BUSINESS & POLITICS IN THE WORLD 

GLOBAL OPINION REPORT NO.773 

Week: December 12 – December 18, 2022 

Presentation: December 23, 2022

 

Contents

 

SUMMARY OF POLLS. 6

 

ASIA  

            Inside Afghanistan: Record Numbers Struggle to Afford Basics. 11

 

MENA   13

            UAE Parents Have High Concerns over Their Child’s Exposure To Inappropriate Online Content 13

 

AFRICA.. 15

            Health Insurance Coverage for Nigerians Still Abysmal; An Urgent Call For New Strategy. 15

 

WEST EUROPE.. 17

            Labour Voters More Wary about Politics of Child’s Spouse. 17

            Most Brits Expect Recession, As Consumer Confidence Dips To Six-Year Low.. 19

            Half of Leave Voters Doubt Johnson Can Secure New Brexit Deal 21

            Few Believe the Government's Explanation of Why Parliament Is To Be Suspended. 23

            Brits Oppose Parliament Suspension By 47% to 27%... 24

 

NORTH AMERICA.. 25

            5 Facts about the Abortion Debate In America. 25

            U.S. Concern about Climate Change Is Rising, But Mainly Among Democrats. 28

            Most Americans Say Science Has Brought Benefits to Society and Expect More to Come. 31

            Parents' Concern about School Safety Remains Elevated. 34

            As Labor Day Turns 125, Union Approval Near 50-Year High. 36

            Americans' Satisfaction with U.S. Education at 15-Year High. 38

            Most Cannabis Consumers Use on a Weekly Basis or More. 41

 

AUSTRALIA.. 43

            Ride-Sharing App Uber Overtakes Taxis as Preferred Private Transport Service. 43

            Rising Numbers of Australians Looking At Electric and Hybrid Vehicles for Their Next Set of Wheels. 45

            Toyota And Mazda Drivers Most Brand Loyal; Have The Luxury Brands Lost Their Lustre?. 48

 

MULTICOUNTRY STUDIES. 50

            Britons Make Worst Tourists, Say Britons (And Spaniards And Germans) 50

            Brazilians Least Satisfied in Amazon With Environment 55

            India Ranks 9th on Happiness among 28 Global Markets: Ipsos Global Happiness Survey. 58

            The Biggest Beauty Influencer Isn’t Who You Think It Is. 59

 


 

INTRODUCTORY NOTE

 

This weekly report consists of twenty-one surveys. The report includes three multi-country studies from different states across the globe.

 

773-43-22/Commentary:

SUMMARY OF POLLS

 

ASIA

773-43-01/Polls

12 Percent Of Japanese People Say They Cook To Relax

In countries other than Japan, many people said they enjoy the act of cooking, such as baking and boiling. (Photo by Atsuko Shimamura)

Despite Japan’s reputation for good although sometimes quirky food, an online survey suggests Japanese are not overly fond of cooking compared with people in other countries.

This was the finding of a private survey among 800 men and women aged at least 18 each in Japan, the United States, Italy, China, Thailand and Indonesia carried out in January by Sigmaxyz Inc., a Tokyo-based consulting firm. It has been conducting surveys on diet and well-being in six countries since 2019.

Respondents were allowed to give multiple answers about what they enjoy about cooking. “Selecting ingredients at stores” and “being complimented for great cooking” were cited by the largest portion of respondents in Japan at 21 percent each, although 21 percent also said, “they don't cook.”

“Nothing is enjoyable in cooking” and “deciding what to cook” were cited by the second-largest portion of Japanese respondents at 17 percent each.

The results showed that two negative answers--“they don't cook” and “nothing is enjoyable in cooking”--were included in the top five answers in Japan.

The ratios for these two answers were up from the previous survey conducted in 2020.

But positive answers came high on the list in the other countries.

“Cooking itself” and “serving meals” were cited by the largest portion of respondents in the United States at 44 percent, while “cooking itself” was cited by 55 percent of those in China and 47 percent of those in Thailand.

And when the respondents were asked to give multiple answers on why they cook, “to cut down on food expenses” was outstandingly high among those in Japan at 44 percent.

“By necessity” came next at 18 percent, followed by “they don’t cook” (17 percent), “out of a sense of obligation to the family” (16 percent), “to have communication time with family members” and “to control their own health and condition” (14 percent).

Only 12 percent of the respondents in Japan said they “are interested in cooking itself and can obtain knowledge.”

But more than twice as many said so in the other Asian countries, with Thailand at 35 percent, China at 34 percent and Indonesia at 33 percent.

Even those in Italy, which ranked second from bottom only above Japan, agreed at 25 percent.

And while 12 percent of the respondents in Japan said they cook to “relax,” at least 30 percent of those in each of the other five countries said so, with Italy ranked first at 43 percent.

“There are two factors in cooking, with one being a form of household chore and the other involving creativity,” said Tomomichi Sumi of Sigmaxyz. “There is a good balance between the two in the overseas countries, while (cooking) is more strongly accepted as domestic labor in Japan.”

(Asahi Shimbun)

December 13, 2022 

Source: https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/14778595

 

773-43-02/Polls

High Inflation Is Moving Households Away From Buying More Diverse, Different Products

In the first 10 months of 2022, the number of different products purchased by households decreased for the first time. The number of purchases of different products, which has always been on the rise in the past years, declined for the first time. This shows that the variety of products in households is decreasing.
 

The decline in product diversity was sharper in EU SES group households.



In the EU group, product diversity fell more, while total spending on products increased less. The hypothesis that this spending falling more in the household may be offset by a higher increase in eating and drinking outside is also not valid: the EU's spending at home and abroad is increasing less than others, the EU is hitting the brakes more.


In the EU group, satisfaction with living standards and the expectation of improvement for the future have also gradually declined, falling below the TR average.

Ipsos, Turkey CEO Sidar Gedik made the following evaluations about the data; High inflation is distracting households from buying more diverse, diverse products. In our Household Consumption Panel research, we always detected an increase in the variety of products purchased in the past years. For the first time in the first 10 months of this year, we have seen a decline in this area. We now buy 2% fewer varieties, compared to 7% in cleaning products, for example.

The Ministry of Labor announced that the proportion of minimum wage earners among all employees is 37%. And the minimum wage has increased by more than 90% in January and July in 2022. For the low-paid people, we can say that it is much more difficult, even impossible, to save, so this wage increase means that disposable income is somewhat protected against inflation. Of course, it would not be right to see this as an increase in welfare, but we can only say that it is a reduction in the loss of welfare. On the other hand, salaries increased relatively less in higher income groups, especially those who worked for wages. The rate of loss in the disposable income of this group is greater. We started to see the reflections of this situation in consumption statistics. As I mentioned, the variety of products purchased in an average household decreased by 2% in the period January-October 2022 compared to the same period last year, while this decrease was 4% in households in the EU socioeconomic segment. EU households are (declining) approaching the average, spending 11% more than the average in the 12 months before October 2021, spending 5% above average in the last 12 months in October 2022. C2 households were on average during the same periods, rising 1% above average, while DE households also took a step towards the average, approaching 1% (rising).

The loss faced by citizens belonging to the EU socio-economic group is also reflected in their general satisfaction and expectations. At the end of 2021, dissatisfaction with the personal standard of living in this group was behind the general average, but by September 2022, we started to see an above-average dissatisfaction. The same applies to expectations for the next few months. About a year ago, the proportion of people who thought their personal economies would deteriorate was lower in the EU segment than the national average. 10 months later, the situation reversed. The EU is more desperate than the general population.

This economic erosion that the upper socioeconomic groups face as consumers is a change that needs a lot of thought. Of course, a more balanced picture in income distribution is the goal of every country, but we should aim to be equalized by getting richer, not by getting poorer.

(Ipsos Turkey)

16 December 2022

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/tr-tr/yuksek-enflasyon-haneleri-daha-cesitli-farkli-urun-satin-almaktan-uzaklastiriyor

 

773-43-03/Polls

Between 2011 To 2022, There Has Been A 61% Increase In The Numbers Of Doctors As Compared To A 135% Increase In The Number Of Dentists In The Country

Abstract As a developing country, Pakistan has been struggling with developments in the health sector. Even though there has been constant development happening, the country still has a long way to go. Undertaking an analysis of facts and figures available in The Pakistan Statistical Yearbook 2022 published by the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, this press release provides an overview of the growth in the health sector over the last decade. The complete Pakistan Statistical Yearbook is available HERE. What is the Big Data Analysis Series by Gallup: Gallup Pakistan’s Big Data series was started by Bilal I Gilani, Executive Director of Gallup Pakistan. Bilal explains the rationale of the series, “The usual complaint from academics and policy makers is that Pakistan does not have data availability. Our experience negates that. Pakistan has lots of data, but it is not available in a usable form and it’s not widely accessible. At Gallup we plan to bridge this gap in terms of accessibility and use of data. The Gallup Big Data series has earlier worked with data sets such as PSLM, Labour Force Survey, and Economic Survey reports as well as National Census Reports and Election Commission Data sets.” The current series is using the Pakistan Statistical Yearbook, an annual compilation which seldom has data points not covered in many other reports. We hope that these series are useful, and we welcome both feedback as well as possible collaborations as we create a public good in the form of useful data sets in Pakistan’ What data points this current edition covers: This series aims to present the important learnings from the Pakistan Statistical Yearbook 2020 for policy makers, the public, as well as for marketers in an easy and understandable way. In particular, this edition looks at the developments in the health sector over the last decade. The health sector has been flourishing when it comes to the number of medical personnel as it has increased. However, there hasn’t been much progress in the development of new health institutions and the facilities available at them. The series’ main aim is to provide data. Implications of these data points for the health sector as well as wider socio-political ramifications is something we would like to trigger in relevant circles.

Today’s Topic is “Health” Key Findings 1) The number of health institutions in Pakistan increased by 10% from 2011 to 2020 2) Almost 37% increase in the number of beds was seen in health institutions from 2011 to 2020 3) 61% increase in the number of doctors as compared to 135% increase the number of dentists in the country from 2011 to 2020 4) 69% increase in lady health visitors, 50% increase in the number of nurses and 40% increase in the number of midwives was seen in the previous decade Table 1: Increase in health institutions, bed and personnel from 2011 to 2020 Health Institutions 10% Beds 37% Doctors 61% Dentists 135% Lady Health Visitors 69% Midwives 50% Nurses 40% 1) The number of health institutions in Pakistan increased by 10% from 2011 to 2020 Healthcare in Pakistan has been a focal point after the country signed the U.N. Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Pakistan began to initiate healthcare programs, establishing both Basic Health Units as well as Rural Health Units. Basic Health Units are assigned to NGOs, who manage the day-to-day operations, administer medicine and overlook the facilities. The number of health institutions increased from 13243 in 2011 to 14455 in 2016, however, the number of health institutions fell from 2016 to 2017, after which it increased gradually till 2020. The decline in 2017 could be due to the privatization of government hospitals due to mismanagement. Instead of increasing and improving facilities at government hospitals, the government was focused on transferring public hospitals to private organizations to operate under public-private partnership. However, the sudden increase in the number of health facilities that can be seen in 2020 could be owed to the Covid-19 pandemic. As the number of covid cases started to increase in the country, the government had to build new health facilities to treat the patients. Figure 1: Number of health institutions in Pakistan from 2011-2020

2) Almost 37% increase in the number of beds was seen in health institutions from 2011 to 2020 The number of beds in health institutions has increased over the decade, however, it has not been sufficient to cater the populations needs, as we saw how the hospitals quickly ran out of bed spaces during the pandemic. The population of the country is growing annually at a rate of over 2% and the rate at which the beds are increasing are not enough to sustain the growing population. The sudden increase from 2019 to 2020 could be due to the Covid pandemic. When the pandemic broke out, the government converted some of the public centers like the expo center into covid wards with a large number of beds – to cater to the increasing number of patients. This led to an increase in the hospital beds Figure 2: Number of beds in health facilities in Pakistan from 2011-2020

3) 61% increase in the number of doctors as compared to 135% increase the number of dentists in the country from 2011 to 2020 In a press release published by Gallup Pakistan previously, (which can be found here) it was seen that there has been a trend of pursuing science amongst matriculation students, and the number of students passing their matriculation exams has increased significantly in the last decade. The increase in the number of doctors and dentists could be owed to that. As per the statistics, the number of doctors has increased significantly, however, the on-ground situation tells us that there is still a lack of doctors. This can be attributed to the incompetence of the government, an appropriate number of doctors have not been posted in hospitals, owing to which the patients face lot of problems daily in getting medical treatment at private and government hospitals in the entire country. Moreover, as per the recommendations of the World Health Organization, a dental surgeon versus population ratio should be one to 20,000 people. However, even with the huge increase in the number of dentists, the ratio of dentists to population is one dentist for more than 75000 people. Thus, the number of dentists is still too low.

4) 69% increase in lady health visitors, 50% increase in the number of nurses and 40% increase in the number of midwives was seen in the previous decade Even though the number of nurses has increased by 50%, it is still not enough to keep up with the increasing population as the country still faces a shortage of more than 1.4 million nurses. As per the global standards, it is an obligation that around two doctors, a dentist and eight nurses should be taking care of 1,000 people however the story in the country is different where this standard is not met in number of doctors and nurses. Lady health Visitors have a broad understanding of basic health care and are responsible for a wide range of activities at the community level, which is why they are essential health professionals. The increase in lady health workers and midwives can be said to have decreased the maternal mortality rate as these professionals attend to females giving birth. Lady health visitors have also been essential in informing and educating the rural females of various health issues. The increase in the number of Lady Health Visitors could be owed to the Lady Health Worker Program (LHWP), introduced in 1994. In 2000, the program was renamed the National Program for Family Planning and Primary Health Care, but it is still commonly known as the Lady Health

Worker Program. Following the 18th Amendment, the management of the LHWP has been devolved to the Provincial Governments. Figure 4 – Number of Lady Health Visitors, Midwives and Nurses from 2011 to 20202

5) 69% increase in lady health visitors, 50% increase in the number of nurses and 40% increase in the number of midwives was seen in the previous decade A quick glance at the statistics makes it seem like the situation of the health sector in Pakistan has been improving over the past decade, however, if we look at the per capita statistics, we can see that even though the situation has improved, it is still not enough to cater to the needs of the population. According to World Bank’s data on the Pakistani population, the population in 2011 was 183340168 while in 2020, the population was 220892331. Based on these figures, the situation of beds, and health personnel has gotten slightly better. The recommended number of doctors by WHO is one doctor per 1000 people, in 2020, Pakistan had one doctor per 8073.6 people. This is almost eight times greater than the recommended number, which can put into perspective how poorly the country is doing. Moreover, the number of health institutions per capita has increased, which means that the increase in the number of health institutions has not been enough.

(Gallup Pakistan)

December 16, 2022

Source: https://gallup.com.pk/wp/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Health-pr.pdf

 

AFRICA

773-43-04/Polls

Government Officials And The Police Remain The Most Violators Of Human Rights In Nigeria

A new public opinion poll conducted by NOIPolls has revealed that Government officials (30 percent) and the Police (26 percent) are the main violators of human rights in Nigeria as disclosed by Nigerians whose rights have been violated in the past. Sadly, it is worth noting that the institutions and government agencies established to protect and defend its citizenry are the ones primarily indicted for human rights violations in the country. 

More findings from the poll also revealed that issues of human rights violation are prevalent in Nigeria as disclosed by 88 percent of respondents interviewed. Regarding violation, 31 percent of adult Nigerians nationwide claimed their human rights have been violated in the past. Analysis by gender showed that there are more male (36 percent) than female (26 percent) respondents whose rights have been violated before. Consequently, when asked about the component of human rights that have been violated, 25 percent claimed that their ‘right to freedom of movement had been trampled upon in one way or another. While 11 percent mentioned that their ‘right to freedom from torture/degrading treatment’ has been infringed on, another 10 percent disclosed the ‘right to life’ amongst other human rights violations.

Finally, the poll result showed that most victims (75 percent) of human rights violations in Nigeria do not report violations committed against them. Therefore, it is important to create frequent awareness campaigns for the citizenry on their basic human rights as recommended by 36 percent of the adult Nigerians interviewed. Also, as advocated by 19 percent of Nigerians, the government should enforce laws against human rights (s) violators in the country as this will serve as a warning to other violators of human rights in Nigeria. These are some of the key findings from the Human Rights Poll conducted in the week commencing November 7th, 2022.

Background

NOIPolls joins the world in commemorating the 75th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which is observed annually across the world on 10th December. This campaign aims to draw people’s attention to the issues surrounding their human rights irrespective of who or where they are in the world. This year’s Human Rights Day theme is “Dignity, Freedom, and Justice for All” and the call to action is hashtagged #StandUp4HumanRights. In commemoration of World Human Rights Day, NOIPolls conducted a public opinion poll to gauge the awareness and perception of Nigerians regarding their basic human rights.

Survey Findings

The first question sought to measure human rights awareness in Nigeria and the result showed that a larger proportion of adult Nigerians nationwide (88 percent) claimed to be mindful of their basic human rights.

Furthermore, findings from the poll also revealed the concern for human rights violations is prevalent in Nigeria as disclosed by 88 percent of respondents interviewed.  

Regarding violation, 31 percent of adult Nigerians nationwide claimed that their human rights were violated. Analysis by gender showed that there are more male (36 percent) than female (26 percent) respondents whose rights have been violated before. Also, an analysis of the geographical location indicated that the South-South zone accounts for the highest number of Nigerians in this category.

Similarly, of the 69 percent who claimed that their rights have not been violated before, 17 percent admitted that they know someone whose rights have been violated before. The South-South zone also had the highest number of Nigerians who mentioned this.

Consequently, when asked which human rights have been violated, 25 percent claimed that their ‘right to freedom of movement had been trampled upon in one way or another. While 11 percent mentioned that their ‘right to freedom from torture/degrading treatment’ has been infringed on, 10 percent disclosed the ‘right to life’ amongst other human rights violations.

In addition, Nigerians who claimed that their rights were violated were further probed, and sadly, the poll findings revealed that 30 percent of Nigerians nationwide claimed that government officials are primarily responsible for violating their rights. Similarly, 26 percent lamented that their rights have been violated by the police, while 22 percent blamed family and friends for violating their human rights.

When asked if the incident was reported, 25 percent indicated that the incident was reported while 75 revealed that it was not reported.

Of the proportion (25 percent) who claimed that the incident was reported, 65 percent stated that they reported it to the police. While 16 percent mentioned that they reported to Human Rights Organizations, 13 percent reported to the court among other organizations

With regards to recommendations on reducing human rights violations in Nigeria, 36 percent of Nigerians suggested that the government should create awareness for people to know their basic human rights. Similarly, while 19 percent advocated for the government to enforce laws against human rights violators in the country, 9 percent encouraged good governance as a way of reducing human rights violations in Nigeria. Another 7 percent advised that law enforcement agencies in Nigeria should be taught and made to respect basic human rights while 6 percent hinted that the judicial system in the country should be allowed to be independent amongst other mentions.

In conclusion, the poll results have shown that most Nigerians believe that human right violation is prevalent in the country. For instance, 31 percent of adult Nigerians nationwide disclosed that their rights have been trampled upon before while few claimed that they know people whose rights have been infringed on in the past.

Sadly, respondents who claimed that their right to freedom of movement, ‘right to freedom from torture/degrading treatment, and ‘right to life had been violated in the past reported they were primarily violated by government officials and the police. Given that government officials and the police are ranked highest violators of human rights, it is, therefore, imperative that routine training is conducted, reorientation of law enforcement officers across all cadres, and government officials are sensitized on what constitutes human rights as part of efforts to protect the citizenry.

Finally, the poll result showed that most victims of human rights violations in Nigeria do not report violations committed against them. Therefore, it is important to create frequent awareness campaigns for the citizenry on their basic human rights as recommended by 36 percent of the adult Nigerians interviewed. Also, as advocated by 19 percent of Nigerians, the government should enforce laws against human rights violators in the country as this will serve as a warning to other violators of human rights in Nigeria.

(NOI Polls)

December 15, 2022

Source: https://noi-polls.com/human-rights-poll-2/

 

WEST EUROPE

773-43-05/Polls

Six In Ten Are Reducing Their Heating Usage, Despite Recent Cold Weather

Half of the population are wearing more layers or using blankets to avoid high energy costs while 13% are still not using heating at all 

With temperatures dropping in many parts of the UK over the past week, YouGov has looked into ways people are attempting to reduce their energy costs by cutting back on heating usage. 

Similarly to when we asked in October, three quarters (73%) of the public are cutting back on the amount of gas and electric they use at home, with six in ten (63%) reducing their heating usage specifically.  

When looking specifically at those who are ‘struggling financially’ – Britons who describe themselves as struggling, or unable, to afford their everyday costs – the share of people cutting back on heating usage rises to eight in ten (79%). 

The most common ways the public are trying to reduce heating usage include wearing more layers or using blankets (52%), reducing the temperature on the thermostat (42%) or reducing the time they have the heating on (42%). People are also being cautious about heating individual rooms, with a third (34%) making sure they are closing doors to keep heat in a certain room and one in five (20%) using fewer rooms in their home. The number of people taking these steps have all increased since October.  

Despite temperatures dropping below zero in many areas of the country, 13% of Britons say they are not using their heating at all. This is down from 25% back in October when temperatures were a lot milder. Amongst those struggling financially, a quarter (26%) are currently still not using heating at all, down from 44% two months ago.  

(YouGov UK)

December 14, 2022

Source: https://yougov.co.uk/topics/economy/articles-reports/2022/12/14/six-ten-are-reducing-their-heating-usage-despite-r

 

773-43-06/Polls

Support For Nurse Strikes Falls – Though Still Outweighs Opposition – As Half Say The Pay Rise They’re Asking For Is Too High

As thousands of nurses strike for the first time, new Ipsos polling shows support for the strikes has fallen in the past month. When the strikes were first announced in November, three in five Britons supported the action (59%), now half support it (50%). The proportion of those in opposition to the strikes has risen from 24% last month to 34% now.  

Opinions are similar when it comes to ambulance workers, including paramedics, call handlers and emergency care assistants. Just under half of those living in England and Wales (47%) support the strike action while 37% oppose it. 

Most Britons appear to be aware of the reasons for the strikes, with around three-quarters (77%) believing they are striking for an increase in pay, while around a third (32%) say it is for better standards of care for patients. Other common reasons for the strikes mentioned are to increase staff numbers in the NHS (41%) or to increase the amount of money spent on the NHS (33%).

When considering how acceptable it is for healthcare workers to strike for different reasons, the majority of Britons find both an increase of pay (61%) and better standard of care for patients (68%) acceptable reasons. 

Looking specifically at the request of the Royal College of Nursing for a 5% pay rise on top of inflation – a total pay rise of 17%, around half of Britons (49%) think this pay rise is too high. Meanwhile, 37% say it is about right and only 7% deem it too low. 

The public are concerned about the ability of the NHS to provide safe care for patients during the strike actions - 80% are concerned about this for the nurse strikes, and 82% for the strikes by ambulance workers. 

Kate Duxbury, Research Director at Ipsos, said:

There are signs that support for the nurses’ strikes has fallen since November, perhaps as the strikes have become a reality and concerns about the ability of the NHS to provide safe care for patients during the strikes set in. On balance though, the public are supportive rather than in opposition to both the nurses’ and ambulance workers’ strikes – it remains to be seen how this will change as the strikes progress, given the public’s often positive views of, and concern for, NHS staff.

(Ipsos MORI)

15 December 2022

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/support-nurse-strikes-falls-though-still-outweighs-opposition-half-say-pay-rise-theyre-asking-too

 

773-43-07/Polls

Most Britons Have A Negative Economic Outlook For The Country Amid The Rising Cost Of Living

The majority of Britons say the government is managing the cost of living badly

The latest YouGov data suggests that the Prime Minister and Chancellor still have a lot of work to do to convince the public that they have a grip on the economy and the rising cost of living - 85% of Britons describe the economy as being in a bad state currently, while 8 in 10 (78%) say the government is doing a poor job of managing the cost of living.

Following Jeremy Hunt’s budget announcements in November, people remain overwhelmingly negative about the country’s economic prospects, with 7 in 10 (68%) expecting the economy to get worse over the next 12 months. Even amongst Conservative voters the picture is bleak – most (58%) of this group expect the economy to get worse.

There has been a small shift in people’s expectations of their own finances, although this should also be of concern to the Government. When first asked in September, 65% said that they expected their household’s financial situation to get worse over the next year; this figure has now dropped to 57%.

However, while fewer people are now saying they have negative expectations, they have only moved as far as saying they expect their situation to be about the same, rather than anticipating better times ahead. Given that nearly two thirds (64%) say their finances have got worse over the last 12 months, it appears that government support is having a limited impact.

The British public are also concerned about exactly what measures will be taken to try and boost the economy. Three quarters (73%) are worried that in the next two to three years people like them will suffer directly from cuts in public services spending as the government looks to tighten the purse strings, while 4 in 10 (43%) are concerned about losing their job or struggling to find work.

Low-income households are struggling with essential costs

Low-income households are particularly feeling the pinch, with 70% of Britons with a household income of £20,000 or less saying that they have already had to make cuts to their usual spending in response to the rising cost of living including more than half (56%) who say they expect to make further cuts. Amongst Britons in low-income households, 4 in 10 (37%) say they are struggling to pay their energy bills most or all of the time, and a third (32%) say they struggle to afford food most or all of the time.

Most worryingly, half of Britons (49%) in low-income households are either struggling to make ends meet (35%) or cannot afford their essential costs and are going without food and heating (14%) as we enter the coldest months of the year.

(YouGov UK)
December 15, 2022

Source: https://yougov.co.uk/topics/economy/articles-reports/2022/12/15/most-britons-have-negative-economic-outlook-countr

 

773-43-08/Polls

Two-Thirds Of Britons Who Celebrate Christmas Will Have An Artificial Tree This Year

More than half of Britons believe a fake tree is the greener option 

With the festive season well under way, a new YouGov survey has revealed that just 15% of Britons who celebrate Christmas will buy a real tree this year. Six in ten (60%) say they will use an artificial tree they already own, while 7% plan to buy an artificial tree this year. 

Britons aged 18 to 24 are most likely to be celebrating with a real Christmas tree, at 25% compared to 9% of the over-65s. 

This is likely because the older generation has long since invested in an artificial tree, before environmental considerations became a factor, with two-thirds of those aged 65 and over using a fake tree they already own compared to 48% of 18-24 year olds. 

More than half of Britons believe an artificial tree is more environmentally friendly 

When considering manufacturing, materials, packaging and transport, a six-and-a-half-foot artificial tree has a carbon footprint equivalent to about 40kg of greenhouse gas emissions. This is more than twice that of a real tree of the same size that ends up in landfill and more than 10 times that of a real tree which is burnt.  

More than half of Britons (54%) think that having an artificial tree is more environmentally friendly than having a real tree each year, with only 16% believing a real tree is the greener option. It is estimated that you would need to keep a fake Christmas tree for at least 7 years before it has less of a carbon impact than buying a real tree each year.

 

How do Britons with real Christmas trees dispose of them? 

In terms of disposing of a real Christmas tree following the festive season, a third of Britons (33%) will take advantage of their local authority’s special collection service, with the trees then shredded and used on gardens and parks. A quarter of Britons (25%) will take their tree to a recycling centre, while 16% will re-plant it, and one in nine (11%) will shred it and use it on their own garden. 

(YouGov UK)

December 16, 2022

Source: https://yougov.co.uk/topics/society/articles-reports/2022/12/16/two-thirds-britons-who-celebrate-christmas-will-ha

 

773-43-09/Polls

Spending Of Russians In November Increased

Romir presents a monthly index of consumer activity* of Russians, demonstrating a change in household consumption of consumer goods. The index is calculated for both nominal and real expenses (adjusted for inflation according to Rosstat).

According to the results of a study based on the Romir Unified Data Panel**, in November 2022, the index of everyday nominal (without adjusting for inflation) expenses of Russians amounted to 235%, which is 10 percentage points (4.4%) more than in October. In annual dynamics, the index increased by 24 percentage points (11.4%). The growth of household spending is largely due to an increase in the frequency of purchases.

The index of real expenditures (adjusted for inflation) in October was 112%. Real expenditures increased by 4 percentage points (3.7%) compared to the previous month, but lower by 11 percentage points (0.9%) than in November last year.

 

(Romir)

16 December 2022

Source: https://romir.ru/studies/romir-rashody-rossiyan-v-noyabre-uvelichilis

 

773-43-10/Polls

1 in 3 Dutch people cut back on groceries

More than 1 in 3 Dutch people cut back on groceries. We especially find offers interesting. We also switch from A-brand to private label and to cheap basic products to save money. A positive side effect of budget cuts is that we leave sweets and cakes more often. All this yields money and a good feeling.

 

The rising prices of groceries and other fixed costs areputting the Dutch in their pockets. The reaction to this is visible: the Dutch consumer keeps his hand on the cut. For example,the five Dutch people pay attention to the expenditure, whereby this is really necessary for one third to be able to make ends meet. The Dutch are cutting back in different ways. This way, athird saves on groceries. This is evident from representative online research by Motivaction among 1,020 Dutch people, conducted in October 2022.

 

Consumers go for cheaper and replace A-brands for private labels

How does Dutch consumers tackle austerity? Consumers are opting for cheaper products in large numbers. For example, eand a quarter of consumers buy fewer products from A-brands. Eand larger group – a third of consumers – mainly buys more private label products. The second way to cut back is to cook more yourself. Eand a quarter of consumers dive into the kitchen more often and are less likely to use convenience products and ready-made products. Thirdly, we see a slight decrease in the purchase of organic products, sustainable products and local products. Finally, there is one way of cutting back that everyone knows and that 34% also actively use: offers.

 

Consumers cut back on unhealthy food and pull the cutting board out of the closet more often

Although in the winter months the supermarkets are full of goodies, from wreaths for the tree to chocolate milk with whipped cream, a fifth of consumers are cutting back on unhealthy food this year. We mainly cut back on sweets and cakes. But ohok the ready meals, frozen pizzas and other frozen meals latand we stand more often. At the same time, there is an increase in the often cheaper, healthy options such as fresh, uncutn vegetables, dry pasta and frozenvegetablesn.

 

Saving money and feeling good

Dutch and saving is a well-known combination. We go to the drugstore for promotions such as 2 for the price of 1, we drive to the neighboring countries for cheaper beer and gasoline and on the groceries weet 71% of the Dutch how they can best save. Besparen provides financialbenefit, but that is not the only thing. For example, 64% of consumers get a good feeling from this. To save money, just under half of consumers visit several supermarkets every week. In addition, a third of consumers go to a supermarket with lower prices in order to score the best deals.

 

(Motivaction Insights and Strategy)

12 December 2022

Source: https://www.motivaction.nl/kennisplatform/nieuws-en-persberichten/nederland-bezuinigt-op-boodschappen-voorkeur-voor-huismerken-en-goedkope-basisproducten-neemt-toe

 

773-43-11/Polls

More Than 4 Out Of 10 French People Have Been Victims Of Cyberviolence

The data collected from victims of cyberviolence point to a health and social emergency. As pointed out in the association's previous national survey, this violence is widespread: more than 4 out of 10 French people who say they have been victims of cyberviolence. They mainly target the most vulnerable or discriminated against people and the phenomenon particularly affects 18-24 year olds, who are 87% to have suffered from it, LGBTQI+ people (85%), racialized people (71%) and women under 35 (65%).

Moreover, among the respondents to the victims' survey, the majority are women (84% of respondents) as well as people discriminated against because of their gender identity and sexual orientation (43%). In more than 1 in 2 cases (51%) the victim was under 30 years of age at the time of the crime. As for the gendered dimension of online attacks, it also appears via the data collected on those identified as responsible for cyberviolence: men are involved in the perpetration of this violence in at least 74% of cases.

While threats and insults are the most frequent situations encountered by victims (93%), the non-consensual dissemination of intimate or degrading content concerns more than half of them (52%). Revictimization is frequent and 93% of victims say they have experienced several situations of cyberviolence, 40% of them even report having experienced between 7 and 10. Insults, threats, sending photos of genitals and exposure to violent content are situations that the majority of victims have suffered several times.

Far from being a virtual evil, cyberviolence has an extremely heavy impact on the health of victims, but also on their relational, family, school and professional development. The consequences can be extreme and 14% of victims say they have attempted suicide as a result of the violence suffered. It is impossible today to draw a clear line between offline and online: cyberviolence is intertwined with violence experienced in the tangible space and is part of a continuum of violence that most often targets women, girls and the most discriminated against.

However, the fight against this violence still relies mainly on the victims, who, in the absence of satisfactory remedies, feel isolated and develop costly and exhausting coping strategies. Less than one victim in 10 say they knew how to react at the time of violence and more than a third of them (36%) report having been made guilty when they confided in their entourage or professionals, this figure even rises to 69% for victims of non-consensual dissemination of intimate or degrading content.


Violence that is part of a continuum and continues offline

The digital space is not separated from the tangible world: threats made online do not remain at the stage of threats and are carried out, thus, 72% of victims say that cyberviolence has continued in person. They are even nearly 1 in 5 (16 and 18%) to report a experience of physical or sexual violence accompanying online violence. Victims of cyberviolence are therefore at great risk: it is not enough to turn off your computer or deactivate your social media accounts to stop this violence.

Moreover, for one in two victims (49%) the situation has been long-term and the violence has continued for at least a month – or even more than a year for a quarter of the victims. This violence leads victims to submit to costly coping and avoidance strategies that cause physical and psychological exhaustion and are harmful to their agency and freedom of expression. 32% of them have deactivated their social accounts following the violence.

Serious consequences for the health and lives of victims

The psychological and social consequences of cyberviolence are numerous and significant for victims, even more so when it comes to women and people discriminated against. In 1 in 2 cases, a medium to very high impact is reported by victims on their education or professional life. Online violence is also the cause of major health problems: it has a psychological impact in 80% of cases, and even a physical impact for 1 in 2 victims (46%).

Among the consequences reported by the victims, there are many symptoms of post-traumatic stress: hypervigilance (91%), anxiety and depressive disorders (88%) and insomnia (78%) and suicidal thoughts (49%). 45% of victims develop eating disorders and nearly 1 in 5 victims say they have already self-harmed as a result of violence. Finally, 31% of victims say they have increased their consumption of alcohol and substances because of the violence suffered.

An over-representation of women and discriminated against among respondents.

The digital world is a reflection of our society: there are all the oppressions and inequalities observed offline and the violence perpetrated there often targets the most discriminated against. Thus, the victims of cyberviolence who took the time to answer the questionnaire to testify about their experiences are mostly women (84%) and people who say they belong to a minority group and/or have a disability (80%). 72% of LGBTQI+ people report having experienced 7 to 10 situations of cyberviolence compared to 40% of respondents overall. In addition, people from disadvantaged groups or with disabilities report significantly greater consequences on their lives and health. Thus, LGBTQI+ people are more likely to feel hopeless and anxious than those who are not part of a minority group, they are also 3 times more likely to self-harm.

People with disabilities report 2 times more often a physical impact of violence than non-disabled people and are 3 times more likely than them to fail their studies — moreover, the violence they suffer has 6 times more often very serious consequences on their schooling or studies. As for racialized people, they report becoming hypervigilant 2 times more frequently than people who do not belong to a minority group. Victims discriminated against because of their religion are 3 times more likely to say they can no longer go to school or work as a result of online violence.

Poor access to the law

The judicial process of victims is fraught with pitfalls: 61% of respondents think that filing a complaint is useless and they cannot really be proven wrong. Although one in 4 victims went to the police station or gendarmerie, they complain in 70% of cases that their complaint has not resulted in any prosecution, while a third of victims have been refused to file a complaint – although this refusal is illegal. As for people from a religious minority, they are 4 times more likely to be unwelcome by the police and gendarmerie and not to be able to file a complaint than people who are not part of a minority group. Overall, online violence experienced by respondents resulted in a complaint followed by legal proceedings in only 3% of cases. Access to victims' rights is clearly insufficient and 17% of them say they did not file a complaint because they did not know they could do so.

A cruel lack of information and recourse

69% of victims admit that they did not know how to react when confronted with a situation of cyberviolence. While 74% were able to talk to at least one person about the violence, more than a third of those who remained silent did so because they did not know who to talk to or because they were afraid of the consequences/that the situation would worsen, and more than a quarter remained silent because they felt guilty. When they confided, the victims did so primarily in the friendly sphere — much less in the family or medical context. In addition, the level of information regarding support systems remains very low: 81% of victims say they are poorly informed on platforms available to help them, this figure even rises to 92% for those who were under 25 years old at the time of the violence. Only 27% of victims say they have heard of a device such as 30 18 and only 3% have used it. These figures point to serious and regrettable shortcomings in terms of government initiatives to ensure public information and care for victims of cyberviolence.

 

(Ipsos France)

December 15, 2022

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/fr-fr/cyberviolences-et-cyberharcelement-le-vecu-des-victimes

 

773-43-12/Polls

German E-Car Market Is Growing

The German electric car market continues to grow steadily despite inflation and the turbulent global political situation. Including September 2022, 556,000 electric vehicles (BEV, PHEV) were sold in Germany and the potential for further EV market growth is there: Compared to the previous year, the number of those considering an electric car for their next car increased from 28 to 33 percent.

 

In the joint project "Electric Car Market & Innovation Report 2022", YouGov and the Center of Automotive Management (CAM) are examining, among other things, the demographic composition of potential BEV customers and the purchase intentions of German consumers, as well as the developments in the electric mobility market in Germany.

 

 

 

Who buys electric cars?

 

The group of potential BEV buyers more often consists of men (62 percent) between the ages of 31 and 50 (43 percent). 34 percent of this target group currently owns more than one car and one in three BEV buyers (29 percent) believes that environmental policy should be completely preventive. Environmental protection is a high priority for potential BEV buyers and they see themselves as environmentalists. The majority of this target group (82 percent) sees climate change as the greatest threat to humanity (vs. 71 percent of the total population). 80 percent are of the opinion that fewer cars should be driven to protect the environment and that electric cars are clearly the means of transport of the future (76 vs. 47 percent of the total population). Potential BEV buyers are open to new technologies and products and generally have a keen interest in science and computers. The vast majority (88 percent) of the target group believe that technology makes life easier and many like to test products before they hit the market (69 vs. 62 percent car decision makers). Almost half of potential BEV buyers (49 percent) are interested in science and finance (47 percent)

 

Existing problems

 

Although the German EV market continues to grow dynamically, there are still large gaps in consumer knowledge that need to be closed for a possible purchase. The number of household decision-makers who previously had direct contact with electric vehicles (e.g. through their own ownership, test or taxi rides) increased by 5 percentage points compared to the previous year, but only 32 percent still had direct contact due to a lack of concrete contact points. Consumers most frequently come into contact with electric cars as passengers (19 percent).

Despite few points of contact, consumers see the advantages of e-cars: 29 percent of potential BEV buyers believe that current energy costs have made e-cars more attractive. However, the target group of potential BEV buyers have concrete ideas about the basic technical needs that an electric car should meet. Both potential BEV buyers and the group of car decision-makers in the household prefer an electric car with a long range and would also accept a longer charging time (0.9 and 0.8 percent respectively). In the eyes of consumers, an electric car should also be more suitable for city traffic and have a long range. A high engine power and a good suitability for the highway are currently rather less interesting.

With regard to improving the range and the public charging infrastructure, expectations of manufacturers and politicians are high, but consumers expect government support programs for electric mobility (37 percent) and electricity costs (74 percent) to deteriorate over the next 12 months. Many are already of the opinion that politics does not relieve motorists enough (51 percent potential BEV buyers, 64 percent car decision-makers).

(YouGov Germany)

December 13, 2022

Source: https://yougov.de/topics/consumer/articles-reports/2022/12/13/deutscher-e-auto-markt-wachst

 

773-43-13/Polls

Good Intentions: More Than Half Of Germans Want To Change Body Weight

Regardless of summer or winter, a slight majority of people in Germany want to change their own weight. As reasons, they name not feeling comfortable in their own body, but often health reasons are also mentioned. In the current target group analysis "Bodytransformation", we use the target group segmentation tool YouGov Profiles and data from the YouGov RealTime Omnibus to examine the target groups of those consumers who plan to gain or lose weight, but also those who are satisfied with their weight. The analysis takes a look at the demographic characteristics as well as the motivations and approach of the three consumer groups.

 

 

 

Women most often want to lose weight

Half of Germans are losing weight (50 percent), so they want to lose body weight. Decreasing are predominantly women (57 percent) and people who live in relationships (57 percent vs. 52 percent of the total population). More than half of this group (51 percent) eat frequently out of boredom (vs. 42 percent). Losing weight people spend a lot of time on social media, most often on Facebook (62 percent) and Instagram and YouTube (42 percent each). 57 percent of people losing weight want to lose weight because they don't feel comfortable in their bodies. But health reasons are also often cited as motivation to lose weight (42 percent). To lose body weight, the majority of people losing weight plan to eat less (64 percent), change their diet (55 percent) or exercise (52 percent).

 

Increasing are more likely to be men

Only 6 percent of Germans say they want to gain weight. This target group is more often male (71 percent) and significantly more likely to have a migrant background (40 percent vs. 17 percent of the total population). The vast majority of this consumer group (76 percent) enjoy discovering new dishes and foreign cuisines. This group is less active on Facebook than those consumers who want to lose weight (54 vs. 62 percent). Instagram (46 percent) and YouTube (44 percent), on the other hand, use them more often. The reasons for the desired weight gain are similar to those of those who lose weight: not feeling comfortable in their own body (38 percent) and health reasons (36 percent). In contrast to the group of people losing weight, the increasing also cite great social pressure as motivation (20 percent vs. 6 percent of those losing weight). To gain weight, this target group plans to eat more (45 percent), exercise (37 percent) and change their diet (32 percent).

(YouGov Germany)

December 15, 2022

Source: https://yougov.de/topics/health/articles-reports/2022/12/15/gute-vorsatze-mehr-als-die-halfte-der-deutschen-wi

 

NORTH AMERICA

773-43-14/Polls

Americans Don’t Have A Clear Idea Of Which Of Their Actions Have The Strongest Impact On Climate Change

Majorities of Americans think recycling, using energy efficient appliances, and carpooling have a large or moderate effect on reducing greenhouse gas emissions caused by a single person, despite research showing that these don’t make as much of a difference. The public is split on the impact of avoiding long flights, lowering the room temperature, buying fewer things, and installing a heat pump. Far fewer believe that changing their diet through eating vegetarian, vegan, or organic food has a large or moderate impact on a single person’s emissions, even as outside research indicates that these actions can have a sizeable impact on reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Through it all, across nearly all of these actions, partisan divisions exist.

To learn more about this, visit the interactive quiz the New York Times put together here.

 

Detailed findings:

About the Study

This NYTimes/Ipsos poll was conducted December 9 – 12, 2022, by Ipsos using the probability-based KnowledgePanel®. This poll is based on a nationally representative probability sample of 1,023 general population adults age 18 or older.

The margin of sampling error for this study is plus or minus 3.3 percentage points at the 95% confidence level, for results based on the entire sample of adults. The margin of sampling error takes into account the design effect, which was 1.17. The margin of sampling error is higher and varies for results based on other sub-samples. In our reporting of the findings, percentage points are rounded off to the nearest whole number. As a result, percentages in a given table column may total slightly higher or lower than 100%. In questions that permit multiple responses, columns may total substantially more than 100%, depending on the number of different responses offered by each respondent.

The survey was conducted using KnowledgePanel, the largest and most well-established online probability-based panel that is representative of the adult US population. Our recruitment process employs a scientifically developed addressed-based sampling methodology using the latest Delivery Sequence File of the USPS – a database with full coverage of all delivery points in the US. Households invited to join the panel are randomly selected from all available households in the U.S. Persons in the sampled households are invited to join and participate in the panel. Those selected who do not already have internet access are provided a tablet and internet connection at no cost to the panel member. Those who join the panel and who are selected to participate in a survey are sent a unique password-protected log-in used to complete surveys online. As a result of our recruitment and sampling methodologies, samples from KnowledgePanel cover all households regardless of their phone or internet status and findings can be reported with a margin of sampling error and projected to the general population.

The data for the total sample were weighted to adjust for gender by age, race/ethnicity, education, Census region, metropolitan status, household income, and party identification. The demographic benchmarks came from the 2021 March Supplement of the Current Population Survey (CPS). The party identification benchmark comes from ABC News.

  • Gender (Male, Female) by Age (18–29, 30–44, 45-59 and 60+)
  • Race/Hispanic Ethnicity (White Non-Hispanic, Black Non-Hispanic, Other, Non-Hispanic, Hispanic, 2+ Races, Non-Hispanic)
  • Education (Less than High School, High School, Some College, Bachelor or higher)
  • Census Region (Northeast, Midwest, South, West)
  • Metropolitan status (Metro, non-Metro)
  • Household Income (Under $25,000, $25,000-$49,999, $50,000-$74,999, $75,000-$99,999, $100,000-$149,999, $150,000+)
  • Party Identification (Democrat, Republican, Independent)

(Ipsos USA)

15 December 2022

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/news-polls/new-york-times-climate-action

 

773-43-15/Polls

At Least Four-In-Ten US Adults Have Faced High Levels Of Psychological Distress During Covid-19 Pandemic

At least four-in-ten U.S. adults (41%) have experienced high levels of psychological distress at least once since the early stages of the coronavirus outbreak, according to a new Pew Research Center analysis that examines survey responses from the same Americans over time.

Experiences of high psychological distress are especially widespread among young adults. A 58% majority of those ages 18 to 29 have experienced high levels of psychological distress at least once across four Center surveys conducted between March 2020 and September 2022.

How we did this

A bar chart showing that young adults are especially likely to have experienced high psychological distress since March 2020

The analysis highlights the fluid nature of psychological distress among Americans, as measured by a five-item index that asks about experiences such as loneliness, anxiety and trouble sleeping.

In the September 2022 survey, 21% of U.S. adults fell into the high psychological distress category; in each of four surveys, no more than 24% of adults have fallen into this category. But because individuals experience varying levels of distress at different points in time, a significantly larger share of Americans (41%) have experienced high psychological distress at least once across the four surveys conducted over the past two and a half years.

In addition to age, experiences of high psychological distress are strongly tied to disability status and income. About two-thirds (66%) of adults who have a disability or health condition that keeps them from participating fully in work, school, housework or other activities reported a high level of distress at least once across the four surveys. And those with lower family incomes (53%) are more likely than those from middle- (38%) and high-income households (30%) to have experienced high psychological distress at least once since March 2020.

See also: In CDC survey, 37% of U.S. high school students report regular mental health struggles during COVID-19 pandemic

While many Americans faced challenges with mental health before the coronavirus pandemic, public health officials warned in early 2020 that the pandemic could exacerbate psychological distress. The negative effects of the outbreak have hit some people harder than others, with women, lower-income adults, and Black and Hispanic adults among the groups who have faced disparate health or financial impacts.

Americans’ personal levels of concern about getting or spreading the coronavirus have continued to decline over the course of 2022. The coronavirus is one of many potential sources of stress, including the economy and worries about the future of the nation.

Psychological distress levels have shifted for most Americans during the pandemic

A pie chart showing that levels of psychological distress have fluctuated for a 60% majority of U.S. adults since COVID-19 pandemic began

Amid the shifting landscape of COVID-19 in the United States, just 35% of Americans have registered the same level of psychological distress – whether high, medium or low – across all four surveys conducted by the Center since March 2020.

Instead, a majority of respondents (60%) moved in and out of levels of psychological distress. Psychological distress increased for some but decreased for others. One illustration of the fluid nature of these experiences is that while 41% of U.S. adults faced high psychological distress at least once across four surveys, just 6% experienced high distress in all four surveys. Nearly five times as many (28%) experienced low distress in all of the surveys.

The index of psychological distress is based on measures of five types of possible distress experienced in the past week, such as anxiety or sleeplessness, that are adapted from standard psychological measures. As used in the current survey, the questions are not a clinical measure nor a diagnostic tool; they describe people’s emotional experiences during the week prior to the interview.

A bar chart showing that having trouble sleeping (64%) and feeling anxious (61%) were the most commonly reported feelings of psychological distress in September 2022

Only one question refers specifically to the coronavirus outbreak. It asks how often in the past week Americans have “had physical reactions, such as sweating, trouble breathing, nausea, or a pounding heart” when thinking about their experience with the coronavirus outbreak. In the most recent September survey, 14% of Americans answered this question affirmatively. In March 2020, in the early stages of the outbreak, 18% said they had experienced this.  

Trouble sleeping is one of the most common forms of distress measured in the surveys. In the latest survey, about two-thirds of adults (64%) reported trouble sleeping at least some or a little of the time during the past week. A similar share (61%) said they had felt nervous, anxious or on edge.

Experiences with depression and loneliness also register with sizable shares of Americans. In the most recent survey, 46% of adults said they had felt depressed at least one or two days during the past week, and 42% said they had felt lonely.

All four surveys have included a question about positive feelings, though it is not part of the psychological distress index. Overall, 78% of U.S. adults said they had felt hopeful about the future at least one or two days in the past week, according to the latest survey from September. However, 22% of adults said they had felt hopeful about the future rarely or none of the time during the past week.

(PEW)

DECEMBER 12, 2022

Source: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/12/12/at-least-four-in-ten-u-s-adults-have-faced-high-levels-of-psychological-distress-during-covid-19-pandemic/

 

773-43-16/Polls

Striking Findings From 2022

Pew Research Center’s surveys have shed light on public opinion around some of the biggest news events of 2022 – from Russia’s military invasion of Ukraine to the overturning of Roe v. Wade to Americans’ experiences with extreme weather events. Here’s a look back at the past year through 15 of our most striking research findings, which cover these topics and more. These findings represent just a sample of the Center’s research publications this year.

Today, roughly four-in-ten Americans (41%) say none of their purchases in a typical week are paid for using casha July survey found. This is up from 29% in 2018 and 24% in 2015.

A bar chart showing that Americans have become more likely to say they don’t use cash for purchases in a typical week. 41% say this, up from 29% in 2018 and 24% in 2015.

Meanwhile, the portion of Americans who say that all or almost all of their purchases are paid for with cash in a typical week has declined from 24% in 2015 to 18% in 2018 to 14% today.

While growing shares of Americans across income groups are relying less on cash than in the past, this is especially the case among the highest earners. Roughly six-in-ten adults whose annual household income is $100,000 or more (59%) say they make none of their typical weekly purchases using cash, up sharply from 43% in 2018 and 36% in 2015.

If recent trends continue, Christians could make up a minority of Americans by 2070. That’s according to a September report that models several hypothetical scenarios of how the U.S. religious landscape might change over the next 50 years, based on religious switching patterns.

Since the 1990s, large numbers of Americans have left Christianity to join the growing ranks of U.S. adults who describe their religious identity as atheist, agnostic or “nothing in particular.”

Depending on whether religious switching continues at recent rates, speeds up or stops entirely – the last of which is not plausible because it assumes all switching has already ended – the projections show Christians of all ages shrinking from 64% to somewhere between 54% and 35% of all Americans by 2070. Over that same period, “nones” would rise from their current 30% of the population to somewhere between 34% and 52%.

A line graph showing that U.S. Christians are projected to fall below 50% of the population if recent trends continue

Views of reparations for slavery vary widely by race and ethnicity, especially between Black and White Americans, a November analysis found. Overall, 30% of U.S. adults say descendants of people enslaved in the United States should be repaid in some way, such as given land or money. About seven-in-ten (68%) say these descendants should not be repaid.

A bar chart showing that 77% of Black Americans – compared with 18% of White Americans – support reparations for descendants of enslaved people

Around three-quarters of Black adults (77%) say the descendants of people enslaved in the U.S. should be repaid in some way. Just 18% of White adults hold this view.

There are also notable differences by party affiliation and age. Among Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents, views are split: 48% say descendants of enslaved people should be repaid in some way, while 49% say they should not. Only 8% of Republicans and GOP leaners say these descendants should be repaid in some way, and 91% say they should not.

And 45% of adults under 30 say these descendants should be repaid, compared with 18% of those 65 and older.

Notably, three-quarters of adults who say descendants of those enslaved in the U.S. should be repaid (including 82% of Black adults who say this) say it’s a little or not at all likely this will happen in their lifetime.

A growing share of adult TikTok users in the U.S. are getting news on the platform, bucking the trend on other social media sites, according to a survey fielded in July and August. A third of adults who use TikTok say they regularly get news there, up from 22% two years ago. The increase comes even as news consumption on many other social media sites has either decreased or stayed about the same in recent years. For example, the share of adult Facebook users who regularly get news there has declined from 54% in 2020 to 44% this year.

A line graph showing that a growing share of TikTok’s adult users say they regularly get news on the site. 33% say this, up from 29% in 2021 and 22% in 2020.

Most Americans who have experienced extreme weather in the past year – including majorities in both political parties – see climate change as a factor, according to a May survey.

A bar chart showing that in both parties, six-in-ten or more who faced certain weather events say climate change played a role

Overall, 71% of Americans said that, in the past 12 months, their community had experienced at least one of the five forms of extreme weather the Center’s survey asked about. Among those who had recently encountered extreme weather, more than eight-in-ten said climate change contributed at least a little to each type of event.

Among Democrats as well as Republicans, majorities of those who had experienced one of these forms of extreme weather said climate change contributed to the event. But Democrats were more likely than Republicans to say climate change contributed a lot.

A line graph showing that since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Americans are much more likely to consider Russia an enemy. 70% of Americans say this, up from 41% in January

Following Russia’s military invasion of Ukraine, Americans became much more likely to see Russia as an enemy of the United StatesIn March, just after the invasion, 70% of Americans said that, on balance, Russia is an enemy of the U.S., up sharply from 41% who held this view in January. In the January survey, Americans were more likely to describe Russia as a competitor of the U.S. than as an enemy. In both surveys, very few Americans described Russia as a U.S. partner.

Democrats and Republicans largely agreed in the March survey that Russia is an enemy of the U.S., but partisan and ideological differences still existed. Liberal Democrats, for example, were the most likely to see Russia as an enemy (78%), while moderate and liberal Republicans were the least likely to do so (63%).

Relatively few Americans take an absolutist view on the legality of abortion – either supporting or opposing it at all times, according to a survey conducted in March, before the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. The vast majority of the public is somewhere in the middle when it comes to abortion: Most think it should be legal in at least some circumstances, but most are also open to limitations on its availability in others.

A pie chart showing that a 61% majority of adults say abortion should be legal in some cases and illegal in others

Overall, 19% of Americans say that abortion should be legal in all cases, with no exceptions. Fewer (8%) say abortion should be illegal in every case, without exception. But 71% either say it should be mostly legal or mostly illegal, or say there are exceptions to their blanket support for or opposition to legal abortion.

A separate survey conducted in June and July – after the Supreme Court struck down Roe – found that 57% of adults disapproved of the decision, including 43% who strongly disapproved. About four-in-ten (41%) approved, including 25% who strongly approved. 

A line graph showing that the partisan gap in views of the Supreme Court is now wider than at any point in more than three decades. 73% of Republicans have a favorable view; 28% of Democrats do.

Following the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, the partisan gap in views of the court grew wider than at any point in more than three decades. While 73% of Republicans expressed a favorable view of the court in an August survey, only 28% of Democrats shared that view. That 45-point gap was wider than at any point in 35 years of polling on the court.

The current polarization follows a term that included the ruling on abortion and several other high-profile cases that often split the justices along ideological lines.

Growing shares of Democrats also say the Supreme Court has a conservative tilt: 67% said this in August, up from 57% in January. And about half of Democrats (51%) said in August that the justices on the court are doing a poor job of keeping their own political views out of their judgments on major cases, nearly double the share who said this in January (26%).

A bar chart showing that in the U.S., young adults are the most likely to be transgender or nonbinary; 5% say this

About 5% of Americans younger than 30 are transgender or nonbinary – that is, their gender is different from their sex assigned at birth, according to a survey conducted in May. By comparison, 1.6% of those ages 30 to 49 and 0.3% of those 50 and older say that their gender is different from their sex assigned at birth. Overall, 1.6% of U.S. adults are transgender or nonbinary – that is, someone who is neither a man nor a woman or isn’t strictly one or the other.

While a relatively small share of U.S. adults are transgender or nonbinary, many say they know someone who is. More than four-in-ten (44%) say they personally know someone who is trans and 20% know someone who is nonbinary. The share of adults who know someone who is transgender has increased from 42% in 2021 and from 37% in 2017.

In focus groups with trans and nonbinary adults, most participants said they knew from an early age – many as young as preschool or elementary school – that there was something different about them, even if they didn’t have the words to describe what it was.

Most Americans say journalists should always strive to give every side equal coverage, but journalists themselves are more likely to say every side does not always deserve equal coverage, according to two separate surveys conducted in late winter amid debate over “bothsidesism” in the media.

A bar chart showing that U.S. journalists are more likely than the public to say all sides don’t always deserve equal coverage. 76% of U.S. adults say this; 44% of journalists do.

Among Americans overall, 76% say journalists should always strive to give all sides equal coverage, while 22% say every side does not always deserve equal coverage. The balance of opinion is reversed among journalists themselves: A little more than half (55%) say every side does not always deserve equal coverage, while 44% say journalists should always strive to give every side equal coverage.

This issue gained new intensity during Donald Trump’s presidency and the widespread disinformation and competing views surrounding the 2020 election and the COVID-19 pandemic. Those who favor  equal coverage argue that it’s always necessary to allow the public to be equally informed about multiple sides of an argument, while those who disagree contend that people making false statements or unsupported conjectures do not warrant as much attention as those making factual statements with solid supporting evidence.

A recent surge in U.S. drug overdose deaths has hit Black men the hardest, a January analysis found. While overdose death rates have increased in every major demographic group in recent years, no group has seen a bigger increase than Black men. As a result, Black men have overtaken White men and are now on par with American Indian or Alaska Native men as the demographic groups most likely to die from overdoses.

A line graph showing that the drug overdose death rate among Black men in the U.S. more than tripled between 2015 and 2020 from 17.3 per 100,000 to 54.1

Nearly 92,000 Americans died of drug overdoses in 2020, up from around 70,000 in 2017. During the same period, the rate of fatal overdoses rose from 21.7 to 28.3 per 100,000 people.

Despite these increases, the share of Americans who say drug addiction is a major problem in their local community declined by 7 percentage points in subsequent surveys – from 42% in 2018 to 35% in 2021. And in a separate survey in early 2022, dealing with drug addiction ranked lowest out of 18 priorities for the president and Congress to address this year.

Nearly half of U.S. teens now say they use the internet “almost constantly,” according to a survey conducted in April and May. This percentage has roughly doubled since 2014-15, when 24% said they were almost constantly online.

A bar chart showing that nearly half of teens (46%) now say they use the internet ‘almost constantly’

Black and Hispanic teens stand out for being on the internet more frequently than White teens. Some 56% of Black teens and 55% of Hispanic teens say they are online almost constantly, compared with 37% of White teens. (There were not enough Asian American teens in the sample to analyze separately.)

Older teens are also more likely to be online almost constantly. About half of 15- to 17-year-olds (52%) say they use the internet almost constantly, while 36% of 13- to 14-year-olds say the same. And 53% of urban teens report doing this, compared with somewhat smaller shares of suburban and rural teens (44% and 43%, respectively).

Since 2014-15, there has been a 22-point rise in the share of teens who report having access to a smartphone (from 73% then to 95% now). While teens’ access to smartphones has increased, their access to other digital technologies, such as desktop or laptop computers or gaming consoles, has remained statistically unchanged.

The share of aggregate U.S. household income held by the middle class has fallen steadily since 1970, according to an analysis published in April.

A line graph showing that the share of aggregate income held by the U.S. middle class has plunged since 1970, from 62% to 42%

In 1970, adults in middle-income households accounted for 62% of aggregate income, a share that fell to 42% by 2020. Meanwhile, the share of aggregate income held by upper-income households has increased steadily, from 29% in 1970 to 50% in 2020. Part of this increase reflects the rising share of adults who are in the upper-income tier; another part reflects more rapid growth in earnings for these adults.

The share of U.S. aggregate income held by lower-income households edged down from 10% to 8% over these five decades, even though the proportion of adults living in lower-income households increased over this period.

Growing shares of both Republicans and Democrats say that members of the other party are more immoral, dishonest and closed-minded than other Americans, according to a survey conducted in June and July.

A line graph showing that growing shares of both Republicans and Democrats say members of the other party are more immoral, dishonest, and closed-minded than other Americans

The percentage of Americans who view the people in the opposing political party in a negative light has increased in recent years. In 2016, 47% of Republicans and 35% of Democrats said those in the other party were a lot or somewhat more immoral than other Americans. Today, 72% of Republicans regard Democrats as more immoral than other Americans, and 63% of Democrats say the same about Republicans. Similar patterns exist when it comes to seeing members of the other party as more dishonest, closed-minded and unintelligent than other Americans.

There is one negative trait that Republicans are far more likely than Democrats to link to their political opponents. A 62% majority of Republicans say Democrats are “more lazy” than other Americans, up from 46% in both 2019 and 2016.

A bar chart showing that social media is generally seen as good thing for democracy – but not in the U.S. A median of 57% in 19 countries say this, while 34% of U.S. adults do.

Majorities in nations around the world generally see social media as a good thing for democracy – but not in the United States, a survey of people in 19 advanced economies found.

Americans are the most negative about the impact of social media on democracy: 64% say it has been bad. Republicans are much more likely than Democrats (74% vs. 57%) to see the ill effects of social media on the political system.

In addition to being the most negative about social media’s influence on democracy, Americans are consistently among the most negative in their assessments of specific ways that social media has affected politics and society. For example, 79% in the U.S. believe access to the internet and social media has made people more divided in their political opinions, the highest percentage among the countries polled.

(PEW)

DECEMBER 13, 2022

Source: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/12/13/striking-findings-from-2022/

 

773-43-17/Polls

Supply Chain Crunch Provides New Perspective For Canadians On Marine Shipping

A stubborn feature of the pandemic era has been a relentless supply chain crunch that has affected everything from new cars to children’s medicine.

New data from the non-profit Angus Reid Institute, in partnership with Clear Seas Centre for Responsible Marine Shipping, finds a growing proportion of Canadians saying marine shipping is “very” or “critically” important to their day-to-day-life – and a shrinking proportion who believe it not to be important at all.

As recently as 2020, two-in-five (39%) Canadians said the shipping industry was not important to their daily life, with one-in-five (22%) believing the opposite. Now, one-quarter (26%) believe shipping to be non-essential to their day-to-day life; one-third (34%) disagree and believe it to be “critically” or “very” important.

Indeed, four-in-five (82%) say global issues such as inflation, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and the COVID-19 pandemic have increased their awareness of how the global network of goods works.

An estimated 70 to 80 per cent of items used daily by Canadians are brought by ship. Canadians are much more aware of this fact now than they have been in recent years. In 2018, half of Canadians voiced an awareness that most or the vast majority of products they used daily were transported by ship. Now three-in-five (61%) say the same.

While Canadians give the shipping industry a high mark on safety (91% believe it to be very or generally safe), there remain common concerns about the impacts of shipping. Three-in-five (61%) worry about potential spills from oil tankers. A similar number (57%) fear the risk of ships dumping garbage. Half (53%) say the prospect of ships spilling their own fuel is a concern.

Although the potential for spills from tankers is the top risk for Canadians, overall residents are more confident than not when it comes to the shipping of petroleum products in general (60% confidence) and liquefied natural gas (LNG) more specifically (67% confidence).

More Key Findings:

  • Fewer than one-in-five (17%) believe Canada should prioritize reducing greenhouse gas emissions in shipping above other industries. More instead believe it should have equal (42%) or low (28%) priority when compared to other industries.
  • Amid a cost-of-living crisis, two-in-five (38%) say they would not pay any additional amount on goods shipped from overseas if it meant reducing or offsetting emissions. Another one-in-five (22%) say they would pay less than one per cent.
  • Majorities believe the Canadian Coast Guard (69%), Canada’s port and harbour authorities (62%) and the shipping industry in general (59%) are doing a good job contributing towards safe shipping in Canadian waters. Provincial governments (49%), federal departments managing the industry (49%), and the federal government more generally (44%) receive less praise.

 

About ARI

The Angus Reid Institute (ARI) was founded in October 2014 by pollster and sociologist, Dr. Angus Reid. ARI is a national, not-for-profit, non-partisan public opinion research foundation established to advance education by commissioning, conducting, and disseminating to the public accessible and impartial statistical data, research and policy analysis on economics, political science, philanthropy, public administration, domestic and international affairs and other socio-economic issues of importance to Canada and its world.

 

About Clear Seas

Clear Seas Centre for Responsible Marine Shipping is a Canadian not-for-profit organization that provides impartial and evidence-based information about marine shipping – risks, benefits, mitigation measures, best practices – to policy makers and the public. Clear Seas’ vision for safe and sustainable shipping is holistic, encompassing the environmental, social, and economic impacts of marine trade. Clear Seas was launched in 2015 to be a leading source of independent, fact-based information on safe and sustainable marine shipping.

 

INDEX

 

Part One: Public impressions of marine shipping

  • Supply chain woes increasing awareness of shipping network

Part Two: Safety, the environment and marine shipping

  • Majorities confident in shipping of oil and LNG
  • Emissions and marine shipping

Part Three: Views on shipping regulation

  • The Oceans Protection Plan
  • Emergency towing vessels: public or private responsibility?

Part Four: Shipping Confidence Index

 

Part One: Public impressions of marine shipping

Marine shipping plays an important role in delivering Canadians the goods they use in their everyday life. More than 70 per cent of the goods Canadians use daily are brought to Canada by ship. Marine shipping is also important in getting Canadian goods to international markets – 20 per cent of Canadian imports and exports by dollar value travel to and from the country by ship.

All in all, the marine shipping industry is worth $30 billion to Canada’s economy, or about 1.8 per cent of Canada’s GDP.

Canadians’ impression of marine shipping has been consistently positive. Since 2016, at least four-in-five Canadians say they have a “very” or “somewhat” positive view of marine shipping. Notably, however, negative impressions have increased by seven points since 2016. One-in-five (21%) now say they have a “very” or “somewhat” negative view of marine shipping:

The view of the industry varies on Canada’s east and west coasts, despite shipping’s importance as an economic cog in both regions. Three-in-ten (29%) in British Columbia have a negative impression of the industry, more than twice the number of those in Atlantic Canada (13%) who say the same. British Columbians have held higher negative views of shipping consistently over the years, though they are still in the minority.

A majority of Canadians affirm the importance of the marine shipping industry to the country’s economy (75%), communities on Canada’s coastlines (76%), and the import (80%) and export (80%) of Canadian goods. Since 2016, at least seven-in-ten Canadians say the shipping industry is key to those four elements of Canada:

Supply chain woes increasing awareness of shipping network

The shipping industry is an important part of the global supply chain, which has buckled in the pandemic era. COVID-19 lockdowns – especially in China, one of the world’s largest exporters of goods – put the initial pressure on the supply chain. The subsequent Russian invasion of Ukraine has driven up the cost of fuel and complicated global supply networks for food.

Canadians are more likely to feel the supply chain woes have increased in recent months. Three-in-five (57%) believe supply chain issues have worsened. Fewer than one-in-five (17%) have noticed improvement. Those in Alberta (19%), Ontario (20%) and Quebec (20%) are most likely to believe the supply chain issues have become much worse in recent months:

Most Canadians say recent global events – the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, climate change, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine – have increased their awareness of how the global network of goods functions. Three-in-ten (30%) say they are now a lot more aware of how products move around the world, and half (53%) say they are somewhat more aware. Both those figures are greater than when ARI asked a similar question in 2020 about the effect the COVID-19 pandemic had on Canadians’ awareness of the supply chain:

*In 2020, respondents were asked only about COVID-19. In 2022, respondents were asked about inflation, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, COVID-19 pandemic, and climate change.

Perhaps in relation to the above data, Canadians are now much more likely to believe shipping plays an important role in their day-to-day life. In 2018, one-third (35%) believed the shipping industry was not important to their daily life. That figure has declined to one-quarter (26%). One-third (34%) now say they believe shipping to be “critically” or “very” important to their life – a 12-point jump from 2020:

There is a growing recognition by Canadians of the number of goods that arrive by ship following two years of supply chain strife. Three-in-five (61%) now estimate most or the vast majority of items they use on a daily basis arrive by ship, an increase from the half who said so in both 2018 and 2020:

Finally, there is a growing belief that shipping is increasing in importance in recent years. Three-in-five (62%) believe marine shipping has been growing in importance over the past 20 years. In 2016, that figure was two-in-five (43%):

Part Two: Safety, the environment and marine shipping

Nearly all (91%) Canadians believe shipping is done safely in the waters surrounding the country. This has been a steady belief since ARI and Clear Seas first asked on this subject in 2016:

Still, there are some concerns over potential impacts from the marine shipping industry. The top worries are related to water pollution. Three-in-five (61%) say they worry about the risk of potential spills from oil tankers. Nearly as many (57%) say this of ships dumping waste into Canadian waters. Half (53%) worry about ships spilling fuel, while half (49%) are concerned about water pollution in general.

Though the amount of oil shipped worldwide has increased significantly, oil spills are happening less frequently due to improved safety measures. For example, Transport Canada’s National Aerial Surveillance Program established in 1991, uses planes stationed across the country to help detect and prevent marine pollution. A 2013 Transport Canada-commissioned independent assessment found Canada to be at low risk for large oil spills.

Other environmental risks are also top of mind for Canadians. Half (51%) say they are concerned about ships striking or otherwise disturbing marine life. Further down the list of concerns, but still chosen by at least two-in-five, are issues of smuggling (42%), and human trafficking (38%):

Majorities confident in shipping of oil and LNG

Though spills from oil tankers top the list of shipping worries for Canadians, a majority (60%) say they are confident in the safety of transporting petroleum products in Canadian waters. Confidence dipped in 2020 to 55 per cent, but otherwise has remained consistent at this three-in-five level:

The global energy price shock brought on by Russia’s invasion of the Ukraine has renewed calls in Europe for the continent to supplant Russian sources of energy. Liquefied natural gas (LNG) from Canada has been touted as a potential alternative to Russian natural gas. On the east coast, however, there is much work to be done before any LNG could be exported from Canada’s Atlantic shores. LNG Canada, a $40-billion project in Kitimat, B.C., is closer to completion.

Canadians are more confident in shipping LNG than traditional petroleum products. More than two-thirds (67%, see detailed tables) say they are more confident than worried about shipping LNG in Canadian waters.

Overall, half (47%) of Canadians believe the environmental risks are balanced by the economic benefits of marine shipping in general. For the other half, more believe that economic benefits carry more weight (31%) than believe the environmental risks outweigh the potential financial rewards (22%):

When compared to other shipping methods and industries, marine shipping is more likely to be seen as economically beneficial – despite the environmental risks – than the oil industry. However, electricity generation, railway transportation, and road transport are viewed as more likely to be worth the environmental risks in economic benefits than transport by sea:

Emissions and shipping

The federal government has set a goal to reach net zero emissions by 2050, which means every industry’s emissions will have to be reduced or offset, including marine shipping. The International Maritime Organization (IMO) has set a goal of reducing emissions in the shipping industry by 70 per cent from 2008 levels by 2050.

Reducing emissions in shipping has been described as difficult for several reasons. Viable alternatives to fossil fuels available at the size and scale needed by large ships are not yet widely available. And because of the long life-cycle of ships – an average of 25 to 30 years – older and less efficient ships remain in operation for a long time.

Few Canadians – less than one-in-five (17%) – believe the shipping industry should be a top priority for emissions reductions. Instead, a plurality believes (42%) all industries should reduce emissions, while nearly as many (37%) believe marine shipping is a lesser priority than other industries:

In the midst of a cost-of-living crisis, a majority do not have much appetite for an increase in prices to help offset marine shipping emissions. Two-in-five (38%) would not pay any amount extra if it meant lower emissions for items shipped from overseas. One-in-five (22%) say they would pay less than one per cent more. One-quarter (24%) say they would pay between one and two per cent, while one-in-six (16%) are willing to pay two per cent or more.

Men are much more likely than women to say they will not pay any amount extra to offset emissions from the marine shipping industry. However, men aged 18- to 34-years-old are the most likely demographic to say they would pay two per cent or more on items from overseas if it meant reduced emissions:

Part Three: Views on shipping regulation

Canadians’ confidence in the regulation of the shipping industry has increased since 2016. Three-quarters (76%) now say they are very or fairly confident in the rules covering transportation in Canadian waters; two-thirds (65%) said so in 2016:

This high level of confidence does not extend to all elements of the regulatory system. While majorities believe the Canadian Coast Guard (69%), port and harbour authorities (62%) and the shipping industry (59%) are doing well in contributing to safe shipping in Canadian waters, there is less positivity towards provincial governments (49%), federal departments (49%) and the federal government overall (44%). At least one-in-five (provincial governments, 20%; federal departments, 23%; federal government, 27%) believe these latter three are instead doing a poor job of contributing to safe shipping:

The perception of the federal government’s contribution towards safe shipping has declined since 2016 when two-thirds (64%) said it was doing a good job on that matter. Positive appraisal of provincial and territorial governments has also declined by 13 points:

*Note: The Canadian Coast Guard was included with federal departments in the 2016 and 2018 surveys.

There is significant belief among Canadians that governments have not paid enough attention to marine shipping safety. Two-in-five (40%) say this issue does not receive the appropriate amount of attention, while one-quarter (27%) believe the opposite. Fewer than one-in-ten (7%) believe too much attention is paid to marine shipping safety.

The sentiment that more attention should be paid to marine shipping safety is strongest in two provinces with strong connections to the marine shipping industry: British Columbia (47%) and Quebec (54%):

Those two provinces, too, are more likely to believe there is not enough oversight or enforcement of marine shipping safety policies. More than two-in-five in British Columbia (45%) and Quebec (45%) say this.

Nationally, one-quarter (25%) believe the government is doing the appropriate amount of oversight and enforcement of marine shipping safety, while two-in-five (37%) believe there is more to be done:

The Oceans Protection Plan

The federal government’s Oceans Protection Plan (OPP) was launched in 2016, a $1.5-billion investment to protect Canada’s coasts and waterways. The plan included improving the marine safety system on all three coastlines, preserving and restoring marine ecosystems, creating stronger partnerships with Indigenous Peoples and coastal communities, and increasing preparedness for oil spill response.

The federal government renewed the program in 2022, with an additional $2 billion of funding over nine years.

Knowledge of the OPP has increased since 2018, when ARI and Clear Seas last surveyed Canadians on the plan. Two-in-five (42%) have some knowledge of the plan (see detailed tables).

Canadians are near universal in their support of the pillars of the OPP. Only a handful disagree with them (6%) or believe the plan should focus on other areas (2%). Men aged 18- to 34-years old are less likely than other demographics to agree with the pillars (77%), though a majority still do so:

Emergency towing vessels: public or private responsibility?

As part of the OPP, the Canadian government leased two emergency towing vessels (ETVs) stationed on the west coast. ETVs are powerful tugboats that can rescue ships in distress. Though Canada has the two ETVs on the west coast, for other parts of Canada’s waters, ships in need of assistance rely on “vessels of opportunity” or suitable ships nearby for emergency response. The government says it is currently developing a long-term plan while factoring in information learned from the leased vessels on the west coast.

Three-quarters (73%) of Canadians believe it should be the responsibility of shipping companies to pay for emergency towing services. Few (13%) believe it should be a government service paid for by taxpayers:



Part Four: Shipping Confidence Index

In order to better understand Canadian perspectives on the marine shipping industry, ARI developed the Shipping Confidence Index in 2020 which analyzed respondents’ views on shipping safety and regulation and relative importance of the industry to the economy.

The Shipping Confidence Index is comprised of three groups: Shipping SupportersMaritime Moderates, and Cautious Critics.

Shipping Supporters (33%) perceive the shipping industry as “critically” or “very” important for the federal economy as well as their own provincial economy, and international trade. This group tends to assign higher priority to the economic considerations of marine shipping over potential environmental risks.

Maritime Moderates (42%), as their name suggests, represent an ideological centre between the other two groups. Although mostly confident about overall safety and regulation, Moderates are divided on other aspects related to marine shipping in Canada, including assessments of shipping petroleum in Canadian waters.

Of the three groups, Cautious Critics (25%) express the highest rates of skepticism when it comes to the importance of the industry and its overall safety. This group is also defined by high levels of concern related to the environmental risks of the industry.

Since 2020, fewer Canadians fall into the Cautious Critics category while more are considered to be Maritime Moderates by the Index.

Three-in-five (59%) Cautious Critics have a negative view of the shipping industry overall. Views are much more positive among Maritime Moderates and Shipping Supporters. For the Cautious Critics, perhaps this is because they are much more likely to believe the environmental risks of shipping outweigh the economic benefits (46%) when compared to Maritime Moderates (19%) and Shipping Supporters (7%, see detailed tables).

Cautious Critics are most common in Quebec (32%) and British Columbia (29%). More than two-in-five in Atlantic Canada (44%) and Alberta (44%) are classified as Shipping Supporters, the most in the country:

Half of men over the age of 54 (52%) fall into the Shipping Supporters category, the most of any demographic. Women are much more likely to be Cautious Critics than men, while 18- to 34-year-old women are the least likely to be considered Shipping Supporters by the Index:

 

(Angus Reid Institute)

December 13, 2022

Source: https://angusreid.org/clear-seas-2022-marine-shipping-supply-chain/

 

AUSTRALIA

773-43-18/Polls

Roy Morgan Consumer Confidence Virtually Unchanged At 82.9 Despite Eighth Straight Interest Rate Increase

ANZ-Roy Morgan Consumer Confidence was virtually unchanged at 82.9 this week and is now a large 25.1pts below the same week a year ago, December 11/12, 2021 (108.0). In addition, Consumer Confidence is now 5.9pts below the 2022 weekly average of 88.8.

Although Consumer Confidence was virtually unchanged this week the measure was up slightly in New South Wales, Western Australia and South Australia but down in Victoria and Queensland.

Across the index the two questions that look at the next year improved slightly this week whereas the question relating to whether now is a ‘good/bad time to buy’ deteriorated in a worrying development for retailers as we enter the last two weeks of the pre-Christmas retailing period.

Current financial conditions

Future financial conditions

  • Looking forward, nearly a third of Australians, 30% (up 1ppt), expect their family to be ‘better off’ financially this time next year while 33% (down 1ppt), expect to be ‘worse off’.

Current economic conditions

  • Only 8% (up 1ppt) of Australians expect ‘good times’ for the Australian economy over the next twelve months compared to a third, 33% (down 3ppts), that expect ‘bad times.’

Future economic conditions

  • Sentiment regarding the Australian economy in the longer term is still very weak with only 11% (unchanged) of Australians expecting ‘good times’ for the economy over the next five years compared to 19% (up 1ppt) expecting ‘bad times’.

Time to buy a major household item

  • When it comes to buying intentions now only 23% (down 3ppts) of Australians, say now is a ‘good time to buy’ major household items while nearly half of Australians, 49% (up 4ppts), say now is a ‘bad time to buy’.

ANZ Senior Economist, Catherine Birch, commented:

Consumer confidence increased marginally last week despite the RBA raising the cash rate 25bp on Tuesday. This was the first time in the current tightening cycle that confidence has improved after an increase in the policy rate, perhaps a sign that households expect a pause soon. While confidence dropped 1.3pts for households paying off their mortgage, to be below 80 for the ninth straight week, confidence lifted for homeowners (+1.9pts) and renters (+0.2pts). We’ll be watching the December spending data carefully for signs of a slowdown following the 6.8pt drop in the “time to buy a major household item” index to a four-week low.

(Roy Morgan)

December 13, 2022

Source: https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/9130-anz-roy-morgan-consumer-confidence-december-13

 

MULTICOUNTRY STUDIES

773-43-19/Polls

One In Three People In Europe Has Difficulty Meeting Essential Expenses, In 7 European Countries

The current inflation tracker: YouGov monthly data on inflation and cost of living in seven European countries since September 2022

Across Europe, inflation and the energy crisis are driving up prices. YouGov's inflation tracker, which has been surveying attitudes towards life situations and politics in the following seven European countries on a monthly basis since September 2022, shows how Europeans are coping with price increases: Germany, France, Great Britain, Spain, Italy, Sweden and Denmark.

About a third (32 percent) of the Europeans surveyed stated in November that they were barely or not at all able to cover the necessary expenses such as food or heating costs. If you ask more precisely whether there have been difficulties buying groceries in the last three months, for example, almost a quarter (23 percent) of Germans state that they have mostly or always had difficulties. In Great Britain (15 percent), Denmark (13 percent), Sweden (15 percent) and Spain (14 percent), this applies to significantly fewer people. In France (28 percent) and Italy (30 percent), on the other hand, more people had difficulties. In Italy, respondents are also particularly likely to find it difficult to pay their rent: four out of ten (40 percent) Italians say they have difficulties here at least occasionally. In the other countries surveyed, a quarter (26 percent) make this statement.

Difficulties in being able to afford rent, food, etc.

 

Against the backdrop of rising living costs, six out of ten (62 percent) of respondents in these seven countries have already made cuts in their usual spending. Respondents from France (67 percent), Spain (66 percent) and Italy (68 percent) had to make cuts slightly more frequently, while Germany (59 percent) is slightly below average with Denmark (59 percent) and Sweden (55 percent). An even larger proportion of Europeans surveyed expect to make (further) cuts. A good two-thirds (67 percent) of Germans expect to make (further) cuts in their spending. This puts Germany in the European midfield. In France (78 percent) and the UK (72 percent), concerns about further restrictions are particularly high. Denmark (48 percent) has by far the lowest prospects for restrictions.

Restrictions on everyday spending

 

Mostly major criticism of governments in dealing with increased cost of living

Although the respective governments in the countries surveyed have launched corresponding programmes to support households and businesses, criticism of national governments is high. In Germany, about three-quarters of respondents (74 percent) express criticism and say that the government is dealing poorly with the cost of living. In particular, respondents from the eastern German states are critical of the government's handling of the crisis (77 percent, compared to 73 percent of respondents from the western states).

Compared to previous months, however, there was a slight improvement in Germany in November: 78 percent expressed their dissatisfaction with the government in September and 76 percent in October. The reasons for the slight improvement in the values could be the various measures adopted by the government – such as emergency aid through one-off payments for gas and district heating customers or the adjustment of the tax system to high inflation.

Dissatisfaction with the government is high

 

But criticism of the government is also high in the other countries surveyed in the inflation tracker. Given the current financial crisis in the UK, it is hardly surprising that four out of five respondents (80 percent) say the government is rather poor when it comes to the cost of living. This is also reflected in Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's steadily declining approval ratings since taking office in October 2022 and during his previous role as Chancellor of the Exchequer. Moreover, only 2 percent of respondents believe there will be an economic boom in the UK in a year's time, while 70 percent think the country will be in recession or depression in 12 months.

In Spain (73 percent) and France (69 percent), the majority of respondents also say the government is dealing badly with the issue. The Danes are the least critical: In comparison, only 52 percent of respondents express criticism, while a third (34 percent) state that the government is (rather) dealing well with the cost of living.

Since September, satisfaction with government regarding the cost of living in Italy has risen

The biggest change compared to previous months can be observed in Italy. Since the new head of government Giorgia Meloni, leader of the far-right Fratelli d'Italia, took office, criticism of the government regarding the inflation crisis has decreased. While in September 82 percent said the government was dealing badly with the situation, in October it was 74 percent and in November only 62 percent. One in five respondents in Italy currently rates the government's handling of the cost of living as (rather) good (22 percent). After the surprising fall of Prime Minister Mario Draghi in July, the upward trend in government assessments could, among other things, be an expression of relief over stable government relations. In view of the rising costs, Meloni had announced at the beginning of November that it would take on further government debt to financially support families and companies. Furthermore, the Italian government plans to develop new natural gas deposits.

(YouGov Germany)

December 13, 2022

Source: https://yougov.de/topics/economy/articles-reports/2022/12/13/jeder-dritte-europa-hat-schwierigkeiten-lebensnotw

 

773-43-20/Polls

Who In Africa Is Connected And Who Is Not, Survey Across 34 African Countries

Summary Digital connectivity through information and communications technologies (ICTs) has been recognised as critical for every country’s future development and prosperity (International Telecommunication Union, 2021). The United Nations (UN) Agenda 2030 highlights this issue in Sustainable Development Goal 9 (SDG 9), to “build resilient infrastructure, promote sustainable industrialization and foster innovation.” Target 9C calls on countries to “significantly increase access to information and communications technology and strive to provide universal and affordable access to the Internet in the least developed countries by 2030” (United Nations, 2022). And while access to ICTs is an objective in its own right, ICTs have crosscutting effects and are important for the achievement of many of the other SDGs as well. ICTs can help developing countries to leapfrog development gaps and join the knowledge society. To quote the United Nations Statistical Commission (2020), the spread of ICTs and global interconnectedness have “great potential to accelerate human progress, to bridge the digital divide and to develop knowledge societies.” The COVID-19 pandemic brought the importance of connectivity to the fore. As lockdowns closed physical businesses and schools and restricted movement, only the connected could keep interacting with their loved ones, work or transact business online, and continue to educate their children. UNICEF (2020) reported that about half of schoolchildren in subSaharan Africa – the highest proportion globally – could not be reached by digital and remote-learning programmes during the COVID-19 crisis (see also Krönke, 2020). As the pandemic has highlighted, significant digital gaps still divide those who are connected and those who are not. Substantial gaps remain both between countries, especially between developed and developing countries, and within many countries between the rich and the poor, urban and rural residents, the most and least educated, and men and women. The International Telecommunication Union (2021) report on connectivity notes that despite increased access to mobile broadband networks, the least developed countries (LDCs) may actually be falling further behind in Internet usage. Likely reasons include the cost of services and devices as well as a lack of awareness of the Internet and requisite digital skills. Afrobarometer captured several dimensions of the digital divide in its Round 8 surveys (2019/2021) in 34 African countries, including 19 countries classified as “least developed” by the UN (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 2022). Survey responses inform measures, across both individuals and states, of access to devices and to network services, utilisation rates, and differences in how the Internet is used in daily practice. Afrobarometer finds that most Africans own a mobile phone and have access to a mobile phone network. However, fewer than half own a mobile phone with Internet access, and even fewer have access to a computer. This translates to low levels of Internet use in many countries. Lack of Internet access and use is far more common among women and people who are rural, older, less wealthy, and/or less educated. There is also a sizeable gap between LDCs and more developed countries. Afrobarometer surveys Afrobarometer is a pan-African, nonpartisan survey research network that provides reliable data on Africans’ experiences and evaluations of democracy, governance, and quality of life. Eight rounds of surveys have been conducted in up to 39 countries since 1999. Round 8 surveys were completed in 18 countries between August 2019 and March 2020 before fieldwork was suspended because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Surveys in 16 more countries between October 2020 and July 2021 completed the 34-country round. (See Appendix Table A.1 for a list of countries and fieldwork dates.) Afrobarometer conducts face-to-face interviews in the language of the respondent’s choice with nationally representative samples that yield country-level results with margins of error of +/-2 to +/-3 percentage points at a 95% confidence level. 1 This 34-country analysis is based on 48,084 interviews. The data are weighted to ensure nationally representative samples. When reporting multi-country averages, each country is weighted equally (rather than in proportion to population size). Key findings § Coverage by a cell network is widespread on the continent: 87% of enumeration areas (EAs) visited by Afrobarometer fieldwork teams have coverage. o Coverage averages 90% in non-LDC countries, but even in LDCs, coverage is only modestly lower at 84%. o Mauritius, Morocco, and Botswana boast nearly universal coverage (99%), and eight other countries record levels of 95% or above. o Where coverage is more limited, it is usually rural areas that are left behind, with coverage averaging just 80%, compared to 95% in urban areas. § More than eight in 10 citizens (84%) personally own a mobile phone. Across 31 countries tracked since 2014/2015, phone ownership has increased by 5 percentage points. o A 14-percentage-point gap in phone ownership separates LDCs (78%) and nonLDCs (92%). Ten LDCs have mobile phone ownership rates below 80%, most notably Ethiopia (59%), Malawi (57%), and Angola (57%). o Phone ownership rates vary across key demographic groups. Differences are especially pronounced by respondents’ education level, urban-rural location, and economic status. § While phone ownership is relatively high, fewer than half (45%) of African adults have access to the Internet on their phones, including just 20% of Malawians and Nigeriens and 16% of Ethiopians. Across 31 countries tracked since 2016/2018, access to the Internet via mobiles has risen by 7 percentage points.

o Demographic differences in Internet access via phone are even larger than for phone ownership, reaching 72 percentage points between citizens with no formal schooling (13% have Internet access via phone) and those with post-secondary education (85%). LDCs trail non-LDCs by 23 points in access to the Internet via phone (35% vs. 58%). § Access to a computer in the household is much more limited (28%) and has not increased significantly since the previous survey round. Fewer than one in 10 citizens have access to a computer in five LDC countries – Uganda, Tanzania, Niger, Ethiopia, and Malawi. § Four in 10 Africans (40%) report that they use the Internet – either through a smart phone or a computer – “a few times a week” or “every day.” o Frequent Internet use is far less common in LDCs (30%) than in non-LDCs (53%) and falls below one in five citizens in six countries, all LDCs: Ethiopia (12%), Malawi (14%), Uganda (15%), Burkina Faso (16%), Niger (17%), and Tanzania (19%). o Frequent Internet use varies widely across key demographic groups, showing gaps of 72 percentage points between citizens with no formal schooling and those with post-secondary education, 39 points between poor and wealthy citizens, 36 points between rural and urban residents, 33 points between the youngest and oldest respondents, and 8 points between women and men. § Comparisons of reported Internet use with estimates of broadband network coverage and voice/data costs suggest that price of service may be a more important barrier to connectivity than service coverage. Access to the mobile network During the course of fieldwork in any given country, Afrobarometer field teams visit between 150 (for survey n=1,200) and 300 (for survey n=2,400) enumeration areas (EA). They conduct eight interviews in each EA and also capture information on the presence of basic services and facilities within that EA, including mobile phone service. The following information on mobile network coverage comes from these EA-level observations recorded by the field teams, rather than from individual interviews Nearly nine in 10 (87%) of the EAs visited during Round 8 have network coverage (Figure 1). The gap between coverage in LDCs (84%) and non-LDCs (90%) is a relatively modest 6 percentage points. Several countries have reached nearly universal network coverage, led by Mauritius, Morocco, Botswana and Kenya. Angola stands out as having exceptionally low network coverage (46%). On average, urban areas have a 15-percentage-point advantage in network coverage over rural areas (95% vs. 80%). The gap ranges from as little as -2 points in Mauritius and Cameroon (i.e. recorded access was actually slightly higher in rural areas) to 47 points in Sierra Leone, 41 points in Côte d’Ivoire, 39 points in Tunisia, and 31 points in Gabon, where rural areas are being left far behind (Figure 2).

Ownership of ICT devices On average across 34 countries, ownership of mobile phones now stands at 84% (Figure 3), with another 8% saying that someone else in their household owns a phone. Access varies widely across countries, from a high of 96% in Gabon and Morocco to just over half (57%) of respondents in Angola and Malawi. All 12 of the countries with mobile phone ownership at or below the average are LDCs. But other LDCs report significantly higher levels of ownership, ranging up to 89% in Burkina Faso and 92% in Guinea.

Accessing the Internet Phone access on its own can be an invaluable tool for communication and information sharing. But of course the utility of this digital technology increases exponentially if that phone can also be used as a tool to access the Internet to tap into the wealth of news and information that is available there. Just over half (45% out of 84%) of mobile phone owners report having access to the Internet on their phones (Figure 5), reaching a high of 77% in Mauritius, followed by Morocco (75%), Cabo Verde (69%), and Gabon and South Africa (66% each). Just one in five citizens or fewer have phones with Internet access in Malawi (20%), Niger (20%), and Ethiopia (16%).

There are stark differences in phone ownership and especially in Internet access via phone across demographic groups. Men are 9 percentage points more likely than women both to own a phone (88% vs. 79%) and to have a phone with Internet access (49% vs. 40%) (Figure 6). The urban-rural gap is considerably larger, at 16 percentage points for phone ownership (92% vs. 76%) and 35 points for Internet access (64% vs. 29%). Younger people are only modestly more likely to own a phone than their elders (84% vs. 78%), but they are more than twice as likely to have Internet access on the device (53% vs. 21%). The same is true for the wealthiest respondents compared to the poorest. The sharpest differences, however, are associated with education level. Nearly everyone (98%) with post-secondary education has a mobile phone, compared to just two-thirds (66%) of those with no formal education. But there is a startling 72-percentage-point gap in phone Internet access between the two groups, from a high of 85% among those with postsecondary education to just 13% among those with no formal schooling. While there is a 14-percentage-point gap in phone ownership between LDCs (78%) and nonLDCs (92%), the gap in Internet access reaches 23 points (35% vs. 58%)

(Afrobarometer)

14 December 2022

Source: https://www.afrobarometer.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/AD582-PAP18-Digital-divide-Who-in-Africa-is-connected-and-who-is-not-Afrobarometer-Pan-Africa-Profile-13dec22.pdf

 

773-43-21/Polls

People Across 36 Countries Place Fault For The Cost Of Living At The Feet Of Politicians, But Also Realize There Are Larger Factors At Play

Consumers are feeling the pinch and they’re pinning some blame on government policies for their pain.

But, most also seem to understand there are other forces at play well beyond the control of any one country’s policy choices.

Prices for everything from gas to groceries skyrocketed in 2022. In response, central banks around the world have pulled the trigger on higher interest rates over and over again. While some governments have rolled out tax breaks and price caps to help people shoulder the burden of high prices, many are seriously struggling to get by.

The blame game

So, who (or what) is to blame for the ongoing cost-of-living crisis?

Citizens realize it’s complicated.

Online polling via Ipsos’ Global Advisor from Oct. 21 – Nov. 14 for the latest Ipsos Global Inflation Monitor finds almost three in four (74%), on average globally, believed “the state of the global economy,” followed by the invasion of Ukraine (70%) are contributing to inflation.

And just over two in three (68%), on average, across 36 countries said both the interest rate level in their country and the policies of their national government are contributing a fair amount/great deal to the rising cost of living.

Other factors 50%, or more, of those surveyed believe are factors in inflation including: businesses making excessive profits (62%), the pandemic (61%), workers demanding pay increases (51%) and immigration (50%).

Unsteady leadership

Great Britain, well, hasn’t had a great year.

Global problems, such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and invasion of Ukraine, paired with national problems (Brexit and Liz Truss’ historically short run as prime minister) likely all helped push inflation even higher (hitting 11.1% in October) and drove down consumer confidence.

So, it’s perhaps little surprise the vast majority (84%) of people in Great Britain, followed closely by respondents in South Korea (82%) and Thailand (81%), said the policies of its government were contributing to the rising cost of living in their country.

Like Great Britain, South Korea has had a bumpy 2022.

Han Duck-soo returned as the country’s prime minister this May after previously serving in 2006 and 2007/08. By July the inflation rate in South Korea hit a high of 6.4% and while it fell to 5.0% by November PM Duck-soo remains “very unpopular for various reasons such as political scandals these days here in Korea,” said Chanbok Lee, Country Service Line Leader of Public Affairs for Ipsos in South Korea.

Thailand’s long-time prime minister has also been embroiled in his fair share of scandal over the years. Usana Chantarklum, Managing Director for Ipsos in Thailand, said 81% of Thais may put some of the blame on national policies for inflation, which hit 7.86% in August but was down to 5.55% by November, due to “the government’s unclear direction or measures that address the rising cost of living.”

Grim outlook

Inflation has eased slightly in Thailand and other countries in recent months, yet prices remain near historic highs. And some experts predict the cost of living could tick back up in 2023, while others warn a global recession is on the horizon.

Regardless of who (or what) is to blame, consumers don’t expect the economic pain to subside any time soon.

  • About 2 in 3, on average globally, thought inflation (69%), interest rates (63%) and unemployment (61%) will all rise a little/a lot over the next year (Nov. 2022 – Nov. 2023).
  • In contrast, only about one in four, on average globally, expected their standard of living (28%) and disposable income (27%) will go up by Nov. 2023.
  • And a mere 12%, on average, across 36 countries thought they’ll get a pay raise at or above inflation while 38% predicted they won’t get any raise at all from Nov. 2022-Nov. 2023.

(Ipsos USA)

18 December 2022

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/news-polls/inflation-has-citizens-around-world-pointing-finger-government-policies