twitter (from 8% in December).

Twitter users are even more convinced the takeover was a bad move: 55% of all users, including 59% of daily users say so. In April 2022, only 30-32% had expected this would be the case.

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/ojr6G0eSPYSR7ScxenoNgf-eG86Sd183dHJFvPqJsYp4q8Y2E6gGvfwg9XamR8RD95lmjrEt-d8PKxewOIXCQjJISq9tKbulgkjnKKFGp0BgMDltj4rCVeRTqV8xetqLxzhwANyiuwOI

How has Twitter usage changed in the last year?

Asked how frequently they used Twitter 12 months ago, and today, a quarter of people who say they were using Twitter a year ago say they’re using it less today than they were at the time (25%). They are partly counteracted by the 15% who say they are using it more than before. Most (59%) say that they are using it about the same as they were. Few (4%) say they no longer use the platform at all, again balanced by the 3% of current Twitter users say they joined the platform in the last year.

Eight in ten of those who used Twitter on a daily basis last year (80%) say they continue to do so, with a further 10% continuing to use the platform multiple times per week. Only 2% say they have no longer visit the social network.

(YouGov UK)

July 27, 2023

Source:https://yougov.co.uk/topics/technology/articles-reports/2023/07/27/twitter-users-increasingly-negative-about-elon-mus

 

805-43-09/Polls

Majority Of Britons Support Government Regulation Of AI To Prevent Job Losses, With Few Expecting It To Create More Job Opportunities Than Those That Are Lost

·         2 in 3 (64%) Britons agree the government should create new regulations or laws to prevent the potential loss of jobs due to AI; 14% disagree

·         Half (50%) think their job will be affected by AI in the next 12 months, increasing to 64% in the next 5 years

·         Only 1 in 8 (12%) think AI will create far more new job opportunities than the jobs that are lost; over half (55%) disagree

·         Graduates are more likely than non-graduates to anticipate their job being affected by AI, and graduates are also much more likely to agree that businesses should embrace AI in the workplace if it saves time / resources (60%, vs 40% among non-graduates)

New polling from Ipsos shows that only 1 in 8 (12%) think AI will create far more new job opportunities than the jobs that are lost; over half (55%) disagree. To mitigate this, 2 in 3 (64%) agree the government should create new regulations or laws to prevent the potential loss of jobs due to AI, with just 14% disagreeing. Despite concerns about loss of jobs without government intervention, nearly half (46%) agree that businesses should embrace AI in the workplace if it saves time and resources – a view more common amongst university graduates (60%) compared to non-graduates (46%).

Few UK adults believe AI will create far more new jobs than it loses, and most support government action to prevent job losses – although nearly half still think business should make use of AI where is saves time and resources - Ipsos survey

When presented with a list of sectors and asked which, if any, they thought would be most likely to see reduced work opportunities due to AI within the next 2-3 years, more than half selected customer service sectors (61%) and manufacturing (55%). By contrast, the least commonly selected sectors included the care sector (4%), healthcare (10%), teaching (13%), and professional services (14%).

Thinking about how they expect improvement in AI to impact their own jobs, half of UK adults currently in work (50%) anticipate their job being affected in some capacity within the next 12 months, rising to 2 in 3 (64%) who expect to be impacted within the next 5 years (mainly through AI helping them to do some aspects of their job, but leaving their main work activities unaffected). By contrast, 4 in 10 (43%) expect AI to have no impact on their job within the same period, a share that falls to 26% when looking ahead to 5 years from now. In each time frame, graduates are much more likely than non-graduates to anticipate changes to their job – though low numbers in either group expect their jobs to cease to exist altogether.

Graduates are more likely than non-graduates to expect AI to impact their work AI will substantially change my main work activities, but my job will still exist 5 years from now (% Agree) Graduates 29% Non-graduates 16%

1 in 5 (22%) in work have used an Artificial Intelligence (AI) chatbot for work since April

Among those in work, 1 in 5 (22%) say they’ve used an AI chatbot (such as ChatGPT, Jasper, or Bard) to support their work or business since the start of April, with a further 17% saying they’ve used an AI chatbot for a non-work purpose. Graduates (27%) are more likely than non-graduates (18%) to have used the tool in a work capacity. The most common way AI chatbots have been used in a work capacity is to polish or amend content someone has written, selected by 25% of those who have used an AI chatbot for work. The least common task was analysing datasets (12%).

1 in 5 (22%) workers say they have used chatbots for work between in recent months, with graduates more likely than non-graduates to have done so Since the start of April, how often, if at all, have you used AI chatbots, such as ChatGPT, Jasper or Bard, to support any aspects of your work or business? % Agree All 22% Graduates 27% Non-graduates 18%

Trinh Tu, Managing Director of Public Affairs at Ipsos, said:

Generative AI has great potential to impact UK workplaces, but at the moment public attitudes towards AI are still feeling their way. While only a small minority expect their jobs to be made redundant due to AI, there is scepticism that it will lead to a big net increase in job opportunities, and most would welcome regulation or laws from the government to prevent potential job losses. At the moment, use of AI chatbots for work is not unusual but still a minority, and broadly workers see it helping them to do their job rather than leading to substantial change, but expectations are that it will grow in the future.  Even so, British businesses should be encouraged by the public’s pragmatic openness to adopting the new technology, provided it allows for measurable benefits to how businesses can operate.

(Ipsos MORI)

26 July 2023

Source:https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/majority-britons-support-government-regulation-of-ai-to-prevent-job-losses

 

805-43-10/Polls

Food Standard Agency's Flagship Survey Shows 1 In 4 People Are Now Food Insecure

The key findings from Wave 6 of Food and You 2 are outlined below. 

Food you can trust

Confidence in food safety and authenticity

·         93% of respondents reported that they were confident that the food they buy is safe to eat. 

·         87% of respondents were confident that the information on food labels is accurate.

Confidence in the food supply chain

·         76% of respondents reported that they had confidence in the food supply chain.

·         Respondents were more likely to report confidence in farmers (88%) and shops and supermarkets (85%) than in takeaways (62%), and food delivery services (45%).

Awareness, trust and confidence in the FSA

·         90% of respondents had heard of the FSA.

·         78% of respondents who had at least some knowledge of the FSA reported that they trusted the FSA to make sure 'food is safe and what it says it is.' While 82% of respondents reported that they were confident that the FSA (or the government agency responsible for food safety) can be relied upon to protect the public from food-related risks (such as food poisoning or allergic reactions from food), 82% were confident that the FSA takes appropriate action if a food-related risk is identified and 79% were confident that the FSA is committed to communicating openly with the public about food-related risks. 

Concerns about food

·         82% of respondents had no concerns about the food they eat, and 18% if respondents reported that they had a concern. 

·         When prompted, the most common concern was food prices (65%). Other common concerns were food waste (62%), the quality of food (61%), and the amount of food packaging (56%). 

Food Security

·         Across England, Wales and Northern Ireland, 75% of respondents were classified as food secure (61% high, 14% marginal and 25% of respondents were classified as food insecure (12% low, 12% very low). 

·         80% of respondents reported that they had made a change to their eating habits for financial reasons in the previous 12 months.

Eating out and takeaways

·         43% of respondents reported checking the food hygiene rating of a business in the previous 12 months. 

·         86% of respondents reported that they had heard of the Food Hygiene Rating Scheme (FHRS). Over half (55%) of respondents reported that they had heard of the FHRS and had at least a bit of knowledge about it. 

Food allergies, intolerances and other hypersensitivities

·         12% of respondents reported that they had a food intolerance, 5% reported having a food allergy, and 1% reported having coeliac disease. Most respondents (78%) reported that they did not have a food hypersensitivity.  

·         26% of respondents who had a food hypersensitivity had been diagnosed by an NHS or private medical practitioner and 5% had been diagnosed by an alternative or complementary therapist. However, most respondents (74%) had not received any diagnosis.

·         56% of respondents who had a food hypersensitivity reported that they had experienced a reaction in the previous 12 months and 39% reported that they had not experienced a reaction. 90% of respondents who go food shopping and take into consideration a person who has a food allergy or intolerance were confident the information provided on food labelling allows them to identify foods that will cause a bad or unpleasant physical reaction.

Eating at home

Cleaning

·         46% of respondents reported that they always wash their hands before eating.

·         72% of respondents reported that they always wash their hands before preparing or cooking food. 91% of respondents reported that they always wash their hands immediately after handling raw meat, poultry, or fish.

Chilling

·         62% of respondents reported that their fridge temperature should be between 0 to 5 degrees Celsius. 

·         61% of respondents who have a fridge reported that they monitored the temperature; either manually (49%) or via an internal temperature alarm (11%). 

Cooking

·         89% of respondents reported that they never eat chicken or turkey when it is pink or has pink juices. However, 9% of respondents reported eating chicken or turkey at least occasionally when it is pink or has pink juices. 

Avoiding cross-contamination

·         56% of respondents reported that they never wash raw chicken, however 40% of respondents reported that they do this at least occasionally. 

·         76% of respondents reported that they always cook food until it is steaming hot and cooked all the way through.

Use-by dates

·         65% of respondents identified the use-by-date as the information which shows that food is no longer safe to eat.

·         64% of respondents reported that they always check use-by-dates before they cook or prepare food. 

(Ipsos MORI)

26 July 2023

Source:https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/food-standard-agencys-flagship-survey-shows-1-4-people-are-now-food-insecure

 

805-43-11/Polls

One In Four Britons Think Climate Change Is Out Of Control

·         Public concern remains high. Two-thirds say we are already feeling the effects of climate change

·         More than half say there is still time to deal with the issue – but public confidence in Britain’s leaders is low.

The latest Ipsos Political Monitor, taken 19th to 23rd July, 2023 explored public attitudes towards climate change, how the government is dealing with the issue and whether Labour would do a better job. The results found strong levels of concern among the public, although more than half still think there is time to deal with it. Yet faith in Britain’s leaders appears low. 6 in 10 think the Conservative government is doing a bad job dealing with it, yet less than three in ten think Labour would do a better job.

Concern about climate change

52% think climate change is a serious global threat but still time to deal with it

·         Three in four Britons think climate change is a serious global threat (77%), with one in four (25%) saying it is out of control but just over half (52%) saying there is still time to deal with it.

·         More generally, 77% of Britons are concerned about climate change / global warming. This is down from 84% last July (during last summer’s heatwave). However, concern is greater than ten years ago (60% in 2013).

·         41% are ‘very concerned’. Women (47%), ABC1s (46%) and graduates (50%) are the most likely groups to be ‘very concerned’.

·         23% are not concerned (up from 15% last July but down from 34% ten years ago).

·         65% think we are already feeling the effects of climate change. This is down 7 points from last July but similar to the 67% in April 2022.

77% concerned about climate change / 23% not

·         Turning specifically to the recent hot weather in Europe. 35% think this is mainly caused by climate change as a result of human activity. 47% think this was partly caused by natural weather processes and partly caused by climate change as a result of human activity. 16% say this was mainly caused by natural weather processes and 3% say they don’t know.

Faith in Britain’s leaders

·         Just one in four think Rishi Sunak’s government are doing a good job dealing with climate change (26%) and 59% say they are doing a bad job. A year ago, Boris Johnson’s government registered scores of 29% good job and 55% bad job.

·         However, less than three in ten think Labour would do a better job (28%), with almost half (48%) saying they’d do about the same and 15% saying they would do worse.

59% think govt has done a bad job at dealing with climate change / 26% think good job

Gideon Skinner, Head of Political Research at Ipsos, said:

It may not be quite as high up the public’s agenda as the cost of living or the NHS, but this data shows that most Britons are still worried about the threat climate change poses to the world.  One in 4 think it is out of control – although while still taking the threat seriously twice as many believe there is still time to deal with it.  Concern is shared across all ages, and among 2019 voters of all parties - although more intensely among Labour than Conservative ones.  

People on balance believe the costs of inaction will outweigh the costs of measures to reduce climate change, and are looking for action from government as well as individuals and businesses. However at the moment they don't think Rishi Sunak's government is doing a very good job on it - although there isn't a lot of confidence that a Labour government would do a better job either.

(Ipsos MORI)

27 July 2023

Source:https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/one-four-britons-think-climate-change-out-control

 

805-43-12/Polls

On The Highway, 27% Of French People Admit To Throwing Waste Out Of The Window Of Their Car

Even though 88% of French people say they are concerned about environmental issues, the 2023 edition of the survey illustrates the difficulty of changing their behavior to limit their environmental impact. For the second year in a row, 27% of them, or more than 1 in 4, say they throw their waste out of their vehicle window when driving on the highway. Even more alarmingly, this practice is paradoxically increasing among young people under 35, who are 42% to admit to doing so – up 6 points compared to 2022. The habit of throwing cigarette butts out the car window, particularly worrying in this summer period with regard to the risk of fire, is declining very slightly, but still concerns nearly 1 in 4 smokers (24% down 2 points). These uncivil and dangerous behaviours have serious consequences on the environment as well as on the safety of users and intervention personnel, consequences that are too often neglected. Every day, on average, 25 tons of litter are collected along highways by highway agents.
"The consequences of climate change and damage to biodiversity are increasingly a source of concern for the French. And yet, a gesture as simple as throwing your garbage in the trash is not self-evident today. The French tend to minimize the consequences of throwing waste out the window of a car: damage to the environment, fire risks and safety of the agents who have to pick them up. Bernadette Moreau, General Delegate of the VINCI Autoroutes Foundation.

Litter does not weaken...

Whether on the highway or on the street, the litter does not weaken, or even increases among those under 35. The French, regardless of their age, say they are overwhelmingly concerned about environmental issues (88%) and more than a third of them (35%) even say they are very concerned. A declared concern that does not translate sufficiently into the adoption of simple and environmentally friendly actions such as putting waste in a garbage can.
On the highway, 27% of French people, or more than 1 in 4, admit to throwing waste out of the window of their car, as in 2022. They throw away organic waste (23%, stable), cigarette butts (24% of smokers, -2 points), paper or packaging (12%, +1 point), as well as plastic bottles or cans (10%, stable).
More seriously, among young people under 35, the situation is deteriorating sharply: 42% of them now say they throw waste out of their window when driving on the motorway (+6 points compared to 2022). More specifically, they increasingly throw away their organic waste (37%, +7 points), cigarette butts (39% of smokers under 35, +1 points), paper and packaging (23%, +4 points) or plastic bottles or cans (22%, +3 points).
As a sign of impatience or lack of ecological awareness, more than 1 in 10 French people (12%) admit to immediately disposing of waste when they are driving, without waiting to find a garbage can (present on all areas, about every 10 minutes of travel).
On public roads too, the behavior of the French has not improved since last year since 41% of French people admit to throwing waste on the sidewalks or in the streets. Whatever the type of waste, records are reached: organic waste (33%, +1), paper, tissue or packaging (16%, +2) and finally plastic bottle or can (11%, +1). The only incivility that decreases is the throwing of cigarette butts (35% of smokers, -7 points).
The behaviour of those under 35 has again deteriorated markedly. More than 1 in 2 (56%, +4 points) admit to throwing garbage on public roads and 50% of smokers under 35 (-1 point) admit to throwing cigarette butts in the street or on the sidewalk.

Image 1

A relaxation that goes hand in hand with a lower awareness of the consequences of these behaviors

The awareness that throwing waste through the window of a car can lead to significant risks has decreased significantly compared to 2022 with regard to:

·         The risk of water and soil pollution (66%, -7 points);

·         Risks to biodiversity (65%, -6 points);

·         Fire risk (64%, -5 points);

·         The risk of accidents affecting motorway staff who have to pick them up (59%, -9 points). On average, every day, 25 tons of litter are collected by highway workers along highways;

·         Or the risk of accidents involving another vehicle (50%, -7 points).

Logically, the level of awareness of the risks of throwing garbage out the window is even more worrying among those who already admit to doing it on the highway. For example, 50% are not aware that it can lead to fires, while 46% do not see how it can have risks for biodiversity!
Lack of information or bad faith, the French who sometimes throw small waste on the highway think that it does not matter because the waste decomposes quickly and that it does not disturb biodiversity (39%) or that no one will be embarrassed or will not realize it (26%).

Concern about wildfire risks grows

More than 1 in 3 French people (35%) say they have already been affected by forest fires (+5 points), either directly, with the evacuation of their home, holiday resort or through a blocked road (13%, stable), or indirectly, by the degradation of biodiversity, landscape or living environment, or by air pollution around a place they frequent (25%+6 points).
More generally, in a context of global warming, the French are increasingly aware of the risks of increasing forest fires. 64% of them (+7 points) believe that they are personally at risk of being affected by forest fires in the coming years.

Image 3


The proximity of risk seems to have an influence on behaviour, since smokers in the most exposed regions throw away their cigarette butts slightly less than in other regions. Thus, 30% of smokers in Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur and Corsica admit to throwing their cigarette butts on the pavement or in the gutter, and 31% in Occitanie, 16 points less than in Ile-de-France (47%). And the same is true when they are driving: on the motorway, the throwing of cigarette butts concerns 17% of smokers in Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur and Corsica, and 16% of those in Occitanie, against 39% for the Grand-Est.

The challenge of waste sorting

Although waste sorting is now one of the most widespread eco-gestures, the share of French people who practice it in their daily lives seems to have reached a ceiling: if they are 91% to sort regularly, the increase has been only 3 points since 2015. In addition, the relaxation observed as soon as the French leave their home is confirmed since they are 86% (+3 points compared to 2015) to do so at their holiday destination. On motorway service areas, this relaxation is even clearer, even if the sorting gesture has been progressing since 2015. Thus, 78% of French people say they regularly sort their waste on the areas (+7 points compared to 2015), 13 points less than in their daily lives. However, all areas (services and rest) of the concessioned motorway network are equipped for selective collection.
These less eco-responsible behaviors on the areas seem to be explained above all by a certain form of laziness and a lack of will to understand the sorting instructions. Indeed, 45% of French people who say they do not systematically sort on the areas, nearly 1 in 2, say they act as quickly as possible and use the nearest bin (-2 points) and 33% of them justify themselves by indicating that they do not know how to do it (+3 points).

Increasing severity in the face of incivility

Faced with the incivility and potentially dangerous behavior of some, the French are more inclined to express their disapproval and advocate greater severity. Even if the French feel guilty (57%) or ashamed (19%) of throwing garbage out of their car window, in the street or in nature, these negative feelings are not enough to change their behavior. On the other hand, the presence of a loved one seems more effective since, according to them, it could lead them to refrain from throwing away (82%).

Image 2


The majority of French people say they are ready to reframe a loved one who would throw waste: 72% say they would point out and explain their disapproval. The same goes for cigarette butt throwing, in front of which 68% of French people say they would point out to their loved one how uncivil and harmful their gesture is for the environment.
Faced with a stranger, they would also be quicker to reframe the person who would throw waste on the road. 32% say they would do it(+4 points, it's a record) while 63% admit that they would be upset but would not intervene (the lowest level ever measured).
Faced with these behaviors, 2 out of 3 French people feel fed up and advocate more severity by calling for the implementation of repressive measures (65%, +1 point), including an increase in the amount of fines (38%, +2 points) or surveillance by cameras to identify offenders (27%).
Only 1 in 4 French people (25%) believe that exemplary conduct in front of children, friends or relatives would be effective and only 1 in 10 that we must rely on the civic sense of citizens.

(Ipsos France)

July 28, 2023

Source:https://www.ipsos.com/fr-fr/sur-lautoroute-27-des-francais-admettent-jeter-des-dechets-par-la-fenetre-de-leur-voiture

 

805-43-13/Polls

Ahead Of U.S. Visit, About 6 In 10 Italians View Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni Favorably

As Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni travels to the United States to meet with President Joe Biden this week, Italians hold largely positive opinions of Meloni’s leadership. They also have generally favorable views of the U.S. and its president, according to a Pew Research Center survey conducted Feb. 20-April 30, 2023.

Italians’ views of Meloni by party

A bar chart showing that right-wing populist supporters are more positive than other Italians toward Prime Minister Meloni.

Nearly six-in-ten Italians (57%) have a favorable opinion of Meloni, while 41% have a negative one.

Meloni, a member of the conservative Brothers of Italy party, is much more popular among Italians who support right-wing populist parties than among those who do not support these parties. These parties include three that make up the governing right-wing coalition: Brothers of Italy, Lega and Forza Italia.

Nearly nine-in-ten or more Italians who have a positive opinion of these parties also hold a favorable opinion of Meloni. In comparison, around 40% or fewer of those who have unfavorable views of these parties support Meloni.

(For more information on how we classify populist parties, read the appendix to our recent report “Large Shares See Russia and Putin in Negative Light, While Views of Zelenskyy More Mixed.”)

In contrast, supporters of the centrist, populist Five Star Movement and the center-left Democratic Party are less likely than those who do not support these parties to have positive views of Meloni.

Favorability of Italian populist parties over time

A line chart that shows Italians have more favorable views of right-wing populist parties than they did in 2022.

The share of Italians who have a favorable view of right-wing populist parties in the country has risen over the past year. Some 44% of Italians currently have a positive opinion of Meloni’s Brothers of Italy, up from 32% in 2022. (The 2022 survey was conducted before Meloni took office in October.)

Favorable views of Forza Italia have also increased by 12 percentage points in the past year. Currently, 42% of Italians have a positive opinion of the party – the highest share since we first asked about Forza Italia in 2016.

Italians are also more likely to support Lega than they were in 2022: 30% now view the party favorably. However, that share is notably lower than the 44% who expressed support for the party in 2019. Between 2019 and 2020, support for Lega dropped by 15 points.

Overall, this increasing positive sentiment toward right-wing populist parties in Italy aligns with a wider European trend. Populists, particularly on the right, have won higher vote shares in recent legislative elections than in the past. In the Netherlands, for example, right-leaning populist parties garnered around 16% of the vote in 2021 – a high not seen in nearly a decade of parliamentary elections. In the most recent Italian general elections in September 2022, about four-in-ten votes went to Brothers of Italy, Forza Italia or Lega. About a third voted for these parties in 2018, and three-in-ten did so in 2013.

(For more information on rising vote shares for populist parties, read “Populists in Europe – especially those on the right – have increased their vote shares in recent elections.”)

Italians’ views of Biden and the U.S.

A bar chart showing that Italians generally view U.S. favorably but lack confidence in President Biden.

Six-in-ten Italians view the U.S. favorably. This largely aligns with views of the U.S. in the nine other European countries included in the Center survey. Supporters of Meloni’s Brothers of Italy party, as well as those of Forza Italia, are more likely than those who do not support these parties to hold favorable views of the U.S.

However, compared with their European counterparts, Italians are among the least confident in Biden to do the right thing regarding world affairs. Some 57% of Italians have no confidence in him, while 42% have at least some confidence. Only Hungarians express lower confidence in Biden across the European countries surveyed.

Italians who support the Brothers of Italy or Forza Italia are more likely than those who do not support each party to have confidence in Biden. For example, 48% of those who favor Brothers of Italy also have confidence in Biden, compared with only 39% of those who do not support the party. 

(PEW)

JULY 25, 2023

Source:https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/07/25/ahead-of-us-visit-about-6-in-10-italians-view-prime-minister-giorgia-meloni-favorably/

 

NORTH AMERICA

805-43-14/Polls

Engagement For Boomers: What They Want, How To Give It

Let’s be honest: Millennials and Gen Zers get a lot of attention in the workplace. And for good reason -- your younger workers are your future leaders. Every organization needs to grow the next generation of managers and executives if they want to survive.

But organizations are also in the middle of a tight labor market, intensified by the retirement of the largest generation in the workforce. Companies may be looking to keep their most veteran workers longer, along with their expertise, institutional knowledge and customer relationships.

At the same time, businesses may be looking to attract retirees to fill part-time or entry-level positions. Those retirees have specific wants: flexibility, social wellbeing, a sense of purpose and supplemental retirement income.

Subscribe to the Gallup at Work newsletter to create an exceptional workplace. (*) Required

Supplemental income is an acute need for many nearing retirement today. According to Gallup’s latest survey, only 39% of nonretired Americans aged 50 to 64 think they have enough money to live comfortably in retirement. In general, nonretirees expect to rely on income sources other than Social Security, including part-time work, in retirement.

But even if older workers think they won’t have to retire soon, they may not achieve the ideal retirement age they’d hoped. The mean age at which nonretirees expect to retire is 66 years, while the actual mean age that retirees report having retired is 62.

The bottom line is that being an older worker near or after retirement is a complex transitional time in which income, identity, purpose and legacy are significant factors.

Employers looking to retain or attract older workers need to recognize that engagement isn’t just for young people. All people have a desire to thrive at work and in life, no matter their age or career stage.

So, how can employers engage older workers in ways that make sense for their career stage and life goals?

A Snapshot of Older Generation Engagement Trends

As of the end of 2022, 35% of employees in the baby boomer generation are engaged at work. That means boomers are slightly more engaged than older millennials (33%) and Gen Xers (31%) but have the same level of engagement as Gen Zers and younger millennials.

Millennials are more likely than Gen Xers or baby boomers to say they have experienced:

·         someone talking to them about their progress

·         opportunities for development

·         opportunities to learn and grow

Gen Xers and baby boomers are more like to say they:

·         know what’s expected of them

·         get to do what they do best

·         have the materials and equipment they need to do their work

We might generalize by saying that younger workers are experiencing a lot of change at their stage of life, while older workers are experiencing the perks of stability. Getting to do what you do best may sound simple, but it can be a deeply rewarding and satisfying part of a job.

What Older Workers Need

There are three general areas of opportunity for the engagement of older generations: development, recognition and friendship.

Employee Engagement

1. Development is different for late-career workers.

Everyone has a human need to develop, grow and change. For older workers, development may look more like developing others. Experienced employees can offer knowledge, experience and a model for success.

Developing others could look like leading a training course or providing a written account of wisdom and advice for future leaders. It could look like one-on-one mentoring or an independent project that would improve the organization over the long term.

The important thing is for employees to take ownership of their own development in a way that makes sense to them and benefits the organization.

2. Recognition looks different in retirement.

Frequent recognition is important at the start of a job or a career. Beginners want to know, “Am I doing this right?” But for experienced workers, recognition changes.

Older employees may appreciate swapping old “war stories” or storytelling that puts a lifetime of work into perspective. Recognition programs or habits that may resonate with younger workers may not invigorate older workers. Older workers may not need or want constant praise, but that doesn’t mean they don’t want to feel appreciated, admired, respected and honored. As with all employees, recognition should be personalized to be meaningful.

3. Friendships are different when you’re older.

Baby boomers and Gen Xers are less likely to say they have someone at work who cares about them and less likely to say they have a best friend at work. If they’ve been at an organization for a long time, they’ve likely seen a lot of faces change. They may feel more disconnected from individuals, even as their commitment to their organization and its values remains strong.

But those social connections remain a big part of why older people continue to work. So, it’s important for managers of older workers to support the social side of work, too. Managers should encourage friendships -- and the time those friendships take to build -- between older and younger workers.

Manage to the Individual

Reaching retirement today is complicated. Retiring employees may be dealing with multiple generations of loved ones -- older parents, children and grandchildren -- who need their care and support. Managing one’s finances and health can be complicated as well. Add to the mix adapting to a diverse, multi-generational workplace -- it’s a lot! There’s no stereotypical life; everyone has their own story.

But the workplace remains a rewarding place where many older workers and retirees can enjoy contributing their talents to something meaningful each day. By meeting the unique needs of employees at this stage of life, leaders can provide a supportive environment where every generation can thrive at work.

(PEW)

JULY 25, 2023

Source:https://www.gallup.com/workplace/509021/engagement-boomers-give.aspx

 

805-43-15/Polls

Which U.S. Workers Are More Exposed To AI On Their Jobs

Artificial intelligence (AI) recently gained new  attention with the release of ChatGPT and Dall-E. These tools and the broader array of AI-driven business applications represent a new reality for workers.

A bar chart showing the shares of workers that are most exposed to AI in their jobs. Groups that stand out include those with a bachelor's degree or more (27%) and Asian adults (24%), though 19% of all workers are most exposed to AI in their jobs.

Historically, changes in technology have often automated physical tasks, such as those performed on factory floors. But AI performs more like human brainpower and, as its reach grows, that has raised questions about its impact on professional and other office jobs – questions that Pew Research Center seeks to address in a new analysis of government data.

What we found

§  In 2022, 19% of American workers were in jobs that are the most exposed to AI, in which the most important activities may be either replaced or assisted by AI.

§  23% of workers have jobs that are the least exposed to AI, in which the most important activities are farther from the reach of AI. Other workers, nearly six-in-ten in all, are likely to have varying levels of exposure to AI.

§  Jobs with a high level of exposure to AI tend to be in higher-paying fields where a college education and analytical skills can be a plus.

Certain groups of workers have higher levels of exposure to AI

§  Those with more education: Workers with a bachelor’s degree or more (27%) are more than twice as likely as those with a high school diploma only (12%) to see the most exposure.

§  Women: A greater share of women (21%) than men (17%) are likely to see the most exposure to AI. This is because of differences in the types of jobs held by men and women.

§  Asian and White: Asian (24%) and White (20%) workers are more exposed than Black (15%) and Hispanic (13%) workers.

§  Higher-wage workers: In 2022, workers in the most exposed jobs earned $33 per hour, on average, compared with $20 in jobs with the least amount of exposure.

Workers seem more hopeful than concerned about the impact of AI on their jobs

§  A recent Pew Research Center survey finds that many U.S. workers in more exposed industries do not feel their jobs are at risk – they are more likely to say AI will help more than hurt them personally. For instance, 32% of workers in information and technology say AI will help more than hurt them personally, compared with 11% who say it will hurt more than it helps.

A graphic showing Jobs in U.S. that are likely to have high exposure to AI, such as budget analysts and data entry keyers, medium exposure, such as chief executives, or low exposure, such as barbers or child care workers

Which jobs are more exposed to AI? Work-related tasks vary in their exposure to AI. Some activities, such as repairing equipment, may have low exposure to AI, while others may have a medium or a high degree of exposure. Also, activities with different levels of exposure may be equally important within many jobs.

In our analysis, jobs are considered more exposed to artificial intelligence if AI can either perform their most important activities entirely or help with them.

For example, AI could replace, at least to a degree, the tasks “getting information” and “analyzing data or information,” or it could help with “working with computers.” These are also among the key tasks for judicial law clerks and web developers, and they are more exposed to AI than other workers. However, AI alone cannot “assist and care for others” or “perform general physical activities.” Thus, nannies – for whom these are essential activities – are less exposed to AI.

In our analysis, jobs that placed in the top 25% when ranked by the importance of work activities with high exposure to AI were judged to be the most exposed. Jobs that placed in the top 25% when ranked by the importance of work activities with low exposure to AI are the least exposed. The remaining jobs, such as chief executives, are likely to see a medium level of exposure to AI. (Refer to the appendix for an extended list of examples of occupations in each group.)

Will exposure to AI lead to job losses? The answer to this is unclear. Because AI could be used either to replace or complement what workers do, it is not known exactly which or how many jobs are in peril. For this reason, our study focuses on the level of exposure jobs have to AI. It sets aside the question of whether this exposure will lead to jobs lost or jobs gained.

Consider customer service agents. Evidence shows that AI could either replace them with more powerful chatbots or it could enhance their productivity. AI may also create new types of jobs for more skilled workers – much as the internet age generated new classes of jobs such as web developers. Another way AI-related developments might increase employment levels is by giving a boost to the economy by elevating productivity and creating more jobs overall.

Overall, AI is designed to mimic cognitive functions, and it is likely that higher-paying, white-collar jobs will see a fair amount of exposure to the technology. But our analysis doesn’t consider the role of AI-enabled machines or robots that may perform mechanical or physical tasks. Recent evidence suggests that industrial robots may reduce both employment and wages. Moreover, jobs held by low-wage workers, those without a high school diploma, and younger men are more exposed to the effects of industrial robots.

What data did we use? This analysis rests on data on the importance of 41 essential work activities in 873 occupations from the U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Information Network (O*NET, Version 27.3). We used our judgment to determine which of these activities have low, medium or high exposure to AI, but focus on the importance of low- and high-exposure activities. For additional analysis, the 873 occupations were further grouped to a total of 485 for which government data on employment and earnings of workers were available. That allowed us to analyze the potential impact of AI on different groups of workers. Other findings about how workers feel about AI come from a Center survey of 11,004 U.S. adults conducted between Dec. 12 and 18, 2022. (Refer to the text boxes and methodology for more details.)

Our other key findings

Jump to

·         Exposure of workers to AI

·         Earnings of workers with more, or less, exposure to AI

·         Workers’ views on the risk of AI to their jobs

·         Skills needed in high- and low-exposure jobs

·         Use of AI-related technologies by U.S. businesses

§  Most workers are more likely to work in jobs with less exposure to AI than in jobs with more exposure. This is true among men, Black and Hispanic workers, younger workers, and workers with less formal education, among others.

§  Asian workers and college graduates are among the highest paid of workers most exposed to AI. The most exposed workers earn more than the least exposed workers no matter their demographic characteristic, and the gap is especially striking among men, Asian workers and foreign-born workers.

§  Analytical skills are more important in jobs with more exposure to AI. These skills include critical thinking, writing, science and mathematics. Mechanical skills, such as equipment maintenance, are more important in jobs with less exposure to AI.

§  Scarcely any U.S. businesses – fewer than 3% – reported using advanced technologies such as machine learning or machine vision software to produce goods or services in 2020, according to the most recent available data from the U.S. Census Bureau. Still, these were large businesses who accounted for about 11% to 16% of overall employment.

Sidebar: How we determined the degree to which jobs are exposed to artificial intelligence

In our analysis, we considered two major questions when assessing the exposure of jobs to AI:

1.       What is the likelihood that a work activity may be substituted for or complemented by AI at this time? Is the likelihood high, medium or low?

2.      How important are activities with high or low exposure to AI in any given job, relative to the importance of other activities?

Classifying work activities by exposure to AI

The O*NET database lists a set of 41 work activities in common across all occupations. Examples of these activities are getting information, selling or influencing others, and handling and moving objects (refer to the methodology for the complete list). We used our collective judgment to designate each activity as having high, medium or low exposure to AI. Consensus on some activities, such as performing general physical activities or processing information, was reached quickly. The former is judged as having low exposure to AI and the latter is judged as having high exposure.

In other instances, we used additional details on a work activity to reach consensus. The question we asked ourselves at this stage was the following:

Are most of the detailed tasks that comprise a work activity exposed to AI?

For example, the job activity “performing for or working directly with the public” is ambiguous on the surface. But consider the list of detailed tasks that comprise this broad activity:

§  Audition for roles

§  Perform for recordings

§  Perform music for the public

§  Collaborate with others to prepare or perform artistic productions

§  Entertain public with comedic or dramatic performances

§  Perform dances

§  Operate gaming equipment

§  Conduct amusement or gaming activities

§  Respond to customer problems or complaints

§  Respond to customer inquiries

§  Answer customer questions about goods or services

§  Communicate with customers to resolve complaints or ensure satisfaction

§  Resolve customer complaints or problems

§  Correspond with customers to answer questions or resolve complaints

The consensus we reached was that most of these detailed tasks, such as interfacing with customers or creating music, had a high degree of exposure to AI. Only a few tasks – auditioning, comedic or dramatic performances and dancing – were considered to have relatively low exposure to AI. For that reason, the broad activity “performing for or working directly with the public” is deemed to have high exposure to AI.

At the other end of the exposure scale is the work activity “coaching and developing others,” entailing:

§  Coach others

§  Encourage patients during therapeutic activities

§  Visit individuals in their homes to provide support or information

§  Encourage students

§  Interact with patients to build rapport or provide emotional support

§  Support the professional development of others

§  Encourage patients or clients to develop life skills

The focus of most of these detailed tasks involves personal interaction. So, we judged that the activity “coaching and developing others” has low exposure to AI.

Overall, 16 work activities were assessed to have high exposure to AI, 16 more were judged to have medium exposure, and nine were deemed to have low exposure. (Refer to the methodology for where each activity was classified.)

Determining the level of exposure of a job to AI

The 41 work activities listed in O*NET are spread across all occupations in the O*NET database. That is to say, each occupation is a mix of low, medium and high AI-exposure activities. The question then is:

Which work activities are relatively more important in a job? Are high- or low-exposure activities more important than other activities?

To answer this, we first estimated the averages of the importance ratings for high-, medium- and low-exposure activities in each job, where the rating of each activity within a category is taken from the O*NET database. The rating for each activity ranges from one (not important) to five (extremely important).

Overall, among the 873 occupations we looked at, high-exposure activities were rated as being important to extremely important in 77% of occupations, and medium-exposure activities were similarly important in 72% of occupations. Low-exposure activities were rated as important in 39% of occupations. This suggests that high, medium and low exposure could simultaneously be important in a job.

The final step was to estimate the relative importance of high-, medium- or low-exposure activities in each job – that is, to determine which tasks are more important than the others in any given job. This procedure is described in the methodology. Occupations were then ranked two ways, once by the relative importance of high-exposure work activities and again by the relative importance of low-exposure work activities.

In our analysis, jobs that are most exposed to AI are in the top 25% of occupations ranked by the relative importance of high-exposure activities. Jobs that are least exposed to AI are in the top 25% of occupations ranked by the relative importance of low-exposure work activities. The other jobs may be thought of as having a medium level of exposure to AI. (Refer to the appendix for examples of occupations that are among the most or least exposed or have a medium level of exposure.)

To take an example, consider mechanical drafters, who prepare detailed working diagrams of machinery and mechanical devices. Mechanical drafters are among the workers most exposed to AI. For them, high-exposure activities have an average rating of 3.28 but low-exposure activities have an average rating of 2.36, where a rating of 3 means an activity is important.

For nannies, among the least exposed workers, high-exposure activities have an average rating of 2.36 but low-exposure activities have a rating of 3.03. 

A dot plot showing that activities with high exposure to AI are more important for mechanical drafters and less important for nannies

Previous research on the impact of AI on U.S. workers

Our analysis follows in the footsteps of other researchers who have recently examined the impact of AI on the workplace. Eloundou, Manning, Mishkin and Rock (March 2023) conclude that about one-in-five U.S. workers may see an impact on half or more of their job tasks. Felten, Raj and Seamans (April 2021) find that white-collar occupations requiring advanced degrees are most exposed to AI, as are industries providing financial or legal services. Webb (January 2020) reports that high-skill occupations, highly educated and older workers will be more impacted by AI, but he does not draw conclusions about the nature or the extent of the impact on workers. Our findings are broadly consistent with the results of these analyses.

(PEW)

JULY 26, 2023

Source:https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2023/07/26/which-u-s-workers-are-more-exposed-to-ai-on-their-jobs/

 

805-43-16/Polls

Americans Name China As The Country Posing The Greatest Threat To The U.S.

Negative views of China have become more common in the United States in recent years, and a new Pew Research Center survey shows that Americans also widely see China as the greatest threat facing their nation.

How we did this

A bar chart showing that half of Americans name China as the greatest threat to the U.S.

§  In an open-ended question allowing Americans to name which country they see as the greatest threat to the U.S., 50% name China – almost three times the share who name Russia (17%).

§  Another 4% say no country poses the greatest threat to the U.S.

§  Only 2% of Americans name North Korea – and the same share describe the U.S. itself as the greatest threat.

No other country apart from China, Russia, North Korea or the U.S. itself is named by more than 1% of Americans as the greatest threat facing their nation. Nearly a quarter of respondents (24%) provided no response, which is not uncommon for open-ended questions.

A table showing that China has risen in Americans’ ranking of greatest threats over the years.

Over time, the Center has changed the way we ask about the greatest threats to the U.S., making it difficult to compare responses from year to year. Still, Americans have not always seen China as the top threat to the United States. When we last asked a question of this sort in 2019, equal shares of Americans pointed to China and Russia as the greatest threat facing their country. In 2014, Russia was at the top of Americans’ list as the greatest threat to the U.S., while in 2007, it was Iran.

Partisan differences

Today, both Democrats and Republicans identify China as the greatest threat facing the country, but there are nonetheless significant partisan and ideological differences on this question.

Republicans and Republican-leaning independents are more likely than Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents to name China as the greatest threat to the United States (63% vs. 40%). And conservative Republicans are much more likely than moderate and liberal Republicans to say this (74% vs. 47%).

The opposite pattern appears when it comes to Russia: Liberal Democrats are the ideological group most likely to see Russia as the greatest threat to the U.S., while conservative Republicans are the least likely to say this.

A chart showing that conservative Republicans especially likely to say China is the top threat to the U.S..

Age, gender differences

Some 61% of Americans ages 65 and older name China as the greatest threat facing the U.S., compared with 36% of those 18 to 29. Men are also more likely than women to name China (59% vs. 42%).

In the case of Russia, there are no significant age differences: Americans ages 18 to 29 are about as likely as those 65 and older to see Russia as the greatest threat to the U.S. (18% vs. 15%). When it comes to gender, women are slightly more likely than men to name Russia (19% vs. 15%).

Perceptions of China and Russia as an economic and security threat

A bar chart that shows Americans see China as an economic and security threat but see Russia mostly as a security threat.

After asking respondents to name the country they see as the biggest threat to the U.S., the survey asked Americans two follow-up questions. These questions explore how much Americans see each country as a threat to the U.S. economy and as a threat to U.S. national security, respectively.

Among those who name China as the greatest threat facing the U.S., nearly all see China as posing at least a fair amount of threat to both America’s economy and its national security. In fact, around three-quarters say China poses a great deal of threat to both.

In contrast, while many Americans see Russia as posing at least a fair amount of threat to the U.S. economy and national security, fewer say it poses a great deal of threat, particularly when it comes to the U.S. economy. Only 36% of Americans who consider Russia to be America’s primary international threat say it poses a great deal of threat to the U.S. economy. Around two-thirds of Americans who see Russia as the top threat (66%) say it poses a great deal of threat to U.S. national security.

Which country is the top ally of the U.S.?

A bar chart that shows about a fifth of Americans see the UK as the United States’ top ally.

The survey also asked Americans in a separate open-ended question which country is the most important ally to the United States. Around half of respondents (48%) did not provide a substantive answer.

Among those who offered a substantive response, one “special relationship” stands out: Around a fifth of Americans (22%) name the United Kingdom as their country’s most important ally. This is nearly four times the share who name America’s northern neighbor, Canada (6%). Fewer name Israel (4%), Germany (3%), China (2%), Japan (2%), the EU (1%), France (1%), Mexico (1%) or Russia (1%).

Due to changes in the way we ask this question, we’re unable to make direct comparisons to past surveys. But, when we’ve asked Americans about national allies in the past, the public has consistently named the UK above all other countries. Canada and Israel have also been frequently mentioned since 2007, and the EU has also ranked highly.

Partisan, age differences

Partisan differences over which country is the greatest ally of the U.S. are relatively muted. Republicans and Republican-leaning independents are more likely than Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents to name the UK (26% vs. 21%) and Israel (8% vs. 1%). Over three-quarters of respondents who named Israel are conservative Republicans (79%). Democrats are slightly more likely than Republicans to name Canada (9% vs. 5%) and Germany (4% vs. 1%).

Older Americans are much more likely than younger Americans to see both the UK and Israel as America’s top ally. Younger Americans are somewhat more likely than their older counterparts to say the U.S. has no allies; they are also significantly less likely to offer a response on this question.

Perceptions of what makes for a strong alliance

The survey also asked Americans how important each of the following are for America’s relationship with its allies: security and defense ties, economic ties and shared values.

A dot plot that shows Americans see defense ties as a crucial part of the United States’ alliances with different countries.

For each named country, defense ties are seen as key. For example, 94% of those who name Israel as America’s top ally say defense ties are very important to the U.S.-Israel relationship. At least three-quarters of respondents say the same for each of the other countries commonly named as America’s top ally.

The public also sees economic ties as relatively important. For most countries named, at least seven-in-ten Americans say economic ties are very important for the United States’ relationship with that country. In the cases of Japan and Canada, Americans say economic ties are about as important as defense ties.

For three of the most-named countries, Americans see shared values as less important than defense or economic ties. For example, fewer than half of those who name Japan as America’s top ally (46%) say shared values are very important for the U.S.-Japan relationship. Israel, however, is a notable exception: More Americans see shared values as very important to the U.S.-Israel relationship than say the same about economic ties (79% vs. 68%).

(PEW)

JULY 27, 2023

Source:https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/07/27/americans-name-china-as-the-country-posing-the-greatest-threat-to-the-us/

 

AUSTRALIA

805-43-17/Polls

1.43 Million Australians ‘At Risk’ Of ‘Mortgage Stress’ In June 2023 Representing 28.7% Of Mortgage Holders

New research from Roy Morgan shows an estimated 1.43 million (28.7%) mortgage holders were ‘At Risk’ of ‘mortgage stress’ in the three months to June 2023. This period encompassed two interest rate increases of 0.25% taking official interest rates to 4.1% in June.

This is the equal highest number of mortgage holders considered ‘At Risk’ of mortgage stress (the same as for the three months to May 2023) for over 15 years since there were 1.46 million ‘At Risk’ in May 2008.

Over 530,000 more households at risk of mortgage stress after a year of interest rate increases

The number of Australians ‘At Risk’ of mortgage stress has increased by 539,000 over the last year as the RBA increased interest rates at twelve of the last fourteen-monthly meetings. Official interest rates are now at 4.1% in July 2023, the highest official interest rates since May 2012 over a decade ago.

Despite the sharp increase during the last year the number of Australians in mortgage stress (1,434,000, 28.7% of mortgage holders) remains below the high reached during the Global Financial Crisis in early 2008 of 1,455,000 (35.6%) – although this level is set to be reached with further interest rate increases.

The number of mortgage holders considered ‘Extremely At Risk’, has now increased to 943,000 (19.6%) in the three months to June 2023 which is now significantly above the long-term average over the last 15 years of 15.4%.

Mortgage Stress – Owner-Occupied Mortgage-Holders

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/USceySXVIv1YO0FH535s0k-BFSsgzYHYb1TWw4ESLNVnbmhdIdqvW4oIA0Nv9xKOG3Pw-r2qT9d0w3aTp0BznrwYxfgrLo_pgnBE71kjvzzvi2qsJF3YDUGLyHgBWXipKeFjLDrLmgmv

Source: Roy Morgan Single Source (Australia), average interviews per 3 month period April 2007 – June 2023, n=2,743.
Base: Australians 14+ with owner occupied home loan.

Mortgage Risk set to increase to over 1.51 million if RBA raises rates by +0.25% in August

Roy Morgan has modelled the impact of two potential RBA interest rate increases of +0.25% in both August (+0.25% to 4.35%) and September (+0.25% to 4.6%).

In June 28.7% of mortgage holders, 1,434,000, were considered ‘At Risk’ and this would increase to over 30% of mortgage holders by September 2023 if these two increases occurred.

If the RBA raises interest rates by +0.25% in August to 4.35% there will be 30.0% (up 1.3% points) of mortgage holders, 1,515,000, considered ‘At Risk’ in August 2023 – an increase of 81,000.

If the RBA raises interest rates by a further +0.25% in September to 4.6% there will be 30.7% (up 2% points) of mortgage holders, 1,551,000, considered ‘At Risk’ in September 2023 – an increase of 117,000.

Mortgage Risk at different level of interest rate increases in August & September 2023

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/Cz8m67b2icmuZJCTPueW1VoGIGs46O5j1GgG8xdYqMzx_TWCFTKHr0PcizpR5W4f8gB0qq5oRd_S37eV7_eE6ebpsbWeo9Kr8gHIxwXBrBTns8GIi_lnpyflIdXLPnbjs1xyJ4mbmNYT

Source: Roy Morgan Single Source (Australia), April – June 2023, n=3,656. Base: Australians 14+ with owner occupied home loan.

How are mortgage holders considered ‘At Risk’ or ‘Extremely At Risk’ determined?

Roy Morgan considers the risk of ‘mortgage stress’ among Mortgage holders in two ways:

Mortgage holders are considered ‘At Risk’[1] if their mortgage repayments are greater than a certain percentage of household income – depending on income and spending.

Mortgage holders are considered ‘Extremely at Risk’[2] if even the ‘interest only’ is over a certain proportion of household income.

Unemployment is the factor which has the largest impact on income and mortgage stress

It is worth understanding that this is a conservative model, essentially assuming all other factors remain the same. And of course we are already seeing an increase in unemployment (Australian unemployment increases to 10.3% in June – the highest since January 2023 – June 30, 2023).

While all eyes are on interest rates the greatest impact on an individual, or household’s, ability to pay their mortgage is not interest rates, it’s if they lose their job or main source of income.

Michele Levine, CEO Roy Morgan, says mortgage stress remained around its highest levels in over a decade in June with 1.43 million mortgage holders considered ‘At Risk’ of mortgage stress as the RBA’s interest rate increases early in 2023 flowed through to the wider mortgage market:

“The latest Roy Morgan data shows mortgage stress in the Australian housing market has remained high with 1.43 million mortgage holders (28.7%) defined as ‘At Risk’ in June 2023, up 539,000 (+8.3% points) on a year ago just after the RBA began a record-breaking series of interest rate rises.

“The figures for June 2023 take into account all twelve RBA interest rate increases which lifted official interest rates from 0.1% in May last year to 4.1% by June. Since then, the RBA has decided to leave interest rates unchanged at its most recent meeting in the first week of July.

“The ABS monthly CPI figures for the year to May 2023 show Australian inflation dropping to 5.6%, down from 6.8% in the year to April 2023. This drop in CPI follows the ANZ-Roy Morgan Inflation Expectations – which also fell in May. However, this monthly decline proved to be short-lived with Inflation Expectations increasing substantially by 0.4% points in June.

“The next ABS monthly, and quarterly, CPI figures for the year to June 2023 are due to be released this week on Wednesday July 26 2023 and will play a key role in the RBA’s determinations about whether to increase interest rates again next week.

“If the RBA does raise interest rates again next week by 0.25% Roy Morgan forecasts mortgage stress is set to increase to over 1.51 million mortgage holders (30.0%) considered ‘At Risk’ by August 2023.

“Of even more concern is the rise in mortgage holders considered ‘Extremely At Risk’, now estimated at 943,000 (19.6%) in June 2023 – the highest for over a decade since September 2011 (22.6%). This is an increase of over 400,000 mortgage holders from a year ago (+7.8% points).

“When considering the data on mortgage stress it is always important to appreciate interest rates are only one of the variables that determines whether a mortgage holder is considered ‘At Risk’. The variable that has the largest impact on whether a borrower falls into the ‘At Risk’ category is related to household income – which is directly related to employment.

“The latest figures show rising interest rates are causing a large increase in the number of mortgage holders considered ‘At Risk’ and further increases will spike these numbers even further. If there is a sharp rise in unemployment, mortgage stress is set to increase towards the record high of 35.6% of mortgage holders considered ‘At Risk’ in May 2008 during the Global Financial Crisis.”

(Roy Morgan)

July 25, 2023

Source:https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/9289-mortgage-stress-risk-june-2023

 

805-43-18/Polls

ANZ-Roy Morgan New Zealand Consumer Confidence Down 1.8pts To 83.7 In July

ANZ-Roy Morgan Consumer Confidence fell 1.8 points in July to 83.7, with the fall driven by the question of whether it’s a good time to buy a major household item, which fell from a net figure of -27% to -39%. That doesn’t bode well for retailers.

Inflation expectations bounced back almost completely from their sharp fall last month, rising from 4.3% back up to 4.7% – still trending lower, however, and well off their high of over 6% in late-2021.

The ANZ-Roy Morgan Consumer Confidence Index eased slightly in July, and remains at low levels.

Turning to the detail:

·         Perceptions of current personal financial situations eased 1 point to a net -25%.

·         A net 11% expect to be better off this time next year, unchanged.

·         A net 39% think it’s a bad time to buy a major household item, a sharp 12-point fall, to be back around its lows (excluding lockdowns). That’s the best spending indicator in the survey, and suggests consumers are indeed “cooling their jets”.

·         Perceptions regarding the economic outlook in 12 months’ time lifted 2 points to a net -32%. The 5-year-ahead measure also lifted 2 points to a net +3%.

·         House price inflation expectations lifted from 1.6% to 1.9%. Expectations are strongest in Canterbury (4.4%) but are at least 1% everywhere.

·         Headline confidence would have fallen by more were it not for a sharp lift in Canterbury, which saw a sharp lift across all questions except for whether it’s a good time to buy a major household item.

·         Two-year-ahead CPI inflation expectations jumped back from 4.3% to 4.7%, but the trend remains downward.

Households are being buffeted currently, with headwinds outweighing tailwinds. The cost of living is an obvious headwind, though this shouldn’t be overstated, insofar as average incomes have broadly kept pace. The rapid rise in mortgage rates and the ongoing rollover from lower rates is another clear headwind.

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/by8cbjLWW9o2rFZZgMs6ZBnhnTbp2eqYQNqXZvc5ocJXgO-n2b4CWDUV-sDBv0SssH4SJl1ApeVNNd5bLY3VMH3hXHxfWCgx1l-mg1ljIyCewN4Llccry2md3Y2y7gZpZ3rxLrT1_HPH

 

(Roy Morgan)

July 28, 2023

Source:https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/9291-anz-roy-morgan-nz-consumer-confidence-july-2023

 

MULTICOUNTRY STUDIES

805-43-19/Polls

What Worries The World – July 2023, Survey Across 29 Nations

However, worry about rising prices now seems to be on the decline, having dropped 2pp from June. 

Our monthly What Worries the World survey explores what the public thinks are the most important social and political issues, drawing on more than ten years of data to place the latest scores in context. This wave was conducted between June 3rd – July 7th, 2023.

Key findings

·         Inflation is still the highest concern this month. But this month sees a further easing of 2pp to 38%.

·         This month’s level of inflation worry is the lowest it’s been this year and the lowest score since June 2022.

·         Ten nations – Argentina, Australia, Canada, Germany, Great Britain, India, Poland, Singapore, Turkey, and the US – have rising prices as their biggest concern. One fewer than last month. France is no longer on the list.

·         Across all countries, worry about inflation is followed by crime & violence (31%, +2pp), poverty & social inequality (30%, -1pp), unemployment (26%, -1pp), and financial & political corruption (26%, +1pp) which together make up the top five global worries.

·         In France, worry about crime and violence has reached its highest level since June 2021, leaping 21pp this month to 49%.

·         Climate change is still the seventh biggest concern globally, with 17% worried, unchanged from last month. Canada has over a quarter (27%) worried, increasing 5pp.

·         Coronavirus worry has dropped 1pp since last month, and it remains at 17th out of 18, with less than one in 10 (5%) picking it. This is the lowest level we have recorded since adding it to the survey in April 2020.

·         The “Right vs wrong direction” monitor is unchanged this month. Almost two-fifths (38%), on a global country average, think their country is heading in the ‘right’ direction.

Ipsos  | Top five worries

Inflation

Just under two-fifths (38%) now put inflation as one of their top worries. This is a 2pp decrease from June, making it the lowest level of concern seen this year and the lowest score since June 2022. February 2023 saw the highest score of 43%.

Argentina (68%) appears to be cooling off gradually, despite being the most concerned country, and is down 3pp from last month. This marks a further decline on May levels, when they broke inflation worry records.

Other highly concerned nations have experienced similar drops, like Poland (59%) which is down by 6pp, and Hungary (44%) which has decreased by 7pp.

This month,10 nations (Argentina, Australia, Canada, Germany, Great Britain, India, Poland, Singapore, Turkey, and the US) have inflation as their biggest worry – one fewer than last month.

For more on public attitudes towards inflation, see our recent 29-country Global Inflation Monitor.

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/PyiTEElHsZLXJd2ionx4VF8SiFuVnUUcrfX1Rlu5xHgGxwTrTEl-2DDrRWuWE46XVTU6VbTYVV6o-_bnXqrUTtiXBbV_fUmX_UwjnEcPKBMKYOLp-PTz5Q22-LnRGol8Yue3FAnMWeZp

Satisfaction with the economy

Across 29 countries, 36% of people describe the current economic situation in their country as “good”, unchanged from last month.

The top three most positive countries about their country’s economic situation are all in Asia Pacific: Singapore (79%), India (68%), and Indonesia (66%).

But with Japan (14%) and South Korea (16%) taking two of the bottom three spots in the rankings, positive economic sentiment is not evenly spread throughout the region.

The “good” economic score has risen most from last month in Colombia (+12pts) followed by the US (+9pts). A 2pt rise also sees Spain record a new highest-ever level of economic optimism (36%).

Meanwhile, there are significant decreases from last month in Turkey
(-9pts) and the Netherlands (-7pts).

Crime & Violence

Nearly a third have crime and violence (31%) as their top worry. This is after a 2pp increase from June, making it the second-highest worry.

Following the riots in France, crime and violence has leaped up from last month by 21pp to nearly half (49%). This is the first time that this issue has been France’s biggest concern since June 2021.

Five other countries currently have crime and violence as their top concern: Sweden (61%), Chile (59%), Peru (57%), Mexico (53%), and Israel (48%).

The Netherlands previously had just over a quarter worried about this issue last month. However, they have dropped down the list after decreasing 6pp to 20%.

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/0qw12Q2YN3Ku8vn7nS55lGtEJAxPIeqAEpmfC0ooyYyPfttFhL1qJWpzpEFmo5Nx7uqq5VG5Biomc3nfvURtSxisri5SF_juInU3qxTtT4pQqsQBtAhhILSo45WqqgXjlXkdEAEAA0RF

Poverty & Social Inequality

Poverty & social inequality is now third on our list of 18 worries with 30% saying it is an issue in their country. This is after a 1pp fall and a 2pp rise for crime and violence.

Brazil (41%), Japan (37%), and the Netherlands (40%) all have inequality as their top concern. The Dutch are particularly worried this month, seeing a 7pp hike, putting them in third.

Indonesia (32%) was first last month but has since tumbled down the list, experiencing a big drop-off, down 12pp.

Turkey (28%) was in the top ten most concerned countries last month but has since slipped out of that position down our chart after falling 10pp.

Coronavirus

Coronavirus remains ranked 17th out of 18 worries between maintaining social programmes and access to credit, dropping 1pp to 5% – it’s the lowest ranking since records began in April 2020. This time last year, the pandemic score was double at 14%.

Just two years ago (July 2021) the issue scored 36% (a 31pp difference from this month) where it was the biggest concern, with 10 nations citing it as their single greatest worry.

Indonesia (5%) and Thailand (13%) were the two most concerned nations last month, respectively. Now, Thailand is third after a 5pp fall and Indonesia is 11th after a 13pp decrease.

Climate Change

Climate change ranks seventh out of 18 global concerns in our What Worries the World survey, between healthcare and taxes. This month’s worry has not moved. We will be monitoring this measure carefully in next month’s release, bearing in mind the very high temperatures being experienced in many parts of the world.

Singapore is still the most concerned country about climate change, with 31% choosing it as an issue in the country, up 1pp. It’s the country’s third biggest concern, behind inflation and unemployment.

Italy was the fourth most worried country last month but has now fallen off the top ten after losing 8pp to 20%.

Canada has now entered the top five, with just over a quarter (27%) worried – a 5pp increase. It is the country’s joint fourth-highest concern, alongside taxes.

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/dgoMMVReY1pJNS3h9zL2RcLtfdavuILoNK2hPDsfwMuJ_LZjkIoVjeVVgQsLqhCdy66VGmqkI8ovHck8lTUb6TJhq3pqp9wZairuWXabVN0JV77nmx5ZLwa-J_z2enoPhrpWs0QMy43Q

(Ipsos Global)

24 July, 2023

Source:https://www.ipsos.com/en/what-worries-world-july-2023

 

805-43-20/Polls

Youth Outlooks: Life Quality And Economic Conditions, Survey Across 12 MENA Countries

What drives differences in future optimism in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region? Part I of this series suggested  that there is no perfect correlation between quality of life and evaluations of economic conditions. MENA citizens can believe that their quality of life in the future will be better, even if they simultaneously have less faith in the economic situation improving in the coming two to three years. Furthermore, age alone was not a factor in explaining differences. With few exceptions, opinions of youth ages 18 to 29 did not differ significantly from older cohorts ages 30 and over.

Part II of this series suggests that rather than age alone, it is the intersection of age and gender that crystallizes significant differences between young and older MENA citizens. It additionally reveals country-specific patterns, with the youth in Sudan and Mauritania being significantly more positive than their older counterparts. Introducing gender as a factor highlights that young women are more positive, especially in Mauritania and Sudan, and particularly in questions about quality of life. This offers insight into perhaps a gendered socialization of future outlooks, where women, especially young women, tend to exhibit more positive attitudes than their older and male counterparts. 

Overall, women are more positive than men, with young women being more positive in country-specific cases – Mauritania and Sudan – than both men of their age cohort and older women. In nine countries, young women are more likely than women ages 30+ to say that the quality of their lives is better than their parents’. The gap is particularly large (10+ percentage points) in Tunisia, Algeria, Jordan, Mauritania, and Iraq. Young women in six countries are also more likely than women aged 30+ to say that their children’s lives will be better than theirs, showcasing more optimism.

In addition to gaps among different cohorts of women, there are also significant differences between young men and young women. Young women in seven countries are likelier than young men to say their quality of life is better than their parents’. In six countries, young women are likelier than young men to believe the quality of their children’s lives will be better than their own. 

This positive pattern among young women compared to older women does not robustly hold when asked about the state of their country’s economy. 

Regarding the current state of their countries’ economies, only in Iraq (+13 points) and Sudan (+5 percent) are young women more positive than older women. On the future state of their countries’ economies, Algeria and Egypt are the only countries where young women are significantly more positive compared to women aged 30+ (Algeria: + 6 points, and Egypt at + 5 points). When compared to men, young women are more positive than young men about the future of their countries’ economies in six countries, and women ages 30+ in five countries compared to men ages 30+. 

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/DwWZJJf3_OP93UslbLnyP0rO6rDv_4ATvquYHhh07AJ0Ce1eZ37aV7VFYuMuzf_DiRzOfxBMo8_C9qqN8TpAPKQQ38i3GQXW_JHHDqtH_6SQmIRM7afDXZ7DCoNtymKOTpUCGEt69lyI

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/2PyBm8XQrQLZED51DHU4gt5Ebej2LoOEC6Glb-QMq4kD5-ldyqdYPAYB1LDdwR-5tFjLVAenIOrUI6d4Rh8uArt65vI4tPa0QXRaIvS8rQw69uukQSx4ZRRJC0pQSqTPKuJLRg4DPEJc

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/A3C_Ul1npHwDymCPbjjWySmjRVtwEClFDGznWEt0ggl-hvaKOS5rjy9HOdLZNCsQQ-GcAxfLkQDYKPDvV4-d8zINHafJ3fltdcoC6Yqh8lZ8yYAlFhm_yLY4ierz_XZarfr838vWQOUj

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/FrLlr9lkriCSDjVLoT5wQBzTd4sffMDIBtJ-29IvfNQgqPBfnp3tSDgs6TtA0__LH5PZLNrTR5R1gT7wbzRgmFSw9P5G4b87sTE_87Xn8FsG33fZ2PPn5KHc3_27gfTdK-9Fit9Zh6qW

In Mauritania, young people and especially young women are more positive compared to older women, particularly on questions covering life quality. Youth in Mauritania are more optimistic about questions on life quality compared to older generations. Mauritanian youth show the largest difference when it comes to their quality of life, with a + 7-point percent gap between the two age-groups. The difference between age-groups is also substantial when asked about their children’s quality of life, with a + 13-point gap. Young Mauritanian women are especially more optimistic than older age cohorts about life quality, at + 10 points higher than older women on their current life quality, and at + 23 points higher on the future of their children’s life quality. Mauritania’s population is predominantly young with more than 60 percent of the total population being under the age of 25. While there isn’t much that speaks to the attitudes of Mauritanian youth, an interesting avenue of exploration is their social and political participation and whether this contributes to the particular positivity on the topic of life quality.  

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/26vfxdsRrrqlHnfS-IZ6JlupeTfYPHY9vvEmcb0O_VvKfCzn4IMODZxwirHTK4no6izisAdOrMrsBhfQydAqI-3trKuuwdMP8_uR3CUrvBcP2gQFa2_0Y8qwBrnJcsSrdjvpTG_UHAuP

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/5VHHXGzsR2MoVMkUaW3x2DqfsIcaeSnACV9V5vPzrZBTrGRBoc9Phw15oxU4RxB8qdNZITfcfpFmcC4a12SYVnMmzF5IdbrMENmnZz_OYJMNpGW82XIQ2hMdQgPTODpZZDd_e1xWwmOi

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/I1fo-j2b2qoWyWrqSs5a1lP0J41zACSVJVSmiskbbE-CWbqaDfZWglmJzXAEDreuPIG8RyTwz-4UoDlHkd5ApF3ntMAHmAEzRXjjqbi5lKqSuKgpE6mDJrai5USVj_VBr6C5FWYVIPxP

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/z4RS_4z0Yd2cLNb0_X9ZT5GVE7s8Vwc7Oc3q-3NN8GLyXT_zTfXIl7FRm9M0nMCDJZVKFdjaeugagkTlJMLKkeGvRP3IE-1jCj3SG2LSM30cSeCIMPm1DUddZdkTPeTIHsO0qDooz0IO

Similarly, the youth in Sudan, both men and women, are more optimistic compared to older generations across both topics. The youth are +5 percent more likely to report positive perceptions about their quality of life compared to their parents, and +10 percent more likely to say their children’s quality of life will be better. Sudanese youth show more positive opinions about the economy, with a +5 percent gap when asked about the current economic state and a +6 percent gap on the future of the economy. Young Sudanese women are also more positive than women ages 30+ on all matters except for the future state of Sudan’s economy. They are more positive by + 5 points on the current quality of their lives and the current state of Sudan’s economy, and by + 9 points about the quality of their children’s lives. Sudanese men also notably show some positivity compared to older men. They are more positive by + 11 points on the future of their children’s lives, and by + 6 points on the future of their country’s economy. 

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/GrkEooVxb3gWxSy_ofrX7sNWwy5CPrCIvGJY6FvpbCjXMCPsj6blUaoMODLNfxgOEA52kNOiMh5j35F07tAt5YI9poME7GpTOP7GBKENprzP0lkpcNnTJKwGN0Bdt88eOEAZl-5DmMY6

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/tbtMeIMcJgPiUp_4Zf3XiPEQIm4-JV4CKD7wLGoQ4azkdy0GsZvsub7ndECFqikPbFUe12lc1AFkb1ifPBQUXzsdhHa7W6kkVw7TXj1ES0jURzAd_mY5lSqeyeLLIiEeK2ZtqHPbWE_A

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/TUupj5GeoDcmKUMCpoOyLxKJENdDYKy-8zfW_bxmQLH56FtRYk2SnRUsjao65Kghn7V3ogM9RaW5cVRlkFrZIYJxAlL_WcPJDa0aOBmxbI_EeHgfrbiIrYg4rfOBD0_Pukzdhd4fpupC

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/mVSHxM-VCRKajRIzX-4nTBxNMMrt-TI3Q54CE2Y-IEpamMcj5jg2ZJzPddk3gxSEcc-mu2ND-WwbX9WweanaB-F9kQxIot5r8vqSgJcM9IjSkZ72V8gI5E0lnu30QmBxch-KP8_weDJe

Across most categories, the youth in Sudan have showcased more positivity than their older counterparts, and particularly young women in Sudan. This is maybe indicative of the youth’s, and especially young women’s, prominent and essential social and political participation in Sudan, considering that the age segment between 15 and 30 years old constitutes 60 percent of the country’s total population. From organizing and driving demonstrations against Al-Bashir’s rule in 2019, to leading protests against the military rule in 2021, youth are at the forefront of demanding reform and change for the future of the country, but are often not included in the governmental processes. Notably, the Arab Barometer Wave VII survey in Sudan was fielded between the 30th of January and the 11th of April 2022, one year before the most recent violence that first broke out on the 15th of April. As such, the results don’t take into account current attitudes, and need more nuancing in light of current conflict and the displacement of thousands. 

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/Tr8YWXmzxoIsI4jQmVNju_Q5Je78prh6_PA7u4Tp2Llaiu9OM4K_q_23K3TeaPRZQckKIhGpODDNmfknQ-XnOd9lmw3LcCwzdYjh1Q2XZbe5f28DCGgmTvnzbL6ONg02s50ZOWaG_KvV

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/KJmF8M1DNO6WmB7lzMrm5SK-zipX_haXEQ1XDjcVYltld2VhCqo4osWL5bHExAfCsktRSbzjma4o_1Tyn2HUBMhzDYVhmBsA_40KoP3zZhhMMEmTgB6y151-YF3dm9ciRvJ-jpv2NEbP

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/_ANS3UBUIu5xdL6gg_VJMO0EOiVfwrXQvjNrq07K3LsomucNA6dsumrA0iOd8j5qB1KPVn3GtCF7ICkvUMvAGhBY9n6Srdd1Zgd5IbYk03ZZ_S3REbHSJ0Mc-lThcQHqz7HmA4XJjpb4

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/Cw7Xtx0ejHYQumOHH6AlV4dqz59cPdEpqLgR6ZfYKpnHekFSd_IjC0Njoux5df0eNHvYRyFD5xcJYbVAYsIDEDpleSN0PdHqFvD_HQf4c_r9Eua7NMjWnMmbbDj0QaDwAyd1Uobnf_xc

Findings from the seventh wave challenge notions that the youth across the region are different in perceptions and attitudes from other age groups, calling for a further understanding and investigation of how they vary in different countries and across gender. Young women are ultimately more positive in their attitudes about quality of life and the economy,  with a focus on Mauritania and Sudan. Especially in Sudan, and in the midst of the conflict and the displacement of thousands of people, a nuanced approach is needed; one that centers Sudanese voices and efforts at this juncture.

(Arabbarometer)

July 25, 2023

Source:https://www.arabbarometer.org/2023/07/youth-outlooks-life-quality-and-economic-conditions-part-ii/

 

805-43-21/Polls

A Recent Yougov Survey Across 18 Nations Shows That Globally The Majority Of Consumers Prefer To Buy Products From Their Own Country

A recent YouGov Surveys survey shows that globally the majority of consumers prefer to buy products from their own country: as many as 60% of these agree with this statement. 46% believe that, overall, local products are of higher quality and 53% agree that it is a patriotic duty to buy products of national origin whenever possible.

While a significant percentage of consumers say they are indifferent, very few are opposed to any of these claims. For example, only 9% of these would be less likely to buy goods produced by a local company.

In all 18 markets analyzed, the tendency to prefer local production prevails, thus confirming a strong propensity towards Made in, albeit for different reasons and with different percentages.

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/kDw3zYjGjPqDqROAQ4XuYYQLQhL1gf2RbT4l1dxnE1GhgfP7vgyJ9O9yQWSeYehYMKBZ_aPJTHZDge5NFNX0ddCg2P3Wrd19QMAXSJnhvhiFMezLonO8O2J_N_ih9BBb6WPmbesg_hIN

In Italy and France, there is a greater propensity to favour national companies. Analyzing the Italian scenario, 69% of consumers say they are more inclined to buy products made in Italy, 61% think that local products are of higher quality and 60% believe that buying from local companies is a patriotic duty.

Nordic consumers are in the middle, with 62% of Swedes and 60% of Danes saying they are more likely to buy from domestic companies. In both markets, purchases of local products tend to be considered less than the world average as a patriotic duty.

Finally, in Great Britain, despite the exit of the United Kingdom from the European Union, the protectionist attitude does not seem to prevail clearly. In fact, among the markets considered, it remains one of the least likely to favor domestic companies: just over half of respondents (54%) say they buy from British companies and only 31% say that products made in their country are superior to those imported.

(YouGov Italy)

July 25, 2023

Source:https://it.yougov.com/news/2023/07/25/global-i-consumatori-preferiscono-acquistare-prodo/

 

805-43-22/Polls

A New International Yougov Survey, Conducted In 12 Countries, Looks At Favourability Towards Having To Travel By Ten Forms Of Transportation

A new international YouGov survey, conducted in 12 countries, looks at favourability towards having to travel by ten forms of transportation (including walking).

Walking is the most favourable way of getting about in most countries, although notably not in the US where the 74% with a positive opinion of getting around on foot is lower than the 77% for driving in a car or the 81% for being a passenger in a car. This is also the lowest favourability score for walking of all the countries in the study.

That Americans are less likely to favour walking than other countries is perhaps unsurprising when you account for how difficult it is to get anywhere by walking in American cities. According to the organization Walk Score, out of the 130 American cities with populations of 200,000 or more, 90 are branded ‘car dependent’, with most daily errands requiring a car to complete.

Americans aren’t the only country where walking doesn’t top the transport list: in Singapore people have slightly more positive attitudes towards being a car passenger (86%), or taking the train (85%) or bus (82%) than walking (80%).

As well as having the lowest favourability towards walking, Americans are also the least likely to have a favourable view of travelling by public bus (32%), subway or metro (35%), coach (or ‘charter bus’ to Americans, 39%) and train (59%). Indeed, Americans are the only nationality to have a net negative view of subway travel (-8) and particularly so for having to use a public bus (-23).

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/j7vFMU9SIt6ab7aEHwIKZfgyKR5nl97fCYbYM2XNqmQhMqK_QT9nQod4nYnM2fnnPMTq5rWB6Z89iqHLyXIW8Ie7CNltEzw_721yVP5_zAC-_TeDuejBD4GYhU3R5s7qcIopKpNi5SEl

The 77% of Americans who have a favourable view of driving a car is among the highest of the survey - slightly behind Australia’s 81%, and similar to Canada’s and Italy’s 77%, Spain’s 76%, and Sweden and Poland’s 74%.

Singaporeans, by contrast, have a far less positive view of having to drive in a car than all the other countries surveyed, with 54% expressing a positive opinion at the prospect and 29% a negative one. This is no surprise given the city-state’s frequent traffic jams, expensive car ownership system, and aggressive drivers.

On your bike… but not in Britain

Britain has the most negative view of travelling by bicycle, being the only country with a net negative view overall, although at -4 this means Britons are effectively divided (43% positive vs 46% negative). This is a far cry from the 80% of Poles who have a favourable view of getting around by bike, making them the most pro-cycling country.

Britons are also only country to have a negative opinion overall of coach travel. While the 42% with a favourable view of having to catch a coach isn’t quite the lowest level, it is outbalanced by the 48% who have an unfavourable view – the highest of any country.

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/JsrkTYsCDAkNj3GM2s5P4Ev1juxa6acWtMtDpctKQQ9w4pEsskW0vGnIDm9sIthKF2gWzhmMJNiH6HuEELn-tT_JOOmCgUo2F0kR2kghyqB7jHGT22nc9b_FXygni7DC95NNUB-cVOwr

Despite perennial grumbling about train services in Britain, the nation does not rate bottom for the form of transport. That honour goes to Germany, where 59% of people have a favourable view of trains compared to 33% a negative one. The same number of Americans have a favourable view of train travel (59%), although they are less likely to have an unfavourable view (23%).

In Britain, 65% of people have a positive opinion of taking the train, compared to 28% with a negative opinion.

Germans join Americans in having the lowest proportion of people who have a favourable view of walking (74%), although unlike in the US this score makes it the most popular way of getting around.

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/5cfhn07Zss0F9tejqgnDYPVPF115qitaRpRaMTtQY2Xx53fU-7XTo56RKjl6h6zEJRGWk8tWV4cOPyq_cEmXXaGPsBqzVmjj81-rNPkFhWD3L9uRS5WYj8i17SDpWp5ssWwcsHArhgGa

Germans and French people have the least favourable opinion of travelling by car as a passenger. Seven in ten in each country (70% and 71%, respectively) have a positive view, but 20% in Germany and 23% in France have a negative view.

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/4YsSgHn0zqmMKDAZa5lmu81S0E7JYNlxW4wO2z6gBFiDiGxI7_kP4l47GLjaBuEjn9guFAo2X7wgb54RJ6yJvHw4N0BesZwiNTpjpJNIjkN8htWMqYet2DXm9E9MqjUgMvT_x9-OZ5oA

(YouGov UK)

July 26, 2023

Source:https://yougov.co.uk/topics/travel/articles-reports/2023/07/26/britons-have-least-favourable-view-cycling-12-coun

 

805-43-23/Polls

China’s Approach To Foreign Policy Gets Largely Negative Reviews In 24-Country Survey

Views of China and its international behavior are largely negative

Views of China are broadly negative across 24 countries in a new Pew Research Center survey: A median of 67% of adults express unfavorable views of the country, while 28% have a favorable opinion.

Negative views extend to evaluations of China’s international actions. Despite several high-profile diplomatic initiatives by Beijing over the past year – such as brokering a peace deal between Saudi Arabia and Iran and issuing a 12-point proposal for the end of violence in Ukraine – a median of 71% think China does not contribute to global peace and stability.

Most people also think China does not take into account the interests of other countries in its foreign policy (76%) and a median of 57% say China interferes in the affairs of other nations a great deal or fair amount.

Still, attitudes toward China are somewhat rosier in middle-income than high-income countries. Across eight middle-income countries – places Pew Research Center has not surveyed since 2019 due to the challenges of conducting face-to-face interviews during the pandemic – India stands out as the only middle-income country in which a majority has unfavorable views of China. And in three middle-income countries – Kenya, Mexico and Nigeria – a majority even gives China a positive rating.

Unfavorable views of China widespread

Fewer in these middle-income countries also criticize China’s global behavior, and many more see China’s “soft power” appeal. Indeed, publics in these middle-income countries offer relatively favorable ratings for China’s entertainment products, its universities and its standard of living – while few in most high-income countries agree.

Across all 24 countries surveyed, however, there is more agreement about China’s technology. A median of 69% describe China’s technological achievements as the best or above average relative to other wealthy nations, with similar shares in high- and middle-income countries. A median of 54% also see China’s military as among the best in the world.

But views of the country as the world’s foremost economic power have faltered somewhat in recent years. More people now name the United States as the top economic power than China (a median of 42% vs. 33%, respectively). Much of this shift has come in high-income countries, where the share naming China has fallen in nearly every surveyed country – including by double digits in Germany, the Netherlands, Poland and Sweden.

In the U.S., where equal shares (43%) called China and the U.S. the world’s leading economic power in 2022, views have shifted significantly over the past year; now, Americans are 10 percentage points more likely to name the U.S. than China (48% vs. 38%). (For more on American views of China, read “Americans are Critical of China’s Global Role – as Well as Its Relationship With Russia”.)

These findings come from a new Pew Research Center survey conducted from Feb. 20 to May 22, 2023, among more than 30,000 people in 24 countries. Below are some of the other findings regarding China’s overall image, views of Chinese foreign policy, ratings of President Xi Jinping, opinions about Chinese soft power and its economic power.

Overall ratings for China

Across many high-income countries surveyed, which are in North America, Western Europe and parts of the Asia-Pacific region, a large majority has unfavorable views of China, as has been the case for multiple years. Indeed, in almost every high-income country surveyed, negative views currently stand at or near historic highs. In most countries, this does not reflect a significant increase over last year; rather, negative views have simply remained high in recent years. One notable exception is Poland, where negative views have increased 12 points during a period of strained bilateral relations, perhaps related to China’s handling of the war in Ukraine.

Record high negative ratings for China in most countries surveyed

Views of China in middle-income countries are relatively more positive. Still, negative ratings in most of these countries have also grown since the countries were last surveyed, pre-pandemic. In South Africa and Mexico, for example, opinions have turned somewhat more negative since 2019, and in Argentina, Brazil and India, negative views have even reached historic highs. In India, military conflicts along a contested border may have contributed to the 21 percentage point increase in unfavorable opinion.

China’s role on the world stage

Majorities in most countries do not think China takes into account the interests of countries like theirs. In Canada, France, Israel, Spain and Sweden, around half or more say China doesn’t consider them at all. Only in the three sub-Saharan African countries surveyed, as well as in Indonesia, does around half or more of the public feel like China listens to their country.

A median of 71% also think China does little or nothing at all to contribute to global peace and stability, compared with a median of 23% who say it is doing a great deal or a fair amount. Australians, Canadians, Indians, Israelis and South Koreans are particularly likely to say China is doing nothing at all to help with global peace and stability.

Most also see China as an interventionist power. A median of 57% say China does interfere a great deal or a fair amount in the affairs of other countries, while a median of 35% say it does not do so much or at all. Around seven-in-ten or more in Australia, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Spain and the U.S. see China getting involved in the affairs of other countries – and many of these places also stood out for the high share who said China’s involvement in domestic politics in their own country was a very serious problem in a 2022 Pew Research Center survey.

But the country which is most likely to see China interfering in the affairs of other countries in this year’s survey is Italy (82%). Italy, which was the only G7 country to join China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), was debating leaving the initiative at the time that the survey was conducted, but treading delicately for fear of stoking possible Chinese retribution against Italian businesses.

Attitudes toward Xi

Few in the 24 countries surveyed have confidence in Chinese President Xi Jinping to do the right thing regarding world affairs. Across most of Western Europe, the U.S., Canada and much of the Asia-Pacific region, around half in each country say they have no confidence in him at all. Indonesia, Kenya, Nigeria and South Africa stand out as the only countries where a majority or plurality have confidence in his leadership.

Confidence in Xi is closely related to views of China more broadly. In each country surveyed people with unfavorable views of China are more likely to have little confidence in the Chinese president, and vice versa.

Countries with more negative views of China also have less confidence in Xi

Chinese soft power

A bar chart showing China’s technological advancements are seen as the best or above average compared with other wealthy nations, followed by military power

When it comes to elements often considered part of a country’s “soft power,” China’s technological achievements receive high marks, though fewer say the same about its universities, entertainment products or standard of living.

In fact, outside of South Korea, nearly half or more in every country say Chinese technological advancements are the best in the world or above average relative to other wealthy nations. And in many of the middle-income countries, around four-in-ten call Chinese technology the best in the world.

Middle-income countries – many of which are increasingly reliant on Chinese companies like Huawei for components of their 4G and 5G systems – were also asked specifically about technology such as phones, tablets or computers made by Chinese companies. Across these eight countries, there is a relatively widespread sense that these products are well-made. Middle-income publics are more divided when it comes to their cost: A median of 50% describe them as inexpensive, while 44% call them costly.

They are also somewhat divided when it comes to whether technological products made by Chinese companies protect people’s personal data (a median of 45%) or make their data unsafe (40%). (Americans were asked a different but related question about Chinese social media companies; large majorities have little confidence that they will use personal information responsibly or follow privacy policies.)

In every country, at least a plurality – and often a majority – also see China’s “hard power,” its military, as one of the best in the world or above average.

Chinese economic power

Fewer name China as the world’s leading economic power than the U.S. (a median of 33% vs. 42%). And, in many countries, the share naming China as the world’s leading economy has gone down in recent years.

Fewer now call China the world’s top economic power in many places

Interestingly, China’s image as an economic superpower is stronger in high-income countries than middle-income ones. Italy, for example, is the only country where a majority (55%) calls China the leading economic power.

Still, people in middle-income countries do recognize economic benefits from their relations with China. A different survey question, asked only in these countries, finds that around half or more in six middle-income countries say their nation’s economy has benefited a great deal or a fair amount from Chinese investment. In Nigeria, Kenya and South Africa, around seven-in-ten or more say this.

In the U.S., Americans were also asked to name the country which poses the top threat to the U.S. Not only was China the top answer, by far, but Americans see it as both an economic and a national security threat – in sharp contrast to Russia, which is primarily seen as a security threat. To read more about this related analysis, see “Americans name China as the top threat facing the U.S.

(PEW)

JULY 27, 2023

Source:https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2023/07/27/chinas-approach-to-foreign-policy-gets-largely-negative-reviews-in-24-country-survey/