BUSINESS & POLITICS IN THE WORLD

 

GLOBAL OPINION REPORT NO. 754

 

 

Week: August 01 –August 07, 2022

 

Presentation: August 12, 2022

 

 

Contents

 

Commentary: Three In Four U S Adults Say Alcohol Use Has A Negative Effect On Society. 3

Country Profile: 5

SUMMARY OF POLLS. 6

ASIA   12

A Third Of Singaporeans Will Spend This National Day Gathering With Friends And Family (30%) 12

One In Four Hong Kong Residents Are Opting To Change Their Payment Platform For Receiving Their Second Batch Of Digital Vouchers (25%) 14

42% Respondents Disagreed When Asked That Climate Change Is Not A Real Issue, It’s Just Propaganda. 18

AFRICA.. 18

According To Latest Opinion Polls, Azimio La Umoja One Kenya Presidential Candidate Would Win 47% Of The Total Votes. 18

Zimbabweans Look To Government For Action On Climate Change. 20

WEST EUROPE.. 29

Half Of Britons Likely To Watch Women's Football Following Lionesses Triumph. 29

8 In 10 Britons Concerned About Climate Change – Half Think Net Zero Target Should Be Brought Forward. 31

Truss Leads Sunak By 69% To 31% In Latest Tory Members Poll 32

Six In Ten Britons Say They Will Need To Cut Other Spending To Fund Coming Energy Bills. 33

Three In Four Britons Think Johnson’s Government Has Done A Bad Job Dealing With The Cost Of Living. 35

Almost 6 In 10 People With Psoriasis Fear Being Mocked. 37

32 Percent Of Germans Are Bundesliga Fans. 38

About Four-In-Ten Hungarian Adults (38%) Say Their Country Has Become Less Democratic Since Orban Became Prime Minister 39

NORTH AMERICA.. 42

Americans Support Incentives For Electric Vehicles But Are Divided Over Buying One Themselves. 43

U S Women More Concerned Than Men About Some AI Developments, Especially Driverless Cars. 46

About One-In-Six U S Journalists At News Outlets Are Part Of A Union; Many More Would Join One If They Could  49

Majority Of Americans Continue To Favor Moving Away From Electoral College. 52

Three In Four U S Adults Say Alcohol Use Has A Negative Effect On Society. 55

AUSTRALIA.. 58

Potential National/Act NZ (46%) Coalition Is Just Ahead Of Labour/ Greens (44.5%) In July, But Maori Party Holds The Balance Of Power 58

MULTICOUNTRY STUDIES. 68

Globally, 3 In 5 Citizens Say Abortion Should Be Legal In All Or Most Cases, In 27 Surveyed Countries. 68

Four In Ten Across 28 Countries Expect Their Disposable Income To Fall Over The Next Year 71

A Study On Online Banking In 5 European Countries. 75

 

INTRODUCTORY NOTE

This weekly report consists of twenty-two surveys. The report includes three multi-country studies from different states across the globe.

 

754-43-23/Commentary: Three in Four U S Adults Say Alcohol Use Has A Negative Effect On Society

Broad majorities of Americans believe the use of alcohol adversely affects both society in general and drinkers specifically. Three in four U.S. adults say alcohol use has a negative effect on society, and nearly as many (71%) think it affects drinkers themselves negatively, though more describe the effect as "somewhat negative" than as "very negative."

Yet, these perceived negative effects of alcohol are not enough to discourage Americans from imbibing, as two in three say they personally have the occasion to drink alcoholic beverages. On the whole, those who are drinking report doing so moderately, averaging about four drinks per week.

As for their drink of choice, drinkers in the U.S. are more closely divided in their preferences than ever before, with roughly equal percentages saying they most often consume beer, wine or liquor.

Alcohol Mainly Viewed as 'Somewhat' Negatively Affecting Drinkers, Society

Americans' views of the ill effects of alcohol, while decisive, are tempered. That is, U.S. adults are much more likely to say alcohol has a somewhat rather than very negative effect on both society and drinkers.

Fifty-five percent of U.S. adults say alcohol use affects society somewhat negatively, while 20% call it very negative. Likewise, 52% think alcohol affects drinkers themselves somewhat negatively, versus 19% very negatively.

Those who do not drink alcohol perceive its effects to be significantly more negative than those who do drink. Non-drinkers are at least three times as likely as alcohol drinkers to say alcohol affects society and drinkers very negatively.

Additionally, U.S. adults without a college degree are more than twice as likely as college graduates to view the effects of alcohol on society and on drinkers as very negative.

Women are seven percentage points more likely than men to view alcohol's effects on both society and on drinkers as somewhat negative.

Americans' Alcohol Use Is Relatively Steady

Gallup has tracked the public's alcohol use since 1939. That year, 58% of U.S. adults said they had the occasion to use alcoholic beverages "such as liquor, wine or beer." Since then, majorities have consistently said they do, with the percentage imbibing no lower than 60% since 1997. The percentage of drinkers reached a high of 71% in three surveys conducted in 1976, 1977 and 1978; however, the question was not asked in 2020 when COVID-19 lockdowns may have impacted drinking habits.

The latest 67% reading, from a July 5-26 Gallup poll, is a slight uptick from last year when alcohol use was at the low end of the narrow range of readings.

Among those who drink, three in 10 say they have consumed an alcoholic beverage in the past 24 hours. Another 36% have had a drink in the past week, while 33% say they last had a drink more than a week ago. The 30% who have consumed alcohol in the past 24 hours is on the low end of the 26% to 40% range since 1984.

On average, U.S. drinkers report having 3.9 drinks in the past seven days, which is roughly in line with the readings historically. In 2003 and 2004, the average was around five drinks a week.

Liquor Use Hits New High; Beer Use at New Low

The type of alcohol that drinkers in the U.S. choose most often has varied somewhat over the past three decades, but beer has outpaced liquor and wine in nearly every reading. That gap is narrower this year as beer consumption, at 35%, is at its lowest level by one percentage point. The reading has been as high as 47% in the early 1990s when Gallup first asked the question.

Wine drinkers comprise 31% of all drinkers. Since 2006, the percentage of drinkers consuming wine most often has ranged between 30% and 35%.

The 30% of U.S. drinkers who favor liquor as their drink of choice is a new high in the trend, also by one point. Liquor consumption has been as low as 18% and has trailed beer and wine consistently until recently, averaging 22% since 1992.

(Gallup)

AUGUST 5, 2022

Source: https://news.gallup.com/poll/395867/say-alcohol-adversely-affects-drinkers-society.aspx

 

754-43-24/Country Profile:

USA2

USA3

SUMMARY OF POLLS

ASIA

(Singapore)

A Third Of Singaporeans Will Spend This National Day Gathering With Friends And Family (30%)

While this year’s National Day celebrations mark the first time the parade has been opened to the public after two years of downsized festivities, latest data from YouGov RealTime Omnibus reveals that most Singaporeans do not intend to join the festivities in person. The greatest proportion of citizens plan to watch the parade and fireworks on TV or online (48%) or just stay home (46%), while around a third said they will spend the time gathering with friends and family (30%).

(YouGov Singapore)
August 2, 2022

 

(Hong Kong)

One In Four Hong Kong Residents Are Opting To Change Their Payment Platform For Receiving Their Second Batch Of Digital Vouchers (25%)

Latest RealTime Omnibus research by YouGov reveals that one in four Hong Kong residents are opting to change their payment platform for receiving their second batch of digital vouchers (25%). Millennials (born 1981–1996) are more likely than other birth cohorts to be switchers – almost one in three are opting for a change (32%). In contrast, Baby Boomers (born 1946–1964) are least likely: less than one in five are seeking a change (18%). 

(YouGov Hong Kong)

August 5, 2022

 

(Pakistan)

42% Respondents Disagreed When Asked That Climate Change Is Not A Real Issue, It’s Just Propaganda

According to a survey conducted by Gallup & Gilani Pakistan and Davaam, 42% respondents either strongly disagreed or disagreed when asked that “Climate change is not a real issue, it’s just propaganda. 44% respondents strongly agree that it is not a real issue but just a propaganda, 14% somewhat agree that climate change is just a propaganda and not a real issue, 16% somewhat disagree that climate change is a propaganda and not a reality and 26% strongly disagree to the notion that climate change is just a propaganda and not a real issue.

(Gallup Pakistan)

August 1st, 2022

 

AFRICA

(Kenya)

According To Latest Opinion Polls, Azimio La Umoja One Kenya Presidential Candidate Would Win 47% Of The Total Votes

The survey shows United Democratic Alliance (UDA) and Deputy President Dr. William Ruto would win 41% of the total votes while the Roots Party flag bearer, George Wajackoya comes a distant third with 2.9%. Agano Party’s Waiga Mwaure will win 0.2% of the total votes. The Ipsos in Kenya poll shows that Mr. Odinga could possibly bridge the 3% + 1 difference to the threshold to win in the first round given there is still 9% undeclared voters (5.1% who refused to disclose, and 3.8% who are undecided. The undeclared voters are mainly older females in rural areas and are likely to be found in Western Kenya and Coast regions.

(Ipsos Kenya)

2 August 2022

 

(Zimbabwe)

Zimbabweans Look To Government For Action On Climate Change

Six in 10 Zimbabweans (60%) say droughts have become “somewhat more severe” or “much more severe” over the past 10 years; only a quarter as many (16%) say the same about floods. Fewer than half (45%) of Zimbabweans say they have heard of climate change. Eight in 10 (80%) say it is making life in Zimbabwe worse. Almost two-thirds (64%) believe that ordinary citizens can help curb climate change, and even more (71%) want the government to take immediate action to limit climate change, even if it is expensive, causes job losses, or takes a toll on the economy.

(Afrobarometer)

3 August 2022

 

WEST EUROPE

(UK)

Half Of Britons Likely To Watch Women's Football Following Lionesses Triumph

With the England women's football team securing its first ever major trophy in a nailbiting 2-1 victory against Germany yesterday at the Euros, a new YouGov poll shows that approaching half of Britons (46%) say they are likely to watch women's football in future. This includes one in five (21%) who say they are "very likely" to watch further women's football fixtures. There is no gender divide on this score, with both men and women about equally likely to say they will tune in to future matches: 48% of men and 44% of women say they are either very or fairly likely to do so.

(YouGov UK)

August 02, 2022

 

8 In 10 Britons Concerned About Climate Change – Half Think Net Zero Target Should Be Brought Forward

The latest Ipsos Political Monitor, taken July 21st to 27th, shows strong levels of concern about climate change amongst the British public. Overall, 84% are concerned about climate change, with more than half (52%) ‘very concerned’. Levels of concern overall have increased 8 points since April but are consistent with findings in July 2019 and August 2021 (both 85% concerned). Similarly, when we ask when Britain will start feeling the effects of climate change, 72% say we are already feeling the effects. This is up 5 points from April but matches the 73% that said the same in both July 2019 and August 2021.

(Ipsos MORI)

2 August 2022

 

Truss Leads Sunak By 69% To 31% In Latest Tory Members Poll

YouGov’s latest full poll of Conservative members – conducted for The Times, and the first since our snap poll after the final two candidates became clear – shows Sunak falling further behind. Liz Truss’s lead over her rival has in fact grown to 38pts, with the foreign secretary currently holding 69% of the headline vote, to Sunak’s 31%. Those figures had stood at 62% and 38% respectively in our previous poll on 20-21 July.*

(YouGov UK)

August 03, 2022

 

Six In Ten Britons Say They Will Need To Cut Other Spending To Fund Coming Energy Bills

YouGov research shows Britons are deeply concerned about the cost of energy. Some 78% of Britons say they are worried about the current price of their household's energy bills – including a third (37%) who are “very” worried about the cost. Only 18% of people claim not to be particularly concerned. A similar proportion (75%) of those with the highest household incomes (£60,000+) also say they are worried. However, those with lower incomes are more likely to be "very" worried (48% versus 31% respectively).

(YouGov UK)

August 04, 2022

 

Three In Four Britons Think Johnson’s Government Has Done A Bad Job Dealing With The Cost Of Living

The latest Ipsos Political Monitor, taken July 21st to 27th, shows that whilst the public think Boris Johnson’s government has done a good job handling the Covid vaccine rollout, dealing with the pandemic generally and responding to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, clear majorities think his government has done a bad job in a host of other areas. 80% think Johnson’s government did a good job ensuring the public are vaccinated against Covid-19. A majority (54%) think his government did a good job dealing with the Covid-19 pandemic (42% say bad).

(Ipsos MORI)

5 August 2022

 

(France)

Almost 6 In 10 People With Psoriasis Fear Being Mocked

Nearly two-thirds of people with psoriasis have high reservations when summer arrives. For 30% of them, summer is a source of stress, for 29% of sadness, and even anger for a quarter of them. Beyond social acceptance, it is also the acceptance of one's own body that is raised: nearly 6 out of 10 patients say they hide under more covering clothes out of shame of their disease (58%). Many people want to avoid answering questions related to their psoriasis (74%), receiving derogatory comments (64%) or fear being mocked (59%).

(Ipsos France)

August 1, 2022

 

(Germany)

32 Percent Of Germans Are Bundesliga Fans

The majority of German Bundesliga fans are men (73 percent) between the ages of 45 and 54 (22 vs. 20 percent of the total population). More than half of this target group (55 percent) has a great interest in politics, while only 34 percent of the total population also have a great interest in politics. In addition to football, this target group also follows biathlon and ski jumping (26 and 25 percent respectively), Bundesliga fans most often consume the TV channel ARD (46 percent) and are customers of the streaming provider Sky (23 percent).

(YouGov Germany)

August 5, 2022

 

(Hungary)

About Four-In-Ten Hungarian Adults (38%) Say Their Country Has Become Less Democratic Since Orban Became Prime Minister

About four-in-ten Hungarian adults (38%) say their country has become less democratic since Orban became prime minister. A third say it has become more democratic, and about two-in-ten (21%) say it has not changed. About three-quarters of those with an unfavorable view of Fidesz (76%) say Hungary has become less democratic since Orban took office. The share who says this increases to 86% among Hungarians who have very unfavorable views of Fidesz and see the party as a threat to Hungary’s future.

(PEW)

AUGUST 3, 2022

 

NORTH AMERICA

(USA)

Americans Support Incentives For Electric Vehicles But Are Divided Over Buying One Themselves

Overall, two-thirds of Americans support providing incentives to increase the use of electric and hybrid vehicles. Democrats and independents who lean to the Democratic Party are much more likely than Republicans and GOP leaners to say they favor incentives to increase the use of electric vehicles (84% to 46%). Majorities of Americans overall are also supportive of several other policies to address climate change, including requiring power companies to use more energy from renewable sources.

(PEW)

AUGUST 1, 2022

 

U S Women More Concerned Than Men About Some AI Developments, Especially Driverless Cars

Overall, women in the U.S. are less likely than men to say that technology has had a mostly positive effect on society (42% vs. 54%) and more likely to say technology has had equally positive and negative impacts (45% vs. 37%). In addition, women are less likely than men to say they feel more excited than concerned about the increased use of AI computer programs in daily life (13% vs. 22%). Gender remains a factor in views about AI and technology’s impact when accounting for other variables, such as respondents’ political partisanship, education and race and ethnicity.

(PEW)
AUGUST 3, 2022

 

About One-In-Six U S Journalists At News Outlets Are Part Of A Union; Many More Would Join One If They Could

At a time when newsrooms in the United States are seeing a wave of unionization, around one-in-six U.S. journalists at news organizations report being in a union and many more say they would join one if it were available to them, according to a recent Pew Research Center survey. Overall, 16% of U.S. journalists who are employed at least part time at a news outlet say they are currently a member of a union at their organization. Another 41% would join one if it were available to them, according to the survey of nearly 12,000 working U.S.-based journalists, conducted Feb. 16 to March 17, 2022.

(PEW)

AUGUST 4, 2022

 

Majority Of Americans Continue To Favor Moving Away From Electoral College

Around six-in-ten U.S. adults (63%) say the way the president is elected should be changed so that the winner of the popular vote nationwide wins the presidency, while 35% favor keeping the current Electoral College system, according to a Pew Research Center survey conducted June 27-July 4, 2022. There has been a modest increase in the share of Americans who favor changing the way presidents are elected: In January 2021, the last time the Center asked this question, 55% said the system should be changed, while 43% supported maintaining the existing system.

(PEW)

AUGUST 5, 2022

 

Three In Four U S Adults Say Alcohol Use Has A Negative Effect On Society

Broad majorities of Americans believe the use of alcohol adversely affects both society in general and drinkers specifically. Three in four U.S. adults say alcohol use has a negative effect on society, and nearly as many (71%) think it affects drinkers themselves negatively, though more describe the effect as "somewhat negative" than as "very negative." As for their drink of choice, drinkers in the U.S. are more closely divided in their preferences than ever before, with roughly equal percentages saying they most often consume beer, wine or liquor.

(Gallup)

AUGUST 5, 2022

 

AUSTRALIA

(New Zealand)

Potential National/Act NZ (46%) Coalition Is Just Ahead Of Labour/ Greens (44.5%) In July, But Maori Party Holds The Balance Of Power

Today’s Roy Morgan New Zealand Poll shows support tightening between a potential National/ Act NZ (46%) coalition now only 1.5% points ahead of the governing Labour/ Greens (44.5%). The gap is the smallest since Christopher Luxon became National Leader in late November.
Support for a potential National/Act NZ coalition dropped by 2.5% points to 46% in July while Luxon holidayed in Hawaii, despite social media posts claiming he was in New Zealand, while support for Labour/ Greens was up 1% point to 44.5%.

(Roy Morgan)

August 02 2022

 

MULTICOUNTRY STUDIES

Globally, 3 In 5 Citizens Say Abortion Should Be Legal In All Or Most Cases, In 27 Surveyed Countries

On average, 59% of adults surveyed by Ipsos in 27 countries say abortion should be legal in all or most cases while 26% say it should be illegal in all or most cases. Those who say it should be legal outnumber those who say it shouldn’t in 22 countries – nowhere more than in Sweden, Belgium, France, and the Netherlands. Opposition prevails in only 4 countries – Peru, India, Malaysia, and Colombia.

(Ipsos MORI)

2 August 2022

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/globally-3-5-citizens-say-abortion-should-be-legal-all-or-most-cases

 

Four In Ten Across 28 Countries Expect Their Disposable Income To Fall Over The Next Year

A Global Country Average of 40% say they expect their disposable income to fall over the year, while 25% expect it to increase. Three quarters of the public in 28 countries are concerned about the rising cost of goods and services in the next six months. Public reactions to rises in the cost of living remain focused on cutting spending on luxuries and delaying big purchase decisions. The state of the global economy is seen as the biggest driver of rising costs, followed by the impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the policies of national governments

(Ipsos MORI)

2 August 2022

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/four-ten-across-28-countries-expect-their-disposable-income-fall-over-next-year

 

A Study On Online Banking In 5 European Countries

Around 1 in 4 people use their smartphone several times a day for this purpose in Spain (26%) and France (23%). On the other hand, 28% of Germans and 21% of Britons say they never use their smartphone for this purpose. Despite this, some Europeans seem to continue to be wary of online banking. The British are the most suspicious: 68% say they do not feel comfortable using this type of service. Note: 50% of Spaniards share this opinion.

(YouGov Spain)

August 4, 2022

Source: https://es.yougov.com/news/2022/08/04/estudio-internacional-existe-un-consenso-sobre-la-/

 

ASIA

754-43-01/Polls

A Third Of Singaporeans Will Spend This National Day Gathering With Friends And Family (30%)

While this year’s National Day celebrations mark the first time the parade has been opened to the public after two years of downsized festivities, latest data from YouGov RealTime Omnibus reveals that most Singaporeans do not intend to join the festivities in person. The greatest proportion of citizens plan to watch the parade and fireworks on TV or online (48%) or just stay home (46%), while around a third said they will spend the time gathering with friends and family (30%).

As for those who do intend to participate in the celebrations in person, one in six plan to watch the parade and fireworks at public viewing points or heartland locations (17%), while a fewer one in twelve said they will be attending the celebrations at the Floating Platform (8%).

Another one in twelve would spend their time shopping (8%), visiting local places of interest (8%) or celebrating in other ways (7%). Just one in ten said they do not plan to celebrate the occasion (11%).

Citizens were also polled on their assessment of personal and public levels of patriotism. While majority identify as being patriotic to some degree (60%), just over a quarter are on the fence, identifying as being neither patriotic nor unpatriotic (27%). One in ten would go further and say they are not very patriotic (6%) or not patriotic at all (4%).

Citizens who described themselves as patriotic were also more likely to say they would watch the parade remotely (58%), at public viewing points and heartland locations (22%) or even at the Floating Platform (10%), while those who identified as being unpatriotic were most likely to say they would not celebrate the occasion (31%).

Looking at how individual levels of patriotism vary across age breaks, young adults aged 18-24 are significantly more likely to identify as being not very patriotic (16%), while those above 55 are most likely to say they are very patriotic (20%).

When asked about overall levels of patriotism – which was most popularly defined as being proud of (56%), loyal to (45%) and loving one’s country (36%) –half agreed that Singaporeans’ level of patriotism has remained about the same (49%). One in three citizens said Singaporeans are less patriotic, while one in ten said patriotism has increased (10%).

 (YouGov Singapore)
August 2, 2022

Source: https://sg.yougov.com/en-sg/news/2022/08/02/what-do-singaporeans-intend-do-national-day-watch-/

 

754-43-02/Polls

One In Four Hong Kong Residents Are Opting To Change Their Payment Platform For Receiving Their Second Batch Of Digital Vouchers (25%)

From 7 August, most long-term residents in Hong Kong aged 18+ years will receive their Phase II consumption vouchers from the government, following an earlier, Phase I disbursement in April this year.  

Notably, the number of digital payment platforms which eligible residents can receive their HK$ 5000 of e-coupons has increased from four in Phase I – Alipay HK, HKT’s Tap & Go, Octopus Cards, WeChat Pay HK – to six in Phase II – with the addition of BoC Pay and HSBC’s PayMe.  

But are many consumers opting to change payment platform in Phase II’s disbursement? Which payment platforms are attracting the most switchovers? And what are consumers planning to spend their Phase II consumption vouchers on? 

What proportion of Hong Kong consumers are switching payment platforms in Phase II? 

Latest RealTime Omnibus research by YouGov reveals that one in four Hong Kong residents are opting to change their payment platform for receiving their second batch of digital vouchers (25%).

Millennials (born 1981–1996) are more likely than other birth cohorts to be switchers – almost one in three are opting for a change (32%). In contrast, Baby Boomers (born 1946–1964) are least likely: less than one in five are seeking a change (18%). 

Which payment platforms are attracting the most switchovers? 

Among consumers who are opting to change payment providers in Phase II, almost half of them say they are switching to either Octopus Cards (23%) or Alipay (22%).  

Of the two new payment platforms in Phase II, HSBC’s PayMe attracted 15% of switchers, ahead of BoC Pay’s 9%. WeChat Pay, which ran a high-profile omnichannel marketing campaign featuring local actor Michael Tao to encourage consumers to choose its platform, attracted just over one in ten switchers (11%).

Consumers residing in the New Territories made up half of all switchers (50%), and the largest proportion of switchovers into each platform, followed by residents of Kowloon.

Consumers residing on Hong Kong Island were least likely to switch payment platforms in Phase II – as a whole and across the six platforms.  

Where are consumers planning to spend their consumption vouchers? 

More than three in five consumers in Hong Kong say they will spend their consumption vouchers on food-related grocery items (63%), while half intend to expend some of their e-coupons on personal care and cosmetic products (50%) – such as shower gels, shampoos and conditioners, toothpastes, skincare products, and make-up products.  

Almost two in five intend to use their consumption vouchers to buy clothing, footwear, bags and fashion accessories (39%), while more than a third are looking to spend them on personal electronics (36%) – including smartphones, computers, and audio and video accessories.  

Close to a quarter of consumers also say they will spend their consumption vouchers on home appliances (24%) and COVID-19 protection supplies (23%) – such as face masks and hand sanitisers.

But among Gen Z consumers, personal electronics (47%) and personal care and cosmetics (45%) are the top two categories and close to half say they intend to spend their consumption vouchers here – ahead of food related-groceries (41%) and clothing and fashion apparel (40%). 

Food-related grocery items, however, remains the top e-voucher spending category for Millennials (55%), Gen X (68%) and Baby Boomers (77%).  

More than half of Millennials (51%), Gen X (50%) and Baby Boomers (51%) also say they will spend on personal care and cosmetic products, while around two in five Millennials (40%), Gen X (38%) and Baby Boomers (38%) intend to buy clothing and fashion apparel with their e-vouchers.

(YouGov Hong Kong)

August 5, 2022

Source: https://hk.yougov.com/en-hk/news/2022/08/05/hong-kong-2022-consumption-vouchers-switch-payment/

 

754-43-03/Polls

42% Respondents Disagreed When Asked That Climate Change Is Not A Real Issue, It’s Just Propaganda

According to a survey conducted by Gallup & Gilani Pakistan and Davaam, 42% respondents either strongly disagreed or disagreed when asked that “Climate change is not a real issue, it’s just propaganda. A nationally representative sample of adult men and women from across the four major cities of Pakistan including Lahore, Karachi, Rawalpindi/Islamabad, and Peshawar was asked the following question, “Climate change is not a real issue, it’s just propaganda’ In response to this question, 44% respondents strongly agree that it is not a real issue but just a propaganda, 14% somewhat agree that climate change is just a propaganda and not a real issue, 16% somewhat disagree that climate change is a propaganda and not a reality and 26% strongly disagree to the notion that climate change is just a propaganda and not a real issue.

(Gallup Pakistan)

August 1st, 2022

Source: https://gallup.com.pk/wp/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/August-1st.pdf

 

AFRICA

754-43-04/Polls

According To Latest Opinion Polls, Azimio La Umoja One Kenya Presidential Candidate Would Win 47% Of The Total Votes

With less than a week to the August 9 Election, Mr. Raila Amolo Odinga is the candidate most voters would choose. The latest opinion poll by Ipsos in Kenya shows the Azimio La Umoja One Kenya presidential candidate would win 47% of the total votes if elections were held on the day the interviews were conducted.

The survey shows United Democratic Alliance (UDA) and Deputy President Dr. William Ruto would win 41% of the total votes while the Roots Party flag bearer, George Wajackoya comes a distant third with 2.9%. Agano Party’s Waiga Mwaure will win 0.2% of the total votes.

The Ipsos in Kenya poll shows that Mr. Odinga could possibly bridge the 3% + 1 difference to the threshold to win in the first round given there is still 9% undeclared voters (5.1% who refused to disclose, and 3.8% who are undecided. The undeclared voters are mainly older females in rural areas and are likely to be found in Western Kenya and Coast regions.

The survey shows voters think that Mr. Odinga will win (irrespective of how they will vote on election day) – except in Central Rift, Northern Kenya, and Mt. Kenya regions.

Mr. Odinga’s popularity is highest among urbanites (51%) and among male voters (52%). It is also higher among older adults (35+ - av. 50%). On the other side, Dr. Ruto’s popularity is highest among the youth (18 – 24: 46%, 25 – 34: 43%) and among females (42%).

Mr. Odinga leads in most of the regions of the country while Dr. Ruto has a clear lead only in the Rift Valley and Mt. Kenya regions.

Regions in this case are analytical classifications of counties that have voter homogeneity as follows: 1. Coast (Mombasa, Kwale, Kilifi, Tana River, Lamu, Taita-Taveta) 2. Lower Eastern (Kitui, Machakos, Makueni) 3. Northern (Marsabit, Isiolo, Garissa, Wajir, Mandera) 4. North Rift (Turkana, Samburu, West Pokot) 5. Central Rift (Uasin Gishu, Elegyo-Marakwet, Nandi, Baringo, Nakuru, Kericho, Bomet) 6. South Rift (Narok, Kajiado) 7. Mt. Kenya East (Meru, Embu, Tharaka Nithi) 8. Mt. Kenya West (Kiambu, Murang’a, Nyeri, Nyandarua, Kirinyaga, Laikipia) 9. Western (Kakamega, Vihiga, Bungoma, Busia, Trans-Nzoia) 10. Nyanza – North (Kisumu, Siaya, Homabay) 11. Nyanza – South (Migori, Kisii, Nyamira) 12. Nairobi (Nairobi County)

Mr. Odinga has a clear lead against Dr. Ruto in Coast (56% - 30%), Lower Eastern (67%-27%), Nyanza (78%-12%) and Nairobi (60% - 32%). Dr. Ruto has a clear lead against Mr. Odinga Central Rift (67% - 23%), Mt. Kenya East (78%-14%), and Mt. Kenya West (62% - 24%). Regions that are tightly contested and able to tip the election in either way are: Northern (Mr. Odinga, 46%; Dr. Ruto 40%), North rift (Mr. Odinga, 42%; Dr. Ruto 43%) and South rift (Mr. Odinga, 52%; Dr. Ruto 40%). While Mr. Odinga has a lead in Western (53%), the large number of undecided voters makes the region a battle ground.

“The Ipsos in Kenya poll was conducted ahead of the presidential debate between 23rd – 26th July 2022 and after the debate 27th - 30th July 2022 among adults aged 18+, who are registered voters, with a sample size of 6,105. All 47 Counties were covered according to their proportion of the Kenyan population. The data collection methodology was Face-to-Face interviews at the household level”, said Mr. Samuel Muthoka who is the Director, Center for Development Research & Evaluation with responsibility for East & Horn of Africa at Ipsos in Kenya during the release of the opinion poll in Nairobi.

Ipsos in Kenya employs quality control measures to ensure the highest possible integrity of obtained results/data. Mr. Muthoka pointed out that Ipsos’ data collection platform captures GPS location (latitudes and longitudes) of interviews conducted to verify the locations of the interviewers in the field alongside allowing silent recording.

“Logical data checks are made on selected questionnaire entries to ensure conformity with the flow of the questions answered by the respondents. Sample quotas were monitored to match the sample’s statistical parameters,” he said.

According to the survey, Mr. Odinga’s sweet spot is his legacy. This is deduced from reasons given for preferring him such as being a democrat (12%), his manifesto (12%), a liberator (11%) and a nationalist leader (9%). Others opine that he now deserves a chance (8%) and is experienced in leadership (5%).

On the flip side, Mr. Odinga’s undoing would likely come from his perceived advanced age (23%) and the tag that he is a ‘project’ of the government (10%) “Those who will vote for the Dr. Ruto will do so because he presents hope, which voters point out comes from his clear plan (27%) and a better connection with the common mwananchi (9%),” Mr. Muthoka pointed out.

However, integrity is raised as single most significant headwind in his bid for the State House job with 35% of those who do not prefer him citing corruption allegations tagged to his name.

The poll shows Dr. Ruto has higher appeal in rural areas, among females and 18–34-year-olds, while Mr. Odinga is more popular among males, urbanites, and older voters.

At least 85% say they are likely to vote, while 15% of registered voters are likely to stay away from the polls. Those who say they are less likely to turn out to vote are more often urbanites (17%), females (18%), and the youth (average of 20%).

Those who are unlikely to vote give reasons such as seeing no value in voting (31%), no impact on their lives (25%), not interested (17%), elections will not be free and fair (11%) and fear of insecurity /violence (9%).

Unemployment, corruption prevention, and education are the three main issues that Kenyans would like the next government to address.

Employment and corruption prevention are highlighted more by urbanites and males, while education concerns the older voters more.

“Only a third of Kenyans feel the country is headed in the right direction, while slightly more than half feel the country is headed in the wrong direction. Older citizens are more likely to hold this view than younger citizens,” said Mr. Muthoka.

He added that four in every ten Kenyan adults are very interested in politics, more among males, and the older generation compared to females and the younger generation. Four in every ten Kenyan adults (39%) are very interested in politics. This interest is however higher among males (45%), and those aged 45 and above (av. 43%) compared to females (33%) and the youth aged 18 – 34 (av 36%).

Lack of / little interest in politics among females and youth is a recipe for voter apathy. These two groups form the largest voter constituency which could determine quality of political leaders should they actively engage and participate in the polls, said Mr. Muthoka.

(Ipsos Kenya)

2 August 2022

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-ke/ipsos-opinion-poll-7-days-general-elections-mr-odinga-leads-presidential-race

 

754-43-05/Polls

Zimbabweans Look To Government For Action On Climate Change

Six in 10 Zimbabweans (60%) say droughts have become “somewhat more severe” or

“much more severe” over the past 10 years; only a quarter as many (16%) say the

same about floods.

 Fewer than half (45%) of Zimbabweans say they have heard of climate change.

Among those who are aware of climate change:

o Eight in 10 (80%) say it is making life in Zimbabwe worse.

o Almost two-thirds (64%) believe that ordinary citizens can help curb climate

change, and even more (71%) want the government to take immediate action to

limit climate change, even if it is expensive, causes job losses, or takes a toll on the

economy.

o Only small minorities are satisfied with efforts by the government (2%), business

and industry (3%), developed countries (4%), and ordinary citizens (11%) to fight

climate change.

Severity of extreme weather conditions

Before mentioning climate change, Afrobarometer asked respondents about their

experiences with extreme weather conditions. Six in 10 Zimbabweans (60%) say droughts

have become “somewhat more severe” or “much more severe” over the past decade,

while 22% say they have become less severe and 15% say they have stayed the same

(Figure 1).

In contrast, more than four in 10 (44%) say that the severity of floods has decreased, while

fewer than half as many (16%) say they have gotten worse.

Compared to 2017, the proportion who say droughts have gotten more severe has increased

by 27 percentage points, while perceptions of worsening floods have decreased by 16

percentage points (Figure 2)

Rural residents are more likely than urbanites to report increasingly severe droughts (64% vs.

54%), perhaps reflecting a greater awareness of the effects of a lack of rainfall in agricultural

areas (Figure 3). Geographically, five provinces have majorities reporting that droughts have

become more severe, most commonly in the Midlands province (78%), Bulawayo/Mat

North/Mat South provinces (78%), and Mashonaland Central (75%).

Citizens with high lived poverty1 are more likely to report that floods have become more

severe (31%) than their better-off counterparts (14%-21%)

Climate change

Awareness of climate change

Fewer than half (45%) of Zimbabweans say they have heard of climate change. This

proportion was 28 percentage points higher (73%) in 2017, perhaps reflecting high public

awareness at the time of floods that hit Zimbabwe in late 2016 and early 2017 (Aljazeera,

2017) (Figure 4).

Although the experience of severe drought is more common in rural areas, awareness of

climate change is far lower among rural residents than among urbanites (38% vs. 56%)

(Figure 5).

Citizens with post-secondary education are three times as likely as the uneducated to have

heard of climate change (75% vs. 25%). But poor citizens are more likely to be familiar with

the term “climate change” (51%) than better-off respondents (40%-44%). Middle-aged

citizens (50%) are also more likely to be aware of climate change than older or younger

respondents.

Awareness of climate change varies widely by geographic location, ranging from 24% in

Manicaland to 61% in Mashonaland Central.

Awareness of climate change increases with respondents’ consumption of news from

television, social media, the Internet, and newspapers: Among those who never or rarely (less

than once a month) consume news from these sources, only 32%-43% are aware of climate

change, compared to 57%-73% among those who obtain news at least a few times a month.

The exception is radio, where we see no difference between the two groups (Figure 6).

Effects of climate change

Eight in 10 of citizens (80%) who are aware of climate change say it is making life in

Zimbabwe “somewhat worse” (30%) or “much worse” (50%). Perceptions of the adverse

effects of climate change have risen sharply from 62% in 2021 (Figure 7).

The negative impact of climate change is more strongly felt among rural residents than

urban residents (89% vs. 70%) (Figure 8).

Fighting climate change

Majorities of Zimbabweans believe that both ordinary citizens and the government have a

role to play in limiting climate change. Almost two-thirds of respondents who are aware of

climate change (64%) “agree” or “strongly agree” that citizens can help curb climate

change (Figure 9). Even more (71%) want their government to take steps now to limit climate

change, even if it is expensive, causes job losses, or takes a toll on the economy.

In fact, for a majority (57%) of Zimbabweans, the government has the primary responsibility

for fighting climate change and reducing its impact. Fewer respondents assign primary

responsibility to ordinary citizens (16%), business and industry (10%), developed countries (3%), and traditional leaders (3%) (Figure 10).

Are stakeholders doing enough to limit climate change? Respondents answer with a

resounding “No.” Only small minorities say the government (2%), business and industry (3%), developed countries (4%), and citizens (11%) are making enough of an effort to fight climate change (Figure 11). Large majorities believe more needs to be done, including 78% who say the government needs to do “a lot more.”

When asked to assess how well the government is addressing the problem of climate change, only a quarter (25%) of all survey respondents give the government a passing grade, while 45% describe its performance as “fairly bad” or “very bad.” Three in 10 (31%) say they “don’t know” or refused to answer the question (Figure 12).

The view that the government is doing a poor job on climate change is particularly common among highly educated citizens (66%), urban residents (55%), and poor respondents (54%) (Figure 13).

Conclusion: Climate change is still an unknown phenomenon to more than half of Zimbabweans, but among those who are aware of it, most report that it is making life in the country worse. Dissatisfied with stakeholders’ efforts to limit climate change, citizens place the primary responsibility for combating it on the government and want immediate action, even at considerable cost to the economy.

(Afrobarometer)

3 August 2022

Source: https://www.afrobarometer.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/AD537-Zimbabweans-look-to-government-for-action-on-climate-change-Afrobarometer-dispatch-2aug22-1.pdf

 

WEST EUROPE

754-43-06/Polls

Half Of Britons Likely To Watch Women's Football Following Lionesses Triumph

With the England women's football team securing its first ever major trophy in a nailbiting 2-1 victory against Germany yesterday at the Euros, a new YouGov poll shows that approaching half of Britons (46%) say they are likely to watch women's football in future.

This includes one in five (21%) who say they are "very likely" to watch further women's football fixtures. There is no gender divide on this score, with both men and women about equally likely to say they will tune in to future matches: 48% of men and 44% of women say they are either very or fairly likely to do so.

https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/inlineimage/2022-08-01/survey-result%20(81).png

While women's football teams have historically played second fiddle to the men's, the Lionesses' victory in the tournament is actively celebrated by the large majority of Britons (72%), including 55% who describe themselves as "very pleased" by the result. Only one in five (21%) are indifferent to the outcome, and just 2% displeased by it. Men are slightly more likely to be uninterested than women (24% vs 18%), but the large majority of men are pleased by the victory.

https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/inlineimage/2022-08-01/survey-result%20(80).png

Scots likewise are much more likely to be indifferent (42%) or displeased by the results (6%), for obvious reasons.

With grassroots clubs reporting that they are already snowed under with requests from girls to join following the team's triumph, the data also highlights the scale of the football gender gap at the participation level. Fully 65% of adult women say they have never played a football match in their life, not even a kickaround at school. Just 13% of adult men say the same.    

Women (17%) and men (15%) are equally likely to say they have just played a kickabout, while 69% of men have participated in at least one match, versus just 17% of women.

https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/inlineimage/2022-08-01/survey-result%20(82).png

(YouGov UK)

August 02, 2022

Source: https://yougov.co.uk/topics/sport/articles-reports/2022/08/02/half-britons-likely-watch-womens-football-followin

 

754-43-07/Polls

8 In 10 Britons Concerned About Climate Change – Half Think Net Zero Target Should Be Brought Forward

  • 7 in 10 think effects of climate change already being felt
  • Increase in proportion of Britons that think human activity the main cause of recent hot weather

The latest Ipsos Political Monitor, taken July 21st to 27th, shows strong levels of concern about climate change amongst the British public. Overall, 84% are concerned about climate change, with more than half (52%) ‘very concerned’. Levels of concern overall have increased 8 points since April but are consistent with findings in July 2019 and August 2021 (both 85% concerned).

Concern about climate change

Similarly, when we ask when Britain will start feeling the effects of climate change, 72% say we are already feeling the effects. This is up 5 points from April but matches the 73% that said the same in both July 2019 and August 2021.

What caused the recent hot weather?

When asked what caused the recent hot weather, 40% say the main cause is climate change because of human activity. Just 12% say it has been caused by natural weather processes and 45% think it is a mix of both. This is a different picture to 2019 where 26% thought the main cause of the hot weather that summer was human activity, 15% said it was caused by natural weather processes and 57% said a mix of both.

Net zero targets

When asked about the UK government target of bringing the UK’s contribution to climate change to ‘net zero’ by 2050.

  • 52% think the UK should bring all emissions to net zero before 2050 (-3 points from July 2019).
  • 26% think the target is about right (no change).
  • 7% think the target should be achieved more slowly (+3 pts).
  • 11% say there should not be a target (no change).

Keiran Pedley, Director of Politics at Ipsos UK, says of the findings:

These findings show that public concern about climate change is real and widespread but in reality this is nothing new. The public have been concerned about climate change for some time and recognise its effects are already with us. It is no surprise then that they want to see urgent action to address it, though some may disagree over the right action to take.

(Ipsos MORI)

2 August 2022

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/8-10-britons-concerned-about-climate-change-half-think-net-zero-target-should-be-brought-forward

 

754-43-08/Polls

Truss Leads Sunak By 69% To 31% In Latest Tory Members Poll

The foreign secretary’s supporters are less likely to say they might change their mind than the former chancellor’s

It has been apparent since our first polling of the Conservative party membership for this leadership election that Rishi Sunak faces an uphill struggle.

In the gaps between polling, Sunak’s supporters have been claiming that the former chancellor has been successfully convincing members to back him.

However, YouGov’s latest full poll of Conservative members – conducted for The Times, and the first since our snap poll after the final two candidates became clear – shows Sunak falling further behind.

Liz Truss’s lead over her rival has in fact grown to 38pts, with the foreign secretary currently holding 69% of the headline vote, to Sunak’s 31%. Those figures had stood at 62% and 38% respectively in our previous poll on 20-21 July.*

Team Sunak will have been hoping that they could convince those who had not made up their mind how to vote to back them as the campaign wore on. At the onset of the membership stage of the campaign, 21% of Tory members were either unsure how they would voted or committed to not doing so. That figure has since fallen to 13%, with Truss seemingly the bigger beneficiary.

Worse still for Sunak, few of his opponent’s supporters look like they could be convinced to join his side. Fully 83% of those who currently say they intend to vote for Truss say they have made their mind up on the matter; just 17% say they might still change their mind.

Indeed, Sunak’s own supporters display less conviction about their candidate: 29% say they might still vote differently.

*YouGov's weighting targets have been updated since the last poll on 20-21 July based on new estimates of the Conservative Party membership base. This had the effect of marginally reducing Truss’s lead from what it would have been under the previous weights.

(YouGov UK)

August 03, 2022

Source: https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2022/08/03/truss-leads-sunak-69-31-latest-tory-members-poll

 

754-43-09/Polls

Six In Ten Britons Say They Will Need To Cut Other Spending To Fund Coming Energy Bills

The vast majority of people across all ranges of income are worried about the current price of energy

In their bid for the office of Prime Minister, Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak have promised to tackle the cost-of-living crisis – including rising energy costs. While Liz Truss has ruled out a windfall tax on energy companies wanting to encourage investment, Sunak has suggested removing VAT on energy bills.

Whoever the successful candidate is, they will need to waste no time in addressing the crisis, as new YouGov research shows Britons are deeply concerned about the cost of energy.

Some 78% of Britons say they are worried about the current price of their household's energy bills – including a third (37%) who are “very” worried about the cost. Only 18% of people claim not to be particularly concerned.

The concern is similar across varying levels of household income. Of those with the lowest household incomes (£19,999 a year or less), 83% say they are concerned about how much they spend on energy. A similar proportion (75%) of those with the highest household incomes (£60,000+) also say they are worried. However, those with lower incomes are more likely to be "very" worried (48% versus 31% respectively).

These high levels of concern follow the increase in the energy price cap that allowed energy companies to charge earlier this year. However, it also precedes another rise in the cap coming in October. Some experts have predicted that the coming hike to the price cap in the autumn could see bills rise as much as 46%*.

Nearly nine in ten Britons (88%) claim they were aware of the coming increase before taking part in the survey. The research further shows that most Britons (62%) expect to have to make at least small cuts to other spending to maintain their current energy use when the next price rise kicks in. This includes 30% who say they will need to cut large parts of their budget to maintain their energy use under the new prices.

A further 15% of people say they will be completely unable to afford their current energy use under the coming higher prices, regardless of cuts.

Just 14% of Britons expect to be able to take on the higher costs of their current energy use without cutting other spending.

Among the lowest income households (£19,999 a year or less), 30% say they will be unable to afford their current energy use under higher prices, while 55% say they will only be able to do so with cuts to other spending. Only 8% of people from these households say they will be able to afford their present energy use in the future without making cuts.

Even in those households on higher incomes, between 65% and 75% say they will need to make cuts to afford their current level of energy use. Among the households with the highest incomes (£60,000+), only 29% say they will be able to continue using the same level of energy without spending less in other areas.

(YouGov UK)

August 04, 2022

Source: https://yougov.co.uk/topics/economy/articles-reports/2022/08/04/six-ten-britons-say-they-will-need-cut-other-spend

 

754-43-10/Polls

Three In Four Britons Think Johnson’s Government Has Done A Bad Job Dealing With The Cost Of Living

  • Seven in ten say the government has done a bad job improving the NHS and managing immigration
  • Seven in ten expect the economy to get worse over the next twelve months

The latest Ipsos Political Monitor, taken July 21st to 27th, shows that whilst the public think Boris Johnson’s government has done a good job handling the Covid vaccine rollout, dealing with the pandemic generally and responding to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, clear majorities think his government has done a bad job in a host of other areas.

Record of the Johnson government

  • 80% think Johnson’s government did a good job ensuring the public are vaccinated against Covid-19. A majority (54%) think his government did a good job dealing with the Covid-19 pandemic (42% say bad). Meanwhile, 57% say Johnson’s government has done a good job responding to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, 28% say bad job.

  • However, clear majorities of 6 in 10 or more think Johnson’s government has done a bad job dealing with the cost of living (75%), managing immigration (71%), improving the NHS (70%), handling tax and public expenditure (66%), managing the economy (63%), reducing regional inequalities / levelling-up (61%) and handling Britain’s relationship with the EU (61%).
  • The government’s scores for doing a ‘good job’ at managing the economy (27%) and handling taxation / public expenditure (22%) are the worst Ipsos have recorded since we began tracking these numbers in 1998, and both metrics have got worse since December.
  • Current Conservative supporters are most likely to think the government has done a bad job on immigration (64%). This is the only issue where more than half of current Conservative voters think the government has done a bad job (although almost half – 48% in each case - are critical on the NHS and cost of living).
  • Labour supporters tend to think the current government has done a bad job across most issues, especially dealing with the cost of living (92%) and improving the NHS (89%). However, they do give some credit to the government for doing a good job on Ukraine (50%) and Covid-19 vaccinations (81%).

Meanwhile, looking ahead to challenges facing the next Government, 69% expect the economy to worsen in the next 12 months (-8 pts from June) and just 16% expect it to improve (+3 pts). This still gives a negative Ipsos Economic Optimism Index of -53, which is worse than all of 2021.

Attitudes to public spending and tax

Elsewhere in the poll, the public were asked about attitudes towards tax and public spending where they are still more than twice as likely to think public spending should be increased rather than cut back, although the gap has narrowed from recent years:

  • 45% think the government should ‘increase spending on public services, even if that means higher taxes or more government borrowing’.
  • 20% think the government should ‘reduce spending on public services, to allow for tax cuts or less government borrowing’.
  • 28% think the government should keep spending on public services at the current level.
  • Attitudes to public spending have shifted in recent years. For example, in October 2019 just before the last General Election, 56% thought that spending should be increased (11 pts higher than today) and 10% thought it should be reduced (10 pts lower).
  • When asked what they think the government under Boris Johnson’s successor will do, 24% think it will increase spending, 25% that it will keep spending at the current level, and 37% that it will reduce spending. Again, expectations that the government under a new PM will reduce spending have risen slightly from previous years.

Keiran Pedley, Director of Politics at Ipsos, UK, says of the findings:

When we look back at Boris Johnson’s legacy, the public do credit his government with notable successes, such as dealing with the Covid vaccine rollout or responding to the Russian invasion of Ukraine. However, with large numbers unhappy at how the current government is managing issues such as the cost of living, the NHS, immigration and levelling-up, it is clear that the new Prime Minister will face immediate real-world delivery challenges from the day they enter office.

(Ipsos MORI)

5 August 2022

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/three-four-britons-think-johnsons-government-has-done-bad-job-dealing-cost-living

 

754-43-11/Polls

Almost 6 In 10 People With Psoriasis Fear Being Mocked

Summer, a source of stress for nearly a third of people with psoriasis

Nearly two-thirds of people with psoriasis have high reservations when summer arrives. For 30% of them, summer is a source of stress, for 29% of sadness, and even anger for a quarter of them. Beyond social acceptance, it is also the acceptance of one's own body that is raised: nearly 6 out of 10 patients say they hide under more covering clothes out of shame of their disease (58%). Many people want to avoid answering questions related to their psoriasis (74%), receiving derogatory comments (64%) or fear being mocked (59%).

A quarter of people with psoriasis have already cancelled their vacation

Some patients go so far as to give up their holidays altogether: a quarter have already cancelled a holiday by the sea (26%) or a holiday with friends (29%), while others will reduce their holidays, or decide to take them at another time when the temperatures are cooler (28%). Psoriasis thus conditions social life during this period: more than a third of patients will refocus on outings in small groups (37%) or will favor individual activities (36%). A situation that has a strong impact on young people, since on average, one in two young people has already canceled their holidays because of their psoriasis.

Significant consequences on sentimental and family life

The family life of people with psoriasis is also strongly affected. One in two parents with psoriasis has difficulty going out with their children on these hot and sunny days: 46% have already asked their spouse or relatives to accompany their child on outings in their place and 44% have guided the choice of their child's activities so that they are more adapted to their skin problem.
Love life also suffers, especially among young people: 56% have already given up a holiday adventure because of their psoriasis, not feeling comfortable talking about their disease.

(Ipsos France)

August 1, 2022

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/fr-fr/presque-6-personnes-atteintes-de-psoriasis-sur-10-apprehendent-detre-victimes-de-moqueries

 

754-43-12/Polls

32 Percent Of Germans Are Bundesliga Fans

Every season, numerous fans cheer with the Bundesliga and the tournaments attract thousands of spectators at home and abroad.

The current target group analysis "Football Bundesliga Fans" shows the attitudes and preferences of this target group, especially with regard to sponsorship in football.

 

Who are the Bundesliga fans?

The majority of German Bundesliga fans are men (73 percent) between the ages of 45 and 54 (22 vs. 20 percent of the total population). More than half of this target group (55 percent) has a great interest in politics, while only 34 percent of the total population also have a great interest in politics. In addition to football, this target group also follows biathlon and ski jumping (26 and 25 percent respectively), Bundesliga fans most often consume the TV channel ARD (46 percent) and are customers of the streaming provider Sky (23 percent).

 

https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/r/52/Bundesliga-Fans.png

Bundesliga fans find sponsorship acceptable

While more than a fifth (22 percent) find it acceptable for a brand to support a sports team, only 15 percent of the total population agree with that. Overall, sponsorship can appeal well to Bundesliga fans, almost half perceive sponsors at sporting events and love it when their favorite team has a "cool" sponsor (48 and 44 vs. 29 percent respectively). For Bundesliga fans, the well-known types of sports sponsorship include in particular jersey sponsors and namesakes of a stadium (62 and 53 percent respectively). 33 percent support their team by wearing a team jersey during the game (vs. 19 percent of the total population).

(YouGov Germany)

August 5, 2022

Source: https://yougov.de/news/2022/08/05/32-prozent-der-deutschen-sind-fussball-bundesliga-/

 

754-43-13/Polls

About Four-In-Ten Hungarian Adults (38%) Say Their Country Has Become Less Democratic Since Orban Became Prime Minister

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, who is set to speak at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Texas this week, receives generally positive ratings from people in his own country, according to a Pew Research Center survey conducted shortly after his reelection this spring. However, he gets mixed reviews for his impact on democracy in Hungary, and attitudes toward him are less positive among young people and residents of urban areas, including the country’s capital city, Budapest.

A bar chart showing that Hungarians disagree on Orban’s impact on democracy

About four-in-ten Hungarian adults (38%) say their country has become less democratic since Orban became prime minister. A third say it has become more democratic, and about two-in-ten (21%) say it has not changed.

A line graph showing that indicators show a decline in Hungarian democracy

Indicators from the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance show a significant backslide in democracy in Hungary since 1998, when Orban took office for the first time as prime minister. The sharpest decline in these indicators – which measure representative government, fundamental rights, checks on government power and impartial administration – appear after 2010, when Orban began his second stint as prime minister. In Europe and globally, these same measures have, on average, remained largely stable in the same period.

The view that the health of democracy has declined under Orban is common among opponents of Fidesz, the right-wing party which he leads. About three-quarters of those with an unfavorable view of Fidesz (76%) say Hungary has become less democratic since Orban took office. The share who says this increases to 86% among Hungarians who have very unfavorable views of Fidesz and see the party as a threat to Hungary’s future. Just 15% of those with a favorable opinion of Fidesz agree that Hungary has become less democratic under Orban.

A bar chart showing that young Hungarians are more likely than older ones to say democracy has declined under Orban

Young Hungarians ages 18 to 29 are more likely than those 65 and older to say their country is less democratic now than when Orban took office (47% vs. 29%), as are those who live in an urban region compared with rural residents (52% vs. 27%).

Still, regardless of disagreement on the path of their nation’s democracy, most Hungarians approve of Orban’s performance as prime minister. As of this year’s survey, conducted in the weeks following his landslide electoral victory, 57% approve of Orban; just one-third disapprove of him.

A bar chart showing that most Hungarians hold strong opinions of Orban’s performance

Views of Orban tend to be deeply held in Hungary: Roughly two-thirds of those who offer either positive or negative evaluations of Orban say they feel strongly. This includes 37% who strongly approve and 24% who strongly disapprove of him.

Like Hungarians’ views of democracy in their country, attitudes about Orban vary by age and geography. Fewer than half (45%) of Hungarians ages 18 to 29 offer positive ratings of Orban’s performance, compared with 70% of those ages 65 and older.

In cities and urban areas, 44% approve of their prime minister, compared with 58% in suburban or mixed regions and 69% in rural areas. The majority of Hungarians reside in suburban or mixed areas, while the populations of the country’s urban and rural regions are roughly the same – just under 20% each – according to the most recent data from the European Commission.

In 2019, Pew Research Center asked Hungarians and other Europeans how much confidence they had in Orban to do the right thing regarding world affairs. In that survey, 45% of Hungarians said they were confident in their prime minister. But across the 14 European Union member countries in the survey, a median of just 27% of adults said the same.

(PEW)

AUGUST 3, 2022

Source: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/08/03/hungarians-differ-in-their-evaluations-of-democracy-under-orbans-leadership/

 

NORTH AMERICA

754-43-14/Polls

Americans Support Incentives For Electric Vehicles But Are Divided Over Buying One Themselves

Democrats in the U.S. Senate have reportedly reached an agreement on sweeping climate change legislation that would include tax credits for electric vehicles. A recent Pew Research Center survey – conducted before news of the potential Senate deal – found that a broad majority of U.S. adults support providing incentives to increase the use of electric or hybrid vehicles.

At the same time, however, Americans are divided over whether they personally would consider buying an electric vehicle the next time they’re shopping for a new car or truck, and a majority oppose phasing out gas-powered vehicles in the years ahead.

A bar chart showing that two-thirds of Americans back incentives for hybrid and electric vehicles

Overall, two-thirds of Americans support providing incentives to increase the use of electric and hybrid vehicles. Democrats and independents who lean to the Democratic Party are much more likely than Republicans and GOP leaners to say they favor incentives to increase the use of electric vehicles (84% to 46%).

Majorities of Americans overall are also supportive of several other policies to address climate change, including requiring power companies to use more energy from renewable sources.

But while Americans back incentives to increase the use of electric vehicles, they are on the fence about whether they would purchase one the next time they buy a car or truck.

About four-in-ten Americans (42%) say they would be very or somewhat likely to seriously consider purchasing an electric vehicle the next time they’re looking for a new car or truck. A slightly larger share (45%) say they would be not too or not at all likely to do this, while 13% say they do not plan to purchase a vehicle in the future.

The share of Americans who are very or somewhat likely to purchase an electric car or truck is about the same as in April 2021. Since then, the price of gas has increased substantially, from an average of $2.95 per gallon in April 2021 to $4.55 in May 2022 – the month the new survey was conducted. Vehicle prices have also increased amid broader inflationary pressures. On the whole, Americans view electric vehicles as more expensive than gas-powered vehicles, a 2021 survey found.

A bar chart showing that younger adults more likely than older adults to consider buying an electric vehicle

Those most inclined to consider an electric vehicle purchase in the future include younger adults, urban dwellers, Democrats and those who already own a hybrid or all-electric vehicle, according to the Center’s recent survey.

A 55% majority of adults ages 18 to 29 say they are very or somewhat likely to consider an electric vehicle the next time they buy a vehicle. Smaller shares of adults ages 50 to 64 (34%) or 65 and older (31%) say the same.

Those living in urban areas (53%) are more likely than those in suburban (44%) and rural areas (27%) to report interest in purchasing an electric vehicle.

Democrats are more inclined than Republicans to say they are at least somewhat likely to consider purchasing an electric vehicle the next time they buy a vehicle (58% vs. 23%). Younger adults within each party are more inclined than older adults to say they this. About two-thirds (68%) of those who already own a hybrid or electric vehicle say they are very or somewhat likely to seriously consider purchasing an electric vehicle the next time they’re shopping for a new car or truck. Among those who do not own a hybrid or electric vehicle, 39% say this.

A bar chart showing that Americans who have considered purchasing electric vehicles cite helping the environment, saving money on gas as top reasons why

Among Americans who say they are at least somewhat likely to consider purchasing an electric vehicle, large majorities say helping the environment (73%) and saving money on gas (71%) are major reasons. They are far less likely to say keeping up with the latest trends in vehicles is a major reason they would be likely to purchase an electric vehicle (10%).

When it comes to current rates of ownership, around one-in-ten U.S. adults (9%) say they currently own an electric or hybrid vehicle, slightly above the 7% of Americans who said the same in April 2021.

While hybrid and electric vehicle ownership is increasing, the public leans against phasing out the production of gas-powered vehicles.

Overall, 55% of U.S. adults say they would oppose a proposal to phase out production of gasoline-powered cars and trucks by 2035, while 43% support the idea. Opposition today is slightly higher today than it was in April 2021, when 51% opposed and 47% favored the idea.

Democrats and Republicans (including those who lean to each party) continue to be deeply divided over whether to end the production of cars and trucks with internal combustion engines. About two-thirds of Democrats (65%) favor phasing out gasoline-powered cars and trucks by 2035. In contrast, just 17% of Republicans support the idea, while 82% oppose it.

Among Democrats, a large majority of liberals (77%) favor phasing out the production of new gas-powered cars and trucks by 2035. Moderate and conservative Democrats are more closely divided: 55% favor this idea, while 44% oppose it.

The Biden administration has taken steps aimed at ensuring that electric vehicles account for half of all new cars sold in the United States by 2030. While these vehicles continue to account for a relatively small share of all new car sales, the global electric vehicle market has seen growth over the past two years, and automakers like Ford Motor Co., General Motors and others are continuing to invest heavily in the technology.

(PEW)

AUGUST 1, 2022

Source: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/08/01/americans-support-incentives-for-electric-vehicles-but-are-divided-over-buying-one-themselves/

 

754-43-15/Polls

U S Women More Concerned Than Men About Some AI Developments, Especially Driverless Cars

Women in the United States are more skeptical than men about some uses of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly the possible widespread use of driverless passenger vehicles, according to a new analysis of Pew Research Center survey data collected in November 2021.

The analysis also finds gender differences in views about the overall impact that technology has on society and some safety issues tied to AI applications, as well as the importance of including different groups in the AI design process.

Overall, women in the U.S. are less likely than men to say that technology has had a mostly positive effect on society (42% vs. 54%) and more likely to say technology has had equally positive and negative impacts (45% vs. 37%). In addition, women are less likely than men to say they feel more excited than concerned about the increased use of AI computer programs in daily life (13% vs. 22%). Gender remains a factor in views about AI and technology’s impact when accounting for other variables, such as respondents’ political partisanship, education and race and ethnicity.

A chart showing that women are more concerned than men about a range of possible artificial intelligence applications

Moreover, across a range of possible AI applications that the November survey asked about, women are consistently more likely than men to express concern about computer programs executing those tasks. For example, 43% of women say they would be very or somewhat concerned if AI programs could diagnose medical problems, while 27% of men say the same. Gender gaps also appear in the amount of concern Americans express about AI programs being able to perform repetitive workplace tasks, make important life decisions for people and know people’s thoughts and behaviors.

Women feel more negatively than men about driverless passenger vehicles

In addition to gender differences about AI in general, women and men express different attitudes about autonomous cars, specifically.

A bar chart showing that women are more likely than men to have doubts about driverless cars

Men are more likely than women to respond positively to several questions about these vehicles. Roughly four-in-ten men (37%) say driverless cars are a good idea for society, while 17% of women say the same. Women, in turn, are somewhat more likely than men to say they are not sure if the widespread use of driverless vehicles is a good or bad idea (32% vs. 25%).

On a similar note, 46% of men say they would definitely or probably personally want to ride in a driverless passenger vehicle if given the opportunity, compared with 27% of women. Most women (72%) report they would definitely or probably not want to do this. Relatedly, a majority of women (54%) say they would not feel comfortable sharing the road with a driverless passenger vehicle if their use becomes widespread. Only 35% of men say the same.

These differences may be associated with women’s greater doubts about the safety of autonomous vehicles. When asked about the effect that the widespread use of these cars would have on the number of people killed or injured in traffic accidents, about half of men (49%) say it would decrease the number of people killed or injured, compared with three-in-ten women who say the same. By a 33% to 20% margin, women are more likely than men to think the number of accidents would increase.

A chart showing that women are more likely than men to oppose use of driverless car technology in a variety of vehicles

Women’s concerns about the safety of autonomous passenger vehicles extend to other applications of driverless systems, too: 51% of women say they oppose the use of this technology in public transportation buses, compared with 35% of men. Women are also about 10 percentage points more likely to oppose the use of driverless vehicle technology in 18-wheeler trucks, delivery vehicles, and taxis and ride-sharing vehicles.

Although these figures cannot be directly compared to previous surveys because of changes in question wording, the current findings align with a 2017 Center study, which found that women are less likely than men to say they would want to ride in a driverless vehicle. Previous Center research has also indicated that women are at times more pessimistic than men about technological change more broadly.

Women and men differ over other applications of artificial intelligence

Besides exploring public views about the possible use of driverless passenger vehicles, the Center’s November survey also covered two other specific AI applications: the use of face recognition technology by police and the use of algorithms by social media companies to find false information on their sites.

There are differences between women and men on some questions related to these applications. Although a majority of both men and women have heard of each AI use, one clear pattern is that men are more likely than women to say they have heard or read at least a little about each of the three technologies: driverless cars (93% vs. 83%), face recognition use by police (86% vs. 74%) and social media algorithms to find false information (81% vs. 70%).

Women are also more likely than men to say they are not sure whether particular AI applications are a good or bad idea for society. Some 34% of women are unsure about whether social media algorithms to find false information are a good or bad idea, compared with 26% of men. When it comes to the use of face recognition by police, 31% of women are not certain whether it is a good or bad idea, compared with 22% of men.

Gender differences on the design of AI technologies

Women are more likely to support the inclusion of a wider variety of groups in AI design. For example, two-thirds of women (67%) say it’s extremely or very important for social media companies to include people of different genders when designing social media algorithms to find false information, compared with 58% of men. Women are also more likely to say it is important that different racial and ethnic groups are included in the same AI design process (71% vs. 63%).

Additionally, women are more doubtful than men that it is possible to design AI computer programs that can consistently make fair decisions in complex situations. Only around two-in-ten women (22%) think it is possible to design AI programs that can consistently make fair decisions, while a larger share of men (38%) say the same. A plurality of women (46%) say they are not sure whether this is possible, compared with 35% of men.

(PEW)
AUGUST 3, 2022

Source: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/08/03/u-s-women-more-concerned-than-men-about-some-ai-developments-especially-driverless-cars/

 

754-43-16/Polls

About One-In-Six U S Journalists At News Outlets Are Part Of A Union; Many More Would Join One If They Could

At a time when newsrooms in the United States are seeing a wave of unionization, around one-in-six U.S. journalists at news organizations report being in a union and many more say they would join one if it were available to them, according to a recent Pew Research Center survey.

A bar chart showing that younger journalists in the U.S. are much more likely  to want to be in a union than their older peers

Overall, 16% of U.S. journalists who are employed at least part time at a news outlet say they are currently a member of a union at their organization. Another 41% would join one if it were available to them, according to the survey of nearly 12,000 working U.S.-based journalists, conducted Feb. 16 to March 17, 2022. (Freelance, self-employed and student or intern journalists are not included in these figures. Overall, 28% of the journalists surveyed by the Center report that they are either a freelancer or self-employed, and fewer than 1% are students or interns.)

The desire to join a union is much more prevalent among younger journalists than among their older peers: 77% of full- or part-time journalists ages 18 to 29 are either already a member of a union at their news organization (20%) or would join a union if it were available to them (57%). This is nearly twice the share among journalists 65 and older (41%) – 13% of whom report already being in a union and 28% of whom say they would join one if it were available to them.

Differences also emerge by journalists’ gender, race and ethnicity. About six-in ten journalists who are women (63%) say they are either currently a union member or would join one if available, compared with 52% of journalists who are men. Black, Hispanic and Asian journalists are all more likely than White journalists to say they are either in a union or would join one if it were available to them.

Journalists at large news outlets are most likely to have a union available to them

Overall, 26% of U.S. journalists who are employed by a news organization full time or part time say their organization has a union.

A bar chart showing that journalists who work at larger news outlets are more likely to have a union available to them

Journalists who work for larger news organizations are far more likely than those who work for smaller ones to say their outlet has a union. About six-in-ten journalists who are employed full or part time at an organization with at least 500 employees (57%) say their organization has a union. This falls to 40% among those who work at an organization with 101 to 500 employees and to just 4% for those who say they work for the smallest organizations – those with 10 or fewer employees.

One other characteristic strongly relates to the availability of a union at U.S. news organizations: the reported political leaning of the outlet’s audience. Among journalists who say they are employed at least part time at an outlet whose audience leans left politically, about four-in-ten (39%) report that their organization has a union. This is far greater than the 12% of those who say their organization’s audience is right leaning, and is also higher than those whose outlet has a more politically mixed audience (25%).

(PEW)

AUGUST 4, 2022

Source: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/08/04/about-one-in-six-u-s-journalists-at-news-outlets-are-part-of-a-union-many-more-would-join-one-if-they-could/

 

754-43-17/Polls

Majority Of Americans Continue To Favor Moving Away From Electoral College

The Electoral College has played an outsize role in several recent U.S. elections, and a majority of Americans would welcome a change to the way presidents are elected.

A line graph showing that support for electing presidents by popular vote has been fairly steady over the last two decades

Around six-in-ten U.S. adults (63%) say the way the president is elected should be changed so that the winner of the popular vote nationwide wins the presidency, while 35% favor keeping the current Electoral College system, according to a Pew Research Center survey conducted June 27-July 4, 2022. There has been a modest increase in the share of Americans who favor changing the way presidents are elected: In January 2021, the last time the Center asked this question, 55% said the system should be changed, while 43% supported maintaining the existing system.

The current electoral system in the United States allows for the possibility that the winner of the popular vote may not be able to secure enough Electoral College votes to win the presidency. This was the case in both the 2000 and 2016 elections, which were won by George W. Bush and Donald Trump, respectively.

A bar chart showing that Democrats and Republicans differ over whether to replace the Electoral College with the popular vote

As in past years, Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents are far more likely than Republicans and Republican leaners to support moving to a popular vote system (80% vs. 42%). The share of Democrats saying this is up 9 percentage points from January 2021, but about on par with views in 2020. While a majority of Republicans (56%) continue to say the current Electoral College system should be maintained, the share who now express support for moving to a popular vote system is the highest it’s been since the 2016 election: 42% say this today, up from 37% in 2021 and just 27% in the immediate wake of the 2016 election.

Liberal Democrats are especially likely to say they would prefer changing the system to be based on the popular vote (87% say this). By contrast, conservative Republicans are particularly likely to prefer keeping the current system where the winner of the Electoral College vote takes office (66% say this).

Younger adults are somewhat more supportive of changing the system than older adults: Seven-in-ten Americans ages 18 to 29 support changing the system, compared with 56% of those 65 or older.

A chart showing that attentive partisans are the most deeply divided over replacing Electoral College

And partisan divides in views of the Electoral College are most pronounced among those who pay the most attention to politics. Among partisans who say they follow what is going on in government and public affairs “most of the time,” 85% of Democrats – but only 24% of Republicans – say they favor changing the system. For those who say they follow politics “only now and then” or “hardly at all,” there is a much smaller partisan gap, with 74% of Democrats and 59% of Republicans saying they favor changing the system.

(PEW)

AUGUST 5, 2022

Source: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/08/05/majority-of-americans-continue-to-favor-moving-away-from-electoral-college/

 

754-43-18/Polls

Three In Four U S Adults Say Alcohol Use Has A Negative Effect On Society

Broad majorities of Americans believe the use of alcohol adversely affects both society in general and drinkers specifically. Three in four U.S. adults say alcohol use has a negative effect on society, and nearly as many (71%) think it affects drinkers themselves negatively, though more describe the effect as "somewhat negative" than as "very negative."

Yet, these perceived negative effects of alcohol are not enough to discourage Americans from imbibing, as two in three say they personally have the occasion to drink alcoholic beverages. On the whole, those who are drinking report doing so moderately, averaging about four drinks per week.

As for their drink of choice, drinkers in the U.S. are more closely divided in their preferences than ever before, with roughly equal percentages saying they most often consume beer, wine or liquor.

Alcohol Mainly Viewed as 'Somewhat' Negatively Affecting Drinkers, Society

Americans' views of the ill effects of alcohol, while decisive, are tempered. That is, U.S. adults are much more likely to say alcohol has a somewhat rather than very negative effect on both society and drinkers.

Fifty-five percent of U.S. adults say alcohol use affects society somewhat negatively, while 20% call it very negative. Likewise, 52% think alcohol affects drinkers themselves somewhat negatively, versus 19% very negatively.

Those who do not drink alcohol perceive its effects to be significantly more negative than those who do drink. Non-drinkers are at least three times as likely as alcohol drinkers to say alcohol affects society and drinkers very negatively.

Additionally, U.S. adults without a college degree are more than twice as likely as college graduates to view the effects of alcohol on society and on drinkers as very negative.

Women are seven percentage points more likely than men to view alcohol's effects on both society and on drinkers as somewhat negative.

Americans' Alcohol Use Is Relatively Steady

Gallup has tracked the public's alcohol use since 1939. That year, 58% of U.S. adults said they had the occasion to use alcoholic beverages "such as liquor, wine or beer." Since then, majorities have consistently said they do, with the percentage imbibing no lower than 60% since 1997. The percentage of drinkers reached a high of 71% in three surveys conducted in 1976, 1977 and 1978; however, the question was not asked in 2020 when COVID-19 lockdowns may have impacted drinking habits.

The latest 67% reading, from a July 5-26 Gallup poll, is a slight uptick from last year when alcohol use was at the low end of the narrow range of readings.

Among those who drink, three in 10 say they have consumed an alcoholic beverage in the past 24 hours. Another 36% have had a drink in the past week, while 33% say they last had a drink more than a week ago. The 30% who have consumed alcohol in the past 24 hours is on the low end of the 26% to 40% range since 1984.

On average, U.S. drinkers report having 3.9 drinks in the past seven days, which is roughly in line with the readings historically. In 2003 and 2004, the average was around five drinks a week.

Liquor Use Hits New High; Beer Use at New Low

The type of alcohol that drinkers in the U.S. choose most often has varied somewhat over the past three decades, but beer has outpaced liquor and wine in nearly every reading. That gap is narrower this year as beer consumption, at 35%, is at its lowest level by one percentage point. The reading has been as high as 47% in the early 1990s when Gallup first asked the question.

Wine drinkers comprise 31% of all drinkers. Since 2006, the percentage of drinkers consuming wine most often has ranged between 30% and 35%.

The 30% of U.S. drinkers who favor liquor as their drink of choice is a new high in the trend, also by one point. Liquor consumption has been as low as 18% and has trailed beer and wine consistently until recently, averaging 22% since 1992.

(Gallup)

AUGUST 5, 2022

Source: https://news.gallup.com/poll/395867/say-alcohol-adversely-affects-drinkers-society.aspx

 

AUSTRALIA

754-43-19/Polls

Potential National/Act NZ (46%) Coalition Is Just Ahead Of Labour/ Greens (44.5%) In July, But Maori Party Holds The Balance Of Power

Today’s Roy Morgan New Zealand Poll shows support tightening between a potential National/ Act NZ (46%) coalition now only 1.5% points ahead of the governing Labour/ Greens (44.5%). The gap is the smallest since Christopher Luxon became National Leader in late November.
Support for a potential National/Act NZ coalition dropped by 2.5% points to 46% in July while Luxon holidayed in Hawaii, despite social media posts claiming he was in New Zealand, while support for Labour/ Greens was up 1% point to 44.5%.


In July support for National fell by 4% points to 35% to its lowest since January 2022 while support for fellow right-leaning party Act NZ was up slightly by 1.5% points to 11%, its highest since February 2022. 


In contrast there were slight increases in support for Labour, up 0.5% points to 34% to its highest level so far this year and a similar increase for the Greens, up 0.5% points to 10.5%.


The drop in support for National appears to have largely benefited the Maori Party for which support increased by 2.5% points to 4% - its highest level of support for over a decade since April 2010.


In addition, a minority of 5.5% of electors (down 1% point) support other minor parties outside Parliament with support for New Zealand First unchanged at 1.5%, The Opportunities Party was up 0.5% points to 2.5% and support for the New Conservative Party was up 0.5% points to 1% in July.


This latest New Zealand Roy Morgan Poll on voting intention was conducted by telephone – both landline and mobile – with a New Zealand-wide cross-section of 937 electors during July. Electors were asked: “If a New Zealand Election were held today which party would receive your party vote?” Of all electors surveyed only 5%, unchanged, did not name a party.


New Zealand Government Confidence Rating up 2pts to 89.5 in July


The Roy Morgan Government Confidence Rating increased by 2pts in July to 89.5. The indicator is now down a massive 31.5pts from a year ago in July 2021.


In July only 40.5% (up 1.5% points) of electors said New Zealand was ‘heading in the right direction’ compared to 51% (down 0.5% points) who said New Zealand was ‘heading in the wrong direction’.


The latest ANZ-Roy Morgan Consumer Confidence Rating for New Zealand was up 1.4pts to 81.9 and is now just below the latest Consumer Confidence figure in Australia of 84.1 on July 25-31, 2022.


Women continue to favour Labour/Greens while men firmly support National and Act NZ


Support for the Labour/ Greens coalition is strongest amongst older women aged 50+ at 53% compared to only 44% support for National/ Act NZ. For women aged 18-49 support more evenly split with 48.5% supporting Labour/ Greens just ahead of the 46.5% supporting National/Act NZ.


The smallest Parliamentary Opposition, the Maori Party, is now attracting the support of 5% of women including 9% of women aged 18-49 and 1% of women aged 50+.


There is a stark difference for men with 51.5% supporting National or Act NZ. In July 49.5% of men aged 18-49 supported National/ Act NZ compared to 37.5% that supported Labour/ Greens. For men aged 50+ there were 55% supporting National/ Act NZ compared to 38.5% supporting Labour/ Greens.


The Maori Party attracts the support of 3.5% of men including 4% support from men aged 18-49 and 2% support from men aged 50+.


Support for the Greens is far higher amongst both younger women and younger men than their older counterparts. Around one-in-six women aged 18-49 (17%) and men aged 18-49 (16.5%) support the Greens compared to only 4.5% of women aged 50+ and just 4% of men aged 50+.

 

Party vote analysis by Gender & Age

 

Total

Women

Men

All

18-49

50+

All

18-49

50+

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

Labour

34

40

31.5

48.5

27.5

21

34.5

Greens

10.5

10.5

17

4.5

10.5

16.5

4

Labour/ Greens

44.5

50.5

48.5

53

38

37.5

38.5

National

35

33

30

37

37

34.5

40.5

Act NZ

11

7

7.5

6

14.5

15

14.5

Maori Party

4

5

9

1

3.5

4

2

National/ Act NZ/ Maori Party

50

45

46.5

44

55

53.5

57

Others

5.5

4.5

5

3

7

9

4.5

Total

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Roy Morgan Government Confidence Rating

Right Direction

40.5

42

38.5

43

39

38.5

39.5

Wrong Direction

51

48

49.5

49

54.5

54.5

54.5

Government Confidence Rating

89.5

94

89

94

84.5

84

85

Can’t say

8.5

10

12

8

6.5

7

6

Total

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

*The Roy Morgan Government Confidence Rating is 100 plus the difference between the percentage of Kiwis who say the country is “heading in the right direction” and the percentage who say the country is “seriously heading in the wrong direction”.

New Zealand Government Confidence Rating is clearly higher for women than men in July

The Roy Morgan New Zealand Government Confidence Rating was clearly higher for women than men in July, but the gap did narrow by 6 points on a month ago.

Among women now 48% (up 1.5% points) say ‘New Zealand is ‘heading in the wrong direction’, while only 42% (up 0.5% points) say New Zealand is ‘heading in the right direction’ – a Government Confidence Rating of 94 (down 1pt).

Though down, a clear majority of men, 54.5% (down 2.5% points) now say New Zealand is ‘heading in the wrong direction’ while just under two-fifths of men, 39% (up 2.5% points), say New Zealand is ‘heading in the right direction’ – a Government Confidence Rating of 84.5 (up 5pts).

The Roy Morgan Government Confidence Rating is highest for women aged 50+ at 94 while for women aged 18-49 it is lower at 89. There is little difference for men of different ages with those aged 18-49 having a Government Confidence Rating of 84 and slightly higher for men aged 50+ at 85.

Michele Levine, CEO Roy Morgan, says the contest between the Labour/Greens coalition and a potential National/Act NZ coalition has narrowed with neither side in a position to win a majority given the latest results from July:

“Today’s Roy Morgan New Zealand Poll shows the lead for a potential National/Act NZ (46%) coalition over the governing Labour/Greens government (44.5%) is now at just 1.5% points – the closest the two sides have been since Christopher Luxon took over as National leader at the end of November 2021.

“The reason for the narrowing gap is the fall in support for National in July, down 4% points to 35% and at its lowest level of support since January 2022. The support that National has lost appears to have gone to fellow Parliamentary opposition parties Act NZ, up 1.5% points to 11%, and the Maori Party, up 2.5% points to 4%.

“This is the highest level of support for the Maori Party in well over a decade since April 2010 when John Key was the Prime Minister. Support for the Maori Party is strongest amongst young people with 9% of women aged 18-49 and 4% of men aged 18-49 supporting the party.

“The decision by Opposition leader Christopher Luxon to take a family holiday to Hawaii during mid-July is understandable during the depth of a New Zealand winter. However, for Luxon’s social media to post videos of Luxon claiming to be ‘In Te Puke, the heart of kiwifruit country’ while he was holidaying in Hawaii has been labelled as a ‘debacle’ by media commentators.

“The mishandling of Christopher Luxon’s family holiday and the related social media posts brings to the fore the key issues of trust and distrust in driving support for political leaders.

“Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has built her leadership on being the person New Zealanders can trust to deal with challenges as varied as the COVID-19 pandemic, the Christchurch shooting and various natural disasters to strike the country such as the eruption of the White Island volcano.

“If Christopher Luxon’s missteps in recent weeks result in people distrusting the National Leader and questioning his honesty, or the honesty of the team around him, he will come under renewed scrutiny as an alternative Prime Minister heading towards next year’s election.

“The instability in the Greens leadership has also been in the political spotlight over the last week although the issue has had little impact on their polling results. Long-term Greens co-leader James Shaw was ousted from the position last week after 30% of delegates at the Green Party AGM voted they had no confidence in Shaw’s leadership.

“The result means the co-leadership position is to be voted on again in coming weeks. Shaw has vowed to re-nominate for the position but there are many in the party who regard Chloe Swarbrick as the rising star of the party. If Swarbrick were to put her hand up for the leadership, she would be likely to win the contest with the strong support of the party faithful.”

New Zealand Party Vote: 2020-22

https://www.roymorgan.com/~/media/files/morgan%20poll/2020s/2022/august/9034-c1.png?h=618&w=948&la=en

Source: Roy Morgan New Zealand Single Source. January 2020 – July 2022.
Base: New Zealand electors aged 18+. Average interviews per month = 934.

 

New Zealand Party Vote: NZ Govt. v Parliamentary Opposition

https://www.roymorgan.com/~/media/files/morgan%20poll/2020s/2022/august/9034-c2.png?h=649&w=998&la=en

Source: Roy Morgan New Zealand Single Source. January 2020 – July 2022.
Base: New Zealand electors aged 18+. Average interviews per month = 934.

Roy Morgan NZ Government Confidence Rating vs. ANZ-Roy Morgan NZ Consumer Confidence

https://www.roymorgan.com/~/media/files/morgan%20poll/2020s/2022/august/9034-c3.png?la=enSource: Roy Morgan New Zealand Single Source. January 2020 – July 2022.

Base: New Zealand electors aged 18+. Average interviews per month = 934.

 

Two-Party Preferred: Labour Party-led Government vs. Parliamentary Opposition Parties

Labour Party-led Government

(Labour, Greens)

Parliamentary
Opposition Parties
(National, Act NZ & Maori)

NZ Election, October 17, 2020*

57.87

34.33

ROY MORGAN NEW ZEALAND POLL

Labour wins the NZ Election and, despite securing a majority of seats in Parliament,
signs a ‘Cooperation Agreement’ with the Greens – October 31, 2020

2021

January 2021

58.5

36

February 2021

58.5

37.5

March 2021

57.5

35

April 2021

55

41

May 2021

56

39

June 2021

51

43.5

July 2021

49.5

44.5

August 2021

51.5

40.5

September 2021

55

41

October 2021

50

44

November 2021

46.5

47

December 2021

44

51

2022

January 2022

43.5

51

February 2022

43

51.5

March 2022

42.5

49

April 2022

44

49

May 2022

43

51

June 2022

43.5

50

July 2022

44.5

50

*At the 2020 NZ Election the Labour party secured 50.01% of the vote which was enough to govern in their own right but Labour opted to sign a ‘Cooperation Agreement’ with the Greens, who won 7.86% of the vote. There were three Parties elected to Parliament not in Government led by National (25.58%), Act NZ (7.59%) and the Maori Party (1.17%). 

 

Voting Intention Summary

The following table compares the latest New Zealand Roy Morgan Polls on Voting Intention with the result from the October 17, 2020, General Election:

 

National-led Governments (& supporting parties) are highlighted in Blue. Labour-led Governments (& supporting parties) are highlighted in Red.

PARTY VOTE

Labour

Green Party*

National

ACT NZ

Maori Party**

TOP**

NZ First

Other

ELECTIONS

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

October 12, 1996*

28.19

10.10

33.87

6.10

n/a

n/a

13.35

8.39

November 27, 1999

38.74

5.16

30.50

7.04

n/a

n/a

4.26

14.30

July 27, 2002

41.26

7.00

20.93

7.14

n/a

n/a

10.38

13.29

September 17, 2005

41.10

5.30

39.10

1.51

2.12

n/a

5.72

5.15

November 8, 2008

33.99

6.72

44.93

3.65

2.39

n/a

4.07

4.25

November 26, 2011

27.48

11.06

47.31

1.07

1.43

n/a

6.59

5.06

September 20, 2014

25.13

10.70

47.04

0.69

1.32

n/a

8.66

6.46

September 23, 2017

36.89

6.27

44.45

0.50

1.18

2.44

7.20

1.07

October 17, 2020

50.01

7.86

25.58

7.59

1.17

1.51

2.60

3.70

ROY MORGAN POLL

December 2020

44

10.5

28

10

2

2

2

1.5

2021

January 2021

47

11.5

25

9

2

1.5

2

2

February 2021

45

13.5

29

7.5

1

1

1.5

1.5

March 2021

45.5

12

23

11

1

2

2.5

3

April 2021

41.5

13.5

29.5

9

2.5

0.5

1

2.5

May 2021

45

11

28.5

9

1.5

1.5

2

1.5

June 2021

38.5

12.5

29.5

11.5

2.5

2

1.5

2

July 2021

39.5

10

29

13

2.5

3

2

1

August 2021

39.5

12

25

13

2.5

2

2.5

3.5

September 2021

45.5

9.5

23

16

2

1.5

1.5

1

October 2021

39.5

10.5

26

16

2

1

2.5

2.5

November 2021

36

10.5

26.5

17.5

3

1.5

2.5

2.5

December 2021

35.5

8.5

31.5

18.5

1

1

2

2

2022

January 2022

33

10.5

35

13.5

2.5

1.5

2.5

1.5

February 2022

32

11

38

11.5

2

1

2

2.5

March 2022

32

10.5

38

9

2

1.5

4

3

April 2022

33.5

10.5

37.5

10

1.5

2

2.5

2.5

May 2022

31.5

11.5

40

10

1

1

3

2

June 2022

33.5

10

39

9.5

1.5

2

1.5

3

July 2022

34

10.5

35

11

4

2.5

1.5

1.5

*The 1996 Election was the first New Zealand Election contested via MMP (Mixed Member Proportional). At the 1996 Election the Greens Party contested as part of the “Alliance” political grouping with four other political parties.
**The Maori Party was launched in July 2004. The Opportunities Party (TOP) was launched in November 2016.

 

Roy Morgan New Zealand Seat Predictor

 

The following table compares the projected seats to be won by the various New Zealand political parties based on the latest New Zealand Roy Morgan Polls on Voting Intention with the results from previous MMP Elections:

National-led Governments (& supporting parties) are highlighted in Blue. Labour-led Governments (& supporting parties) are highlighted in Red.

SEAT COUNT

Labour

Green Party*

National

ACT NZ

Maori Party**

NZ First

Other

ELECTIONS

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

October 12, 1996*

37

0

44

8

0

17

14*

November 27, 1999

49

7

39

9

0

5

11*

July 27, 2002

52

9

27

9

0

13

10*

September 17, 2005

50

6

48

2

4

7

4*

November 8, 2008

43

9

58

5

5

0

2*

November 26, 2011

34

14

59

1

3

8

2*

September 20, 2014

32

14

60

1

2

11

1*

September 23, 2017

46

8

56

1

0

9

0

October 17, 2020

65

10

33

10

2

0

0

ROY MORGAN

SEAT PREDICTOR

2021

January 2021

60

15

32

11

2

0

0

February 2021

56

17

36

10

1

0

0

March 2021

59

16

30

14

1

0

0

April 2021

52

17

37

11

3

0

0

May 2021

57

14

36

11

2

0

0

June 2021

49

16

37

15

3

0

0

July 2021

50

13

37

17

3

0

0

August 2021

51

16

33

17

4

0

0

September 2021

57

12

29

20

2

0

0

October 2021

51

13

33

20

3

0

0

November 2021

46

14

34

22

4

0

0

December 2021

45

11

40

23

1

0

0

2022

January 2022

42

13

45

17

3

0

0

February 2022

41

14

48

15

2

0

0

March 2022

42

14

50

12

2

0

0

April 2022

43

13

49

13

2

0

0

May 2022

40

15

51

13

1

0

0

June 2022

43

13

50

12

2

0

0

July 2022

43

13

45

14

5

0

0

*Other seats won at elections from 1996 - 2014 include: 1996 – 14 seats: Alliance (13 seats) & United NZ (1 seat); 1999 – 11 seats: Alliance (10 seats) & United NZ (1 seat); 2002 – 10 seats: United Future (8 seats) & Progressive (2 seats); 2005 – 4 seats: United Future (3 seats) & Progressive (1 seat); 2008 – 2 seats: Progressive (1 seat) & United Future (1 seat); 2011 – 2 seats: United Future (1 seat) & Mana Party (1 seat); 2014 – 1 seat: United Future (1 seat).


Fourth National Government (1990 – 1999): 1996 NZ Election: National (44 seats) wins the NZ Election and governs in coalition with NZ First (17 seats) for a total of 61 seats in the 120 seat Parliament.


Fifth Labour Government (1999-2008): 1999 NZ Election: Labour (49 seats) wins the NZ Election and governs in coalition with Alliance (10 seats) and the support of the Greens (7 seats) for a total of 66 seats in the 120 seat Parliament. 2002 NZ Election: Labour (52 seats) wins the NZ Election and governs in coalition with the Progressive Coalition (2 seats) and confidence and supply from United Future (8 seats) for a total of 62 seats in the 120 seat Parliament. 2005 NZ Election: Labour (50 seats) wins the NZ Election and governs in coalition with the Progressive Coalition (1 seat) and confidence and supply from New Zealand First (7 seats) and United Future (3 seats) for a total of 61 seats in the 121 seat Parliament (including 1 ‘overhang’ seat).


Fifth National Government (2008-2017): 2008 NZ Election: National (58 seats) wins the NZ Election and governs with the confidence and supply of Act NZ (5 seats), the Maori Party (5 seats) and United Future (1 seat) for a total of 69 seats in the 122 seat Parliament (including 2 ‘overhang’ seats). 2011 NZ Election: National (59 seats) wins the NZ Election and governs with the confidence and supply of Maori Party (3 seats), Act NZ (1 seat) and United Future (1 seat) for a total of 64 seats in the 121 seat Parliament (including 1 ‘overhang’ seat). 2014 NZ Election: National (60 seats) wins the NZ Election and governs with the confidence and supply of Maori Party (2 seats), Act NZ (1 seat) and United Future (1 seat) for a total of 64 seats in the 121 seat Parliament (including 1 ‘overhang’ seat).

Sixth Labour Government (2017-?): 2017 NZ Election: Labour (46 seats) ‘wins’ the NZ Election and governs in coalition with NZ First (9 seats) and the confidence and supply of the Greens (8 seats) for a total of 63 seats in the 120 seat Parliament. 2020 NZ Election: Labour (65 seats) wins the NZ Election and governs with the cooperation of the Greens (10 seats) for a total of 75 seats in the 120 seat Parliament.

(Roy Morgan)

August 02 2022

Source: https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/9034-nz-national-voting-intention-july-2022-202208012359

 

MULTICOUNTRY STUDIES

754-43-20/Polls

Globally, 3 In 5 Citizens Say Abortion Should Be Legal In All Or Most Cases, In 27 Surveyed Countries

On average, 59% of adults surveyed by Ipsos in 27 countries say abortion should be legal in all or most cases while 26% say it should be illegal in all or most cases. Those who say it should be legal outnumber those who say it shouldn’t in 22 countries – nowhere more than in Sweden, Belgium, France, and the Netherlands. Opposition prevails in only 4 countries – Peru, India, Malaysia, and Colombia.

Views about whether abortion should be legal vary depending on the circumstances. On average across the 27 countries, four in five adults surveyed say it should be allowed if the pregnancy threatens the life or health of the woman, three in four if it is the result of a rape, and two in three if the baby could have severe disabilities or health problems. A clear majority (62%) say abortion should be legal for any woman in the first six weeks of a pregnancy, a plurality (45%) for any woman in the first 14 weeks, but only a minority (27%) for any woman in the first 20 weeks.

Graph: Should abortion be legal?

The survey of 20,523 adults under the age of 75 was conducted on Ipsos’ Global Advisor online platform between June 24 and July 8, 2022.

Detailed findings

Geographic and demographic differences in views on the right to legal abortion

Views on abortion are nuanced: on average globally, 3 in 10 say it should be legal in all cases (30%), and about as many that it should be legal in most cases (29%). On the other hand, 16% say it should be illegal in most cases and just 10% that it should be illegal in all cases. Another 16% do not know or prefer not to express their opinion.

Opinion on the right to legal abortion varies widely across the 27 countries. Combined, support for abortion being legal in all cases or most cases averages 59% globally, but it ranges from 86% in Sweden to just 31% in Peru. The view that it should be illegal in all or most cases adds up to a global average of 26%, but it ranges from 49% in India to just 8% in Japan and France.

On average, globally, support for the legal status of abortion in all or most cases is somewhat higher among women than it is among men, among those aged 50-74 than among those under 50, and among those with a university-level education than those without. However, these skews do not apply uniformly. A country-by-country analysis shows that:

  • The gender gap in pro-choice sentiment is most marked in South Africa, Argentina, South Korea, and Poland (at least 10 percentage points higher among women than among men) but it is nonexistent or reversed in countries as diverse as Colombia, Malaysia, the Netherlands, and Japan.
  • The age gap also goes in opposite directions depending on the country. Older adults tend to be a lot more favorable to the legality of abortion than younger adults in Germany, Romania, and Sweden (by 10 points or more among those aged 50-74 than among those under 35). However, the reverse is true in Brazil, Malaysia, Peru, and Chile (where pro-abortion sentiment is higher among those under 35 than among those aged 50-74 by 10 points or more).

More support for allowing abortion in dire circumstances

Support for abortion being legal is more widespread in several circumstances. It reaches:

  • 80% on average globally if the pregnancy threatens the life or health of the woman, including a majority in every single country surveyed
  • 76% if the pregnancy is the result of a rape, including a majority in all countries except Malaysia
  • 67% if the baby is likely to be born with severe disabilities or health problems, including a majority in all countries except Malaysia and Japan

Pregnancy length matters

According to the Center for Reproductive Rights, gestational limits significantly vary globally. In countries allowing abortion on request, the most common gestational limit is 12 weeks, but abortion is often permitted under a range of circumstances after this limit has expired.

The survey points to differentiated views about the legal status of abortion for “any woman” depending on how long she has been pregnant.

  • Those who say abortion should be legal for any woman in the first six weeks of pregnancy outnumber those who say it should be illegal by a global average of 41 percentage points (62% vs. 21%) and in every country except Malaysia and Peru.
  • Those who say abortion should be legal for any woman in the first 14 weeks of pregnancy outnumber those who say it should be illegal by a global average of 11 points (45% vs. 34%) and in 17 countries. The 10 countries where those who say it should be illegal outnumber those who say it should be legal are Argentina, Chile, Colombia, India, South Korea, Mexico, Malaysia, Peru, South Africa, and Turkey.
  • However, those who say it should be legal for any woman in the first 20 weeks of pregnancy are outnumbered by those who say it should be illegal by 20 points (27% vs. 47%) and represent a plurality only in seven countries (Australia, Canada, Spain, France, Great Britain, the Netherlands, and Sweden).

Diverging views on penalties for illegal abortions

If an abortion was carried out in a situation where it is illegal, fewer say the woman who had the abortion should be penalized (32% on average across the 27 countries) than say so of the person who performed it (44%) or a someone else who arranged for it (42%). As for all matters related to abortion, attitudes toward punishing various parties involved in an illegal one diverge widely across countries:

  •  Peruvians and Colombians are those most likely to say each of them should face a penalty: the woman had it (61% and 55%, respectively), the person who performed it (75% and 66%), and someone else who arranged for it (73% and 65%).
  • The Japanese are the least likely to say so for each of the three parties (10%, 12%, and 14%).

Also, on average globally, the percentage of females who say of each party that it should face a penalty is between 7 and 9 points lower than the percentage of males, pointing to a notable gender gap on whether those taking part in an illegal abortion should be punished.

Trends

The response options that Ipsos employed in 2022 differ from those used in previous surveys conducted annually since 2014. However, this year’s survey results seem to indicate an increase in support for abortion in certain circumstances. Globally – and in many countries -- the percentage of adults surveyed in 2022 who say abortion should be legal if the pregnancy is the result of a rape is higher than the combined percentage of those who said in 2021 that it should be permitted “whenever a woman decides she wants one” or “in certain circumstances, such as when a woman has been raped.” It is up five points on average globally, and by at least seven points in Belgium, Brazil, Colombia, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, Turkey, and the United States. The only country where it is lower (by five points) is India.

(Ipsos MORI)

2 August 2022

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/globally-3-5-citizens-say-abortion-should-be-legal-all-or-most-cases

 

754-43-21/Polls

Four In Ten Across 28 Countries Expect Their Disposable Income To Fall Over The Next Year

  • A Global Country Average of 40% say they expect their disposable income to fall over the year, while 25% expect it to increase
  • Three quarters of the public in 28 countries are concerned about the rising cost of goods and services in the next six months
  • Public reactions to rises in the cost of living remain focused on cutting spending on luxuries and delaying big purchase decisions
  • The state of the global economy is seen as the biggest driver of rising costs, followed by the impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the policies of national governments

A Global Country Average of 40% say they expect their disposable income to fall over the next year. This is larger than the proportion who expect their disposable income to stay the same (31%) or increase (22%).

Expectation of falling incomes is highest in Turkey (58%), France (55%), Great Britain (54%) and Hungary (50%), where at least half agree this will be the case. By contrast, the countries who are most optimistic about their disposable income rising are India (48%), Saudi Arabia (42%) and South Africa (40%), although in all three of these countries the sample reflects a more affluent segment of society.

The study also finds those living in Latin America are more likely to report struggling with the cost of living. Across the 28 countries, three in ten report finding it difficult to get by financially (29%) and the same proportion say they are just about getting by (30%). Argentinian citizens are the most likely to be struggling, with two thirds (66%) finding it difficult to get by. While people in Turkey are close behind on 64%, the rest of the top five countries reporting financial challenges are also from Latin America: 51% in Chile, 49% in Brazil and 48% in Peru.

At the other end of the scale, just over one in ten of the global public feel they are living comfortably, including 28% of Chinese citizens and 27% of Swedes.

Three quarters of the global public are concerned about the cost of goods and services increasing over the next six months (77%). This includes 91% of Hungarians, 88% of those in South Africa and 86% of Argentines. Even in China where the concern is lowest, 45% say this is a worry over the next half year.

Other areas of significant public concern include:

  • 56% are concerned about their ability to pay energy bills: emerging markets top the list with 79% of South Africans and 73% of Indians saying they see this as a concern, followed by Turkey (71%) and Argentina (70%) and Chile (69%). Among established economies, concern about energy bills is highest in Great Britain, where 67% are worried about their ability to pay utility bills.
  • 54% worry about their ability to buy the things they are used to buying, led by Turkey (80%), South Africa (73%) and Argentina (69%). The Chinese (28%) and Dutch (33%) are least likely to say they are concerned about this.

There are widespread expectations of further price rises over the next six months.

  • Three quarters expect the cost of food to rise (76%), including 92% of Hungarians, 89% of Swedes and 88% of Turkish citizens. Just under three quarters expect the cost of other shopping to increase as well (72%).
  • A similar proportion expect gas and electricity costs to increase (73%): Turks top the list with 87% expecting this to be the case, followed by Argentines (86%) and Poles (86%). Britons are most likely of any country to say they think the cost of gas and electricity will increase substantially: 65% expect it to increase “a lot” over the next six months.
  • Seven in ten (71%) expect motoring fuel costs to increase. This is a particular concern in Chile and Korea where it is seen as the area where price rises are most likely. But the countries where the largest proportion say they expect an increase in fuel costs are Turkey (84%), Argentina (83%) and Poland (81%).

Public expectations of price rises are highest in the most impactful categories. Six in ten say that price rises in food shopping would have the most negative impact on their quality of life, followed by 51% who say the same about the cost of utilities and 42% who say rising fuel prices would have the biggest effect.

How might consumers react?

Potential consumer actions remain focused on cutting discretionary spending. In the face of rising costs which make their normal lifestyle unaffordable, almost half say they would spend less money on socialising (46%) and a similar proportion say they would delay large purchase decisions (44%). Over a third of people say they will spend less on holidays and other household shopping (37% and 36%)

Actions which focus on changing behaviour are less likely: three in ten say that in the face of rising costs they would use less energy or drive less to conserve fuel (both 29%) – although in Great Britain half say they would seek to reduce their energy consumption. A quarter would look to economise on food (26%) and just one in ten would move into cheaper accommodation.

Changes in employment are also less common. Across the 28 countries, just twelve per cent say they would look for higher-paid work with another employer if rising costs made their normal lifestyle unaffordable. Fewer still – eight per cent – say they would ask for a pay rise from their employer in this situation. These views are similar looking only at those in work: among the employed, 12% say they would ask for a pay rise and 18% would look for higher paid work.

What is driving inflation?

The global public is most likely to view the drivers of recent price rises as being external to their own country. At the Global Country Average level, the state of the global economy is considered the biggest contributor (76%), followed by the consequences of the Russian invasion of Ukraine (72%). However, the policies of the national government come third, on 70% - and it is the biggest driver for those in Argentina, Colombia, Indonesia and Poland.

European countries are more likely to see Russia’s invasion of Ukraine as a contributing factor to inflation: it is ranked as the biggest driver in Belgium, Germany, Denmark, France, Hungary, the Netherlands and Sweden. It is also held as the biggest driver of cost increases in South Korea.

COVID-19 is ranked as the biggest contributor predominantly in Asian countries. Those living in China, Malaysia and Saudi Arabia put it ahead of other factors in having a great deal or a fair amount of a role in driving the rising cost of living, as do people in Brazil.

In Turkey the view is different: Immigration is seen as the biggest driver of cost increases, followed by interest rates and the policies of the national government.

Ben Page, CEO of Ipsos, said:

“Inflation is the biggest worry worldwide and the global public expects things to get worse. And while countries with more recent experience of high inflation such as Turkey and Latin American countries tend to be most pessimistic, European countries and the US are not far behind.
At this point the consumer reaction is still focused on cutting discretionary spending and postponing large purchases, and we know from other Ipsos research that all categories are suffering as people focus on food and fuel. The proportion seeking higher-paid work or asking for a raise from their employer remains comparatively low but if high inflation becomes more than a 2-year phenomenon, we expect this to change.

(Ipsos MORI)

2 August 2022

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/four-ten-across-28-countries-expect-their-disposable-income-fall-over-next-year

 

754-43-22/Polls

A Study On Online Banking In 5 European Countries

Thanks to YouGov Global Proifles we prepared a study on online banking in 5 countries: France, Italy, Germany, United Kingdom and Spain.

How often do consumers use their smartphone to access online banking services?

Around 1 in 4 people use their smartphone several times a day for this purpose in Spain (26%) and France (23%).

On the other hand, 28% of Germans and 21% of Britons say they never use their smartphone for this purpose.

Despite this, some Europeans seem to continue to be wary of online banking. The British are the most suspicious: 68% say they do not feel comfortable using this type of service. Note: 50% of Spaniards share this opinion.

(YouGov Spain)

August 4, 2022

Source: https://es.yougov.com/news/2022/08/04/estudio-internacional-existe-un-consenso-sobre-la-/