BUSINESS & POLITICS IN THE WORLD

 

GLOBAL OPINION REPORT NO. 783

 

 

Week: February 20 – February 26, 2023

 

Presentation: March 03, 2023

 

 

Contents

 

SUMMARY OF POLLS                                                                                                              6

 

ASIA

            Inside Afghanistan: Record Numbers Struggle to Afford Basics                                                                       11

 

MENA                                                                                                                                       13

            UAE Parents Have High Concerns over Their Child’s Exposure To Inappropriate Online Content          13

 

AFRICA                                                                                                                                    15

            Health Insurance Coverage for Nigerians Still Abysmal; An Urgent Call For New Strategy.                     15

 

WEST EUROPE                                                                                                                        17

            Labour Voters More Wary about Politics of Child’s Spouse                                                                              17

            Most Brits Expect Recession, As Consumer Confidence Dips To Six-Year Low                                          19

            Half of Leave Voters Doubt Johnson Can Secure New Brexit Deal                                                                 21

            Few Believe the Government's Explanation of Why Parliament Is To Be Suspended                                  23

            Brits Oppose Parliament Suspension By 47% to 27%                                                                                         24

 

NORTH AMERICA                                                                                                                  25

            5 Facts about the Abortion Debate In America                                                                                                     25

            U.S. Concern about Climate Change Is Rising, But Mainly Among Democrats                                            28

            Most Americans Say Science Has Brought Benefits to Society and Expect More to Come                         31

            Parents' Concern about School Safety Remains Elevated                                                                                   34

            As Labor Day Turns 125, Union Approval Near 50-Year High                                                                         36

            Americans' Satisfaction with U.S. Education at 15-Year High                                                                          38

            Most Cannabis Consumers Use on a Weekly Basis or More                                                                              41

 

AUSTRALIA                                                                                                                             43

            Ride-Sharing App Uber Overtakes Taxis as Preferred Private Transport Service                                          43

            Rising Numbers of Australians Looking At Electric and Hybrid Vehicles for Their Next Set of Wheels 45

            Toyota And Mazda Drivers Most Brand Loyal; Have The Luxury Brands Lost Their Lustre?                   48

 

MULTICOUNTRY STUDIES                                                                                                   50

            Britons Make Worst Tourists, Say Britons (And Spaniards And Germans)                                                    50

            Brazilians Least Satisfied in Amazon With Environment                                                                                   55

            India Ranks 9th on Happiness among 28 Global Markets: Ipsos Global Happiness Survey                        58

            The Biggest Beauty Influencer Isn’t Who You Think It Is                                                                                 59

 


 

INTRODUCTORY NOTE

 

This weekly report consists of eighteen surveys. The report includes four multi-country studies from different states across the globe.

 

783-43-19/Commentary: Arab Public Opinion Prefers China Over USA 11 Out Of 12 Surveyed Nations Hold That View

This piece is part of a four-part series published by the Middle East Institute in cooperation with Arab Barometer analyzing the results of the seventh wave of the Arab Barometer surveys.

Apart from Europe and the South China Sea region, the Middle East and North Africa is one of the epicenters for what the U.S. has termed “great power competition” especially between the U.S. and China, although Russia also figures into the assessment. There is particular sensitivity to China’s perceived economic inroads into the region as it has surged to become its largest economic partner. Apart from China’s dependence on imports of Gulf oil to meet its energy needs, China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has expanded Beijing’s footprint from Oman in the east to Morocco in the west.

Based on Arab Barometer’s Wave 7 raw favorability numbers, China’s increased presence in the region appears to have paid dividends in terms of its popular standing, especially in North Africa. Except for Morocco, where favorability for the U.S. at 69% is marginally higher than China’s rating at 64%, the U.S. consistently lags behind China in the view of respondents to the 12-country survey. The favorability gap is particularly notable in Algeria, where China enjoys a 20-point edge over the U.S. at 67% vs. 47%. One possible explanation for the broad disparity in favorability ratings for the U.S. between Morocco and Algeria, of course, is widespread anger in Algeria, and the converse in Morocco, over the Trump administration’s December 2020 decision to recognize Moroccan sovereignty in the Western Sahara. The Arab Barometer seventh wave polling was undertaken after that decision, between October 2021 and July 2022.

But even in Tunisia and Libya, where the U.S. has focused a great deal of effort in promoting positive outcomes in their political transitions since the Arab Spring, China is viewed far more favorably than the U.S. (in Tunisia by 50% vs. 33% and in Libya by 49% vs. 37%). Skepticism over the U.S. intent in providing foreign assistance appears to underlie unfavorable views of the U.S. Only 18% of rural and 15% of urban Tunisians agreed that U.S. assistance is motivated by a desire to improve people’s lives whereas a plurality of Tunisians (40% rural and 44% urban) and a majority of Libyans (50% rural and 53% urban) believe the U.S. uses its foreign assistance to gain influence. By contrast, pluralities of Libyans (35%) and Tunisians (40%) saw Chinese objectives in providing foreign assistance as aiding either economic development or internal stability.

One contributing factor in low U.S. favorability ratings is likely the overhang of negative regional sentiments toward U.S. policy in the Trump administration. Broad regional attitudes toward Biden administration policies are notably higher than his predecessor’s poll results. In Sudan, for example, a majority of Sudanese (52%) consider Biden administration policies to be good or very good compared to only 20% who viewed Trump policies in a positive light. In Morocco, Biden’s approval stands at 46% vs. the 14% who viewed Trump favorably despite the Western Sahara decision. Even among populations that continue to hold the U.S. in low esteem, there has been improvement since the Biden administration came into office. In Tunisia, 23% of those polled think that Biden’s policies are good or very good as compared to Trump’s 10% while the similar comparison in Palestine is 11% vs. 6%. In that regard, despite overall improvement in attitudes toward Biden’s regional policies, the vast majority of Palestinians clearly see little reason for optimism in U.S. policy toward their issues since Biden came into office.

Biden’s improved numbers also reflect an uptick in popular perceptions of Biden’s foreign policy as compared to Chinese President Xi Jinping’s policies. A majority of Sudanese (52%) see Biden’s policies as good or very good compared to Xi’s 43%. In Morocco, as well, the public holds generally more favorable attitudes toward Biden (46%) as opposed to Xi (39%). Elsewhere in the region, including, surprisingly, in Jordan and Lebanon, U.S. and Chinese policies are seen in roughly equivalent terms (Jordan: Biden 28%/Xi 26%; Lebanon: Biden 31%/Xi 35%). And Xi is notably more popular with the publics in several countries, including Algeria (Xi 53%/Biden 35%), Iraq (Xi 48%/Biden 35%), and Tunisia (Xi 35%/Biden 23%).

On economic relations, there is clearly a region-wide desire to strengthen relations with global partners. For both the U.S. and China, young people (18-29) generally favor the economic relationships more than their older fellow citizens (30+). Even in Tunisia, nearly 60% of young respondents favor closer economic ties to the U.S, nearly equal to the 65% who would like to see closer economic ties to China. Overall in the region, even in those countries that are generally skeptical of ties to the U.S., there is a desire to seek stronger economic links. In Iraq and Libya, for example, equal numbers of young people want to strengthen economic ties to the U.S. and China. In several other countries, including Morocco, Mauritania, and Sudan, young people clearly favored the U.S. as an economic partner over China.

Despite these seemingly solid favorability numbers overall for the Chinese, however, a public diplomacy professional in Beijing would clearly see warning signs in some of the Arab Barometer measures of popular perceptions. In particular, there appears to be a fairly high degree of ambivalence about their country’s economic relations with China among the publics as compared to the U.S. Notably, there are significant minorities in several of the countries, particularly among rural and less-educated respondents, that would like to see economic links to China reduced. In Lebanon, for example, 23% of respondents with a maximum secondary education and a full third of rural respondents preferred to see economic ties to China loosened. In Iraq, 23% of secondary educated and 21% of rural respondents advocated for reduced economic relations with China, as well.

There are a number of factors that appear to contribute to the ambivalence about China as an economic partner. In all of the countries surveyed, often by wide margins, the Chinese are seen as the country that provides the lowest quality products. In Iraq, for example, 69% of respondents thought that Chinese products were low quality as compared to only 8% who thought of U.S. products that way. Similarly, in Jordan, 64% of survey participants saw China as a producer of low quality products compared to 7% who viewed U.S. products in that light. In the other seven countries surveyed, a plurality of respondents all agreed that Chinese goods were of low quality. Conversely, the U.S. and Germany were seen through all of the nine countries surveyed as producers of the highest quality products. Respondents who viewed Chinese products positively ranged from a low of 8% in Algeria to a high of 18% in Libya.

Similarly, Chinese companies were held in generally low esteem as business partners and employers. For the most part, respondents in the surveyed countries preferred businesses in either the U.S. (Lebanon, Mauritania, Sudan) or Germany (Algeria, Libya, Morocco, Tunisia) as contracting partners. Only in Iraq did the plurality (27%) of respondents prefer Chinese companies as business partners. Integrity appears to be a factor in that perception as respondents generally saw U.S. (Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Sudan) and German (Algeria, Mauritania, Tunisia) businesses as least likely to pay bribes while Chinese companies lagged behind. Likewise, U.S. (Iraq, Jordan, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Sudan) and German (Algeria, Lebanon, Tunisia) businesses were deemed most likely to pay their local employees top salaries with Chinese companies generally scoring poorly in that regard.

Arab Barometer’s Wave 7 surveys straddled the outbreak of conflict between Russia and Ukraine, so we will have to await Wave 8 to determine if Russia’s war of aggression will affect regional attitudes toward Russia and Vladimir Putin. For the most part, views of Russia and Putin in Wave 7 were not substantially different from views of the U.S. and Biden or China and Xi. In fact, in a number of instances, views of Russia and Putin closely approximated respondent attitudes toward China and Xi. In Lebanon, Algeria, and Libya respondents rated Russian and Chinese favorability in nearly identical terms (Lebanon: China-51%/Russia-52%; Algeria: China-67%/Russia-66%; Libya: China-49%/Russia-49%) while in Iraq and Tunisia, respondents rated Putin and Xi equally (Iraq: Putin-46%/Xi-48%; Tunisia: Putin-34%/Xi-35%). Only in Morocco did U.S. favorability significantly exceed Russia and China (U.S.-69%/China-64%/Russia-38%) while in Jordan, the U.S. and China were rated equally ahead of Russia (U.S.-51%/China-51%/Russia-39%). The same holds true as to the personal favorability estimations for Biden, Putin, and Xi. Only Sudanese and Moroccan respondents held a significantly more favorable view of Biden (Sudan: Biden-52%/Xi-43%/Putin-34%; Morocco: Biden-46%/Xi-39%/Putin-26%).

The same picture also holds among the three competitors in economic favorability ratings. Only in Algeria did a significantly higher number of respondents favor stronger economic ties to Moscow as compared to the U.S. or China (Russia-55%/China-38%/U.S.-31%). In Morocco and Sudan, respondents favored stronger ties to the U.S. (Morocco: U.S.-42%/China-36%/Russia-28%; Sudan: U.S.-58%/China-48%/Russia-45%). Among the other countries participating, there are few distinctions among the U.S., China, and Russia, although China is the preferred partner in Tunisia, Libya, and Iraq. Trend lines may be somewhat more revealing. After enjoying a significant rise in economic favorability during the Obama years (Wave 3 and Wave 4), positive views of U.S. economic ties dropped significantly during the Trump administration (Wave 5) but have now recovered somewhat in the latest (Wave 7) survey. By contrast, both China and Russia saw drops in their economic favorability ratings between Wave 5 and Wave 7, with China experiencing a precipitate decline in its favorability rating in Jordan, albeit from an extremely high 70% favorable to a still respectable 50%. Aside from Tunisia, where its favorability rating essentially flat-lined from Wave 4 to Wave 7, Russia’s favorability has also declined between Wave 5 and Wave 7.

A recurring theme in discussions with interlocutors in the region is that the MENA countries will resist becoming a battleground in a “great power competition” between the U.S., Russia, and China. Although there are clearly differences in how the three competitors are viewed in the region, it’s also clear that public opinion in the Arab Barometer Wave 7 survey echoes the views of political leaders that they seek to maintain positive political and economic relations with all three. As noted, the potential impact of Russia’s aggression in Ukraine on MENA popular attitudes remains to be measured. But that variable aside, unlike the post-World War II Cold War era, these populations will favor strongly remaining non-combatants in any new cold war.

(Arabbarometer)

February 21, 2023

Source: https://www.arabbarometer.org/2023/02/as-great-power-competition-in-the-middle-east-heats-up-polling-data-shows-a-complex-picture-of-popular-attitudes/

 

SUMMARY OF POLLS

SUMMARY OF POLLS

ASIA

(Pakistan)

47% Pakistanis Say That They Have Experienced The Lack Of Medicine While Visiting The Hospital In The Past Year

According to a survey conducted by Gallup & Gilani Pakistan, 47% Pakistanis say that they have experienced the lack of medicine while visiting the hospital in the past year. A nationally representative sample of adult men and women from across the country, was asked the following as a follow up question, “In the last twelve months, have you experienced any of the following problems in a government hospital/clinic? - Lack of medication?” 47% responded yes while 53% said no.

(Gallup Pakistan)

February 24, 2023

 

AFRICA

(Nigeria)

Political Party Logo Recognition Poll (Election Poll)

A new public opinion poll conducted by NOIPolls has revealed that the top three political party logos properly described in Nigeria are those of the All-Progressive Congress (APC), People’s Democratic Party (PDP) and the Labour Party (LP). The APC and PDP logos had larger proportion of adult Nigerians (82 percent each) who could easily describe the party’s logos, while 40 percent had good description of the Labour party logo amongst other party logos.

(NOI Polls)

21 February 2023

 

WEST EUROPE

(UK)

Rishi Sunak Registers Lowest Favourability Scores As Prime Minister

The latest update to the Ipsos Political Pulse shows Rishi Sunak registering his weakest favourability ratings since becoming Prime Minister amidst significant public pessimism about the impact of Brexit and the direction of the country. Looking at opinions of leading politicians, Keir Starmer is seen most favourably, with 32% favourable and 39% unfavourable he achieves a Net score of -7. In comparison, the current Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak, is seen favourably by 27% of Britons while 46% disagree, giving a score of -19.  Starmer’s numbers are unchanged from January but Rishi Sunak has seen falling scores (January: 30% favourable and 39% unfavourable).

(Ipsos MORI)

22 February 2023

 

Only A Third Of The Public Think The NHS Is Providing A Good Service Nationally, Yet Support For The Founding Principles Remains Strong

The Health Foundation has partnered with Ipsos to deliver a 2-year programme of research into public expectations and perceptions of health and social care. Every 6 months, we poll a representative sample of the UK public using the UK KnowledgePanel – Ipsos’ random probability online panel. There is deepening public concern about NHS services. Nearly two thirds (63%) think the general standard of care has got worse in the past 12 months. Across the UK, only a third (33%) of the public think the NHS is providing a good service nationally, a significant fall from the previous survey (43%) in May 2022. Additionally, just 10% think their national government has the right policies for the NHS.

(Ipsos MORI)

23 February 2023

 

The Majority Of Britons Have Been Bullied – And It Had A Significant Impact On Most

Two thirds of Britons (66%) say they have been bullied at some point in their lives, according to a new YouGov poll. One in five people (21%) say they experienced bullying as an adult, while six in ten Britons (59%) were bullied as a child (some respondents will have been bullied in both childhood and adulthood). Older Britons aged 65 and over are least likely to say (or remember) that they’ve been bullied, with 52% saying they have been, compared to between 63% and 72% of other age groups.

(YouGov UK)

February 23, 2023

 

Only 5% Of Britons Are Giving Anything Up For Lent 2023

The centuries-old Christian tradition of Lent will see millions across the world give up something they love for the 40 days leading up to Easter. But just 5% of Britons are partaking in the ancient festival this year, including just 11% of British Christians. That represents a notable fall since 2012, when 12% of Britons and 20% of British Christians marked the occasion. One in ten (10%) have turned their back on fatty foods, while 8% are abstaining from sex and the same proportion are giving up eating out and takeaways (8%).

(YouGov UK)

February 24, 2023

 

(France)

Energy Renovation: More Than Half Of Owners Are Considering Taking Steps, But There Are Still Many Obstacles

Inflation, the increase in the share of housing in the household budget and the context of tensions on the energy market that we have been experiencing for months have undoubtedly contributed to placing this problem at the heart of French life. Indeed, half of French people (49%) feel that over the past two years, the share of housing in their overall budget has increased, and even "increased a lot" for more than 1 in 5 French people (22 %).

(Ipsos France)

February 23, 2023

 

(Ukraine)

Desire To Migrate In Ukraine Hits Record Low

Before Russia invaded Ukraine a year ago, more Ukrainians than ever said they would like to leave Ukraine permanently. But that desire quickly faded after the war began, and now, most Ukrainians do not want to leave even if they could. A record-low 9% of Ukrainians surveyed in September of last year -- almost seven months into Russia’s war with their country -- said they would like to leave Ukraine permanently, which is down sharply from a record-high 35% just the year before.

(Gallup)

FEBRUARY 24, 2023

 

NORTH AMERICA

(USA)

60% Of Americans Would Be Uncomfortable With Provider Relying On AI In Their Own Health Care

A new Pew Research Center survey explores public views on artificial intelligence (AI) in health and medicine – an area where Americans may increasingly encounter technologies that do things like screen for skin cancer and even monitor a patient’s vital signs. The Pew Research Center survey, conducted Dec. 12-18, 2022, of 11,004 U.S. adults finds only 38% say AI being used to do things like diagnose disease and recommend treatments would lead to better health outcomes for patients generally, while 33% say it would lead to worse outcomes and 27% say it wouldn’t make much difference.

(PEW)

FEBRUARY 22, 2023

 

Americans Largely Satisfied With Their Personal Life

The 83% of Americans who are at least somewhat satisfied with their personal life matches the historical average since 1979, and broad majorities of U.S. adults likewise report they are satisfied with nine specific life aspects. Between 81% and 90% of U.S. adults are either “very” or “somewhat” satisfied with their family life, current housing, education, job, community and personal health, while 71% to 77% express the same degree of satisfaction with the amount of leisure time they have, their standard of living and their household income.

(Gallup)

FEBRUARY 23, 2023

 

48% Of Americans Played A Sport In 2022

The latest poll from Ipsos unpacks what sports Americans play and watch, how they tune into their favorite games, and attitudes towards the biggest controversies in the world of sports. Ipsos explores American attitudes and behavior toward sports betting, showing few Americans bet on sports as the country remains split on legalizing sports betting. Still, 8% of Americans report betting on sports online or on an app in the past year, while 4% of have done so in-person. The NFL is the most popular league to bet on.

(Ipsos USA)

22 February 2023

 

American Health In Polarizing Times

This week we released our first Axios-Ipsos American Health Index, which builds off of our Axios-Ipsos Coronavirus Index and expands into some of the biggest worries Americans have around healthcare, behaviors surrounding health and wellness, and what policies the public supports. Most Americans have received at least one dose of the COVID vaccine. Given the hesitancy surrounding and political jousting over the COVID vaccine, this is a remarkable feat to reach. But booster shots are lagging way behind.

(Ipsos USA)

24 February 2023

 

(Canada)

Inflation Taking Disproportionate Toll On Canadians Aged 18-34, Impacting Confidence In Their Financial Future

Given today’s economic environment, just 18% of Canadians aged 18-34 are feeling more confident about their financial future than before, a significant drop from the 31% who, last year, said they were feeling more confident about their future emerging from the pandemic. Nearly eight in ten of those aged 18-34 (77%) are concerned (31% very/47% somewhat) about their cashflow right now, significantly higher than the proportions of those aged 35-54 (69%) and 55+ (57%) who say the same.

(Ipsos Canada)

23 February 2023

 

AUSTRALIA

ANZ-Roy Morgan Consumer Confidence Recovers Slightly, Up 2.3pts To 80.4

Driving this week’s recovery in Consumer Confidence was sentiment related to personal finances compared to a year ago and whether now is a ‘good/bad time to buy’ major household items. Consumer Confidence was up in all five mainland States this week and above 80 in Victoria, Western Australia and South Australia but under 80 in New South Wales and Queensland. Now 22% of Australians (up 3ppts) say their families are ‘better off’ financially than this time last year compared to 47% (down 2ppts) that say their families are ‘worse off’ financially.

(Roy Morgan)

February 21, 2023

 

MULTICOUNTRY STUDIES

Arab Public Opinion Prefers China Over USA 11 Out Of 12 Surveyed Nations Hold That View

Based on Arab Barometer’s Wave 7 raw favorability numbers, China’s increased presence in the region appears to have paid dividends in terms of its popular standing, especially in North Africa. Except for Morocco, where favorability for the U.S. at 69% is marginally higher than China’s rating at 64%, the U.S. consistently lags behind China in the view of respondents to the 12-country survey. The favorability gap is particularly notable in Algeria, where China enjoys a 20-point edge over the U.S. at 67% vs. 47%.

(Arabbarometer)

February 21, 2023

Source: https://www.arabbarometer.org/2023/02/as-great-power-competition-in-the-middle-east-heats-up-polling-data-shows-a-complex-picture-of-popular-attitudes/

 

Between Economic And Environmental Concerns, Europeans Are Reinventing Their Mobility Habits, A Survey In 6 European Nations

Since the Covid and the multiple periods of confinement, Europeans have adapted their way of life, including their mobility habits. Some "soft" modes of transport are used more frequently than before: walking (31% of Europeans say they walk more often than before Covid), cycling (30% of electric bike users use it more frequently, 25 % for classic bikes), but also scooters (28% of personal scooter users do it more often). On the contrary, certain modes of transport involving proximity to strangers have seen their use decrease: carpooling (27% of users do so less often), public transport (25% use them less often), taxis or car sharing follow the same trend.

(Ipsos France)

February 21, 2023

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/fr-fr/entre-preoccupations-economiques-et-environnementales-les-europeens-reinventent-leurs-habitudes-de

 

North American Tracker: Artificial Intelligence (Ai) Tools And Politics

Canadians and Americans are most likely to trust AI tools (a great deal or somewhat) to complete tasks at home or answer questions about products/services via a website chat. They are least likely to trust them to teach their children or help them find a life partner online. Canadians are most concerned that AI tools lack the emotion/empathy required to make good decisions (75% agree) and/or are susceptible to fraud/hacking (72% agree). Americans are most concerned that they are susceptible to fraud/hacking (73% agree) and/or threaten human jobs (72% agree). 

(Leger Opinion)

February 23rd, 2023

Source: https://blog.legeropinion.com/en/surveys/north-american-tracker-february-15-2023/

 

Remote Employees Most Wary Of Job Security, A Survey Across 10 Nations

Global workers are watching as many corporations struggle in the current economic climate, resulting in layoffs for many. The global workforce has been under considerable strain since 2020 - first acclimating to the expansion of pandemic-fueled remote work, then adjusting back to hybrid or reintroduction of return-to-office plans. 69% of Gen-Z are worried about the security of their roles, compared to 51% of Boomers. Additionally, the vast majority - 86% - of workers at a Manager level or below are concerned about layoffs, compared to only 14% of those are Director level or higher.

(Kantar)

23 February 2023

Source: https://www.kantar.com/inspiration/research-services/remote-employees-most-wary-of-job-security-pf

 

ASIA

783-43-01/Polls

47% Pakistanis Say That They Have Experienced The Lack Of Medicine While Visiting The Hospital In The Past Year

According to a survey conducted by Gallup & Gilani Pakistan, 47% Pakistanis say that they have experienced the lack of medicine while visiting the hospital in the past year. A nationally representative sample of adult men and women from across the country, was asked the following as a follow up question, “In the last twelve months, have you experienced any of the following problems in a government hospital/clinic? - Lack of medication?” 47% responded yes while 53% said no. Question: “In the last twelve months, have you experienced any of the following problems in a government hospital/clinic? - Lack of medication?”

(Gallup Pakistan)

February 24, 2023

Source: https://gallup.com.pk/wp/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/24th-Feb_24-Feb_merged.pdf

 

AFRICA

783-43-02/Polls

Political Party Logo Recognition Poll (Election Poll)

Abuja, Nigeria. 21st February 2023 – A new public opinion poll conducted by NOIPolls has revealed that the top three political party logos properly described in Nigeria are those of the All-Progressive Congress (APC), People’s Democratic Party (PDP) and the Labour Party (LP). The APC and PDP logos had larger proportion of adult Nigerians (82 percent each) who could easily describe the party’s logos, while 40 percent had good description of the Labour party logo amongst other party logos.

In terms of popularity across Nigeria, the poll assessed the popularity of the 18 candidates vying for the presidential position. The findings revealed that the top five (5) popular candidates in the upcoming February 25th Presidential election in Nigeria are Bola Ahmed Tinubu of the APC (93 percent), Atiku Abubakar of the PDP (91 percent), Peter Obi of LP (87 percent), Rabiu Kwankwaso of the NNPP (66 percent) and Hamza Al Mustapha of AA (35 percent) amongst other Presidential candidates.

Further findings revealed that most adult Nigerians nationwide (67 percent) advocated that it should be compulsory for a presidential candidate to attend a debate or town hall meeting. Of this proportion, 41 percent of adult Nigerians nationwide recommend that candidates should be penalized if they fail to participate in a debate. Although there is no law which makes it compulsory for candidates seeking political offices to participate in any debate, it will be interesting for this aspect to be included in the election process as stated by 67 percent of adult Nigerians. This will give the voters the opportunity to make side-by-side comparisons and afford candidates the opportunity to say why they are best suited for the elected office they are vying for.

Nigerians will be going to the election booths in three (3) days’ time (25th February 2023). This is the 7th consecutive election that will be conducted in the country without interruption. With over 9 million new registrants in the election being mostly youths, it makes the election an interesting one[1]. However, the country still faces election challenges which include insecurity, INEC preparedness, money politics, and election rigging amongst other issues. It remains to be seen if these issues will be addressed before the election or if they will form a stumbling block to the success of the election.

These are some of the key findings from the Election series poll following the countdown to the 2023 general election, conducted on the week commencing 12th December 2022. This is the fifth (5) in the series of monthly election polls conducted by NOIPolls as Nigerians countdown to February 25th, 2023, elections.

Survey Background

It is time again, precisely on 25th February, 2023, for Nigerians to go to the ballots and elect their next President. It is also a time that democracy affords Nigerians another opportunity to choose a leader that will steer the affairs of the country for another 4 years. The election period is indeed a critical one for Nigerians as they stand to either continue with the ruling APC and its candidate or entirely take a departure completely to another party like they did in 2015. It remains to be seen what the outcome of the election will be[2].

However, the popularity of candidates and the party’s amongst the populace is an important and crucial factor as it tends to be a deciding coefficient on which the election trajectory may tilt. It is pertinent to note that the more popular a candidate is amongst the electorate, the higher the chances the candidate has in winning the election and vice-versa. Therefore, all the candidates have embarked on rigorous campaigning to increase their visibility and popularity and to canvass for votes amongst the electorates.

The importance of this election cannot be over-emphasized as it affords all Nigerians the opportunity to choose their leaders at all levels. However, All Nigerians are earnestly hoping that the elections will provide them with the opportunity of having new sets of leaders that will curb the myriad of challenges the country is facing such as inflation, joblessness, banditry, kidnapping, terrorism, and the rest.  It remains to be seen if the country will achieve this feat or will continue in the trajectory of the current trend of affairs[3].

Against this background, NOIPolls conducted its Election Series Poll to seek the views of Nigerians on political party logo and candidate’s popularity ahead of the February 25th, 2023, general elections. This is the fifth in the series of monthly election polls conducted by NOIPolls (the first one was conducted in July 2022) as Nigerians countdown to the February 25th, 2023. General elections.        

Survey Findings

The first question revealed that 93 percent of adult Nigerians disclosed they have been thinking of the February 25th general election in the country. In addition, while 92 percent of the respondents indicated that they have registered to vote for the general election, 91 percent claimed to have their PVCs.

Furthermore, respondents were asked to describe the logos of the 18 political parties that are contesting for the Presidential election. The findings revealed that All Progressive Congress (APC) and People’s Democratic Party (PDP) logos were easily described by most adult Nigerians (82 percent each) across the country. This is followed by 40 percent of the respondents who properly described the Labour Party’s logo and 29 percent for All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) while 24 percent described the party logo of the New Nigeria People’s Party (NNPP) amongst all other party logos.

Subsequently, the poll assessed awareness of adult Nigerians on the 18 candidates vying for the Presidential position. Findings revealed that the top five (5) popular candidates in the February 25th presidential election in Nigeria are Bola Ahmed Tinubu of the APC (93 percent), Atiku Abubakar of the PDP (91 percent), Peter Obi of LP (87 percent), Rabiu Kwankwaso of the NNPP (66 percent) and Hamza Al Mustapha of AA (35 percent) amongst other Presidential candidates.

The poll result also revealed most adult Nigerians nationwide (67 percent) suggest it should be compulsory for a presidential candidate to attend a debate or town hall meeting. This assertion cuts across gender, geographical location, and age-group with a minimum representation of 61 percent. On the other hand, 30 percent think otherwise while 3 percent did not respond to the question.

When respondents were asked of their opinion on penalty should a candidate fail to attend a debate or town hall meeting, the poll revealed 41 percent of adult Nigerians nationwide recommended that the candidate should be penalized while 55 percent responded negatively.

Conclusion

The poll findings have shown that not all electorates are aware of the political party logo that they support in the February 25th, 2023, general election. On the other hand, the poll revealed that the name of the candidates resonates more with the electorates than the party logo of the candidate. For instance, the top 3 candidates mentioned by Nigerians in terms of popularity for the Presidential position are Bola Tinubu, (93 percent), Atiku Abubakar (91 percent) and Peter Obi (87 percent) respectively. Therefore, given that it is only party logo that are printed in the ballot paper, it would be advised that political parties in future carry out enough awareness on their party logo during meetings, rallies, and campaigns.

Finally, it is advised that debates be considered as an aspect of the electioneering process as advocated by 67 percent of adult Nigerians who think it should be compulsory for a Presidential candidate to attend a debate or town hall meeting. This will give Voters the opportunity to make side-by-side comparisons and give candidates a chance to say why they are best suited for the elected office they intend to vie for.

(NOI Polls)

21 February 2023

Source: https://noi-polls.com/apc-pdp-and-lp-top-three-political-party-logo-nigerians-properly-recognize/

 

WEST EUROPE

783-43-03/Polls

Rishi Sunak Registers Lowest Favourability Scores As Prime Minister

  • 46% unfavourable towards PM (+7pts from January), 27% favourable (-3pts)
  • 55% say Brexit has had a negative impact. Just 21% say Brexit has had a positive impact.
  • 6 in 10 say the country is heading in the wrong direction.

The latest update to the Ipsos Political Pulse shows Rishi Sunak registering his weakest favourability ratings since becoming Prime Minister amidst significant public pessimism about the impact of Brexit and the direction of the country.

Favourability of politicians

Looking at opinions of leading politicians, Keir Starmer is seen most favourably, with 32% favourable and 39% unfavourable he achieves a Net score of -7. In comparison, the current Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak, is seen favourably by 27% of Britons while 46% disagree, giving a score of -19.  Starmer’s numbers are unchanged from January but Rishi Sunak has seen falling scores (January: 30% favourable and 39% unfavourable).

A similar number of the public are favourable towards Boris Johnson as Rishi Sunak (28% vs 27%). However, with 52% unfavourable to the former PM, his overall net favourability rating is lower at -24.

Favourability of leading politicians

Looking at specifically at their own voters, Boris Johnson is seen slightly more favourably than Rishi Sunak. More than half of 2019 Conservative voters are favourable to Johnson (55%) while 49% say the same for Sunak. Overall, among 2019 Conservative voters, Johnson scores +29 while Sunak scores +23.  However, Johnson’s lead owes more to falling ratings for Mr Sunak rather than improving ratings for the former PM.

Liz Truss sees the worst favourability rating of the politicians on our list with the public overall. Only 1 in 10 (9%) are favourable and 71% unfavourable meaning she has a net score of -62, significantly lower than other politicians such as Jeremy Corbyn (-36), Suella Braverman (-33), Jeremy Hunt (-28) and Theresa May (-27%). 

Favourability towards parties

With a net score of+2, the Labour Party appears the most popular political party currently, 38% have a favourable opinion of the Opposition party (+3 pts from Jan) while 36% are unfavourable (no change). With 28% positive towards the Green Party (+5 pts) and 30% negative (-2), they see a net score of -2. The Conservatives see the lowest score with -29, 25% are favourable towards them (unchanged) while 54% are unfavourable (+3). The Liberal Democrats see a score of -17 while Reform UK (new to our list) score -24.  However, many are neutral or do not have an opinion of each.

Favourability towards political parties

Brexit and direction of country 

The public are increasingly negative about the impact of Brexit over time. Now, 55% of Britons say the UK’s decision to leave the European has had a negative impact on the country, the fourth straight month we have recorded numbers over half. Only 1 in 5 (21%) believe Brexit has had a positive impact while a similar proportion say it has made no difference (18%). 

If we subtract the proportion saying Brexit has had a negative impact from the proportion saying positive the result is a net positivity score of -34. This continues to be the lowest we have recorded on Brexit, since we started asking this question in January 2020.

Impact of the UK's decision to leave the European Union

In line with this, we see 6 in 10 now believe the country is heading in the wrong direction (60%), remaining stable since January (61%).

Direction of the country

Keiran Pedley, at Ipsos, said:

When Rishi Sunak became Prime Minister it was notable that his personal poll ratings were significantly better than those of his party. This increasingly no longer appears to be the case amidst public pessimism about the direction of the country. Our polling shows strong public concern about the cost of living and public services, whilst Brexit is being viewed more negatively over time as well. The Prime Minister will hope he is able to seize the political agenda in the coming weeks and months if he is to have any chance of turning his fortunes around.

(Ipsos MORI)

22 February 2023

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/rishi-sunak-registers-lowest-favourability-scores-prime-minister

 

783-43-04/Polls

Only A Third Of The Public Think The NHS Is Providing A Good Service Nationally, Yet Support For The Founding Principles Remains Strong

The Health Foundation has partnered with Ipsos to deliver a 2-year programme of research into public expectations and perceptions of health and social care. Every 6 months, we poll a representative sample of the UK public using the UK KnowledgePanel – Ipsos’ random probability online panel.

The findings from the third survey show:

(Ipsos MORI)

23 February 2023

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/only-third-public-think-nhs-providing-good-service-nationally-yet-support-founding-principles-strong

 

783-43-05/Polls

The Majority Of Britons Have Been Bullied – And It Had A Significant Impact On Most

Schools and workplaces are at the centre of most of Britain’s bullying

Two thirds of Britons (66%) say they have been bullied at some point in their lives, according to a new YouGov poll.

One in five people (21%) say they experienced bullying as an adult, while six in ten Britons (59%) were bullied as a child (some respondents will have been bullied in both childhood and adulthood).

Older Britons aged 65 and over are least likely to say (or remember) that they’ve been bullied, with 52% saying they have been, compared to between 63% and 72% of other age groups.

Those who experienced bullying as a child are most likely to say it happened repeatedly: 42% say it happened many times while a further 38% say it happened on several occasions. Only 17% say it only happened once or twice.

Bullying as an adult seems to have been less sustained: a lower figure of 23% of victims say it happened many times. Around half say they were subjected to bullying several times (47%), while 28% say it happened only once or twice.

Majority of bullied Britons say being targeted by bullies had a significant impact on their life

Three-quarters of people who were bullied as an adult say the experience impacted their life a great deal (35%) or a fair amount (39%).

In comparison, one in five of those bullied as children (20%) say it had a great deal of impact while 37% say it had a fair amount of impact on their life.

Just 4% of Britons targeted by bullies in adulthood say it had no impact on their life, while one in ten (10%) of those bullied as children say the same.

Classmates blamed by most of those bullied as children

Nearly nine in ten (87%) of those who were bullied in childhood say they were bullied by a classmate, with friends (15%) and teachers (13%) also among the culprits cited.

And a significant proportion of those Britons say they were targeted by members of their own family, including 12% who were bullied by a parent, 11% by a sibling and 5% by another family member.

One in five bullied adults say they were targeted by their partner

A significant proportion of Britons bullied as an adult say they have suffered at the hands of those who arguably should love them the most – their spouse or partner.

One in five (20%) report being bullied by a partner, while 16% have been bullied by other family members, including 8% who say they were bullied by a parent and 6% who were bullied by a sibling.

However, the most likely source of bullying in adulthood is the workplace – more than half of those bullied as adults (56%) say they have been bullied by a boss or manager and 47% by a colleague.

Most Britons bullied as children were physically attacked

Around six in ten Britons (58%) bullied in childhood say their bully physically attacked them, including 11% who say they were attacked “many times”.

Men are more likely than women to have been physically set upon by their childhood bully, at 68% to 48%.

But when it comes to bullying in adulthood, the gender gap narrows – 21% of those who say they were bullied as an adult report being attacked at least once or twice, including 19% of men and 23% of women.

Those who were bullied in adulthood are more likely to describe the worst bullying they were subjected to as severe, with 71% of bullied adults saying it was compared to 49% of Britons bullied in childhood.

Internet brings shift in the nature of bullying for young people

The nature of bullying has shifted since the advent of the internet, with 42% of 18 to 24-year-olds who were bullied as a child saying at least some of the bullying they experienced took place online – although almost all say they were also bullied in person.

One in six Britons (18%) who have experienced bullying as an adult say at least part of it happened online.

(YouGov UK)

February 23, 2023

Source: https://yougov.co.uk/topics/society/articles-reports/2023/02/23/majority-britons-have-been-bullied-and-it-had-sign

 

783-43-06/Polls

Only 5% Of Britons Are Giving Anything Up For Lent 2023

Chocolate and sweets most commonly given up by those marking the tradition

The centuries-old Christian tradition of Lent will see millions across the world give up something they love for the 40 days leading up to Easter.

But just 5% of Britons are partaking in the ancient festival this year, including just 11% of British Christians.

That represents a notable fall since 2012, when 12% of Britons and 20% of British Christians marked the occasion.

Chocolate and sweets most likely to be given up for Lent

Half of those marking the occasion (50%) say they have temporarily given up eating chocolate and sweets, while 17% have put pub-going and booze drinking on a temporary hiatus.

One in ten (10%) have turned their back on fatty foods, while 8% are abstaining from sex and the same proportion are giving up eating out and takeaways (8%).

(YouGov UK)

February 24, 2023

Source: https://yougov.co.uk/topics/society/articles-reports/2023/02/24/only-5-britons-are-giving-anything-lent-2023

 

783-43-07/Polls

Energy Renovation: More Than Half Of Owners Are Considering Taking Steps, But There Are Still Many Obstacles

A context marked by the growing weight of housing in household budgets…

Inflation, the increase in the share of housing in the household budget and the context of tensions on the energy market that we have been experiencing for months have undoubtedly contributed to placing this problem at the heart of French life. , even more than was the case before: now, every expense counts, and everything that can be done to relieve an overly constrained budget is considered.

Indeed, half of French people (49%) feel that over the past two years, the share of housing in their overall budget has increased, and even "increased a lot" for more than 1 in 5 French people (22 %)

  • Heating costs are the ones that weigh the most in their perception: they have “ increased a lot ” for 52% of our fellow citizens, and even for 62% of people who have the feeling of living in a thermal sieve.
  • For people whose share of housing in the budget has increased, it is of course on the superfluous that we seek to save money (18% on shopping, 15% on leisure, outings, cultural activities and sports, 14% on holidays) … but not only: 15% save on food, and 13% on energy consumption (such as heating).

Energy renovation, a subject that concerns the French

Four out of five French people have heard of the renovation of old dwellings, a very substantial proportion for a subject that at first glance might be considered quite "technical" (for comparison: slightly more than half of French people have heard of the Climate Resilience Law)

And 55% of them feel personally concerned by the energy renovation of housing. This high figure can be explained in particular because nearly a third of French people feel that they live in a thermal colander (29%), a figure roughly equivalent to the proportion of landlords (33%) who think of renting colanders thermal.

More than half of landlords and landlords are considering formalities

The proportion of French people who are considering eco-renovation approaches is substantial:

  • 51% of resident owners of thermal sieves are ready to take steps to eco-renovate their homes
  • More than 60% of thermal sieve landlords say they are ready to take steps to eco-renovate the accommodation(s) they rent, either following the departure of their tenants (65%), or on their own initiative (62 %).

For the French who are considering the eco-renovation of the housing they own, it is:

  • For 78% of them, above all to reduce the energy bill (50% first, 78% in total), in a context where the cost of energy has increased considerably.
  • But also, for 73% to improve their interior comfort (38% first, 73% in total).

Their general knowledge of the subject and its issues is relatively good:

  • In the eyes of our fellow citizens, “effective renovation” rhymes above all (55%) with “improved insulation”. Those who give priority to changing windows are very few in number (9% - the time when people thought that insulating their windows was enough is therefore long gone), as are those who place priority on improving the heating system (8%). The communication of the public authorities and private actors on the subject has therefore been rather effective.
  • Similarly, 63% of French people know that the overall renovation of a home is more profitable in the long term than the combination of small works, and 72% that, in general, modern buildings have better energy performance than old buildings.

Two types of obstacles to energy renovation

Financial obstacles, due to amounts to be committed deemed too high

There is a difficulty in finding the financing necessary for energy renovation: half of French people who do not plan to eco-renovate their home invoke the fact that the budget to be mobilized is too large for their finances (46% first, 52% overall).

A sign of the importance of the problem of financing in the transition to the act of renovation, their own bank is the second interlocutor to whom the French turn most spontaneously to undertake the procedures and manage the works (19% first, 45% in total), behind the France Rénov site (44% first, 58% in total).

The practical obstacles, the French experiencing difficulties on how to undertake these renovations

26% of French people thus cite this type of obstacle as a priority as a hindrance to renovation: 13% say they do not know by whom and how to get support (33% of responses in total), 6% do not know how to identify serious companies and are afraid of scams (31% in total) and finally 7% consider the help too complicated, too numerous and not clear enough (40% of quotes in total).

In addition, State aid is considered by the vast majority to be illegible: if there are many people who feel concerned and ready to act, the passage to action is hampered by a lack of legibility of State aid: 69% of French people think that it is not easy to find their way around (including 40% not at all easy). A figure that sums up the extent of the simplification efforts still to be made by the public authorities.

Similar obstacles within condominiums

Quite logically, and because of these major difficulties raised - informational, financial and logistical -, the proportion of French people judging that in their co-ownership, the co-owners are in favor of a complete eco-renovation of the co-ownership only amounts to 38%. .

All of the difficulties encountered in the context of eco-renovation constitute an opportunity for a trusted third party such as the trustee, who is currently only identified by one owner in four as a door to entered to undertake an eco-renovation approach (23%).

The inability of co-owners to achieve a clear majority in favor of overall eco-renovation work on co-ownerships is responsible for a large part of the wait-and-see attitude in this area. At Nexity, we observe that on average 8% of renovation projects are blocked for lack of a majority vote according to the current rules. One of the possible solutions would be to change the voting rules in this area, moving from an absolute majority to a majority of those present (simple majority).

  • Questioned, the French co-owners are almost half (46%) in favor of voting by an absolute majority of co-owners, against 35% who prefer a majority vote of those present. 19% do not say, a sign that the issues are not yet understood and integrated by a good part of the French.
  • No doubt the French co-owners are worried that the collective could commit large sums on their behalf, in a context where many French people are already struggling to make ends meet.

A real risk of resignation

Owners who plan to sell because they cannot renovate

Financial concerns, the difficulty of finding one's way in state aid, and the difficulties of obtaining majorities within condominiums no doubt explain why a large proportion of owners say they are ready to put their thermal sieve up for sale (rather than renovating it at great expense):

  • 48% of thermal sieve landlords could sell the accommodation(s) they rent within the next 12 months,
  • 26% of resident owners of thermal colanders could also consider this option within 12 months.

And tenants who mostly accept a de facto situation

Asked about their intentions:

  • 48% of tenants do not plan to leave their home for a more energy-efficient one (compared to 38% who could)
  • And 50% do not plan to ask their landlord to undertake energy renovation work on your home (compared to 37% who plan to do so)

(Ipsos France)

February 23, 2023

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/fr-fr/renovation-energetique-plus-de-la-moitie-des-proprietaires-envisagent-des-demarches-mais-les

 

783-43-08/Polls

Desire To Migrate In Ukraine Hits Record Low

Before Russia invaded Ukraine a year ago, more Ukrainians than ever said they would like to leave Ukraine permanently. But that desire quickly faded after the war began, and now, most Ukrainians do not want to leave even if they could.

A record-low 9% of Ukrainians surveyed in September of last year -- almost seven months into Russia’s war with their country -- said they would like to leave Ukraine permanently, which is down sharply from a record-high 35% just the year before.

Gallup collected these data Sept. 2-11 among Ukrainians who currently reside in Ukraine, including those who had been internally displaced to other areas within their country by the war.

The survey represents views across Ukraine, including the four occupied regions in the country's south and east, where Russia launched referendums on Sept. 23 to annex them and later declared martial law. Notably, before either of these developments, desire to migrate was only marginally higher in the country’s east (12%) and west (12%).

Desire to Leave at Record Lows Among Ukrainians From All Walks of Life

Desire dropped precipitously across most demographics of Ukrainians in 2022. The largest declines were evident among younger Ukrainians -- who in past surveys have usually been the most likely to want to leave. Before the war, nearly half of Ukrainians (45%) younger than age 50 expressed a desire to leave their country for good, but by last fall, these figures had dropped to just 13%.

Shortly after the war began, Ukraine banned men of fighting age -- those between the ages of 18 and 60 -- from leaving the country. This ban may have factored into the drop in men’s desire to leave, which declined from 38% in 2021 to 13% in 2022. However, women’s desire to migrate dropped just as much, falling from 32% to 6% within the same period.

Canada, U.S. and Poland Top Desired Destinations for Those Who Want to Move

Shortly after Russia invaded, millions of Ukrainians -- mostly women and children -- began fleeing Ukraine for other countries, including bordering countries to the west. Although several million returned home within months, in October 2022, the United Nations estimated 7.6 million Ukrainian refugees were still spread across Europe, including nearly 3 million in Russia.

Although relatively few Ukrainians desire to move, if they do, they are most likely to name Canada (19%), the U.S. (16%) and Poland (16%) -- which has taken in more Ukrainian refugees than any other country -- as their most desired place to move. In a departure from years past, no potential migrants in Ukraine named Russia or Belarus as a desired destination.

Bottom Line

Despite the stream of refugees who left Ukraine in the months after the war broke out, few Ukrainians interviewed in Ukraine late last year were interested in making a permanent move to another country. Even if everyone who left and did not return to Ukraine were people who wanted to migrate previously, it would still not account for the 26-percentage-point drop in Ukrainians’ desire to migrate in 2022. Instead, this lack of interest may reflect a heightened sense of patriotism among Ukrainians with their country at war and a reluctance to move.

Still, even as Ukrainians have rallied around their institutions and remained committed to victory, surveys in Ukraine later this year will show how much the protracted conflict has tested their resolve.

(Gallup)

FEBRUARY 24, 2023

Source: https://news.gallup.com/poll/471119/desire-migrate-ukraine-hits-record-low.aspx

 

NORTH AMERICA

783-43-09/Polls

60% Of Americans Would Be Uncomfortable With Provider Relying On AI In Their Own Health Care

A new Pew Research Center survey explores public views on artificial intelligence (AI) in health and medicine – an area where Americans may increasingly encounter technologies that do things like screen for skin cancer and even monitor a patient’s vital signs.

Chart shows fewer than half in U.S. expect artificial intelligence in health and medicine to improve patient outcomes

The survey finds that on a personal level, there’s significant discomfort among Americans with the idea of AI being used in their own health care. Six-in-ten U.S. adults say they would feel uncomfortable if their own health care provider relied on artificial intelligence to do things like diagnose disease and recommend treatments; a significantly smaller share (39%) say they would feel comfortable with this.

One factor in these views: A majority of the public is unconvinced that the use of AI in health and medicine would improve health outcomes. The Pew Research Center survey, conducted Dec. 12-18, 2022, of 11,004 U.S. adults finds only 38% say AI being used to do things like diagnose disease and recommend treatments would lead to better health outcomes for patients generally, while 33% say it would lead to worse outcomes and 27% say it wouldn’t make much difference.

These findings come as public attitudes toward AI continue to take shape, amid the ongoing adoption of AI technologies across industries and the accompanying national conversation about the benefits and risks that AI applications present for society. Read recent Center analyses for more on public awareness of AI in daily life and perceptions of how much advancement emerging AI applications represent for their fields.

Asked in more detail about how the use of artificial intelligence would impact health and medicine, Americans identify a mix of both positives and negatives.

On the positive side, a larger share of Americans think the use of AI in health and medicine would reduce rather than increase the number of mistakes made by health care providers (40% vs. 27%).

And among the majority of Americans who see a problem with racial and ethnic bias in health care, a much larger share say the problem of bias and unfair treatment would get better (51%) than worse (15%) if AI was used more to do things like diagnose disease and recommend treatments for patients.

But there is wide concern about AI’s potential impact on the personal connection between a patient and health care provider: 57% say the use of artificial intelligence to do things like diagnose disease and recommend treatments would make the patient-provider relationship worse. Only 13% say it would be better.

The security of health records is also a source of some concern for Americans: 37% think using AI in health and medicine would make the security of patients’ records worse, compared with 22% who think it would improve security.

Chart shows Americans more concerned that health care providers will adopt AI technologies too fast than too slowly

Though Americans can identify a mix of pros and cons regarding the use of AI in health and medicine, caution remains a dominant theme in public views. When it comes to the pace of technological adoption, three-quarters of Americans say their greater concern is that health care providers will move too fast implementing AI in health and medicine before fully understanding the risks for patients; far fewer (23%) say they are more concerned that providers will move too slowly, missing opportunities to improve patients’ health.

Concern over the pace of AI adoption in health care is widely shared across groups in the public, including those who are the most familiar with artificial intelligence technologies.

Younger adults, men, those with higher levels of education are more open to the use of AI in their own health care

Chart shows majority of U.S. adults would be uncomfortable if their health care provider relied on artificial intelligence

There is more openness to the use of AI in a person’s own health care among some demographic groups, but discomfort remains the predominant sentiment.

Among men, 46% say they would be comfortable with the use of AI in their own health care to do things like diagnose disease and recommend treatments, while 54% say they would be uncomfortable with this. Women express even more negative views: 66% say they would be uncomfortable with their provider relying on AI in their own care.

Those with higher levels of education and income, as well as younger adults, are more open to AI in their own health care than other groups. Still, in all cases, about half or more express discomfort with their own health care provider relying on AI.

Among those who say they have heard a lot about artificial intelligence, 50% are comfortable with the use of AI in their own health care; an equal share say they are uncomfortable with this. By comparison, majorities of those who have heard a little (63%) or nothing at all (70%) about AI say they would be uncomfortable with their own health care provider using AI.

At this stage of development, a modest share of Americans see AI delivering improvements for patient outcomes. Overall, 38% think that AI in health and medicine would lead to better overall outcomes for patients. Slightly fewer (33%) think it would lead to worse outcomes and 27% think it would not have much effect.

Chart shows 38% of Americans think that the use of AI in health care would improve patient outcomes

Men, younger adults, and those with higher levels of education are more positive about the impact of AI on patient outcomes than other groups, consistent with the patterns seen in personal comfort with AI in health care. For instance, 50% of those with a postgraduate degree think the use of AI to do things like diagnose disease and recommend treatments would lead to better health outcomes for patients; significantly fewer (26%) think it would lead to worse outcomes.

Americans who have heard a lot about AI are also more optimistic about the impact of AI in health and medicine for patient outcomes than those who are less familiar with artificial intelligence technology.

Four-in-ten Americans think AI in health and medicine would reduce the number of mistakes, though a majority say patient-provider relationships would suffer

Americans anticipate a range of positive and negative effects from the use of AI in health and medicine.

Chart shows Americans tilt positive on AI’s ability to reduce medical errors; greater concern around data security, patient-provider relationships

The public is generally optimistic about the potential impact of AI on medical errors. Four-in-ten Americans say AI would reduce the number of mistakes made by health care providers, while 27% think the use of AI would lead to more mistakes and 31% say there would not be much difference.

Many also see potential downsides from the use of AI in health and medicine. A greater share of Americans say that the use of AI would make the security of patients’ health records worse (37%) than better (22%). And 57% of Americans expect a patient’s personal relationship with their health care provider to deteriorate with the use of AI in health care settings.

The public is divided on the question of how it would impact the quality of care: 31% think using AI in health and medicine would make care for people like themselves better, while about as many (30%) say it would make care worse and 38% say it wouldn’t make much difference.

Americans who are concerned about bias based on race and ethnicity in health and medicine are more optimistic than pessimistic about AI’s potential impact on the issue

Chart shows 64% of Black adults say bias based on patients’ race or ethnicity is a major problem in health and medicine

When it comes to bias and unfair treatment in health and medicine based on a patient’s race or ethnicity, a majority of Americans say this is a major (35%) or minor (35%) problem; 28% say racial and ethnic bias is not a problem in health and medicine.

There are longstanding efforts by the federal government and across the health and medical care sectors to address racial and ethnic inequities in access to care and in health outcomes.

Black adults are especially likely to say that bias based on a patient’s race or ethnicity is a major problem in health and medicine (64%). About four-in-ten Hispanic (42%) and English-speaking Asian adults (39%) also say this. A smaller share of White adults (27%) describe bias and unfair treatment related to a patient’s race or ethnicity as a major problem in health and medicine.

Chart shows among those who see a problem with bias based on race or ethnicity in medicine, 51% think relying more on AI would make the issue better

On balance, those who see bias based on race or ethnicity as a problem in health and medicine think AI has potential to improve the situation. About half (51%) of those who see a problem think the increased use of AI in health care would help reduce bias and unfair treatment, compared with 15% who say the use of AI would make bias and unfair treatment worse. A third say the problem would stay about the same.

Among those who see a problem with bias in health and medicine, larger shares think the use of AI would make this issue better than worse among White (54% vs. 12%, respectively), Hispanic (50% vs. 19%) and English-speaking Asian (58% vs. 15%) adults. Views among Black adults also lean in a more positive than negative direction, but by a smaller margin (40% vs. 25%).

Note that for Asian adults, the Center estimates are representative of English speakers only. Asian adults with higher levels of English language proficiency tend to have higher levels of education and family income than Asian adults in the U.S. with lower levels of English language proficiency.

Chart shows about half of those who see racial or ethnic bias in health and medicine think the
use of artificial intelligence would help address the issue

Asked for more details on their views about the impact of AI on bias in health and medicine, those who think it would improve the situation often explain their view by describing AI as more objective or dispassionate than humans. For instance, 36% say AI would improve racial and ethnic bias in medicine because it is more neutral and consistent than people and human prejudice is not involved. Another 28% explain their view by expressing the sense that AI is not biased toward a patient’s characteristics. Examples of this sentiment include respondents who say AI would be blind to a patient’s race or ethnicity and would not be biased toward their overall appearance.

Among those who think that the problem of bias in health and medicine would stay about the same with the use of AI, 28% say the main reason for this is because the people who design and train AI, or the data AI uses, are still biased. About one-in-ten (8%) in this group say that AI would not change the issue of bias because a human care provider would be primarily treating people even if AI was adopted, so no change would be expected.

Among those who believe AI will make bias and unfair treatment based on a patient’s race or ethnicity worse, 28% explain their viewpoint by saying things like AI reflects human bias or that the data AI is trained on can reflect bias. Another reason given by 10% of this group is that AI would make the problem worse because human judgment is needed in medicine. These responses emphasized the importance of personalized care offered by providers and expressed the view that AI would not be able to replace this aspect of health care.

Americans’ views on AI applications used in cancer screening, surgery and mental health support

The Center survey explores views on four specific applications of AI in health and medical care that are in use today or being developed for widespread use: AI-based tools for skin cancer screening; AI-driven robots that can perform parts of surgery; AI-based recommendations for pain management following surgery; and AI chatbots designed to support a person’s mental health.

Public awareness of AI in health and medicine is still in the process of developing, yet even at this early stage, Americans make distinctions between the types of applications they are more and less open to. For instance, majorities say they would want AI-based skin cancer detection used in their own care and think this technology would improve the accuracy of diagnoses. By contrast, large shares of Americans say they would not want any of the three other AI-driven applications used in their own care.

For more on how Americans view the impact of these four developments read, “How Americans view emerging uses of artificial intelligence, including programs to generate text or art.”

AI-based skin cancer screening

AI used for skin cancer detection can scan images of people’s skin and flag areas that may be skin cancer for testing.

Chart shows majority of Americans say they would want AI to be used in their own skin cancer screening

Nearly two-thirds of U.S. adults (65%) say that they would definitely or probably want AI to be used for their own skin cancer screening. Consistent with this view, about half (55%) believe that AI would make skin cancer diagnoses more accurate. Only 13% believe it would lead to less accurate diagnoses, while 30% think it wouldn’t make much difference.

On the whole, Americans who are aware of this AI application view it as an advance for medical care: 52% describe it as a major advance while 27% call it a minor advance. Very few (7%) say it is not an advance for medical care.

Chart shows 65% of U.S. adults say they would want AI to be used in their own skin cancer screening

Majorities of most major demographic groups say they would want AI to be used in their own screening for skin cancer, with men, younger adults, and those with higher education levels particularly enthused.

A larger majority of men (72%) than women (58%) say they would want AI to be used in their screening for skin cancer.

Black adults (57%) are somewhat less likely than White (65%) and Hispanic (69%) adults to say they would want AI used for skin cancer screening. Experts have raised questions about the accuracy of AI-based skin cancer systems for darker skin tones.

Younger adults are more open to using this form of AI than older adults, and those with a college degree are more likely to say they would want this than those without a college degree.

In addition, those who have heard at least a little about the use of AI in skin cancer screening are more likely than those who have heard nothing at all to say they would want this tool used in their own care (75% vs. 62%).

AI for pain management recommendations

AI is being used to help physicians prescribe pain medication. AI-based pain management systems are designed to minimize the chances of patients becoming addicted to or abusing medications; they use machine learning models to predict things like which patients are at high risk for severe pain and which patients could benefit from pain management techniques that do not involve opioids.

Chart shows two-thirds of U.S. adults say they would not want AI to help determine amount of pain medication they get

Asked to consider their own preferences for treatment of pain following surgery, 31% of Americans say they would want this kind of AI guiding their pain management treatment while two-thirds (67%) say they would not.

This reluctance is in line with people’s beliefs about the effect of AI-based pain management recommendations. About a quarter (26%) of U.S. adults say that pain treatment would get better with AI, while a majority say either that this would make little difference (40%) or lead to worse pain care (32%).

Among those who say they’ve heard at least a little about this use of AI, fewer than half (30%) see it as a major advance for medical care, while another 37% call it a minor advance. By comparison, larger shares of those aware of AI-based skin cancer detection and AI-driven robots in surgery view these applications as major advances for medical care.

Chart shows U.S. adults aware of AI use in pain management more likely to want this in their own care than those unfamiliar with this technology

Those with some familiarity with AI-based pain management systems are more open to using AI in their own care plan. Of those who say they have heard at least a little about this, 47% say they would want AI-based recommendations used in their post-op pain treatment, compared with 51% who say they would not want this. By comparison, a large majority (72%) of those not familiar with this technology prior to the survey say they would not want this.

Demographic differences on this question are generally modest, with majorities of most groups saying they would not want AI to help decide their pain treatment program following a surgery.

Performing surgery with AI-driven robots

AI-driven robots are in development that could complete surgical procedures on their own, with full autonomy from human surgeons. These AI-based surgical robots are being tested to perform parts of complex surgical procedures and are expected to increase the precision and consistency of the surgical operation.

Americans are cautious toward the idea of surgical robots used in their own care: Four-in-ten say they would want AI-based robotics for their own surgery, compared with 59% who say they would not want this.

Chart shows 59% of Americans say they would not want AI-powered robots to be used in their own surgery

Still, Americans with at least some awareness of these AI-based surgical robots are, by and large, convinced they represent an advance for medical science: 56% of this group says it is a major advance and another 22% calls it a minor advance. (For more on how Americans view advances in artificial intelligence, read “How Americans view emerging uses of artificial intelligence, including programs to generate text or art.”) Public familiarity with the idea of AI-based surgical robots is higher than for the three other health and medical applications included on the survey; 59% say they have heard at least a little about this development.

Chart shows men more likely than women to say they would want surgical robots with AI to be used in their own care

As with other AI applications included in the survey, those unfamiliar with AI-driven robots in surgery are especially likely to say they would not want them used in their own care (74% say this). Those who have heard of this use of AI before are evenly divided: 50% say they would want AI-driven robots to be used in their surgery, while 49% say they wouldn’t want this.

Across demographic groups, men are more inclined than women to say they would want an AI-based robot for their own surgery (47% vs. 33%). And those with higher levels of education are more open to this technology than those with lower levels of education.

There is little difference between the views of older and younger adults on this: Majorities across age groups say they would not want an AI-based robot for their own surgery. This contrasts with preferences about other uses of AI in medical care in which younger adults are more likely than older adults to say they would want AI applications for skin cancer screening or pain management.

AI chatbots designed to support mental health

Chatbots aimed at supporting mental health use AI to offer mindfulness check-ins and “automated conversations” that may supplement or potentially provide an alternative to counseling or therapy offered by licensed health care professionals. Several chatbot platforms are available today. Some are touted as ways to support mental health wellness that are available on-demand and may appeal to those reluctant to seek in-person support or to those looking for more affordable options.

Chart shows large majority of Americans do not want to use an AI chatbot to support their mental health

Public reactions to the idea of using an AI chatbot for mental health support are decidedly negative. About eight-in-ten U.S. adults (79%) say they would not want to use an AI chatbot if they were seeking mental health support; far fewer (20%) say they would want this.

In a further sign of caution toward AI chatbots for mental health support, 46% of U.S. adults say these AI chatbots should only be used by people who are also seeing a therapist; another 28% say they should not be available to people at all. Just 23% of Americans say that such chatbots should be available to people regardless of whether they are also seeing a therapist.

Large majorities of U.S. adults across demographic and educational groups lean away from using an AI chatbot for their own mental health support. Read the Appendix for details.

Chart shows many in U.S. support limits on the availability or use of AI chatbots for mental health wellness

Even among Americans who say they have heard about these chatbots prior to the survey, 71% say they would not want to use one for their own mental health support.

And among those who have heard about these AI chatbots, relatively few (19%) consider these to be a major advance for mental health support; 36% call them a minor advance, while 25% say they are not an advance at all. Public opinion on this use of AI, as with many others, is still developing: 19% of those familiar with mental health chatbots say they’re not sure if this application of AI represents an advance for mental health support.

(PEW)

FEBRUARY 22, 2023

Source: https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2023/02/22/60-of-americans-would-be-uncomfortable-with-provider-relying-on-ai-in-their-own-health-care/

 

783-43-10/Polls

Americans Largely Satisfied With Their Personal Life

The 83% of Americans who are at least somewhat satisfied with their personal life matches the historical average since 1979, and broad majorities of U.S. adults likewise report they are satisfied with nine specific life aspects.

Between 81% and 90% of U.S. adults are either “very” or “somewhat” satisfied with their family life, current housing, education, job, community and personal health, while 71% to 77% express the same degree of satisfaction with the amount of leisure time they have, their standard of living and their household income.

Personal Satisfaction Matches Average Since 1979

Americans’ satisfaction with their overall personal life has ranged from 73% to 90% in Gallup’s periodic measures since 1979. The record high was measured in 2020, two months before the COVID-19 pandemic swept across the U.S. It was short-lived, however, as the reading fell to 82% in 2021. Last year, it edged up to 85%.

The low point in personal satisfaction came in the summer of 1979 during the energy crisis. Personal satisfaction was also below 80% during challenging economic times in the early 1980s, early 1990s and the years after the Great Recession.

Gallup has asked a follow-up question in most years since 2001 about the degree to which Americans are satisfied with their personal life. In a Jan. 2-22 Gallup survey, 50% of U.S. adults say they are very satisfied, in line with the previous two years’ 51% readings but well below the 65% high from 2020. The only times Gallup found a smaller share of Americans very satisfied with their life were in December 2008, during the global economic crisis, and in 2011, as the country was still recovering from the 2007-2009 recession.

Satisfaction Highest for Family Life, Housing; Lowest for Household Income

Gallup also measures U.S. adults’ degrees of satisfaction and dissatisfaction with the nine specific life aspects. Majorities of Americans are very satisfied with four of the elements, including their family life (66%), current housing (63%), education (53%) and community as a place to live (51%). In addition, a majority of employed Americans are very satisfied with their work (54%).

Fewer express such high satisfaction with the remaining four life elements -- the amount of leisure time they have (43%), their personal health (41%), their standard of living (37%) and their household income (30%). However, taking the percentages who are “somewhat satisfied” into account, no fewer than 71% of Americans are satisfied with any of these aspects.

Americans’ levels of high satisfaction are lower than they were in the 2019 poll on all but two of the life aspects -- housing and amount of leisure time, for which the readings differ by just one percentage point. The aspects with the greatest declines in the percentage of U.S. adults saying they are very satisfied are personal health (-13 points), family life (-10), community as a place to live (-10), standard of living (-9) and household income (-6). Among U.S. employees, high satisfaction with their job has declined by eight points.

Satisfaction with many of the life aspects was also measured in a 1995 survey, but the results are not comparable because of differences in the content of the two surveys.

Income, Age, Marital Status, Education Affect Life Satisfaction

Income has more of an effect than any other major demographic factor on Americans’ satisfaction with their personal life and with most specific life aspects. Those with a higher household income are more likely than lower-income adults to say they are very satisfied with all measures except for the amount of leisure time they have. The biggest differences between these two groups’ satisfaction levels are seen in household income, standard of living and housing.

Americans’ satisfaction with their personal life overall and with the specific aspects also differs by other demographic factors, including age, marital status and college education.

By age:

  • Older adults are generally more satisfied than middle-aged and younger adults with their personal life and most aspects of it.
  • Majorities of Americans aged 55 and older are very satisfied with their personal life in general as well as six of the nine specific areas. Meanwhile, family life is the only area that garners majority-level satisfaction from U.S. adults aged 18 to 34. Middle-aged adults’ satisfaction levels are closer to young adults on several measures (including housing, work, community, standard of living and income), but they are closer to older adults’ levels on family life, education and overall personal life.
  • About four in 10 Americans in all three age groups are very satisfied with their personal health.

By marital status:

  • With the exception of their personal health, married adults are significantly more satisfied than unmarried adults across all dimensions measured.
  • Majorities of married adults are very satisfied with their overall personal life, education, family life, community, housing and job. Slim majorities of unmarried adults are very satisfied with just two aspects -- family life and housing.

By education level:

  • College graduates are slightly more likely than those without a college degree to say they are very satisfied with their personal life (54% vs. 48%, respectively).
  • College graduates are also more satisfied than nongraduates with their education (by 33 points), standard of living (17 points), housing (16 points), income (12 points), community (nine points) and health (eight points).
  • There is little to no difference between the two groups in satisfaction with their job, amount of leisure time or family life.

Bottom Line

Even as the American public is largely dissatisfied with the way things are going in the U.S., they are broadly satisfied with the direction their personal life is taking. Still, they are now slightly less satisfied with their overall personal life than they were in the few years before the COVID-19 pandemic. While satisfaction in the immediate pre-pandemic years was high for the trend, current attitudes match the historical average.

Americans’ latest depressed satisfaction with their household income and standard of living likely reflects the toll inflation has taken over the past year. The pandemic also may have affected people’s physical or mental health, their job and their family life.

(Gallup)

FEBRUARY 23, 2023

Source: https://news.gallup.com/poll/470888/americans-largely-satisfied-personal-life.aspx

 

783-43-11/Polls

48% Of Americans Played A Sport In 2022

Latest Polling on Sports Fandom

The latest poll from Ipsos unpacks what sports Americans play and watch, how they tune into their favorite games, and attitudes towards the biggest controversies in the world of sports.

Sports fandom infographic

A slim majority of Americans, particularly Black Americans, support allowing college athletes to profit off their name, image, and likeness (NIL).

For more data, go here.

NIL sports

More data here.

Latest Polling on Sports Betting

Ipsos explores American attitudes and behavior toward sports betting, showing few Americans bet on sports as the country remains split on legalizing sports betting.
Polling shows that Americans are divided about legalizing in-person or online or app-based sports betting. Though, when forced to choose, most Americans agree that people should be allowed to bet and spend their money how they choose over feeling betting is wrong because it can lead to addictive behavior.

legalize

To see more, download the data here.

Still, 8% of Americans report betting on sports online or on an app in the past year, while 4% of have done so in-person. The NFL is the most popular league to bet on.

Infographic

To see more, download the data here.


Ipsos Point of View: Sports in America

New Ipsos research explores what sports and sports fandom looks like in America today and how controversies in sports can reflect a broader political and social divide in American society, finding that not all Americans have access to activities.

Americans activity

To learn more, download the report here.

Policymakers invested in getting more Americans active and executives interested in advertising, communicating, or building business in any sector touching the world of sports need to understand that while these are fun and games, many critical differences exist in the public that may be the difference between success and failure.

Streaming

Download the data here.

Ipsos Point of View: Sports betting is everywhere. How do Americans feel about it?

While only one in three Americans feel that sports betting is a way to get people more engaged with sports, 69% of sports bettors feel the same. Compared to the general public, they are more likely to self-describe as sports fans, play fantasy sports, go to live sporting events, and watch more niche types of sports, like esports.

sports bettors

 To learn more about the data behind sports betting, download the full report here.

People who don’t bet on sports don’t do so because of four broad reasons: money concerns, lack of knowledge, moral opposition, or it’s just illegal where they live.

Non-sports bettors

(Ipsos USA)

22 February 2023

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/sports-0

 

783-43-12/Polls

American Health In Polarizing Times

This week we released our first Axios-Ipsos American Health Index, which builds off of our Axios-Ipsos Coronavirus Index and expands into some of the biggest worries Americans have around healthcare, behaviors surrounding health and wellness, and what policies the public supports.

Between March 2020 and now, a lot has changed. COVID isn’t the top concern for people anymore, as other perennial issues in the American health landscape, like healthcare costs and drug overdoses, rise to the fore.

What has stayed the same? In short, partisanship. The political divide and the different realities partisans live in continue to color views for many Americans.

This week we break down Americans’ experiences with health and healthcare in five charts below.

  1. Number one threat. When asked about the biggest threat to public health, the opioid and fentanyl epidemic is looming large for many Americans. From there, other public health issues like obesity and access to guns or firearms follow. Compared to these other issues, COVID is low on the list.Number one threat
  2. Partisan perspective. Partisanship colors people’s world view. While near-majorities of Democrats and Republicans alike feel that overdose deaths and violent crime are increasing in their area, Republicans are more likely to report this than Democrats. Because of the lingering polarization around the pandemic and vaccinations, Democrats are more likely to feel that COVID and flu or other infections are rising in their community. Two Americas, one red, the other blue.Partisan perspective
  3. Polarizing pandemic. There is no unified understanding of whether the pandemic is even over. Few Democrats feel the pandemic is over, while most Republicans have moved on. Partisanship split people’s realities during the pandemic and it continues to divide how people interpret the present. The tale of two Americas.Polarizing pandemic
  4. Vaccination nation. Most Americans have received at least one dose of the COVID vaccine. Given the hesitancy surrounding and political jousting over the COVID vaccine, this is a remarkable feat to reach. But booster shots are lagging way behind. This hasn’t majorly impacted us yet, but time will tell if it comes back to haunt us.Vaccination nation
  5. Healthcare messengers. Americans still view their doctors, family, and friends as trusted sources of information when it comes to health. But government institutions and politicians are too close to the political sphere to warrant resounding trust from Democrats and Republicans alike. We trust who is closest to us, even as the partisan COVID effects on institutions—like the CDC—linger.Healthcare messengers

Healthcare is a worry for many Americans, occupying a good portion of ;President Biden’s State of the Union address a few weeks ago.

But Democrats and Republicans tell different stories about the last three years. And that changes how they view the present. Partisans don’t see eye-to-eye on the healthcare issues facing the country or their communities, which puts constraints on exactly who and how people can communicate around these issues. It’s another story of a nation divided.

(Ipsos USA)

24 February 2023

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/american-health-polarizing-times

 

783-43-13/Polls

Inflation Taking Disproportionate Toll On Canadians Aged 18-34, Impacting Confidence In Their Financial Future

Canadians aged 18-34 are being disproportionately impacted by inflation and it is impacting confidence in their financial future, according to the 32nd annual RBC Financial Independence poll conducted by Ipsos.

Given today’s economic environment, just 18% of Canadians aged 18-34 are feeling more confident about their financial future than before, a significant drop from the 31% who, last year, said they were feeling more confident about their future emerging from the pandemic. Nearly eight in ten of those aged 18-34 (77%) are concerned (31% very/47% somewhat) about their cashflow right now, significantly higher than the proportions of those aged 35-54 (69%) and 55+ (57%) who say the same.

Thinking about what is preventing them from saving more than they currently do, low incomes (46%) fixed expenses that are too high (35%), and unexpected expenses (27%) are among the primary culprits for young adults.

One half (52%) of those aged 18-34 admit that they were unprepared (15% not at all prepared/37% not very) to deal with the current inflation rates. By comparison, only one in three (33%) Canadians aged 55+ say they were not prepared (9% not at all/23% not very). Reflecting on the reasons for their lack of preparedness, younger Canadians say they just never experienced high inflation before (47%), that they didn’t anticipate how it would affect their ability to pay for basic needs (43%), or their ability to save/invest for the future (32%). One in three (34%) young adults say they were already living paycheque to paycheque.

The challenging economic situation has caused many to pay closer attention to their own finances. Among the areas where younger Canadians are increasing their focus include their day-to-day living expenses (62%, up 14 points from last year), managing their debt (34%, up 7 points), and monitoring the value of their investments (25%, up 5 points).

Many 18-34 year-olds are also taking the opportunity to set financial priorities, as three in ten (30%) indicate that building their investment portfolio is a key financial priority. Among those with this goal, six in ten (62%) intend to put some money aside whenever they can in order to achieve it. Moreover, nearly half (47%) agree (8% strongly/39% somewhat) that they are willing to pay fees if it means a better return on their investments, making them the most likely age cohort to say so.

The data also show that twice as many younger Canadians are prioritizing a comfortable retirement (41%) to an early retirement (21%) when setting goals for investing. Among their top investment goals are building a safety net (45%), building wealth (44%), achieving financial independence (41%) and providing protection for their family (35%).

However, those aged 18-34 do acknowledge that there are some barriers to achieving these goals. Nearly half (44%) admit they are not knowledgeable (11% not at all/34% not very) about investments and a majority (54%) say they have no financial plan, whether it be formal or informal. Further, most (77%) have not consulted with a professional advisor for financial advice within the last year.

Many young adults are off on the right footing. Half (51%) have a TFSA, and 38% have an RRSP, but they do lag older generations in the ownership of both. If they could choose to put money into only one type of plan, either an RRSP or a TFSA, half (50%) would choose the TFSA, while only 25% would opt for the RRSP, and 25% do not know which option they would choose.

(Ipsos Canada)

23 February 2023

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/inflation-taking-disproportionate-toll-canadians-aged-18-34

 

AUSTRALIA

783-43-14/Polls

ANZ-Roy Morgan Consumer Confidence Recovers Slightly, Up 2.3pts To 80.4

ANZ-Roy Morgan Consumer Confidence recovered slightly this week, up 2.3pts to 80.4. However, Consumer Confidence is still a large 21.4pts below the same week a year ago, February 14-20, 2022 (101.8). Consumer Confidence is now 3.9pts below the 2023 weekly average of 84.3.

Driving this week’s recovery in Consumer Confidence was sentiment related to personal finances compared to a year ago and whether now is a ‘good/bad time to buy’ major household items.

Consumer Confidence was up in all five mainland States this week and above 80 in Victoria, Western Australia and South Australia but under 80 in New South Wales and Queensland.

Current financial conditions

Future financial conditions

  • Looking forward, under a third of Australians, 30% (down 1ppt), expect their family to be ‘better off’ financially this time next year while just over a third, 34% (down 1ppt), expect to be ‘worse off’.

Current economic conditions

  • Only 6% (down 1ppt) of Australians expect ‘good times’ for the Australian economy over the next twelve months compared to almost two-fifths, 37% (down 4ppts), that expect ‘bad times’.

Future economic conditions

  • Sentiment regarding the Australian economy in the longer term is very weak with only 12% (down 1ppt) of Australians expecting ‘good times’ for the economy over the next five years compared to 19% (up 1ppt) expecting ‘bad times’.

Time to buy a major household item

  • When it comes to buying intentions now 20% (up 3ppts) of Australians, say now is a ‘good time to buy’ major household items while over half, 51% (down 3ppts), say now is a ‘bad time to buy’.

ANZ Senior Economist, Adelaide Timbrell, commented:

Consumer confidence increased last week but remained lower than before the February RBA cash rate hike. At 80.4, the Consumer Confidence Index was among the worst ten results in the 150 weeks since the initial COVID outbreak in Australia. The confidence among those paying off their mortgage is still lower than the other groups, at 73.8. Average confidence rose for all the three housing groups during the week, with gains of 1.4pts for people who own their home outright, 3.1pts for those paying off their mortgage, and 2.6pts for renters. Household inflation expectations softened to 5.1%, potentially a lagged response to the rise in interest rates.

 

(Roy Morgan)

February 21, 2023

Source: https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/9170-anz-roy-morgan-consumer-confidence-february-21

 

MULTICOUNTRY STUDIES

783-43-15/Polls

Arab Public Opinion Prefers China Over USA 11 Out Of 12 Surveyed Nations Hold That View

This piece is part of a four-part series published by the Middle East Institute in cooperation with Arab Barometer analyzing the results of the seventh wave of the Arab Barometer surveys.

Apart from Europe and the South China Sea region, the Middle East and North Africa is one of the epicenters for what the U.S. has termed “great power competition” especially between the U.S. and China, although Russia also figures into the assessment. There is particular sensitivity to China’s perceived economic inroads into the region as it has surged to become its largest economic partner. Apart from China’s dependence on imports of Gulf oil to meet its energy needs, China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has expanded Beijing’s footprint from Oman in the east to Morocco in the west.

Based on Arab Barometer’s Wave 7 raw favorability numbers, China’s increased presence in the region appears to have paid dividends in terms of its popular standing, especially in North Africa. Except for Morocco, where favorability for the U.S. at 69% is marginally higher than China’s rating at 64%, the U.S. consistently lags behind China in the view of respondents to the 12-country survey. The favorability gap is particularly notable in Algeria, where China enjoys a 20-point edge over the U.S. at 67% vs. 47%. One possible explanation for the broad disparity in favorability ratings for the U.S. between Morocco and Algeria, of course, is widespread anger in Algeria, and the converse in Morocco, over the Trump administration’s December 2020 decision to recognize Moroccan sovereignty in the Western Sahara. The Arab Barometer seventh wave polling was undertaken after that decision, between October 2021 and July 2022.

But even in Tunisia and Libya, where the U.S. has focused a great deal of effort in promoting positive outcomes in their political transitions since the Arab Spring, China is viewed far more favorably than the U.S. (in Tunisia by 50% vs. 33% and in Libya by 49% vs. 37%). Skepticism over the U.S. intent in providing foreign assistance appears to underlie unfavorable views of the U.S. Only 18% of rural and 15% of urban Tunisians agreed that U.S. assistance is motivated by a desire to improve people’s lives whereas a plurality of Tunisians (40% rural and 44% urban) and a majority of Libyans (50% rural and 53% urban) believe the U.S. uses its foreign assistance to gain influence. By contrast, pluralities of Libyans (35%) and Tunisians (40%) saw Chinese objectives in providing foreign assistance as aiding either economic development or internal stability.

One contributing factor in low U.S. favorability ratings is likely the overhang of negative regional sentiments toward U.S. policy in the Trump administration. Broad regional attitudes toward Biden administration policies are notably higher than his predecessor’s poll results. In Sudan, for example, a majority of Sudanese (52%) consider Biden administration policies to be good or very good compared to only 20% who viewed Trump policies in a positive light. In Morocco, Biden’s approval stands at 46% vs. the 14% who viewed Trump favorably despite the Western Sahara decision. Even among populations that continue to hold the U.S. in low esteem, there has been improvement since the Biden administration came into office. In Tunisia, 23% of those polled think that Biden’s policies are good or very good as compared to Trump’s 10% while the similar comparison in Palestine is 11% vs. 6%. In that regard, despite overall improvement in attitudes toward Biden’s regional policies, the vast majority of Palestinians clearly see little reason for optimism in U.S. policy toward their issues since Biden came into office.

Biden’s improved numbers also reflect an uptick in popular perceptions of Biden’s foreign policy as compared to Chinese President Xi Jinping’s policies. A majority of Sudanese (52%) see Biden’s policies as good or very good compared to Xi’s 43%. In Morocco, as well, the public holds generally more favorable attitudes toward Biden (46%) as opposed to Xi (39%). Elsewhere in the region, including, surprisingly, in Jordan and Lebanon, U.S. and Chinese policies are seen in roughly equivalent terms (Jordan: Biden 28%/Xi 26%; Lebanon: Biden 31%/Xi 35%). And Xi is notably more popular with the publics in several countries, including Algeria (Xi 53%/Biden 35%), Iraq (Xi 48%/Biden 35%), and Tunisia (Xi 35%/Biden 23%).

On economic relations, there is clearly a region-wide desire to strengthen relations with global partners. For both the U.S. and China, young people (18-29) generally favor the economic relationships more than their older fellow citizens (30+). Even in Tunisia, nearly 60% of young respondents favor closer economic ties to the U.S, nearly equal to the 65% who would like to see closer economic ties to China. Overall in the region, even in those countries that are generally skeptical of ties to the U.S., there is a desire to seek stronger economic links. In Iraq and Libya, for example, equal numbers of young people want to strengthen economic ties to the U.S. and China. In several other countries, including Morocco, Mauritania, and Sudan, young people clearly favored the U.S. as an economic partner over China.

Despite these seemingly solid favorability numbers overall for the Chinese, however, a public diplomacy professional in Beijing would clearly see warning signs in some of the Arab Barometer measures of popular perceptions. In particular, there appears to be a fairly high degree of ambivalence about their country’s economic relations with China among the publics as compared to the U.S. Notably, there are significant minorities in several of the countries, particularly among rural and less-educated respondents, that would like to see economic links to China reduced. In Lebanon, for example, 23% of respondents with a maximum secondary education and a full third of rural respondents preferred to see economic ties to China loosened. In Iraq, 23% of secondary educated and 21% of rural respondents advocated for reduced economic relations with China, as well.

There are a number of factors that appear to contribute to the ambivalence about China as an economic partner. In all of the countries surveyed, often by wide margins, the Chinese are seen as the country that provides the lowest quality products. In Iraq, for example, 69% of respondents thought that Chinese products were low quality as compared to only 8% who thought of U.S. products that way. Similarly, in Jordan, 64% of survey participants saw China as a producer of low quality products compared to 7% who viewed U.S. products in that light. In the other seven countries surveyed, a plurality of respondents all agreed that Chinese goods were of low quality. Conversely, the U.S. and Germany were seen through all of the nine countries surveyed as producers of the highest quality products. Respondents who viewed Chinese products positively ranged from a low of 8% in Algeria to a high of 18% in Libya.

Similarly, Chinese companies were held in generally low esteem as business partners and employers. For the most part, respondents in the surveyed countries preferred businesses in either the U.S. (Lebanon, Mauritania, Sudan) or Germany (Algeria, Libya, Morocco, Tunisia) as contracting partners. Only in Iraq did the plurality (27%) of respondents prefer Chinese companies as business partners. Integrity appears to be a factor in that perception as respondents generally saw U.S. (Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Sudan) and German (Algeria, Mauritania, Tunisia) businesses as least likely to pay bribes while Chinese companies lagged behind. Likewise, U.S. (Iraq, Jordan, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Sudan) and German (Algeria, Lebanon, Tunisia) businesses were deemed most likely to pay their local employees top salaries with Chinese companies generally scoring poorly in that regard.

Arab Barometer’s Wave 7 surveys straddled the outbreak of conflict between Russia and Ukraine, so we will have to await Wave 8 to determine if Russia’s war of aggression will affect regional attitudes toward Russia and Vladimir Putin. For the most part, views of Russia and Putin in Wave 7 were not substantially different from views of the U.S. and Biden or China and Xi. In fact, in a number of instances, views of Russia and Putin closely approximated respondent attitudes toward China and Xi. In Lebanon, Algeria, and Libya respondents rated Russian and Chinese favorability in nearly identical terms (Lebanon: China-51%/Russia-52%; Algeria: China-67%/Russia-66%; Libya: China-49%/Russia-49%) while in Iraq and Tunisia, respondents rated Putin and Xi equally (Iraq: Putin-46%/Xi-48%; Tunisia: Putin-34%/Xi-35%). Only in Morocco did U.S. favorability significantly exceed Russia and China (U.S.-69%/China-64%/Russia-38%) while in Jordan, the U.S. and China were rated equally ahead of Russia (U.S.-51%/China-51%/Russia-39%). The same holds true as to the personal favorability estimations for Biden, Putin, and Xi. Only Sudanese and Moroccan respondents held a significantly more favorable view of Biden (Sudan: Biden-52%/Xi-43%/Putin-34%; Morocco: Biden-46%/Xi-39%/Putin-26%).

The same picture also holds among the three competitors in economic favorability ratings. Only in Algeria did a significantly higher number of respondents favor stronger economic ties to Moscow as compared to the U.S. or China (Russia-55%/China-38%/U.S.-31%). In Morocco and Sudan, respondents favored stronger ties to the U.S. (Morocco: U.S.-42%/China-36%/Russia-28%; Sudan: U.S.-58%/China-48%/Russia-45%). Among the other countries participating, there are few distinctions among the U.S., China, and Russia, although China is the preferred partner in Tunisia, Libya, and Iraq. Trend lines may be somewhat more revealing. After enjoying a significant rise in economic favorability during the Obama years (Wave 3 and Wave 4), positive views of U.S. economic ties dropped significantly during the Trump administration (Wave 5) but have now recovered somewhat in the latest (Wave 7) survey. By contrast, both China and Russia saw drops in their economic favorability ratings between Wave 5 and Wave 7, with China experiencing a precipitate decline in its favorability rating in Jordan, albeit from an extremely high 70% favorable to a still respectable 50%. Aside from Tunisia, where its favorability rating essentially flat-lined from Wave 4 to Wave 7, Russia’s favorability has also declined between Wave 5 and Wave 7.

A recurring theme in discussions with interlocutors in the region is that the MENA countries will resist becoming a battleground in a “great power competition” between the U.S., Russia, and China. Although there are clearly differences in how the three competitors are viewed in the region, it’s also clear that public opinion in the Arab Barometer Wave 7 survey echoes the views of political leaders that they seek to maintain positive political and economic relations with all three. As noted, the potential impact of Russia’s aggression in Ukraine on MENA popular attitudes remains to be measured. But that variable aside, unlike the post-World War II Cold War era, these populations will favor strongly remaining non-combatants in any new cold war.

(Arabbarometer)

February 21, 2023

Source: https://www.arabbarometer.org/2023/02/as-great-power-competition-in-the-middle-east-heats-up-polling-data-shows-a-complex-picture-of-popular-attitudes/

 

783-43-16/Polls

Between Economic And Environmental Concerns, Europeans Are Reinventing Their Mobility Habits, A Survey In 6 European Nations

Less promiscuity with strangers, more means of personal transport

Since the Covid and the multiple periods of confinement, Europeans have adapted their way of life, including their mobility habits.

Some "soft" modes of transport are used more frequently than before: walking (31% of Europeans say they walk more often than before Covid), cycling (30% of electric bike users use it more frequently, 25 % for classic bikes), but also scooters (28% of personal scooter users do it more often).

On the contrary, certain modes of transport involving proximity to strangers have seen their use decrease: carpooling (27% of users do so less often), public transport (25% use them less often), taxis or car sharing follow the same trend.

Changes in mobility habits are above all triggered by two dimensions: environmental concerns on the one hand, and cost on the other, in line with the current concerns of citizens in terms of ecology and inflation.

In fact, two-thirds of Europeans (64%) say they have had to change their mobility habits because of inflation and the cost of fuel. The same proportion say they have already changed their daily mobility habits to make them more “green”.

Despite everything, the use of the personal car remains fairly stable: as many motorists use it more often than less often than before (respectively 16%, the remaining 68% declaring that their use has remained stable).

In the end, the car is still the majority in Europe: nearly 9 out of 10 Europeans (88%) now own at least one car in their household.

A future without having your own car? Possible for some, impossible for others...

1 in 3 European motorists (32%) could consider not owning a personal car in the future - however, only 8% could do so "definitely".

However, looking at specific populations, differences appear in relation to the car: young Europeans are more inclined to give up their personal car (40% say they could do so among 18-34 year olds, including 12% "definitely"), and people living in big cities as well, having access to more mobility alternatives (35% of big city dwellers might give up owning a personal car, compared to 31% in smaller towns and areas rural). There are also differences between countries: more reluctance to give up the car in France and Belgium, less in Italy and Spain.

Ecological awareness already seems to be very present: half of Europeans (54%) say they have a bad conscience about the carbon footprint of their car, even if only 15% "totally agree" with this statement - much higher scores in Portugal and Spain (75% agree).

...while obstacles to the adoption of electric vehicles remain

Most of the cars currently owned by Europeans are petrol or diesel engines (a total of 89% of main household cars), while hybrid cars represent 5% and electric vehicles barely 1%. However, looking at future intentions, there is real potential for hybrid and electric vehicles: almost a third (31%) of Europeans could consider buying a hybrid or electric car, and 9% "certainly ".

However, significant obstacles remain to accelerate the adoption of electric vehicles. First of all, the cost: in a context of inflation and economic crisis, the cost of acquiring the vehicle is the first obstacle mentioned (cited by 52% of non-intentional EVs), the costs of maintaining the vehicle appear also (18%).

Charging points also represent a significant barrier (32% of mentions for the difficulties of installing charging stations at home or their absence in the workplace). Finally, Europeans are not yet convinced by the autonomy of EVs for long-distance journeys (30% of mentions).

All of Europe soon by bike?

Almost 2 out of 3 Europeans (63%) have at least one bicycle in their household, and almost half use their bicycle at least once in a while, whether on weekdays or weekends (46%) .

Electric bikes have already been adopted by 1 in 5 Europeans (20% use a personal electric bike), especially among 18-34 year olds (30%). Differences emerge between countries: electric bikes are less widespread in Spain and Portugal (16% use respectively), while Belgium and Germany are more advanced in their adoption (respectively 25% and 24%).

Scooters continue to become a habit: 17% of Europeans own at least one (and even more in France and Spain), with similar ownership rates between standard scooters (13% of owners) and scooters electric (11%). Young Europeans are even more scooter enthusiasts than the rest of the population (28% of owners among 18-34 year olds).

The use of micro-mobility devices and bicycles has intensified since the Covid crisis: a third (33%) of micro-mobility / bicycle users have started using them regularly during or since the Covid crisis.

However, disparate situations in terms of safety and coverage emerge: while two thirds (62%) of users wear a bicycle/scooter helmet at least occasionally, 38% never wear any protection. And when asking Europeans about their coverage in the event of a bicycle/scooter accident, only a third of users are sure that they are covered by their insurance when using these vehicles, the other two thirds being unsure or not Covered.

In the end, a need for coverage for all modes and uses of mobility: more than 4 out of 10 Europeans could be interested in mobility insurance based on the person. This is particularly true among young people (53% interested among 18-34 year olds), bicycle users (56%), and scooter users (70%).

(Ipsos France)

February 21, 2023

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/fr-fr/entre-preoccupations-economiques-et-environnementales-les-europeens-reinventent-leurs-habitudes-de

 

783-43-17/Polls

North American Tracker: Artificial Intelligence (Ai) Tools And Politics

DISCOVER OUR MOST RECENT RESULTS BELOW! 

This survey is conducted in collaboration with the Association for Canadian Studies (ACS) and published in the Canadian Press. This series of surveys is available on Leger’s website. 

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) TOOLS

opinion on AI Tools canadians and americans

CANADIAN POLITICS 

  • If a federal election were held today, 35% of Canadian decided voters would vote for Poilievre’s CPC and 32% would vote for Trudeau’s LPC.  
  • Canadians think Justin Trudeau (24%) would be the best prime minister, closely followed by Pierre Poilievre (21%).* 

AMERICAN POLITICS 

  • For the 2024 presidential election, Trump is currently the most preferred Republican candidate among American Republican voters and Biden is currently the most preferred Democratic candidate among American democrat voters.** 
  • Inflation (65%) and the U.S. economy (59%) are Americans’ biggest concerns right now. 

(Leger Opinion)

February 23rd, 2023

Source: https://blog.legeropinion.com/en/surveys/north-american-tracker-february-15-2023/

 

783-43-18/Polls

Remote Employees Most Wary Of Job Security, A Survey Across 10 Nations

Global workers are watching as many corporations struggle in the current economic climate, resulting in layoffs for many. The global workforce has been under considerable strain since 2020 - first acclimating to the expansion of pandemic-fueled remote work, then adjusting back to hybrid or reintroduction of return-to-office plans. As companies, and employees, adjust to modern ways of working, they are also adjusting to the impacts of a squeeze in the global economy.

Kantar conducted research into the feelings, experiences and behaviours of global workers as they traverse an evolving workplace. Read on to learn more about how the workforce is grappling with concerns about their personal job security, and what they’re doing to combat it.

Remote workers and junior staff consider themselves high risk for layoffs

Half of global workers are worried their companies may need to cut costs and lay-off employees. Remote workers, however, are more concerned about their personal job security than those who have returned full-time in-person. Employees who have returned to offices may feel a greater sense of personal connection with supervisors or upper management compared to those who may feel more compelled to prove the value of their work as remote staff.

 layoff

Age and seniority are also indicators of stress over job safety in a time of economic instability. 69% of Gen-Z are worried about the security of their roles, compared to 51% of Boomers. Additionally, the vast majority - 86% - of workers at a Manager level or below are concerned about layoffs, compared to only 14% of those are Director level or higher.

Side hustles and job hopping more frequent for Gen Z and Millennials

As the global workforce watches large and small companies announce layoffs, they are also taking actions to safeguard their personal financial stability and diversify their income. 7 of 11 (64%) workers who are worried about their company needing to lay-off employees already have a side job or would consider one.

32% already have a “side hustle,” to bring in extra money or meet financial obligations, but younger workers are more apt to pursue it. Gen-Z is roughly 1.5 times more likely than Boomers to at least consider adding a second job to their primary position. As Gen-Z enters the labour force, they are also likely paid less than older professionals and more driven to bring in additional income to meet financial needs or lifestyle desires.

side jobs

Of those who already have a side job, “making more money” is a top driver - regardless of other demographic factors - and it's often related directly to the current state of the economy. Nearly half (49%) report pursuing side gigs to “bring in more money due to economic uncertainty.”

Global workers are also looking for new roles outside their current company to protect their professional careers. 4 in 6 workers (67%) who are concerned about layoffs at their company are already considering new employment elsewhere.

layoff concerns

As the workforce looks ahead, many reduce spending or increase savings

The labour force is also adjusting their spending habits and the ways they make money. 42% of Millennials are pursuing a second income stream while Boomers and Gen-X are more apt to delay an investment or reduce spend. Across generations, workers are more considerate of their spending, or pursuing additional streams of income as threats of more corporate layoffs persist across industries.

Globally, workers in different countries are reacting in varied ways. South Africans are most likely to reduce spending, while workers in India and Germany report “delaying an investment” as result of the current economic climate.

reduce spending

(Kantar)

23 February 2023

Source: https://www.kantar.com/inspiration/research-services/remote-employees-most-wary-of-job-security-pf